中文參考文獻
王精文、陳明德、洪瑞雲、黃瓊億與李筱萍等人(2004)。企業導入網路群體決策支援系統及創意訓練之個案研究。《台灣管理學刊》，4，3，頁 357-378。
江羽慈(2003)。《影響國小教師採用資訊科技創新教學因素之研究》。國立交通大學教育研究所碩士論文。余玉照(2002)。創造是永遠的顯學。《創意開發學術研討會》，頁21-25。
於之鈞、林獻堂與袁賢銘(2005 a)。植基於網際網路的腦力激盪系統架構。第九屆全球華人計算機應用大會。
於之鈞、林獻堂與袁賢銘(2005 b)。網路環境對團體創意活動的影響之研究－以腦力激盪為例。修平技術學院：2005 產業管理創新研討會。
吳明烈(2001)。知識管理的概念、策略及其對學習型組織的起士。成人教育雙月刊，63，頁12-23。吳明雄(1996)。腦力激盪數應用在技術創作教學之探討。《現代開放教育》，85.01，頁257-271。
邱浩政(2002)。「通情」才能「達理」?創造歷程的社會文化影響與人際互動機制之探討。第六屆華人心理與行爲科際學術研討會，中央研究院民族學研究所，台北南港。
林建妤、洪素蘋、劉怡秀與林珊如(民92)。在網路環境中以共識評量評定科技創造力。政治大學：2002 TANET。
吳靜吉（2001）。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育。香港浸會大學兒童發展中心主辦，第二屆國際兒童發展會議：靈機一動觸創意。大會主講。香港。
柳秀蘭(1994)。創造四P。《創造思考教育》，6，頁10-14。
胡瑋珊 譯(民88)。《知識管理》，Thomas H. Davenport & Laurence Prusak 著。台北市：中國生產力。
姜榮哲(2001)。《網路化訓練環境學習成效之影響要素研究》。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。涂月珍、許芳慈與王大福(2002)。知識管理在教育組織上的應用。「組織學習與知識管理」專題講座。
莊修田(民91)。《學生創造力及其相關因素研究－以中原大學室內設計系為例》。私立中原大學室內設計學系碩士學位論文。
陳心怡(民88)。「遠距教育在企業訓練上之運用」，新世紀經濟發展與人力培育之挑戰。高雄：中華亞太經濟與管理學會。
張金鐘(民91)。《以科技接受模式探討教師與學生採用數位化教材的態度》。國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士在職專班論文。教育部創造力教育中程發展計畫入口網。http://www.creativity.edu.tw/。存取於1/16/2005
陸述人(1997)。《電子腦力激盪方法論及網際網路上開發其支援系統之研究》。國立雲林術學院資訊管理技術研究所碩士論文。陳淑惠 (1996)。《台灣地區學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究》。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。未出版。
陳慧霞、游萬來(2005)。腦力激盪法在創意發想階段的運用。政治大學：第三屆 創新與創造力研討會。
陳龍安(2002)。創造力的開發的理念與實踐。《創意開發學術研討會》，頁1-20。
陳龍安(2000)。《創造思考教學》。台北市：師大書苑。
黃錦法、陳重臣與陸述人(1998)。網際網路上電子腦力激盪系統之研究。第9屆資訊管理學術研討會論文。
黃麒祐(2003)。《IT知識管理導論》。台北市：文魁資訊。
楊平吉 譯(民81)。《腦力激盪法會議術》，大貫 章 著。台北：臺華工商圖書出版公司。
楊家興(民88)，「虛擬學校：資訊網路下整合性的教學環境」，管理與資訊學習，4，頁211~226。
楊德遠、吳毓桂與張傳源(2005)。KMS-國中小校園創造力教育知識管理分享平台。政治大學：第三屆 創新與創造力研討會。
蒲怡靜(2004)。《電子腦力激盪術於設計創意值之研究》。國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。廖珮容(2001)。《會議方式、群體大小及人格特質對腦力激盪會議成效之影響》。國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。劉月純、徐敏珠、楊建民(2005)。 網路化教學融入企業教育訓練之研究─以『政大E世終身學習網』為例。政治大學：第三屆 創新與創造力研討會。
劉京偉 譯(2000)。《知識管理的第一本書》，Arthur Andersen Business Consulting 著。台北市：商周出版。
鍾蔚文、陳百齡、林文琪(2004)。「傳播與媒介創新」，提出一個以工具為核心的創意理論。政治大學創新創造力研究中心。
藝立協(2003)。《Blog 部落格線上出版、網路日誌實作》。台北市：上奇科技。
FlashPaint。http://www.tsk.edu.hk/~nelson/flashpaint/index.php。存取於3/31/2005
英文參考文獻
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 227-247.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Amabile, T. M.. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview.
Bagozzi, R. P., Davis, F. D., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 660-686.
Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 215-227.
Bass, F. M. (1986). The adoption of a marketing model: Comments and observations. In V. Mahajan & Y. Wind (Eds.), Innovation diffusion models of new product acceptance. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Bikson, T.K.(1996). Groupware at the World Bank. In C. U. Ciborra (Ed.), Groupware and teamwork: Invisible aid or technical hindrance. NY: John Wiley.
Bono, E. (1992). Serious Creativity. Publisher: Harper Business.
Budd, R. J. (1987). Response bias and the theory of reasoned action. Social Cognition, 5, 95-107.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. NY: HarperCollins
Csikzentmihalyi, M. & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approach to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in Education. In Heller, K. A., Monk, F. J., Sternberg, R. J. & Subotnik, R. F. (eds.)(2000). International handbook of giftedness and talent (P.81-94). NY: Elsevier.
Czaja, S. J., Hammond, K., Blascovich, J. J., & Swede, H. (1986). Learning to use a word processing system as a function of training strategy. Behaviour and Information Technology, 5, 203-216.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information system: Theory and results, doctoral dissertation. MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshar, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical model. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Dennis, A. R.& Williams, M. L. (2003). Electronic brainstorming: Theory, research and future directions. In Paulus, P. (Ed.), Group Creativity. Oxford University Press.
Desantics, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 693-703
Dewett, T. (2003) Understanding the relationship between information technology and creativity in organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 167-182.
Dixon, N. M.(2000). Common knowledge: how companies thrive by sharing what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Edmondson, A., & Moingeon, B. (1998). From organizational learning to the learning organization. Management Learning, 29(1), 5-20
Elam, J. J., & Mead, M. (1990). Can software influence creativity? Information Systems Research, 1(1), 37643.
Gallupe, R.B., Dennis, A.R., Cooper, W.H., Valacich, J.S., Bastianutti, L.M., & Nunamaker, J.F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 2, 350-369.
Gruber, H. E. & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Sternberg（Ed.）, Handbook of creativity (pp. 93-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hackbarth, S. (1997). Integrating Web-based learning activities into school curriculums. Educational Technology, 37 (3), 59-71.
Hendrickson, A. R., Massey, P. D., & Cronan, T. P. (1993). On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly, 17, 227-230.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives(pp.11-38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450-464
Ingirige, B., Sexton, M., Betts, M. (2002), The suitability if IT as a tool to facilitate knowledge sharing in contruction alliances. Proc. of CIB W78 Conference 2002.
Kay, G.(1995). Effective meetings through electronic brainstorming. Management Quarterly, 35(4), 15-26.
Keil, M., Beranek, P. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1995). Usefulness and ease of use: Field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems, 13(1), 75-91.
Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.),Handbook of creativity (pp. 339-350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137-152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg （Ed.）, Handbook of creativity (pp. 449-460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Odin, J.L. (1997).ALN: Pedagogical assumptions, instructional strategies, and software solutions. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii at Manoa, available at http://www.hawaii.edu/aln/aln_tex.htm
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination. N. York: Scribners.
Van der Lugt, R. (2002). Functions of sketching in design idea generation meetings, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Creativity & Cognition(p 72-79). Loughborough, UK.
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 517-525.
Skyrme, D.J.(1999). Knowledge networking: Needing the collaborative enterprise. Butterworth Heinmann.
Stenmark, D.(2002). Group cohesiveness and extrinsic motivation in virtual groups: Lessons from an action case study of electronic brainstorming. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35’02), Hawaii.
Stewart, T. (1986). Task fit, ease-of-use and computer facilities. In N. BjØrn-Anderson, K. Eason, & D. Robey (Eds.), Managing computer impact: An international study of management and organizations (pp. 63-76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision Sciences, 25(5/6), 863-873.
Szajna, B. (1994). Software evaluation and choice: Predictive evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 319-324.
Technology Acceptance Model, available at http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/T/Te/Technology_acceptance_model.htm
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, R. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29, 28-45.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, (46:2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, (27:3), 425-478.
Wallas.G.(1926).The Aart of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanvich.
Wildemuth, B. M. (1992). An empirically grounded model of the adoption of intellectual technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(3), 210-224.