跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/01 18:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:鄭凱玲
研究生(外文):Kao-Lin Cheng
論文名稱:團隊氣候對知識分享行為之影響
論文名稱(外文):Influences of Team Climate on Knowledge Sharing Behaviors
指導教授:曾旭民曾旭民引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsu-Min Tseng
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:長庚大學
系所名稱:醫務管理學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:醫管學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
中文關鍵詞:知識分享行為團隊氣候利他主義工作特性路徑分析
外文關鍵詞:Knowledge Sharing BehaviorTeam ClimateAltruismJob CharacteristicsPath Analysis
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:352
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:4
知識是一種流動的概念,因此知識管理強調的不僅止於純粹的知識蒐集與儲存的工作,同時必需透過在個人之間的流動才能讓知識產生價值。如何使員工樂於分享本身的知識以創造知識價值,避免知識管理流於單純的檔案管理,已成為知識管理重要的議題。本研究以問卷方式調查某醫學中心行政與資訊管理人員,從工作特性、團隊與個人層次來探討影響這些知識工作者知識分享行為的因素,使用的結構性問卷包括有工作特性調查量表、團隊氣候量表、個人利他特質量表與及知識分享行為量表。問卷調查共得227份有效問卷,結果顯示利他主義、工作特性以及團隊氣候中的參與安全感構面對知識分享行為表現有顯著且正向影響效果,同時團隊的參與安全感氣候與個人的利他主義特質對知識分享行為有顯著的交互作用。本研究結果應用於組織落實知識管理的過程中,建議藉由營造團隊氣候方式來促進成員間的知識分享行為,以達成最終創新行為與知識創造的績效。
The concept of knowledge-in-motion brings up the notion that knowledge flows amongst people. Therefore, knowledge management is not only a collection of data and information, but also a process that enables their effective use. How to provide the right environment which allows people to leverage their tacit knowledge has become one of the most important issues in knowledge management. The present study, using a questionnaire survey, aims to investigate the factors related to individuals’ knowledge sharing behaviors. The factors at issues include the team climate, job characteristics, and individual characteristic of altruism. A total of 227 administrators and information managers in a medical center were recruited and administered with the questionnaire package. The results suggested that the degree of altruism, the motivating potential of job characteristics, and the team climate of participative safety significantly and positively related to knowledge sharing behaviors. In addition, knowledge sharing behaviors were significantly influenced by the interaction effect between the individual characteristic of altruism and the team climate of participative safety. The implications for knowledge management suggest that knowledge managers need to recognize the importance of building a participative safety climate to make effective use of corporate knowledge and enable employee to efficiently create knowledge.
目錄
指導教授推薦書…………………………………………………………
口試委員審定書…………………………………………………………
長庚大學博碩士紙本論文著作授權書……………………………………… iii
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………… iv
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………… v
Abstract……………………………………………………………………… vi
目錄………………………………………………………………………………vii
圖表目錄…………………………………………………………………………viii
第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………- 1 -
第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………………- 3 -
第一節 知識分享………………………………………………………………- 3 -
第二節 影響知識分享行為的因素……………………………………………- 4 -
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………- 8 -
第一節 研究假設………………………………………………………………- 8 -
第二節 研究架構………………………………………………………………- 9 -
第三節 研究對象………………………………………………………………- 10 -
第四節 研究工具………………………………………………………………- 11 -
一、團隊氣候量表………………………………………………………………- 11 -
二、利他主義量表………………………………………………………………- 13 -
三、工作特性量表………………………………………………………………- 13 -
四、知識分享行為量表…………………………………………………………- 14 -
第五節 資料分析…………………………………………………………………- 15 -
第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………………………- 16 -
第一節 樣本群體描述性統計……………………………………………………- 16 -
第二節 相關分析…………………………………………………………………- 18 -
第三節 路徑分析…………………………………………………………………- 19 -
第四節參與安全感、利他主義的交互影響與知識分享行為之關係…………- 22 -
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………- 24 -
第一節 研究結論與討論…………………………………………………………- 24 -
第二節 管理與實務意涵…………………………………………………………- 26 -
第三節 研究限制與建議…………………………………………………………- 28 -
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………- 29 -
附錄一 正式問卷………………………………………………………………- 34 -


圖表目錄
表 4.1 樣本群體之描述性統計………………………………………………- 17 -
表 4.2 相關分析………………………………………………………………- 19 -
表 4.3 參與安全感、利他主義與知識分享行為變異數分析摘要表………- 22 -

圖 3.1 研究架構………………………………………………………………- 10 -
圖 4.1 路徑分析………………………………………………………………- 21 -
圖 4.2 參與安全感對知識分享行為影響之交互作用 ………………………- 23 -
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967.
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1994). The team climate inventory:Manual and user's guide: Windsor:ASE,NFER-Nelson.
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1996). The Team Climate Inventory: Development of the TCI and its Applications in Teambuilding for Innovativeness. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 53-66.
Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation:development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.
Bain, P. G., Mann, L., & Pirola-Merlo, A. (2001). The innovation imperative:The relationships between team climate,innovation,and performance in research and development teams. Small Group Research, 32(1), 55-73.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee., J. N. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining The Role of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Force, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-112.
Curral, L. A., Forrester, R. H., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2001). It's what you do and the way that you do it:Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 187-204.
Davenport, T. H., DeLong, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management project. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.
Davenport , T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge:How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
Gephart, M. A., & Marsick, V. T. (1996). Learning organizations come alive. Training and Development, 5(12), 35-50.
Greengard, S. (1998). Will your culture support KM? Workforce, 77(10), 93-95.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91.
Holtshouse, D. (1998). Knowledge Research Issues. California Management Review, 43(3), 277-280.
Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence,team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 877-904.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1998). Procedural Justice, Strategic Decision Mking, and the Knowledge Economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 323-338.
Lang, J. C. (2004). Social context and social capital as enablers of knowledge integration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 89-105.
Litwin, G., & Stringer, R. (1968). Motivational and Organizational Climate. Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Martin, B. (2000). Knowledge management within the context of management: An evolving relationship. Singapore Management Review, 22(2), 17-36.
Mathisen, G. E., Elnarsen, S., Jorstad, K., & Bronnick, K. S. (2004). Climate for work group creativity and innovation: Norwegian validation of the team climate inventory (TCI). Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 383-393.
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role Definitions and Organizational Citizenship Behavior:The importance of employee's perspective Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 157-169.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organization Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka , I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation. Long Range Planning, 33, 5-34.
O'Dell, C., & Grayson, J. C. (1998). If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174.
Quinn, J. B. (1992). Intelligent Enterprise:A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry New York: The Free Press.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Leader's New Work: Building Learning Organizations. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 7.
Senge, P. M. (1997). Sharing knowledge. Executive Excellence, 14(11), 17-20.
Tampoe, M. (1993). Motivating knowledge workers - The challenge for the 1990s. Long Range Planning, 26(3), 49-59.
Tjosvold, D. (1982). Effects of approach to controversy on superiors incorporation of subordinates information in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 189-193.
West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M.A. West & Farr (Eds) Innovation and creativity at work: psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester, England: Wiley.
West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in Top Management Teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680-693.
方冠雅. (2000). 醫院護理人員工作投入相關變項之探討. 長庚大學管理學研究所碩士論文.
王文彥. (2002). 知識分享內外在動機與知識分享行為之研究-以A公司為例. 國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
王誕生, & 徐其力. (2003). 組織文化與知識分享動機對知識分享之影響研究. 中山管理評論, 11(3), 409-431.
吳盛. (2003). 以計劃行為理論探討資訊人員的知識分享行為. 國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所博士論文 
吳盛, 林東清, & 林杏子. (2006). 以社會交換理論觀點探討影響虛擬團隊成員知識分享行為因素. 資訊管理學報, 13(1), 193-219.
沈其泰, 黃敏萍, & 鄭伯壎. (2004). 團隊共享心智模式與知識分享行為:成員性格特質與性格相似性的調節效果 管理學報, 21(5), 553-570.
沈鵬飛, & 林志信. (2003). 知識類型、人格特質與激勵制度對知識分享意願影響之研究--以壽險業為例 致理學報, 17 89-110.
陳心田, & 陳薇娟. (2005). 人際網絡與知識分享行為:知識分享動機調節效果之研究. 創新與管理, 2(2), 159-179.
勤業管理顧問公司 (Ed.). (2000). 知識管理的第一本書: 商周.
董玉娟. (2004). 知識分享意願影響前因之研究:威脅之情境效果. 人力資源管理學報, 4(3), 117-137.
劉雯中. (2005). 動機與人格特質對知識分享影響之研究—以非營利組織社福慈善基金會為例. 國立台北大學合作經濟學研究所碩士論文 
鄭仁偉, & 黎士群. (2001). 組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究. 人力資源管理學報, 1(2), 69-93.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top