跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.246) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/01 00:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:周泰成
研究生(外文):Chou, Tai-Cheng
論文名稱:以不同條件風險值及高階動差重新檢視臺灣股市之動能策略
論文名稱(外文):Reinvestigating the Momentum Strategy Based on Conditional Value at Risk and Higher Order Moments in Taiwan Stock Market
指導教授:古永嘉
指導教授(外文):Goo, Yeong-Jia
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:動能策略選股準則條件風險值投資規模高階動差
外文關鍵詞:Momentum strategystock selection criteriaconditional value at risksizehigher order moments
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:636
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:137
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究之目的在提高動能策略自股票市場中賺取超額報酬的能力,此部分著重於股票排序準則及投資規模大小之設定,並以高階動差解釋動能報酬的來源。研究期間自2004年1月1日至2008年12月31日,共五年1241筆日資料,499支股票。
文中使用累積報酬率、夏普比率、穩定尾部調整報酬率及瑞秋比率等四個準則作為股票排序之依據,穩定尾部調整報酬比率與瑞秋比率是以條件風險值(CVaR)為基礎的新準則,較傳統的夏普比率更能捕捉股票報酬分配之非常態特性,且CVaR具有凸性(Convex)與一致性風險衡量指標之特質,是一個很好的風險衡量工具;文中同時將投資組合之規模大小分為10、20、…、170支股票,共17種規模,藉以探討在何種準則及規模下可獲得最高的動能利潤。研究發現,當投資規模為10支股票且選股準則為R-ratio(99%,99%)時,有最高的動能報酬,約每個月7.89%;而動能以及對報酬貢獻較高的投資組合有負偏之現象,因此動能報酬的產生可能是來自於對偏態風險的補償。
The goals of this paper are enhance the ability, which we focus on the stock selection criteria and the size of winner and loser portfolios, of momentum to earn excess return in Taiwan stock market and explain the momentum payoffs by higher order moments. The data sample consists of 499 include in Taiwan Stock Exchange in period January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008.
We use cumulative return, Sharpe ratio, Stable-Tail Adjusted Return ratio(STARR), and Rachev ratio(R-ratio) to rank the stocks. STARR and R-ratio are new criteria based on conditional value at risk(CVaR). CVaR capture better the non-normality properties of individual stock returns than the traditional mean-variance measure of Sharpe ratio, and possessing the properties of convex and coherent risk measures. We also contain seventeen portfolio size, including 10, 20,…, and 170 shares. So that we could analyze on which criteria and size momentum can perform best. We find that the best performance is when the 10 top and button performing stock shares are employed and the stock criteria is R-ratio(99%,99%). The highest return is 7.89% per month. We also find the returns of momentum and high return portfolio are negative skewness. And we can conclude that momentum profit may be a compensation for skewness risk.
謝 詞 I
中文論文提要 II
ABSTRACT III
圖 次 VI
表 次 VII

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 論文架構與流程 5

第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 動能策略 7
第二節 選股準則 13

第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究流程 21
第二節 資料來源與研究期間 28
第三節 研究對象 28
第四節 形成期與持有期定義 28
第五節 變數定義 29
第六節 選股準則定義 31

第四章 實證結果 35
第一節 最佳動能選股準則 35
第二節 不同投資規模下之動能報酬 48
第三節 動能投資組合之高階動差 53

第五章 結論與建議 61
第一節 研究結論 61
第二節 研究建議 64
第三節 後續研究建議 65

參考文獻 67
一、中文部分
1.李文琳(2007),報酬率、交易量與研發費用對股價動能策略之影響探討-以台灣上市櫃資訊電子業為例,國立交通大學經營管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
2.李政鴻(2007),考量條件風險值下製造商退貨價格與零售商定價和訂購量政策之研究,國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
3.周隆裕(2006),產業類股投資策略之實證研究-動能及反向操作投資策略,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版之碩士論文。
4.莊幸雯(2008),台灣投資人情緒與動能策略研究,國立東華大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
5.許哲瑋(2006),考量風險下建構動量投資組合的研究,國立清華大學科技管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
6.郭芝君(2006),台灣電子類股動能策略之研究,國立中興大學財務金融研究所未出版之碩士論文。
7.陳達新(2007),初版,財務風險管理:工具、衡量與未來發展,台北市,雙葉書廊有限公司。
8.曾瓊萩(2006),條件風險值限制下的最適投資組合,國立台灣大學財務金融學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
9.楊朝孔(2007),條件風險值CVaR之應用,國立中正大學國際經濟研究所未出版之碩士論文。

二、英文部分
1.Ang, A., Hodrick, R. J., Xing, Y. & Zhang, X. (2006). The cross-section of volatility and expected returns. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 259-299.
2.Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M. & Heath, D., (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), 203–228.
3.Avramov, D., Chordia, T., Jostova, G. & Philipov, A. (2007). Momentum and credit rating. Journal of Finance, 62(5), 2503-2520.
4.Basak, S. & Shapiro, A. (2001). Value at risk based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices. The Review of Financial Studies, 14(2), 371-405.
5.Biglova, A., Jasic, T., Rachev, S. & Fabozzi, F. J. (2004). Profitability of momentum strategies: Application of novel risk/return ratio stock selection criteria. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4, 47-61.
6.Biglova, A., Ortobelli, S., Rachev, S. & Stoyanov, S. (2004). Different approaches to risk estimation in portfolio theory. Journal of Portfolio Management, 31(1), 103-112.
7.Chelley-Steely, P. & Siganos, A. (2005). Momentum profits in alternative stock market structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
8.Chordia, T. & Shivakumar, L. (2002). Momentum, business cycle, and time-varying expected returns. Journal of Finance, 57(2), 985-1019.
9.Conrad, J. & Kaul, G. (1998). An anatomy of trading strategies. The Review of Financial Studies, 11(3), 489-519.
10.Cooper, M. J., Gutierrez, R. C. & Hameed, A. (2004). Market states and momentum. Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1345-1365.
11.Dowd, K. (1999). A value at risk approach to risk-return analysis. Journal of Portfolio Management, 25(4), 60–67.
12.Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55-84.
13.Figelman, I. (2007). Interaction of stock return momentum with earnings measures. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(3), 71-78.
14.Griffin, J. M., Ji, S. & Martin, J. S. (2003). Momentum investing and business cycle risk: Evidence from pole to pole. Journal of Finance, 58(6), 2515-2547.
15.Harvey, C. R. & Siddique, A. (2000). Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. Journal of Finance, 55(3), 1263-1295.
16.Hong, H., Lim, T. & Stein, J. C. (2000). Bad news travels slowly size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 265-295.
17.Jegadeesh, N. & Titman, S. (1993). Return to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65-91.
18.Lee, C. M. C. & Swaminathan, B. (2000). Price momentum and trading volume. Journal of Finance, 55(5), 2017-2069.
19.Levy, R. A. (1967). Relative strength as a criterion for investment selection. Journal of Finance, 22(4), 595-610.
20.Li, X., Miffre, J., Brooks, C. & O'Sullivan, N.(2008). Momentum profits and time-varying unsystematic risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(4), 541-558.
21.Liu, W., Strong, N. & Xu, X. (1999). The profitability of momentum investing. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 26(9-10), 1043-1091.
22.Marshall, B. R. & Cahan, R. M. (2005). Is the 52-week high momentum strategy profitable outside the US?Applied Financial Economics, 15(18), 1259-1267.
23.Martin, R. D., Rachev, S. & Siboulet, F. (2003, November). Phi-alpha optimal portfolios and extreme risk management. Willmot Magazine of Finance, 6, 70-83.
24.Moskowitz, T. J. & Grinblatt, M. (1999). Do industries explain momentum? Journal of Finance, 54( 4), 1249-1290.
25.Pflug, G. (2000). Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Applications, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Uryasev, S. ed.
26.Rachev, S., Jasic, T., Stoyanov, S. & Fabozzi, F. J. (2007). Momentum strategies based on reward-risk stock selection criteria. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31(8), 2325-2346.
27.Shapre, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business, 39(1), 119-138.
28.Shapre, W. F. (1994). The sharpe ratio. Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49-58.
29.Siganos, A. (2007). Momentum returns and size of winner and loser portfolios. Applied Financial Economics, 17(9), 701-708.
30.Uryasev, S. (2000). Conditional value at risk: optimization algorithms and applications. Financial Engineering News, 14, 1-5.
31.Yamai, Y. & Yoshiba, T.(2002). Comparative analyses of expected shortfall and value-at-risk (3): Their validity under market stress. Monetary and Economic Studies, 20(3), 181-238.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊