臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

基本上中文字是屬於一種表徵型態的認知過程，而英文字則是屬於一種拼
音型態的認知過程，故當兩者混合呈現時，或將出現二者之交互作用；意
即中文的最佳格式配上英文的最佳格式，未必即是最佳的混合格式；而以
往的文獻皆未有所著墨。本研究即主要在探討於中英文混合資訊之印表輸
出格式中，英文字體控制為 Roman，分別與中文字型為明體或楷書的搭配
之下，透過各種不同的字元密度（D0﹑D1﹑D2），字間距（X1﹑X4﹑ X10
），及列間距（L5﹑L10﹑L25）的組合，對閱讀者而言，何者於偵錯能力
﹑視覺疲勞程度﹑閱讀速度﹑以及理解力方面能有較佳的表現，並進而得
到一較合適之輸出格式。45 位視力相當的大學生參與這項實驗，且其中
無人受過速讀訓練。由實驗結果顯示，就字元密度而言以 D1 為最佳；而
字間距以 X4 為宜；至於列間距則較無差別；另外，明體和楷書的閱讀效
果差異不大；又一般常用之列間距為 double space（約 L25），因此，
D1X4L25 之組合格式不失為一合適的格式。

This study examined the reading performance of chinese- english-
mixed articles processed on computer and printed by printer. An
experiment was conducted in order to find reasonable printing
forms. There were four independent variables : (1) cha- racter
density（D, three levels）, (2) character spacing（X, three
levels）, (3) line spacing（L, three levels）, (4) display
format（fm or fk）and four dependent variables : (1) fault de-
tection, (2) visual fatigue, (3) reading speed, (4)
comprehension level in the experiment design. Forty-five
undergraduate students whose sight were equivalent participated
in this experiment. Re- sults of this study indicated that (1)
in character size, the most reasonable desnity for reading is
D1 level; (2) in character spacing, X4 is the best level for
reading; (3) there is no signi- ficant difference in reading
performance among three line spaces; And (4) there is almost no
significant difference in reading per- formance between Ming
style (fm) and KasShu style (fk). Additi- onally, double space
(L25) printing style is used popularly. Th- erefore, D1X4L25 is
the most reasonable printing form in chinese english-mixed
articles.