臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

環保是近年來的趨勢，許多國家已經發布規章來控制消費者和企業對環境所造成的影響。如今不只是政府，消費者也越來越有環境意識。因此，綠色消費和綠色行銷逐漸風行於商業活動中。但是綠色市場的表現卻是令人失望的。
先前的研究專注在綠色消費的心理因素影響，但是消費者的需求仍然是需要被滿足的。因此我們結合心理學和行銷學為綠色消費提出一套新的概念性架構。 為此，我們選擇了低價格和高價格的產品成為我們的分析目標並且提出十四項 假說。我們建立流程圖來檢驗所提出的因素以及相關假設。根據隨機抽樣的調查數據，我們使用LISREL來進行分析。我們先做整體消費者的測試，之後再隨著收入水準和教育水準將消費者分群。驗證的結果顯示每條假說被接受或者拒絕取決於不同種類的消費者和產品。根據我們的分析，我們發現每個因素造成的影響會隨不同種類的消費者和綠色的產品而變。不僅是環境意識，業界常使用的行銷工具也能有效影響綠色的購買意圖。這表示銷售人員想要推銷不同綠色產品給不同消費者的時候，他們應該首先分辨消費者和產品的類型然後使用不同的銷售工具。簡言之，雖然我們不能只用環境意識銷售綠色的產品，但是它確實會影響消費者，而綠色產品實際上也是可以被行銷的。

“Green” has been a trend for several years. Many countries have issued regulations to control the impact caused by consumers and companies. Nowadays, not only government but also consumers have more and more awareness about environment. Thus, green consumption and green marketing are gradually prevailed among business area. But performance of green market is still disappointing.
Previous researches concentrate on analyzing the psychological effect on green consumption. But the consumers` requirements of product attributes still need to be satisfied. Thus we combine psychology and marketing concept to propose a new conceptual framework for green consumption. To do so, we choose low-price and high-price products to be our objects and postulate fourteen respective hypotheses. A hypothetical model is established to analyze these constructs and their correlations in the proposed conceptual framework. Based on the survey data collected randomly in Taiwan, we use the LISREL analytical approach. At first, we use total samples to test our conceptual framework, and then we separate our samples with income-level and education-level and we test both low-price and high-price products with every kind of consumers.
The empirical results indicated that every hypothesis is accepted or rejected depends on different kinds of consumers and products. According to our analysis, we find the effects of every construct are changed with different kinds of consumers and green products. Not only environment awareness but most used marketing tools can effectively affect green purchase intention. That means when marketers want to promote different green products to different consumers, they should identify the type of consumers and products first and then use diverse marketing tools. In brief, although we can`t market green products only with environment awareness, it does affect consumers and we also find that green products actually can be marketed.

Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation and background 1
1.2 Propose of research 2
1.3 Research limit 2
1.4 Research procedure 2
Chapter 2 Literature Review 5
2.1 Green marketing 5
2.1.1 Definition of green marketing 5
2.1.2 Trend of green marketing 6
2.1.2.1 Execution intention of enterprises 6
2.1.2.2 Regulation pressure 7
2.2 Consumer behavior 7
2.2.1 Definition of consumer behavior 7
2.2.2 Analysis of consumer`s decision 8
2.2.3 Theory of consumer behavior 10
2.2.3.1 Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) 10
2.2.3.2 Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) 11
2.3 Green consumption 11
2.3.1 Definition of green consumption 11
2.3.2 Trend of green consumption 12
2.3.3 Green consumers category 12
Chapter 3 Conceptual framework and hypotheses 14
3.1 Conceptual framework 14
3.1.1 Independent constructs 14
3.1.2 Mediators 15
3.1.3 Dependent construct 17
3.2 Hypotheses 17
3.3 Measurements 21
Chapter 4 Methodology 24
4.1 Descriptive Statistics 24
4.2 Reliability 24
4.3 Validity 25
4.4 Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) 25
4.5 Goodness-of-Fit index of model 27
Chapter 5 Analysis of results 28
5.1 Sample analysis 28
5.2 Reliability and validity analysis 29
5.3 Structural Model 30
5.3.1 Structural model of recycled paper 30
5.3.2 Structural model of Variable-frequency AC 33
5.4 Analysis of Result 36
5.5 Sample Clustering 37
5.6 Reliability and validity analysis (Sample clustering) 37
5.7 Measurement models analyzing 58
5.8 Structural model (Sample Clustering) 63
5.4.1 Low-income, recycled paper 63
5.4.2 High-income, recycled paper 66
5.4.3 College, recycled paper 69
5.4.4 Master, recycled paper 72
5.4.5 Low-income, variable-frequency AC 75
5.4.6 High-income, variable-frequency AC 78
5.4.7 College, variable-frequency AC 81
5.4.8 Master, variable-frequency AC 84
5.9 Difference analysis 87
5.9.1 Compare products types 87
5.9.2 Compare consumers types 88
Chapter 6 Conclusions 89
6.1 Conclusions 89
6.2 Marketing implication 89
6.3 Directions for future research 92
Reference 93
Appendix 100

1. Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and the Human Decision Process, Vol. 50, p.179-211.
2. Alford, B. L. and Biswas, A. (2002), “The effects of discount level, price consciousness and sale proneness on consumers’ price perception and behavioral intention,” Journal of Business Research Vol.55, p.775– 783
3. Axelrod, L. and Lehman D. (1993), “Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action?” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol.13, p.149-159.
4. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1998), “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” Academic of Marketing Science, Vol.16, p.76-94.
5. Baldassare, M. and Katz, C.(1992), “The personal threat of environmental problems as predictor of environmental practices,” Environment and Behavior, Vol.24, p.602-616.
6. Bari A. H., Aradhna K., Donald R. L. and Carl M. (1995),“Impact of Bundle Type, Price Framing and Familiarity on Purchase Intention for the Bundle,” Journal of Business Research Vol.33, p.57-66.
7. Bauer, R. A. (1967), “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” in Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, D. F. Cox, ed. Boston: Harvard University Press. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, p.23-33.
8. Berger, I. E. and Corbin, R. M. (1992), “Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Faith in Others as Moderators of Environmentally Responsible Behaviors,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. Vol. 11(2), p79-89.
9. Bishop, W. R. Jr. (1984), “Competitive Intelligence,” Progressive Grocer (March), p.19-20
10. Boris S., Aleksandra P. K. and Damijan M. (2004), “The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value,” Journal of Product & Brand Management, Volume 13(3), p.156-167.
11. Brown J. D., & Washlers, R. G. (1998), “The environmentally concerned consumer: an exploratory study,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol.6(2), p.39-47
12. Calfee, J. and Ringold, D. (1988). “Consumer skepticism of advertising: what do the polls show?” In Advances in consumer research, Vol. 15, p.244-248.
13. Chan, Y. K. (2001). “Determinants of Chinese consumers' green purchase behavior,” Psychology & Marketing, Vol.18(4), p.389
14. Chang, T. Z. and Wildt, A. R. (1994), “Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study,“ Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22(1), p.16-27
15. Chapman, J. and Wahlers, R. (1999), “A revision and empirical test of the extended price-perceived quality model,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 7(3), p. 53-64.
16. Chen, S.F., Monroe, K. B. and Lou, Y.C. (1998), “The Effects of Framing Price Promotion Messages on Consumers' Perceptions and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, Vol.74(3), pp. 353-372.
17. Clarke, K. and Russell W. B. (1978), “The Effect of Product-related information acquisition and Task Definition on Anticipated Consumer Effort,” Advances In Consumer Research, Vol. 5, p.313-318.
18. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, Vol.16(3), p.297-334.
19. Davis, J. J. (1992). "Ethics and Green Marketing," Journal of Business Ethics Vol.11 (2), p.81-87.
－(1993), “Strategies for environmental advertising,” The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.10 (2), p.19-36.
20. Del, I. H., Roger J. B. and Kenneth A. C. (2001), Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. Eighth edition.
21. Dhruv Grewal, Monore K. B. and Krishnan R. (1998), “The efficacy of price-comparison advertising on buyer`s perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value and behavioral intentions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.62, p.46-59.
22. Diamantopoulos, A., Siguaw, J. A. (2000), “Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated,” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Dispoto, R. G. (1977). “Interrelationships among measures of environmental activity, emotionality, and knowledge,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol.37, p.451-459.
24. Dowling, G. R. (1986), “Perceived Risk: The Concept and Its Measurement,” Psychology and Marketing, Vol.3, 193-210.
－and Staelin R. (1994), “A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.21, p.119-134.
25. Doyle, M. (1984), “New ways of measuring value,” Progressive Grocer-Value, Executive Report, p.15-19.
26. EPA-NSW. (1994), Who Cares about the Environment. Sydney, Australia: Environmental Protection Authority.
27. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.
28. Follows S. B. and Jobber D. (2000), “Environmentally responsible purchase behavior: a test of a consumer model,” European Journal of Marketing Vol.34 No.5/6, p.723-746.
29. Freeman, R. E. and Liedtka, J. (1991), ”Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Approach,” Business Horizons Vol.34(4), p.92-98.
30. Fryxell, G. and Lo, C. (2003), “The influence of environmental knowledge and values on managerial behaviors on behalf of the environment: An empirical examination of managers in China,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol.46, p.45-59.
31. Gemunden, H. G. (1985), “Perceived Risk and Information Search: A Systematic Meta-analysis of the Empirical Evidence,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.2 (2), p.79-100.
32. Grunert, S. C. and Kristensen, K. (1992). The Green Consumer: Some Danish Evidence. XXI Annual Conference of The European Marketing Academy Proceedings, Aarhus, p.26-29.
33. Hines, J., Hungerford, H. and Tomera, A. (1987), “Analysis and synthesis of research on environmental behavior: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Environmental Education, Vol.18, p.1-8.
34. Howard, J. A. and Jagdish N. S. (1969), “The Theory of Buyer Behavior,” New York: John Welly.
35. Huang, J.H., Lee, C.Y. and Ho, S.H. (2004), “Consumer attitude toward gray market goods,” International Marketing Review, Vol. 21(6), p. 598-614.
36. Ingene, C. A. and Hughes M. A. (1985), “Risk Management by Consumers,” Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 1, p.103-158.
37. Ivan, R. (1975), “Perceived Risk and Consumer Behavior: Acritical Review,” Advance in Consumer Research, Vol. 2 p.1-19.
38. Jacoby, J. and Olson, J. C. (1985), Perceived Quality. Lexington, Ma: Lexington Books.
39. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993), “Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language.”
40. Kalafatis S. P., Pollard M., East R. and Tsogas M. H. (1999), “Green marketing and Ajzen`s theory of planned behavior: a cross-market examination,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.16 (5) p.441-460.
41. Keller, G. M. (1987), "Industry and the Environment: Toward a New Philosophy." Vital Speeches Vol.54 (5) p.154-157.
42. Kinnear, T. C., Taylor, J. R. and Ahmed (1974), “Ecologically concerned consumers: who are they?” Journal of Marketing, Vol.38(2), p.20-24.
43. Kilbournea, W. E., Beckmannb, S. C. and Thelenc E. (2002), "The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes A multinational examination," Journal of Business Research Vol.55, p193– 204.
44. Kline, R. B. (1998), “Principles and practice of structural equation modeling,” New York: Guilford Press.
45. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., Wong, V. (2001), Principles of marketing. 3rd European ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall; p93
46. Laroche, M., Toffoli, R., Kim, C. and Muller, T. (1996), “The influence of culture on pro-environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviour: A Canadian perspective.” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.23, p.196-202.
－and Bergeron, J. and Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2001), “Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.6(6), p.503-520.
47. Le Boutillier, J., Le Boutillier, S.S. and Neslin, S.A. (1994), “A replication and extension of the Dickson and Sawyer price-awareness study,” Marketing Letters, Vol.5(1), p. 31-42.
48. Lee, J. A., Holden, S. J. (1999), “Understanding determinants of environmentally conscious behavior,” Psychology & Marketing, Vol.16 (5), p. 373.
49. Lichtenstein, D. R., Bloch, P. H. and Black, W. C. (1988), ”Correlates of Price Acceptability,” Journal of Consumer Research; Vol.15(2), p.243.
－and Ridgway, N. M., Netemeyer, R. G. (1993), “Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: a field study”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30, p.234-45.
50. Lim, N. (2003), “Consumers’ perceived risk: sources versus consequences,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Vol.2, p.216–228.
51. Lindenberg, S. and Steg, L. (2007), "Normative, Gain and Hedonic Goal Frames Guiding Environmental Behavior ," Journal of Social Issues, Vol.63(1), p.117.
52. Margareta Wandel & Annechen Bugge(1997), “Environmental concern in consumer evaluation of food quality,” Food Quality and preference, Vol. 8(1), p.19-26.
53. Martin, B. and Simintiras, A. C. (1995), “The impact of green product lines on the environment: Does what they know affect how they feel?” Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol.13 (4), p.16-23.
54. McIntosh, A. (1990). “The Impact of Environmental Issues on Marketing and Politics in the 1990s,” Journal of the Marketing Research Society Vol.33 (3), p.205-217.
55. Meyer A. (2001), “What's in it for the customers? Successfully marketing green clothes,” Business Strategy and the Environment; Vol.10 (5), p.317-330.
56. Meyvis Tom and Janiszewski Chris (2002), “Consumers' beliefs about product benefits: The effect of obviously irrelevant product information,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28 (4), p.618-635.
57. Mitchel V. W. (1999), “Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and Models,” European Journal of Marketing, 33 (1), p.163–195.
58. Minton, A. P. and Randall, L. R. (1997), “The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: an exploratory study,” Journal of Business Research, Vol.40 p.37-48.
59. Monroe, K. B. (1973), “Buyer’s Subjective Perceptions of Price,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.10, p.70-80.
－and Petroshius, S. M. (1981), “Buyers` perceptions of price: an update of the evidence,” Consumer Behavior, p.43-55.
－and Krishnan, R. (1985), “The effect of price on subjective product evaluations”, in Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise , eds.
60. Mostafa, M. M. (2006), Antecedents of Egyptian Consumers’ Green Purchase Intentions: A Hierarchical Multivariate Regression Model, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol.19(2).
61. National Association of Attorneys-General (NAAG). (1990). “The green report: findings and preliminary recommendations for responsible advertising,” San Francisco, USA: National Association of Attorneys-General.
62. Ottman, J. (1993), “Green marketing: challenges and opportunities for the new marketing age,” Lincolnwood, Illinois: NTC Business Books.
－and (1998), “Green marketing opportunity for innovation,” foreword by William K. Reilly. 2nd ed. Lincolnwood, Ill. :NTC Business Books,c1998.
63. Peattie, K. and Charter, M. (1999), “Green Marketing,” chapter in The Marketing Book (4th edition)
64. Peter, J. P. and Olson, J. C. (2001) Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy. Sixth Edition.
65. Polonsky, M. J. (1994). “An Introduction To Green Marketing,” ELECTRONIC GREEN JOURNAL, Vol.1(2).
66. Rajeev Batra and Michael L Ray (1986), “Affective Responses Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.13 (2), p.234-249.
67. Ramsey, C. and Rickson, R. (1976), “Environmental knowledge and attitudes,” Journal of Environmental Education, Vol.8, p.10-18.
68. Resnik, Alan and Stern, Bruce L. (1977), “An Analysis of Information Content in Television Advertising,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41 (1), p.50-53.
69. Rex E., Baumann H. (2007), “Beyond ecolabels: what green marketing can learn from conventional marketing,” Journal of Cleaner Production Vol.15, p.567-576.
70. Rokicka, E. (2002). “Attitudes towards natural environment,” International Journal of Sociology, Vol.32 (2), p.78-90.
71. Roselius, T. (1971), “Consumer rankings of risk reduction method,” Journal of marketing, Vol.35, p.56-61.
72. Russo J. Edward, Meloy, Margaret G. and Medvec, Victoria Husted (1998), “Predecisional Distortion of Product Information,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35 (4), p.438-452.
73. Sawyer, A. G. and Dickson, P. (1984), “Psychological Perspectives in Consumer Response to Sales Promotion,” in Research on Sales Promotion: Collected Papers, Katherine Jocz, ed. Cambridge.
74. Schahn, J. and Holzer, E. (1990), Studies of individual environmental concern: The role of knowledge, gender and background variables. Environment and Behavior, 22 (6), p.767-786.
75. Schlechter, Len (1984), “A Normative Conception of Value,” Progressive Grocer, Executive Report, p.12-14.
76. Scholder, E. P., Lyle, W. J.,and Cathy, Cobb-Walgren,.(1991), “The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. Vol. 10(2), p.102-117
77. Schwartz, J. and Miller, T. (1991) “The earth`s best friends,” American Demographics, p.26-35
78. Shearer, J. W. (1990), "Business and the New Environmental Imperative," Business Quarterly, Vol.54 (3), p.48-52.
79. Sigmund A. Wagner (2003), “Understanding green consumer behavioura qualitative, cognitive approach,”London ; Routledge.
80. Smith, Robert E (1993), “Integrating Information from Advertising and Trial: Processes and Effects on Consumer Response to Product Information,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 30 (2) p.204-219.
81. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel T., Guagnano, G. A. and Kalof L. (1999), “A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism,” Human Ecology Review, Vol.6(2), p.81-98
82. Synodinos, N. E. (1990). “Environmental attitudes and knowledge: A comparison of marketing and business students with other groups,” Journal of Business Research, Vol.20 (2), p.161-170.
83. Taylor, J.W. (1974) “The role of risk in consumer behavior,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.38(2), p.54-60
84. Vanhuele, M. and Dre` ze, X. (2002), “Measuring the price knowledge shoppers bring to the store”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, pp. 72-85.
85. Verhagen, T., Meents, S. and Tan Y.H. (2006), ”Perceived risk and trust associated with purchasing at electronic marketplaces,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.15, p.542–555.
86. Vlosky, R. P., Ozanne, L. K. and Renée J. Fontenot (1999), “A conceptual model of US consumer willingness-to-pay for environmentally certified wood products,” Journal of consumer marketing, Vol.16(2), p. 122-140.
87. Zeithaml V. A. (1988), “Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.52, p.2-22.