跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.127) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/31 08:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:蕭惠方
研究生(外文):Hui-Fang Hsiao
論文名稱:銀行最適資本與適足性之研究
論文名稱(外文):Studies of Optimal Capital and Capital Adequacy in Banks
指導教授:蘇恩德蘇恩德引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ender Su
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:風險管理與保險所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:風險管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2006
畢業學年度:94
語文別:中文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:金控公司最適資本結構風險值限制巴塞爾資本協定資本適足率
外文關鍵詞:BaselVaR LimitFinancial Holding CompanyOptimal Capital Structure
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:186
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
摘要
本論文以台灣十四家金融控股公司的子銀行作為研究對象,觀察台灣金融業
2002 年12 月至2004 年12 月之資料,以風險性資產的報酬與經營成本為基礎,經
由解最佳化問題的公式推導後,便可求得以最大利潤為目標與最適風險值限制下
的最適資本額、資本結構與最適風險值限制下資本率(optimal VaR limit capital ratio-
OVLCR),並可模擬存款利率改變時,銀行的風險值與清算條件。與巴塞爾協訂的
資本適足率(CAR)比較,發現最適風險值限制之資本率較高的銀行,例如:玉山銀
行為19.7041%、國泰世華銀行為18.0489%,表示這些銀行應該採取保守策略,適
當減少高風險資產的投資比率或是增加資本,以免銀行發生經營危機,特別是交
通銀行的OVLCR 值為25.9987%,屬於最適風險值限制之資本率特別高的銀行,
更應該要特別注意;而另外像第一銀行OVLCR 的值為2.3877%、日盛銀行為
3.6814%、台灣新光銀行為1.1005%,屬於最適風險值限制之資本率較低的銀行,
應該要採取較積極的策略,適當增加高報酬與較高風險資產的投資比率或是減少
資本。
ABSTRACT
This thesis uses 14 financial holding banks (FHBs) in Taiwan as research data
collected for the period from December 2002 to December 2004. Based on financial
accounts of the risky asset returns and the administrative costs, the optimal capital
amounts, structures and optimal VaR limit capital ratio (OVLCR) were obtained
through solution process of the optimization problem and formula derivations by
maximizing operating profit under VaR solvency restriction. Also, the VaR and
solvency condition were simulated as the deposit rate was changed. Compared with
capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of the Basel accord, the OBLCR are much higher for E.
Sun Bank (19.7041%) and Cathay United Bank (18.0489%) due to their higher
optimal capital amounts. This means that they should adopt a conservative strategy by
decreasing the proportion of the high risky asset investment or increasing financial
capital to avoid business risk. Especially for Chiao Tung Bank (25.9987%), its
OBLCR is the highest one to be paid attention. On the other hand, for First Bank
(2.3877%), Jih Sun Bank (3.6814%), and Shin Kong Bank (1.1005%), their OBLCR
is much lower due to their lower optimal capital amounts. It means that they should
adopt an active strategy by increasing the proportion of the high risky asset
investment or decreasing financial capital.
目錄
中文摘要........................................................................................................................ i
英文摘要....................................................................................................................... ii
誌謝.............................................................................................................................. iii
目錄.............................................................................................................................. iv
表目錄.......................................................................................................................... vi
圖目錄......................................................................................................................... vii
壹、緒論........................................................................................................................1
一、 研究動機......................................................................................................1
二、 研究目的......................................................................................................3
三、 本文流程......................................................................................................4
貳、文獻回顧................................................................................................................6
一、 有關資本管制的文獻探討..........................................................................6
二、 有關資本要求的文獻探討........................................................................12
(一) 資本要求對銀行之影響......................................................................12
(二) 資本要求與銀行資本之相關研究......................................................14
三、 有關銀行經營績效文獻探討....................................................................16
參、研究方法..............................................................................................................19
一、 研究對象及研究期間說明........................................................................19
二、 研究方法....................................................................................................20
(一) 利用集群分析將銀行分類..................................................................20
(二) 銀行利潤方程式與最適權益...........................................................22
(三) 風險值..................................................................................................24
(四) 利潤函數推導......................................................................................25
(五) 最適權益推導......................................................................................26
(六) 最適風險值限制之資本率..................................................................26
(七) 風險中立情況......................................................................................31
肆、實證分析..............................................................................................................32
一、 資料來源介紹與研究資料整理................................................................32
(一) 資料來源介紹......................................................................................32
(二) 研究資料整理......................................................................................32
二、 集群分析....................................................................................................34
三、 風險值........................................................................................................37
四、 最適權益與最大利潤................................................................................39
(一) 求算最適權益與最大利潤..................................................................39
(二) 最適權益與最大利潤分析圖..............................................................40
五、 最適風險值限制之資本率........................................................................42
(一) 資料分析與整理..................................................................................42
(二) 最適風險值限制之資本率的估算......................................................43
六、 風險中立情況............................................................................................45
伍、結論與建議..........................................................................................................46
一、 結論............................................................................................................46
二、 建議............................................................................................................47
參考文獻......................................................................................................................48
附錄一 公式推導........................................................................................................51
附錄二 最適權益公式推導........................................................................................52
附錄三 新舊巴塞爾資本協定比較............................................................................53
表目錄
表2-1 關於資本管制的理論基礎................................................................................9
表2-2 資本要求相關文獻..........................................................................................14
表3-1 台灣金融控股公司之子銀行..........................................................................19
表3-2 集群分析指標..................................................................................................22
表3-3 巴塞爾資本協定訂立過程..............................................................................27
表3-4 本國法規變革..................................................................................................28
表3-5 資本適足架構下之資產風險權數..................................................................30
表4-1 銀行A μ 、rd、r?之彙整表.............................................................................32
表4-2 銀行集群分類表..............................................................................................34
表4-3 集群分類表......................................................................................................35
表4-4 破產機率5%之下最大損失金額....................................................................37
表4-5 最適權益和最大利潤......................................................................................39
表4-6 銀行自有資本淨額、風險性資產總額和資本適足率資料之彙整表..........42
表4-7 最適風險值限制之資本率..............................................................................43
表4-8 風險中立下最適權益......................................................................................45
圖目錄
圖1-1 本文研究架構流程圖........................................................................................5
圖4-1 集群分類圖......................................................................................................35
圖4-2 玉山銀最適權益與利潤分析圖......................................................................40
圖4-3 第一銀最適權益與利潤分析圖......................................................................41
圖4-4 交通銀最適權益與利潤分析圖......................................................................41
參考文獻
(一)中文文獻:
1. 江婕寧,2002,美國金融控股公司與非金融控股公司經營績效之比較—DEA
之應用,國立台灣大學,碩士論文。
2. 周賢榮、林星楊、周朝鵬,1991,“銀行資金管理績效之評估研究",1991
年銀行管理研討會論文集。
3. 林炳文,2002,“台灣地區商業銀行合併效率性之分析:資料包絡分析法的
應用",台灣管理學刊,1 卷,2 期,頁341-356。
4. 林景春,1994,“政府資本適足性規定對銀行投資組合的影響",台北銀行
月刊,25 卷,6 期,頁38-46。
5. 垣�琴、陳明煇,1993,“我國商業銀行資本與風險關係之實證研究",中
國財務學會八十二年年會論文集,頁177-201。
6. 徐萬爐,2001,台灣地區商業銀行效率之研究—應用資料包絡分析法,國立
暨南國際大學,碩士論文。
7. 張麗娟,2000,銀行資本適足率、風險管理品質與資產組合形態之研究—運
用混合橫斷面和時間序列迴歸模型,國立台北大學,博士論文。
8. 郭照榮,1997 ,“風險基礎資本管制對台灣銀行業者投資組合行為之影
響",管理學報,14 卷,頁479-156。
9. 劉美櫻,1994,風險性資產導向資本管制政策效果之研究,國立交通大學,
博士論文。
(二)英文文獻:
1. Aggarwal, R. and K. Jacques, 1997, “The Impact of EDICIA and Prompt
Corrective Action on Bank Capital and Risk: Estimates Using a Simultaneous
Equations Model,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, pp.1139-1160.
2. Dothan, U. and J. Williams, 1980, “Banks, Bankruptcy and Public Regulation,”
Journal of Banking and Fuller Finance, 4, pp.65-88.
3. Dahl, D. and R. E. Shrieves, 1990, “The Impact of Regulation on Bank Equity
Infusions,” Journal of Banking Finance, 14, pp.1209-1228.
4. Ediz, S., I. Michael and W. Perraudin, 1998, “Bank Capital Dynamics and
Regulatory Policy,” Bank of England.
5. Ediz, T., I. Michael, W. Perraudin, 1998, “The Impact of Capital Requirements On
U.K Bank Behaviour,” Economic Policy Review - Federal Reserve Bank of New
York. New York, 4, pp.15-22.
6. Furlong, F. T. and M. C. Keeley, 1987, “Bank Capital Regulation and Asset Risk,”
Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 2, pp.20-40.
7. Furlong, F. T. and M. C. Keeley, 1989, “Capital Regulation and Bank Risk-Taking:
A Note,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, pp.883-891.
8. Gardner, M. J., 1984, “Minority Owned Banks: A Managerial and Performance
Analysis,” Journal of Bank Research, 15, pp.26-34.
9. Hancocok, D. and J. A. Wilcox, 1994, “Bank Capital, Loan Delinquencies, And
Real Estate Lending,” Journal of Housing Economics, 3, pp.121-146
10. Jackson, P., D. J. Maude, and W. Perraudin, 1997, “Bank Capital and Value at
Risk,” Journal of Derivatives, 4, pp.73-90.
11. Jacques, K. T. and P. Nigro, 1997, “Risk-Based Capital, Portfolio Risk and Bank
Capital: A Simultaneous Equation Approach,” Journal of Economics and Business,
49, pp.533-547.
12. Kahane, Y., 1977, “Capital Adequacy and the Regulation of Financial
Intermediaries,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 2, pp.207-217.
13. Kareken, J. H. and N. Wallace, 1978, “Deposit Insurance and Bank Regulation, A
Partial-Equilibrium Exposition,” Journal of Business, 51, pp.413-438.
14. Kim, D. and A. M. Santomero, 1988, “Risk in Banking and Capital Regulation,”
Journal of Finance, 43, pp.1219-1233.
15. Koehn, M. and A. M. Santomero, 1980, “Regulation of Bank Capital and Portfolio
Risk,” Journal of Finance, 35, pp.1235-1250.
16. Merton, R. C., 1977, “An Analytic Derivation of the Cost of Deposit Insurance and
Loan Guarantee: An Application of Modern Option Pricing Theory,” Journal of
Banking and Finance, 1, pp.3-11.
17. Pyle, H., 1986, “Capital Regulation and Deposit Insurance,” Journal of Banking
and Finance, 10, pp.189-201.
18. Ronn, E. I. and A. K. Verma, 1989, “Risk-Based Capital Adequacy Standards for a
Sample of 43 Major Banks,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, pp.21-29.
19. Sharpe, W. F., 1978, “Bank Capital Adequacy, Deposit Insurance and Security
Values,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 13, pp.701-718.
20. Shrieves, R. E. and D. Dahl, 1992, “The Relationship between Risk and Capital in
Commercial Banks,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 16, pp.439-457.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top