臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究首先針對駕駛者對於車內後視鏡的即時資訊是否有其他類別需求進行研究探討，並依駕駛者最需要的即時資訊做實驗及統計分析，以提供未來相關開發單位做為開發之參考。初期研究經由問卷調查後得知，一般駕駛者希望在車內後視鏡能夠提供簡單的即時資訊，而超速提示、行車距離提示、來電提示及電子羅盤為最優先需求。而在研究實驗過程中，利用駕駛者的視覺及聽覺刺激來接收相關訊息，並配合本研究室已開發之駕駛模擬器進行實驗，在實驗完成後針對駕駛者完成的實驗數據再加以統計分析。經過實驗後數據顯示，當越多任務配置產生的時候，這些任務配置彼此之間會產生干擾，使得任務配置的執行績效下降，所以當多重任務實驗配置出現時最好採取不同的顯示方式。視覺與聽覺的任務同時產生時，會使人體負荷反應變慢而且會影響注意力，因此在車內後視鏡上盡量減少不必要訊號的數量。而從實驗後的調查顯示，受測者偏愛聽覺刺激的顯示方式即為閃爍加提示音提示，當閃爍加提示音提示時績效滿意較高，而在只有閃爍提示出現時績效會下降。此研究完成後的數據，不僅僅可以提供將來在車內後視鏡資訊整合之應用，也可使用於不同情境下所提供的多重資訊，對於使用者的績效評估參考依據。

This research firstly investigates if drivers have different inquiries when using the instant information displayed by the rear-view mirror, and proceeds experiments and statistic analysis on the most desired instant information of drivers. With the above to propose practical references for related designing units to develop useful devices in the future. It is shown that the general drivers hope that a rear-view mirror can supply them with simple instant information. The primary inquiries are speed alert, travelling distance alert, call alert, and an electronic compass. During the process of the experiment, it takes advantages of vision and hearing stimulus of the driver to receive related information, proceeds the experiment with the assistance of the driving simulator designed by our laboratory, and then calculates and analyzes the results of the experiments after the completions of the experiments. According to the data shown in the experiment, when there are more task dispositions, there will be more disturbances among one another, which will lower down the executive efficiency of the allocation of tasks. Therefore, it had better adopt different ways to display when having allocation of multiple task experiments. When visionary and hearing tasks take place at the same time, a person will not be able to react aptly because of more pressures, and thus have insufficient attention; therefore, there should be less unnecessary signals in rear-view mirrors. Also, it can be observed from the survey after the experiment that the hearing stimulus, the examinees prefer will be hints made up of glitter and alert sounds. When there are glitters going with alert sounds, there will be a better efficiency. However, the efficiency goes down when there’s only glitters. The results completed in this research can not only offer materials for future rear-view mirrors to integrate different information, but also can offer drivers rich information in different situations as well as can be applied to serve as a referential basis when evaluating the using effect of drivers.

謝誌i
摘要ii
ABSTRACTiii
目錄v
圖目錄ix
表目錄xii
第一章 緒論1
1.1研究背景與動機1
1.2研究目的與重要性2
1.3研究範圍3
1.4研究架構4
第二章 文獻探討6
2.1駕駛者行為6
2.1.1注意力6
2.1.2駕駛行為模式9
2.1.3雙重任務的干擾10
2.1.4雙重任務處理模式12
2.1.5瞥視12
2.2人與人機系統的資訊交流模式16
2.3心理負荷與反應時間20
2.4視覺與聽覺23
2.5感知與反應時間24
2.6模擬器相關研究26
2.7心智負荷主觀量測準則30
第三章 先期研究32
3.1現有車內後視鏡產品調查32
3.2現有車內後視鏡產品之駕駛模擬評估34
3.2.1實驗變數設定35
3.2.1.1超速提示36
3.2.1.2行車距離提示36
3.2.1.3 來電提示37
3.2.1.4 電子羅盤顯示37
3.3實驗設備38
3.3.1駕駛模擬艙設定38
3.3.2資料擷取設備40
3.3.3虛擬實境場景製作軟體選用42
3.3.4駕駛參數操控設定43
3.3.5軟硬體整合43
第四章 實驗設計與規劃46
4.1實驗受測者46
4.2實驗流程46
4.2.1 實驗變數設定48
4.2.2 車內後視鏡配置暨提醒方式說明49
4.2.2.1 超速提醒50
4.2.2.2 車距提醒50
4.2.2.3 來電提醒51
4.2.2.4 電子羅盤52
4.3實驗任務設定與分析53
第五章 結果與討論57
5.1駕駛正確與否的資料判讀方式57
5.2客觀評量之結果與討論分析57
5.2.1基本資料統計分析57
5.2.1車內後視鏡的績效分析58
5.2.2受測者對於顯示狀況的完成率58
5.3受測者主觀建議69
5.3.1NASA-TLX主觀評量表69
第六章 結論與建議71
6.1結論71
6.2後續建議72
參考文獻73
附件一 車內後視鏡即時資訊對駕駛行為影響研究問卷一81
附件二 車內後視鏡即時資訊對駕駛行為影響研究問卷二84
附件三 車內後視鏡即時資訊對駕駛接受度及績效研究之影響研究操作評量表89
附件四 車內後視鏡即時資訊對駕駛接受度及績效研究之主觀評量問卷96

參考文獻
（1）Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R.M., (1968),: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes - In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol 2. London: Academic Press.
（2）Agter, F., & Donk, M.,（2005）, “Prioritized Selection in Visual Search Through Onset capture and Color Inhibition: Evidence From a Probe-Dot Detection Task”, Journal of experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 722-730.
（3）Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P.,（1972）, “On the division of attention: A disproof of the single channel hypothesis”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 225-235.
（4）Bronkhorst, A. W., Veltman, J. A., & van Breda, L.,（1996）, “Application of a three-dimensional auditory display in a flight task”, Human Factors, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp.23-33.
（5）Boradbent, D. E.,（1958）, Perception and communication. Pergamum Press. New York.
（6）Borger, R.,（1963）, “The refractory period and serial choice reactions”, Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 1-12.
（7）Bhise, V. D., Dowd, J. D. and Smid, E., (2003), “Driver Behavior While Operating In-vehicle Devices,” TRB Annual Meeting.
（8）Craik, F. I. M., (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present . . . and future? Memory, 10(5-6), 305-318.
（9）Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S., (1972), Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
（10）Cherry, E. C.,（1953）, “Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears”, Journal of Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 25, pp. 975-979.
（11）Charles, C. R., Jr.,（1986）, “Response Time”, http://www.roberts.ezpublishing.com/croberts/respon.htm
（12）Dingus, T. A., Antin, J. F., Hulse, M. C., & Wierwille, W.W.,（1989）, “Attention demandr equirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system. Transportation Research,” 23A（4）, (pp.301-315).
（13）Diao, FangFang, Sundar, S. Shyam.,（2004）. Orienting response and memory for web advertisements: exploring effects of pop-up window and animation. Communication research, 31（5）, 537-567
（14）Gagne, R. M.,（1985）(Eds), The conditions of learning and theory of instruction., 4th edition, CBS College, New Jersey, December.
（15）Gottsdanker, R., & Way, T. C.,（1966）, “Varied and constant intersignal intervals in psychological refractoriness”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 72, pp. 792-804.
（16）Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., Mangun, G. R.,（2002）,Cognitive neuroscience：The Biology of The mind. W.W.Norton & Company Press.
（17）Green, P.,（1999）, Visual and Task Demands of Driver Information Systems（Technical Report UMTRI-98-16）, Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, (pp. 10).
（18）Green. P.（1999）, The 15-Second Rule fordriver Information System, Intelligent Transportation Society of America Conference Proceedings.
（19）Green. P.,（2001）, Variations in Task Performance between Younger and Older Drivers ： UMTRI Research on Telematics. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Conference on Aging and Driving.
（20）Hart, S.G., and Staveland, T.E.,（1988）, Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, Eds. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp139-178 .
（21）Hick, W. E., (1952), on the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
（22）Herman, L. M., & Kantowitz, B. H.,（1970）, “The psychological refractory period effect: Only half the double-stimulation story?”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 73, pp. 74-86.
（23）Horrey, W. J., & Wickens, C. D.,（2002）, Driving and Side Task Performance：The effects of display Clutter, Separation, and Modality, Aviation Human Factors Division Institute of Aviation, Technical Report AHFD-02-13/GM-02-2.
（24）Kahneman, D.,（1973） (Eds), Attention and effort., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, September .
（25）Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P.,（2002）(Eds), Attention: From tasks to mechanisms., In Yantis, S.(Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 1. Sensation and perception. (pp. 235-286), Wiley, New York.
（26）Miller, G. A.,（1956）, “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information”, Psychological Review, Vol 63, pp.81-97.
（27）Magill, R. A.,(1993), Motor learning: Concepts and applications. (4th ed.) Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
（28）Michon., J.A., （1985）, A critical view of driver behavior models：What do we know, what should we do？In Evans, L. & Schwing, R.C.（Eds.）, Human Behavior and Traffic Safety（pp. 485-524）, New York：Plenum Press 11.
（29）Nanthavanij, S., & Yenradee, P.,（1999）, “Predicting the optimum number, location, and signal sound level of auditory warning devices for manufacturing facilities”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 569-578.
（30）Navon, D., (1977), Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353-383.
（31）Olson, P. L., & Sivak, M.,（1986）, “Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards”, Human Factors, Vol. 28, pp. 91-96.
（32）Psychology the science of behaviour 4th edition Carlson & Heth 心理學（行為科學）（2011年）第四版 卡利申／哈乎
（33）Procotr, R. W., & Zandt, T. V.,（1994）(Eds), Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems., Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
（34）Ranney, T.A., （1994）, Models of driving behavior：a review of their evolution. AccidentAnalysis and Prevention, 26（pp.733-750.）
（35）Rockwell, R.E., （1972）, An investigation of the relationship of nine nointervention 86 variables to the school success or failure of culturally disadvantaged children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, ( pp.2793).
（36）Schmidt, R. A., (1991), Motor learning & performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
（37）Schmidt, R. A., (1991), Motor learning & performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
（38）Sanders, A. F.,（1967）, “The effect of compatibility on grouping successively presented signals”, Acta Psychologica, Vol. 26, pp. 373-382.
（39）Shaffer, H. L.,（1975）(Eds.), “Multiple attentions in continuous verbal tasks”, In Rabbitt, P. M., & Dornic, S., Attention and performance V. (pp. 234-258), Academic Press, London.
（40）Sperling, G.,（1960）, “The information available in brief visual presentation”, Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 14, pp. 101-109.
（41）Ullman, S.,（1984）, “Visual Routines”, Cognition, Vol. 18, pp. 97-157.
（42）Wickens, C. D.,（1992）(Eds), Engineering Psychology and Human Performance., 2th edition, Addison-Wesley, New York.
（43）Wickens, C. D., (1980) (Ed.), The structure of attentional resources. In R.S. Nickerson, Attention and Performnce VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 239-257.
（44）Wickens, C. D.,（1984） Processing resources in attention., In Parasuraman, R., & Davies, D.R. (Eds.), Varieties of attention. (pp. 63-102), Academic Press, New York.
（45）Welford, A. T.,（1952）, “The Psychological Refractory Period and the timing of high-speed performance - A review and a theory”, British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 43, pp. 2-19.
（46）Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W.,（1997）, “Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attention inhibition of old objects”, Psychological review, Vol. 104, pp. 90-122.
（47）Wierwille, W.W.,（1995）,Development of an initial model relating driving in-vehicle visual demands to accident rate. Third Annual Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference Proceedings, Blacksburg, VA :Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
（48）Yantis, S.,（1993）, “Stimulus-driven capture and attentional control settings”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 19, pp. 676-681.
（49）NASA-TLX from,http://humansystems.arc.nasa.gov/groups/TLX
（50）心理學報（2001）：第33卷第2期，頁127 – 131。
（51）李永輝，2002，道路駕駛以及使用車內資訊系統的行為研究（II），行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫NSC90-2218-E-011-024 成果報告。
（52）林淑親、林耀豐（2007）影響反應時間因素之探討。中華體育季刊，21，（3），103—117。
（53）姚泰主編（2000）：生理學。第五版：人民衛生出版社。
（54）高尚仁（1996）：心理學新論。台北市：揚智文化公司。
（55）莊忠益（2003）：”車用電腦中央控制介面之階層式選單對駕駛者績效之影響”，清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所。
（56）許勝雄、彭遊、吳水丕（1991）：人因工程學-Ergonomics / Human factors，初版。台北市：揚智文化事業股份有限公司。
（57）陳俊儒，2003，以類神經網路探討汽車駕駛姿勢與壓力分佈之研究，大同大學工業設計研究所，碩士論文，台北。
（58）劉超群（2010）。（雙重任務干擾與資訊處理模式研究）。國立中央大學博士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
（59）柳永青，2002，抬頭顯示器用於先進旅行者資訊系統之效用評估，行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫NSC90-2218-E-224-019 成果報告。
（60）黃慧真譯(1994)：發展心理學。台北：桂冠。
（61）黃雪玲，2002，以自製之駕駛模擬器進行車內警示系統之設計評估，碩士論文，新竹。
（62）鄭麗玉（2006）：認知心理學，二版。台北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。