跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.213) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/12 09:07
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉佩玲
研究生(外文):Pei-Ling Liu
論文名稱:甄選面談的女王蜂症候群存在嗎?哪些人存在呢?─以大學教師為實證樣本
論文名稱(外文):Is the Queen Bee Syndrome real existence with selection interview? Which people exist? The University teachers as sample
指導教授:羅新興羅新興引用關係
指導教授(外文):Hsin-Hsin Lo
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:清雲科技大學
系所名稱:經營管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2008
畢業學年度:96
語文別:中文
論文頁數:53
中文關鍵詞:女王蜂症候群面談性別組成
外文關鍵詞:queen bee syndromeinterviewgender combination
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:674
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:3
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究探討面談過程中,面談者與應徵者性別組合對於面談評價(專業評價、外表評價及整體評價)的影響,並探討面談者年齡對於面談者與應徵者性別組合與面談評價關係之干擾作用。本研究以大學教師的甄選面談為調查情境,分析221位大學教師所填答的有效問卷,獲得以下研究發現:1.女性面談者對女性應徵者的面談評價會顯著低於其它三種性別組合(本研究將稱此現象為女王蜂症候群)。2.面談者年齡會強化上述「女王蜂症候群」的現象。本研究討論研究結果在理論發展的價值與管理實務意涵。
This study examined the relationship between interviewer–applicant gender combination and interview evaluation and exploring the moderate effects of age toward the relationship between gender combination and interview evaluation. The members of university teacher were selected as target sample. Resulted from the questionnaires of the 221 effective responses, Two findings, At first, Female interviewer will be more lower than other three kinds of gender combination to the interview evaluation of female applicant. (This study call this phenomenon “queen bee syndrome”) Second, interviewer's age will strengthen above “queen the bee syndrome” phenomenon. This study discussed research findings both in terms of theoretical development and of practical management implications.
目錄
中文摘要i
英文摘要ii
誌謝iii
目錄iv
表目錄vi
圖目錄vii
第一章 緒論1
1.1 研究動機與目的1
1.2 研究流程3
第二章 文獻探討4
2.1 應徵面談相關文獻4
2.2 女王蜂症候群8
2.3 面談者年齡對女王蜂症候群的影響12
2.4 研究架構13
第三章 研究方法14
3.1 變項衡量14
3.2 資料蒐集過程16
3.3 資料分析方法19
第四章 資料分析結果與討論20
4.1 衡量效度信度與變項敘述統計20
4.2 假說檢定22
第五章 綜合討論與建議29
5.1 研究發現討論29
5.2 實務管理意涵30
5.3 研究限制與後續研究建議30
參考文獻32
附錄一 問卷發放回收備忘錄38
附錄二 大學教師應徵面談問卷39
簡歷41

表目錄
表3.1 有效樣本基本資料統計結果17
表3.2 面談者與應徵者性別組合表18
表4.1 應徵者專業評價與外表評價之因素分析結果20
表4.2 應徵者整體評價與受試者(面談者)的社會期許之因素分析結果21
表4.3 平均數、標準差、相關係數與量表內部一致性21
表4.4 面談評價之ANOVA分析結果 22
表4.5 面談者與應徵者性別組合對面談評價之平均數表24
表4.6 面談者與應徵者性別組合及面談者年齡對面談評價之交互影響列聯表26

圖目錄
圖1.2 本研究之研究流程3
圖2.1 本研究之研究架構圖13
圖4.1 面談者與應徵者性別組合對面談評價的交互作用示意圖25
圖4.2 面談者與應徵者性別組合及面談者年齡對專業評價的交互作用27
圖4.3 面談者與應徵者性別組合及面談者年齡對外表評價的交互作用27
圖4.4 面談者與應徵者性別組合及面談者年齡對整體評價的交互作用28
Gary Dessler著、方世榮編譯,現代人力資源管理,第十版,華泰文化,台北,民國九十六年。
李美技、鍾秋玉,「性別與性別角色析論」,本土心理學研究,第六卷,260-299頁,民國八十五年。
Stephen P. Robbins著、李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯,組織行為學,第十一版,華泰文化,台北,民國九十五年。
房美玉,人力資源管理的12堂課(全新修訂本),台北,李誠等主編,天下文化,民國九十一年。
陳心田,「關係人口與利社會組織行為:軍事後勤服務型組織的一項探索性研究」,人力資源管理學報,第三卷,第三期,107-125頁,民國九十二年秋季號。
陳建丞、蔡維奇,「面談前印象對面試官評量效應之影響:以面談結構性為干擾變數」,台大管理論叢,第十六卷,第一期,第155-170頁,民國九十四年。
張世昌,「面談目的、訊息組型對面談結果及決策之影響」,國立政治大學心理研究所,碩士論文,民國八十一年。
張仁勇,「甄選面談結構性對應徵者反應之影響:中介歷程之探討」,國立台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程,碩士論文,民國八十七年。
黃同圳,人力資源管理的12堂課(全新修訂本),台北,李誠等主編,天下文化,民國九十一年。
黃小鳳,「性別角色刻板印象、晉升者性別及平權意識喚起對晉升決策的影響」,國立政治大學心理研究所,碩士論文,民國九十年。
鄧慧文,「主管性別、應徵者性別與晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響」,國立政治大學心理研究所,碩士論文,民國八十五年。
鄭瀛川著,人才甄選與面談技巧,初版,汎果國際文化,台北,民國九十五年。
羅新興、李幸穗,「應徵者面談過程所呈現的訊息對面談評價的影響-以企業員工的招募甄選為實驗情境」,人力資源管理學報,第四卷,第三期,第55-72頁,民國九十三年秋季號。
Anderson, J.C., Johnson, E. N., & Kaplan, S. E., “Perceived Effects of Gender, Family Structure, and Physical Appearance on Career Progression in Public Accounting: A Research Note.”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 6, pp.483-491, 1994.
Arvey, R.D., & Campion, J. E., “The employment interview: A summary and review of recent research.”, Personnel Psychology, 35, pp.281-322, 1982.
Barclay, J. M., “Employee Selection: A Question of Structure.”, Personnel Review, 28, pp.134-151, 1999.
Beehr, T. A., & Gilmore, D. C., “Applicant Attractiveness as a Perceived Job-Relevant Variable in Selection of Management Trainees.”, Academy of Management Journal, 25, 3, pp.607-617, 1982.
Binning, J. D., F., Goldtein, M. A., Garcia, M. F., & Scattaregia, J. H. “Effects of pre-interview impressions on questioning strategies in same and opposite sex employment interviews”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 1, pp.30-37, 1988.
Bragger, J. F., Kutcher, E., Morgan, J., & Firth, P., “The effects of structured interview on reducing biases against pregnant job applicants.” , Sex Roles, 46, 7-8, pp.215-226, 2002.
Cable, D. M., & Gilovich, T., “Looked over or overlooked? Prescreening decisions and post-interview evaluations.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3, pp.501-508, 1998.
Dion,K.,Berscheid, E.,& Walster,e. “What is beautiful is good.”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, pp.285-290, 1972.
Dipboye, R. L. “Social interaction in the interview. In R. L. Dipboye (Ed.)”, Selection interview: Process perspectives: pp.75-100, 1992.
Dunning. D., Meyerowitz, J.A., & Holzberg, A. “Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessment of ability.”, Journal of Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, 57, 6, pp.1082-1090, 1989.
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C., “What is Beautiful is Good, But….: A Meta-analytic Review of Research on the physical Attractiveness Stereotype.”, Psychological Bulletin, 110, 1, pp.109-128, 1991.
Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A., “The Underrepresentation of Women in Science: Differential Commitment or the Queen Bee Syndrome? ”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, pp.315-388, 2004.
Festinger, L. “A theory of social comparison processes.”, Human relations, 7, pp.117-140, 1954.
Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N., “The Effect of Sex Similarity on Recruiters’ Evaluations of Actual Applicants: A Test of the Similarity-Attraction Paradigm.”, Personnel Psychology, 48, 1, pp.85-98, 1995.
Hardin, J. R., Reding, K. F., & Stocks, M. H., “The Effect of Gender On the Recruitment of Entry-Level Accountants.”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 14, 2, pp.251-266, 2002.
Hays, R.D., T. Hayashi, & A. L. Stewart, “A Five Item Measure of Socially Desirable Response set.”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, pp.629-636 , 1989.
Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R., “When Beauty is Beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and non-managerial jobs.”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 3 , pp.360-372, 1979.
Heilman, M. E., Kaplow, S. R., Amato, M. A. G., & Stathatos, P., “When Similarity Is a Liability: Effects of Sex-Based Preferential Selection on Reactions to Like-Sex and Different-Sex Others.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, pp.917-927, 1993.
Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E., & Coats, G., “The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcome: A meta-analysis of experimental studies.”, Personnel psychology, 56, pp.431-462, 2003.
Huffcutt, A.I., & Woehr,D. J. “Further analysis of employment interview validity: A quantitative evaluation of interview-related structuring methods.”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 4, pp.549-560, 1999.
Ibarra. H. “Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm.”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, pp.422-447, 1992.
Jackson, S.E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J.A., & Peyronnin, K. “Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotion, and turnover.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, pp.675-689, 1991.
Jawahar, I. M., & Mattsson, J. “Sexism and beautyism effects in selection as function of self-monitoring level of decision maker.”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 90, 3, pp.563-573, 2005.
Johlke, M. C. “Sales presentation skill and salesperson performance.”, Journal of Business and Industrial Markering,21, 5, pp.311-319, 2006.
Judice, T. N., & Neuberg, S. L. “When interviewers desire to confirm negative expectations: Self-fulfilling prophecies and inflated applicant self-perceptions.”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20, 3, pp.175-190, 1998.
Keiffer, M.G. & Cullen, D. M. “Women who discriminate against other women: The process of denial.”, International Journal of Group Tensions, 4, pp.21-23, 1974.
Konrad, A. M., S. Winter, and B. A. “Gutek, Diversity in work group sex composition: Implications for majority and minority members. In P. Tolbert and S. B. Bacharach (Eds.)”, Research in the sociology of organizations, 10, pp.115-140, 1992.
Macan, T.H., & Dipboye, R.L. “The effects of the application on processing of information from the employment interview.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 14, pp.1291-1314, 1994.
Mathison D. L., “Sex Differences in the Perceptions of assertiveness among female managers.”, Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 5, pp.599-606, 1986.
Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E., “Gender and Attractiveness Biases in Hiring Decisions: Are More Experienced Managers Less Biased? ”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 1, pp.11-21, 1996.
Morrow, P. C., “Physical Attractiveness and Selection Decision Making.”, Journal of Management, 16, 1, pp.45-60, 1990.
Morgan, L. A. “Glass-ceiling effect or cohort effect? A longitudinal study of the gender earnings gap for engineers, 1982 to 1989.”, American Sociological Review, 63, pp.479-483, 1998.
Oliphant, V. N., & Alexander, E. R., “Reacts to Resumes as a Function of Resume Determinateness, Applicant Characteristics, and Sex of Raters.”, Personnel Psychology, 35, pp.829-843, 1982.
Orpen, C. “Attitude similarity, attraction, and decision-making in the employment interview.”, Journal of Psychology, 117, pp.111-120, 1984.
Pelled, L.P. “Relational demography and perceptions of group conflict and performance: A filed investigation.”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 7, 3, pp.230-246, 1996.
Phillips, A. P., & Dipboye, R.L. “Correlational tests of predictions from a process model of predictions from a process model of the interview.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 1, pp.41-52, 1989.
Posthuma, R. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M.A. “Beyond employment interview validity: A comprehensive narrative review of recent research and trends over time.”, Personnel Psychology, 55, 1, pp.1-81, 2002.
Rijsman, J. “The dynamics of social competition in personal and categorical comparison-situations. In W. Doise & S. Moscovici Eds.”, Current Issues in European Social Psychology, 1, pp.279-312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Schmitt, N., & Coyle, B.W., “Applicant decisions in the employment interview.”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 2, pp.184-192, 1976.
Staines, G., Tavris, C. & Jayaratne,T.E. “The queen bee syndrome.”, Psychology Today, 7, 8, pp.55-60, 1974.
Snyder, R.A.,Verderber, K.S., Langmeyer, L. & Myers, M. “A reconsideration of self and organization referent attitudes as ‘causes’ of the glass ceiling effect.”, Group & Organization Management, 17, 3, pp.260-278, 1994.
Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Chiu, S. F., “Exploring Boundaries of the Effects of Applicant Impression Management Tactics in Job Interviews.”, Journal of Management, 31, 1, pp.108-125, 2005.
Wharton, A. S., & Baron, J. N. “So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men at work.”, American Sociological Review, 52, pp.574-587, 1987.
Wills, T. A. “Downdard comparison principles in social psychology.”, Psychological Buiietin, 90, pp.245-271, 1981.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top