臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究目的是從實體控制器之動作，探討至虛擬控制器之操作手勢，共規劃了兩個實驗。實驗一讓受測者在一台觸控平板ASUS ZenPad上執行泡咖啡的任務，透過錄影記錄受測者操作實體與虛擬控制器之手勢。並利用獨立樣本T檢定，探討「實體與虛擬介面」、「介面外觀」在優使性之差異，以及「使用者等級」在操作虛擬介面的差異。實驗二之目的蒐集受測者在虛擬介面上操作3D產品之手勢，透過螢幕側錄和錄影的方式，蒐集受測者在iPod touch上執行旋轉、平移、縮放以及開門之任務。綜合兩個實驗的研究結果如下：
1. 按押與滑動操作手勢，在實體介面與虛擬介面上的操作方式一致。
2. 旋轉以及搖動操作，在實體介面與虛擬介面上的操作方式並不一致。
3. 與實體介面相比較，使用者在操作虛擬介面時較容易發生錯誤。
4. 介面外觀設計並不影響介面優使性。
5. 在優使性的部分，虛擬介面的高階使用者具有下列特徵：傾向給予較低的SUS分數，任務完成時間是較快速的，且錯誤次數較少。
6. 是否更改鎖屏畫面之使用習性，可作為判定使用者等級之項目。
7. 有無更改的鈴聲設定之使用習性，不能作為判定使用者等級之項目。
8. 在虛擬介面上，旋轉3D產品最常見之手勢為「單指直線滑動」。
9. 在虛擬介面上，縮放3D產品最常見之手勢為「兩指之間漸近或漸遠的直線滑動」。
10. 在虛擬介面上，平移3D產品最常見之手勢為「兩指平行的直線滑動」。
11. 在虛擬介面上，開啟3D三層櫃櫃門之手勢為往櫃門開啟的方向進行「單指直線滑動」。

This study aimed to collect gesture on used controllers. To do this, two experiments are carried out. Experiment I invited 43 participants to evaluate the SUS scores on four samples, physical interfaces with tidly and untity layouts and virtual interfaces tidly and untity layouts. Experiment II collect gesture tracks of rotary, scaling, translation, and open the door. Participants operated a 3D three cabinet on touch-screen and recorded by camera and screen capture. The finding are summarized below :
1. The operation gestures on physical and virtual interfaces were found to be consistent on the pushing and sliding gestures.
2. The operation gestures on physical and virtual interfaces were found to be different on the rotating and tumbling gestures.
3. Comparing with physical interface, the errors occured were more frequently on virtual interface.
4. The appearance of interface was found not to affect the usability.
5. For the virtual interface, the participants with higher personalisation level tented to give lower SUS scores, complete task time quicker and make less errors.
6. Change lock screen, were confirmed to identify the personalisation level.
7. Change ringtone or not, were found to be insignificant for identify the level.
8. On virtual interface, operating with ”single finger on straight line’’ was found to rotate the 3D product.
9. On virtual interface, operating with ”two fingers together or moving separate’’ was found to scale the 3D product.
10. On virtual interface, operating with ”moving two fingers parallel at same time’’ was found to panning the 3D product.
vi
11. On virtual interface, operating with ”single finger on straight line’’ was found to open the the 3D cabinet door.

摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vii
第1章 前言 1
第2章 文獻探討 3
21 操作實體控制器之手勢探討 3
211 實體介面之控制器 3
212 操作實體介面之手部動作 7
22 操作虛擬控制器之手勢探討 9
221 虛擬介面之操作手勢 9
222 虛擬介面之控制方式 11
23 虛擬介面之優使性 17
231 實體與虛擬介面之優使性差異 21
232 介面外觀在優使性之影響 22
233 使用者操作虛擬介面之差異 26
24 小結 28
第3章 實驗計畫 29
31 實驗一 29
32 實驗二 34
33 小結 36
第4章 操作實體與虛擬小型控制器之手勢 37
viii
第5章 虛擬介面的優使性之影響因素 44
51 介面設計因素在優使性之差異 44
52 虛擬介面之使用者等級差異 46
53 在虛擬介面上發生錯誤的主因 50
54 小結 52
第6章 在虛擬介面上與3D產品互動之手勢 53
61 旋轉3D產品之手勢 53
62 縮放3D產品之手勢 56
63 平移3D產品之手勢 58
64 開啟3D三層櫃門之手勢 60
65 小結 62
第7章 結論與討論 63
71 結論 63
72 討論 66
參考文獻 68
附錄一：實驗一之紙本問卷樣張 72
附錄二:實驗二之紙本問卷樣張 78

Angeli, A. D., Sutcliffe, A., & Hartmann, J. (2006). Interaction, usability and aesthetics: what influences users' preferences? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems, University Park, PA, USA.
2. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J. (2009). Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. JOURNAL OF USABILITY STUDIES, 4, 114-123.
3. Baumann, K., & Thomas, B. (2002). User Interface Design of Electronic Appliances: CRC Press.
4. Brave, S., & Nass, C. (2003). Emotion in human–computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 53.
5. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194), 4-7.
6. ISO, I. O. F. S. (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs): Part 11: Guidance on Usability: ISO.
7. Kroemer, K. H. E., & Kroemer, H. J. (1997). Engineering Physiology: Bases of Human Factors/Ergonomics: Wiley.
8. Kurosu, M., & Kashimura, K. (1995). Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. Paper presented at the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA.
64
9. MacKenzie, C. L., & Iberall, T. (1994). The Grasping Hand: Elsevier Science.
10. Napier, J. R. (1956). The prehensile movements of the human hand. Bone & Joint Journal, 38(4), 902-913.
11. Nielsen, J. (1996). Usability metrics: Tracking interface improvements. Ieee Software, 13(6), 12.
12. Phillips, Cary B., and Norman I. Badler. "Jack: A toolkit for manipulating articulated figures." Proceedings of the 1st annual ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on User Interface Software. ACM, 1988.
13. Preece, J. (1999). 人机介面与互动入门: 电脑之人因工程: 和硕科技公司.
14. Quinn, J. M., & Tran, T. Q. (2010). Attractive phones don't have to work better: independent effects of attractiveness, effectiveness, and efficiency on perceived usability. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
15. Saffer, D. (2008). Designing gestural interfaces: Touchscreens and interactive devices: " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
16. Shih, H. (2014). SUS 系統易用性量表.
17. Tossella, C. C., Kortuma, P., Shepardb, C., & Zhongb, A. R. a. L. (2012). An empirical analysis of smartphone personalisation: measurement and user variability. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(10), 995-1010. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.687773
18. Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the
65
ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
19. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127-145. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00031-X
20. Villamor, C., Willis, D., & Wroblewski, L. (2010). Touch gesture reference guide. Touch Gesture Reference Guide.
21. Wigdor, D., & Wixon, D. (2011). Brave NUI World: Designing Natural User Interfaces for Touch and Gesture: Elsevier Science.
22. Woodson, W. E., Tillman, B., & Tillman, P. (1992). Human factors design handbook: information and guidelines for the design of systems, facilities, equipment, and products for human use.
23. Wroblewski, L. (2012). Responsive Navigation: Optimizing for Touch Across Devices. from http://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?1649
24. 小松原明哲, 松岡政治, 西田和子, & 大成直子. (1999). 操作機器手順的使評価操作遷移関係分析. 人間工学, 35(5), 347-354.
25. 吉川嘉修, 吉岡英俊, & 山岡俊樹. (2006). 操作抽出反映制作評価. 人間工学, 42, 154-155.
26. 特許庁. (2004). 標準技術集 小型.
27. 方裕民. (2003). 人與物的對話: 互動介面設計理論與實務. 田園城市文化
66
事業有限公司.
28. 梁成一, & 黃文能. (1999). 冷氣機遙控中文標識字體與圖地色彩之研究. Paper presented at the 中華民國設計學會第四屆學術研究成果研討會論文集.
29. 陳立儀. (1997). 電視遙控器中文標字之字體與對比研究.
30. 曾景祥, & 吳志富. (2008). 數位相機軟硬體介面對操作任務之研究.
31. 黃雅卉. (2008). 冷氣機遙控器介面影響高齡者易識性因素之研究. Tatung University.
32. 劉冠儀, & 李文淵. (2014). 手持裝置版型之情感研究.
33. 魏澤群. (2005). 使用者最大: 從優使性(Usability)出發的網站設計原則: 網奕資訊科技.
34. 羅煥龍, & 涂永祥. (2011). 觸控與實體控制介面趨勢之研究-以網路視訊電話為例.
35. 鲁正田. (1977). 人类工程学: 文豪出版社.