跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.13) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/23 08:15
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:吳曼綺
研究生(外文):WU,MAN-CHI
論文名稱:會計師事務所分所、產業群聚與財務報表可比較性
論文名稱(外文):Audit Firm Branches、Industry Cluster and Financial Statement Comparability
指導教授:薛敏正薛敏正引用關係郭俐君郭俐君引用關係
指導教授(外文):SHIUE,MIN-JENGKUO,LI-CHUN
口試委員:尤琳蕙葛俊佑
口試委員(外文):YU,LIN-HUIKE,CHUN-YU
口試日期:2017-06-01
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:會計學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:會計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:45
中文關鍵詞:事務所分所產業群聚財務報表可比性財報品質
外文關鍵詞:Audit firm branchesIndustrial clusterComparability of financial statementEarning quality
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:392
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:34
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究旨在探討會計師事務所分所以及產業群聚與財務報表可比性之關聯,可比性能夠協助財務報表使用者辨認並了解財報項目間相似與不同之處,強化財報品質以及財務資訊之有用性,有利於投資者、債權人、企業管理階層及其他財務報表使用者對企業做出比較、分析和預測,提高決策之效率。本文以台灣2013到2015年上市櫃之電子產業作為研究樣本,並參照Francis et al. (2014)以裁量性應計數之差異來衡量可比性。研究結果顯示,同一事務所分所查核之企業,其財務報表可比性並不相似。同時,本研究也納入產業群聚作為探討,發現當兩間企業位於同一產業聚落時,其財務報表可比性較高,與預期假說相同。

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between audit firm branches, industrial cluster and the comparability of financial statement. Comparability can help users of financial statement identify and understand the similarities and difference in accounting items, which enhances the quality of financial statement and improves the usefulness of financial information. Investors, creditors, enterprise management and other financial statements users can use this information to compare, analyze and predict the performance of the company, which improves the efficiency of making decision. This study uses data from Taiwan listed company from the period of 2013 to 2015, and uses the difference of discretionary accruals between two firm to proxy for the comparability of financial statement proposed by Francis, Pinnuck and Watanabe (2014). The empirical results show that two companies audited by the same audit branches firm do not present more comparability. Instead, two companies which are located in the same industrial cluster have more comparability.
中文摘要 i
Abstracct ii
表次 iii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究架構 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 財務報表可比性 6
第二節 事務所分所 8
第三節 產業群聚 11
第三章 研究方法 16
第一節 樣本選取 16
第二節 迴歸模型 17
第四章 實證結果與分析 22
第一節 敘述性統計 22
第二節 相關係數分析 26
第三節 迴歸結果分析 29
第四節 額外測試 34
第五章 結論與建議 39
第一節 研究結論 39
第二節 研究限制 41
參考文獻 42

李建然與陳政芳,2004,經濟誘因與審計獨立性-以五大事務所組別為觀察標的,會計評論(38): 59- 80。
周素卿,1998,科學園區的另一種發展版本: 台南科學園區,台灣社會研究季刊(32): 125-163。
林嬋娟與劉嘉雯,1999,我國與先進國定會計師懲戒制度之比較,中華民國會
計師公會全國聯合會委託研究。
林玟君,2002,分析師預測誤差與長短期股價的關聯性,私立元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
洪玉美,1995,會計師財務報表簽證之法律責任:責任歸屬與第三人範圍之研
究,國立臺灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
郭奕伶,2000,會計業的龍虎爭霸戰:安侯與勤業搶當老大,數位周刊,第 22
期:22-28。
財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會,2014,財務會計觀念架構及財務報表
之編製。
楊聰敏,2005,科學園區產業群聚與創新優勢之研究-以矽谷、竹科與南科為例,科技部-行政院國家科學委員會94年度自行研究計畫成果報告。
經濟部經濟部工業局,2016,台灣工業用地供給與服務資訊網,工業區開發
管理-104年度年報。
賴春田,2000,會計師的業務、責任及會計師事務所組織的演變,國立臺灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蔡偉銑,2011,從新國家論角度檢視科學園區政策的定位與變遷: 竹科,南科與中科的比較,國科會研究報告。
Bental, B., and M. Spiegel. 1995. Network competition, product quality, and market coverage in the presence of network externalities. The Journal of Industrial Economics 43(2):197-208.
Banker, R. D., H. Chang, and Y. C. Kao. 2002. Impact of information technology on public accounting firm productivity. Journal of Information Systems 16(2): 209-222.
Barth, M. E., W. R. Landsman, M. Lang, and C. Williams. 2012. Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? Journal of Accounting and Economics 54(1): 68-93.
Brown, S. V., and W. R. Knechel. 2016. Auditor–client compatibility and audit firm selection. Journal of Accounting Research 54(3): 725-775.
Choi, J-H., J-B. Kim, A. A. Qiu, and Y. Zang. 2012. Geographic proximity between auditor and client: How does it impact audit quality? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (2): 43–72.
Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review(70): 193-225.
De Franco, G., S. P. Kothari, and R. S. Verdi. 2011. The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research 49(4): 895-931.
Francis, J. R., D. J. Stokes, and D. Anderson. 1999. City markets as a unit of analysis in audit research and the re‐examination of big 6 market shares. ABACUS 35(2): 185-206.
Ferguson, A., J. R. Francis, and D. J. Stokes. 2003. The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review 78(2): 429-448.
Francis, J. R., K. Reichelt, and D. Wang. 2005. The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the us audit market. The Accounting Review 80(1): 113-136.
Francis, J. R., M. L. Pinnuck, and O. Watanabe. 2014. Auditor style and financial statement comparability. The Accounting Review 89(2): 605-633.
Hinds, P. J., and M. Mortensen. 2005. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science 16(3): 290-307.
Hanes, D. R. 2013. Geographically distributed audit work: Theoretical considerations and future directions. Journal of Accounting Literature 32(1): 1-29.
Katz, M. L., and C. Shapiro. 1985. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review 75(3): 424-440.
Krishnan, G. V. 2005. The association between big 6 auditor industry expertise and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 20(3): 209-228.
Kang, M., J. W. Kim, H. Y. Lee, and M. G. Lee. 2015. Financial statement comparability and audit efficiency: Evidence from south korea. Applied Economics 47(4): 358-373.
Maletta, M., and A. Wright. 1996. Audit evidence planning: An examination of industry error characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15(1): 71-86.
Narayanan, V. G. 1995. Moral hazard in repeated professional partnerships. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 895-917.
Newlands, D. 2003, Competition and cooperation in industrial clusters: The Implications for publics policy, European planning Studies 11(5): 521-532.
Owhoso, V. E., W. F. Messier Jr, and J. G. Lynch Jr. 2002. Error detection by industry‐specialized teams during sequential audit review. Journal of Accounting Research 40(3): 883-900.
O’Brien, R. M. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for varianceinflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41:673-690
Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. 2010. National and office‐specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 48(3): 647-686.
Simmons, J. K. 1967. A concept of comparability in financial reporting. The Accounting Review 42(4): 680-692.
Solomon, I., M. D. Shields, and O. R. Whittington. 1999. What do industry-specialist auditors know? Journal of Accounting Research 37(1): 191-208.
Saito, Y., and F. Takeda. 2014. Global audit firm networks and their reputation risk. Journal of Accounting, Auditing&Finance 29(3):203-237
Vera-Munõz, S. C., J. L. Ho, and C. W. Chow. 2006. Enhancing knowledge sharing in public accounting firms. Accounting Horizons 20(2): 133-155.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top