臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

自2001 年金融控股公司法實施以來，目前台灣已有14 家金控成立，一般認為金控因具有交叉行銷及一次購足等優勢，故其旗下子銀行的績效也較一般獨立子銀行之績效為優，故本文目的在研究金控子銀行與非金控子銀行間績效是否有所差異，以及金控事業主體不同（如保險、銀行或證券），是否會影響旗下子銀行之績效。本文第一階段使用資料包絡分析法，分析台灣十一家金控子銀行及十三家獨立銀行之績效是否不同。第二階段利用吸引力測度(attractiveness measure)及進步測度(progress measure)來區辨各評估單位(DMUs)間的績效優劣及排名。研究發現，金控子銀行績效顯著優於非金控子銀行，以銀行為金控事業主體之金控子銀行其績效優於事業主體為保險與證券之金控旗下子銀行。本文作者亦依據分層、吸引力測度與進步測度為各評估單位建立標竿，並建議銀行管理當局利用標竿遞進學習。

The Financial Holding Company Act passed in 2001 and allows banks to combine with insurance firms, security brokerages and to form Financial Holdings. It is thought that the performance of the bank subsidiary of a Financial Holding Company (FHC) is better than the independent bank, because the FHC develops cross-selling strategy and provides a one-stop shopping convenience for its bank subsidiary’s customers. The purpose of this research is to determine whether a bank subsidiary in FHC or independent bank has a greater efficiency and ascertain whether different main businesses (banking, insurance, securities) of a FHC affects the performance of its bank subsidiary. Applying a non-parametric frontier approach, data envelopment analysis (DEA), to evaluate the relative efficiencies of 11 bank subsidiaries of Financial Holding Companies (FHCs) and 13 independent commercial banks in Taiwan, this thesis provides evidences that (1) bank subsidiary of a FHC outperforms independent banks; (2) the types of main businesses of a FHC does have influence on the performance of its subsidiary; the ranking of performances from good to bad as follows: banking, insurance and securities. In addition, this thesis measures context-dependent bank performance for different efficiency levels. This context-dependent DEA model allows (1) the benchmarking of our Decision-Making units (DMUs) compared to its competitors; (2) measuring attractiveness and progress and drawing a benchmark-learning roadmap as a tool for ranking all DMUs.

ABSTRACT ................................ i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.........................iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................... iv
LIST OF FIGURES ......................... v
LIST OF TABLES .......................... v
LIST OF APPENDIXES ...................... v
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION..................1
1.1 MOTIVATION AND BACKGROUND ........... 1
1.2 INTRODUCTION OF THE PRESENT TAIWANESE BANKING MARKET................................... 2
1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS .................. 4
1.4 FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS ............... 5
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW .................................. 6
2.1 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT APPROACHES IN BANKING.................................. 6
2.1.1 Ratio Analysis .................... 6
2.1.2 Data Envelopment Analysis ................................ 6
2.2 FINANCIAL HOLDING COMPANY, FINANCIAL CONGLOMERATES AND UNIVERSAL BANKS......................... 17
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY............... 20
3.1 THE TECHNIQUE....................... 20
3.1.1 DEA CCR model .....................21
3.1.2 Context-dependent DEA..................................... 23
3.2 DATA COLLECTION AND DECISION-MARKING UNITS SLECTION................................ 29
3.3 SELECTION OF INPUTS AND OUTPUT ..... 31
3.2.1 Choice of Inputs/Output........... 31
3.2.2 Examinations and Adjustments of Output Data ................................... 34
CHAPTER FOUR EMPIRICAL RESULTS................................. 36
4.1 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AND CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS OF THE RATIO MODEL ........................ 36
4.2 RATIO OUTPUT-ORIENTED DEA MODELS.................................. 37
4.4 CONSTRUCTING A BENCHMARK-LEARNING ROADMAP ................................ 46
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUDING REMARKS, LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS...................... 54
5.1 CONCLUDING REMARKS.................. 54
5.2 LIMITATIONS ........................ 56
5.3 SUGGESTIONS......................... 57
REFERENCES.............................. 59
APPENDIXES ............................. 63

1.A.N. Berger, et al. (1997), “Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions,” Journal of Banking & Finance 21 pp. 895-947.
2.A. N. Berger (2003), “ The efficiency effects of a single market for financial services in Europe,” European Journal of Operational Research 150, pp. 466-481.
3.A.S. Camanho, R.G. Dyson (2005) "Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a DEA application to bank branch assessments", European Journal of Operational Research 161 pp. 432-446.
4.Anja Cielen, et al. (2004), “Bankruptcy prediction using a data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research 154 pp. 526-532.
5.Arnoud W.A. Boot (1999) “ European lessons on consolidation in banking,” Journal of Banking & Finance 23, pp. 609-613.
6.Banker R., Charnes A. y Cooper W. (1984): “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in DEA”. Management Science, vol. 30 (9), pp. 1078-1092.
7.Bertrand Rime and Kevin J. Stiroh (2003) “ The performance of universal banks: Evidence from Switzerland,” Journal of Banking & Finance 27, pp. 2121-2150.
8.“ By Country Awards”, The Banker, Sep. 05, 2005, pp. 171.
9.Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European Journal of Operational Research 2(6) pp. 429-444.
10.Cooper, Lawrence M. Seiford and Kaoru Tone, Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, Reference and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston / Dordrecht / London, 2000.
11.Chen, Y,H Morita, and J Zhu (2005), “ Context-dependent DEA with an application to Tokyo public libraries,” International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 4(3), pp. 385-394.
12.Chiang Kao, Shiang-Tai Liu (2004) "Predicting bank performance with financial forecasts: A case of Taiwan commercial banks", Journal of Banking & Finance 28 pp.2353-2368.
13.Dean Amel, et al. (2002), “ Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: A review of the international evidence," The Federal Reserve Board Publications. 《http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2002/200247/200247abs.html》
14.Dean Amel, et al. (2004), “ Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: A review of the international evidence,"　Journal of Banking & Finance 28, pp. 2493-2519.
15.Elyas Elyasiani (2003), “ Efficiency change, technological progress and productivity growth in small thrift institutions: the case of U.S. cooperative banks,” Research in Banking and Finance, Volume 3, pg 165-187, 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
16.Fitch, Thomas P. (2000), Dictionary of Banking Terms (eBook) Barron's Business Guides, Hauppauge, NY Barron's.
17.G.R. Jahanshahloo (2004) “Multi-component performance, progress and regress measurement and shared inputs and outputs in DEA for panel data: an application in commercial bank branches,” Applied Mathematics and Computation 151 pp. 1-16.
18.Halkos and Salamouris (2004) “ Efficiency measurement of the Greek commercial banks with the use of financial ratios: a data envelopment analysis approach,” Management Accounting Research 15 pp. 201-224.
19.Harlan S. Byrne (1987) “Merger Mania: Now, Midwestern Banks Have Caught the Fewer,” Barron’s National Business and Financial Weekly 67 : 32 pp. 16.
20.Hugh Croxford, et al., THE ART OF BETTER RETAIL BANKING, JOHN WILEY & SONS, LTD U.S.A., 2004.
21.I.M. Premachandra (2001)"A note on DEA vs principal component analysis: An improvement to Joe Zhu's approach," European Journal of Operational Research 132 pp. 553-560.
22.Ingo Walter, Mergers and Acquisitions in Banking and Finance: What Works, What Fails, and Why, OXFORD university press, 2004.
23.Jen Fu Wang, Development and Innovation of Taiwan Banking Industry at Current Predicament, Liu Kuai-Chih Foundation, 2001 (in Chinese).
24.Jesus T. Pastor (2003) “Evaluating the Financial Performance of Bank Branches”, CORE DISCUSSION PAPER.
25.Joe Zhu (2000), “Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies,” European Journal of Operational Research 123 P105-124.
26.Joseph C. Paradi, Claire Schaffnit (2004), “Commercial branch performance evaluation and results communication in a Canadian bank- a DEA application,” European Journal of Operational Research 156 pp. 719-735.
27.Kang Yong-Qing, More detail about local branches of foreign banks, Business Week Publishers Taiwan , 2001 (in Chinese).
28.Laurent Weill (2004), “ Measuring Cost Efficiency in European Banking: A Comparison of Frontier Techniques,” Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, pp. 133-152.
29.Lawrence M. Seiford and Joe Zhu (1999), “Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks” Management Science; Sep 1999, 45, 9 pp.1270-1288.
30.Lawrence M. Seiford and Joe Zhu (2002), “Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research 142 pp. 16-20.
31.Lawrence M. Seiford and Joe Zhu (2003), “Context-dependent data envelopment analysis-Measuring attractiveness and progress,” Omega, The international Journal of Management Science 31 pp. 397-408.
32.Lawrence M. Seiford and Joe Zhu (2005), “ A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation,” European Journal of Operational Research 161 pp. 579-581.
33.Lovell (1995), “Measuring the macroeconomic performance of the Taiwanese economy,” International journal of production economics 39, pp. 165-178.
34.Lovell, Pastor, and Turner (1995), “Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries,” European Journal of Operational Research 87, pp. 507-518.
35.Lown, C.S., et al. (2000), “The changing landscape of the financial services industry: What lies ahead?” FRBNY Economic Policy Review (October), pp.39-55.
36.M.K. Leung, T. Young and D. Rigby (2003), “Explaining the Profitability of foreign Banks in Shanghai,” Managerial and Decision Economics 24 pp. 15-24.
37.Manuel Nunez Nickel, et al. (2002), “A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman’s paradox,” Omega: The international Journal of Management Science 30, pp. 1-18.
38.Marcia J. Staff, et al. (1986) “Increased bank merger activity: causes and effects,” American Business Law Journal, Spring 24, 1; pp.67-85.
39.Marcos Roberto Vasconcelos and Jose Ricardo Fucidji (2003), “ Foreign entry and efficiency: evidence from the Brazilian banking industry,” Research in Banking and Finance 3, pp. 253-286.
40.Martin Mayer, The Bankers: The next generation, Penguin USA, 1997 (in Chinese)
41.Meir kohn, financial institutions and markets second edition, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, New York and Oxford, 2004.
42.Milind Sathye (2001), “X-efficiency in Australian banking: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Banking & Finance 25 pp. 613-630.
43.Morita, H, K Hirokawa, and J Zhu (2005), “ A slack based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis,” Omega, International Journal of Management Science 33 (4), pp. 357-362.
44.Morten Balling, et al., Technology and Finance: Challenges for financial markets, business strategies and policy markers, Routlegdeg International Studies in Money and Banking, London and New York, 2003.
45.Muhammet Mercan, et al. (2003) "The effect of scale and mode of ownership on the financial performance of the Turkish banking sector: results of a DEA-based analysis", Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 37 pp.185-202.
46.Necmi Kemal Avkiran (1999), “The evidence on efficiency gains: The role of mergers and the benefits to the public,” Journal of Banking & Finance 23 pp. 991-1013.
47.Necmi Kemal Avkiran (2001), “ Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis,” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35 pp. 57-80.
48.Nicole Adler, Lea Friedman and Zilla Sinuany-Stern (2002), “ Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context,” European Journal of Operatioanl Research 140 pp. 249-265.
49.P.L . Brockett, et al. (1997) " Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances", European Journal of Operational Research pp. 250-268.
50.Raman Manadhar, John C. S. Tang (2002) , “ The evaluation of bank branch performance using data envelopment analysis: A framework,” Journal of High Technology Management Research 13, pp. 1-17.
51.Sherman y Gold (1985): “Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with DataEnvelopment Analysis”. Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 9 (2), pp. 297-315.
52.TAI-HSIN HUANG( 2000), “ Estimating X-Efficiency in Taiwanese Banking Using a Translog Shadow Profit Function,” Journal of Productivity Analysis 14 pp. 225-245.
53.Thanassoulis, Emmanuel., Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A foundation text wit integrated software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts USA 2001.
54.Theodor Kohers, et al. (2000) "Market perception of efficiency in bank holding company mergers: the roles of the DEA and SFA models in capturing merger potential,” Review of Financial Economics 9 pp.101-120.
55.Tser-Yieth Chen (2004), “ A Study of Cost Efficiency and Privatisation in Taiwan’s Banks: The Impact of the Asian Financial Crisis,” The Service Industries Journal 24, pp. 137-151.
56.Tser-Yieth Chen and Tsai-Lien Yeh (2000), “A Measurement of Bank Efficiency, Ownership and Productivity Changes in Taiwan,” The Service Industries Journal,20, 1 pp. 95-109.
57.Vander Vennet, R. (2002), “ Cost and profit efficiency of financial conglomerates and universal banks in Europe,” Journal of Money, Credit and Finance 34 (1), pp. 254-282.
58.Xueming Luo (2003), “Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis ,“ Journal of Business Research 56, pp.627-635.
59.Yang Li et al. (2004), “ Non-Performing Loans and Bank Efficiencies: An Application of the Distance Function Approach,” working paper, 《http://nft01.nuk.edu.tw/econ/workingpaper/yangli/AE-2004-02.pdf》