跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.60) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/03 23:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:詹棨翔
研究生(外文):Chi-Hsiang Chan
論文名稱:考量惡意合作攻擊下最小化服務被攻克率之有效網路建置與防禦策略
論文名稱(外文):Effective Network Planning and Defending Strategies to Minimize Service Compromise Probabilities under Malicious Collaborative Attacks
指導教授:林永松林永松引用關係
口試委員:呂俊賢莊東穎傅新彬鍾順平
口試日期:2012-07-25
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:資訊管理學研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:協同攻擊網路存活度數學規劃法模擬雲端運算虛擬化資源配置
外文關鍵詞:Collaborative AttackNetwork SurvivabilityMathematical ProgrammingSimulationCloud ComputingVirtualizationResource Allocation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:290
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
雲端運算使用了虛擬化和網路技術。這個最近熱門的議題,讓使用者和組織可以去除地理上的限制在任何時間、地點存取所需的應用服務。這個方便的技術帶來了許多的利益但也造成了資訊安全上的複雜度提高。
在本論文中,我們利用數學模型描述一個網路攻防情境,並且配合模擬和數學規劃法解決雙層問題。由於攻防策略的多變性造成情境具高複雜度且不可預期,因此透過模擬評估平均的網路存活度,接著使用了模試圖最佳化攻擊方的策略,攻擊方將試著最大化服務被攻克率而防禦方則希望最小化被攻擊者最大化之服務被攻克率。
在我們考量的攻防情境中,攻擊方會採用協同攻擊策略,此種策略可帶給攻擊方更多的優勢。另一方面,防禦者在考量有限的資源預算和合法使用者的服務品質下,決定適合的策略以保護服務,防禦策略包含佈置即時防禦機制,如:動態網路拓樸調整、區域防禦以及雲端安全服務,另外也利用了虛擬化技術建置網路拓樸。


Recently, Cloud computing which base on virtualization and network technology becomes a popular issue. Through the novel model it provides, users and organizations can decrease the cost on resources and access the applications without geographic limit. The convenient technologies bring a lot of profits but also raise the complexity of information security.
In this thesis, we model the network attack and defense scenario as a mathematical formulation and solve the bi-level problem through simulation and mathematical programming. Because of the complexity and non-deterministic characteristic of both attack and defense strategies, we adopt simulation to evaluate the average network survivability. Furthermore, several methods are used to help us discover the optimal strategies. The attack commander tries to maximize the service compromise probabilities and the defender has to minimize the maximized probabilities.
As for the attack and defense scenario, collaborative attack is considered. This kind of attack is advantageous to the commanders. On the other hand, the defender must decide the appropriate strategies under budget and predefined quality of service constraints, which including deploying various reactive defense mechanisms such as dynamic topology reconfiguration, local defense function, and cloud security service to protect the system. The Virtualization technology is also considered as a strategy for constructing the topology.


論文摘要 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….I
THESIS ABSTRACT III
TABLE OF CONTENTS V
LIST OF TABLES VII
LIST OF FIGURES IX
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1
1.2 MOTIVATION 7
1.3 LITERATURE SURVEY 9
1.3.1 Survivability 9
1.3.2 Collaborative Attack 11
1.3.3 Dynamic Topology Reconfiguration 12
1.3.4 Intrusion Detection and Prevention System 13
1.3.5 Security as a Service in Cloud computing 14
1.4 PROPOSED APPROACH 15
1.5 THESIS ORGANIZATION 16
CHAPTER 2 PROBLEM FORMULATION 17
2.1 PROBLEM DESCRIPTION 17
2.1.1 Commander Perspective 19
2.1.2 Defender Perspective 22
2.2 ATTACK AND DEFENSE SCENARIO 26
2.3 PROBLEM FORMULATION 38
CHAPTER 3 SOLUTION APPROACH 45
3.1 MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING 45
3.2 MONTE CARLO SIMULATION 46
3.3 ENHANCEMENT PROCEDURE BASED ON INFORMATION COLLECTED DURING SIMULATION 47
3.3.1 Evaluation Process 47
3.3.2 Policy Enhancement 50
3.4 INITIAL ALLOCATION SCHEME 54
3.4.1 Topology Generation 54
3.4.2 Proactive Defense Resource Allocation 54
3.4.3 Reactive Defense Resource Allocation 55
CHAPTER 4 COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATIONS 57
4.1 SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT 57
4.2 SIMULATION RESULT 59
4.2.1 Evaluation Times 59
4.2.2 Robustness Experiment 61
4.2.3 Enhancement 62
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK 65
REFERENCES 67


[1] “State of Enterprise Security,” Symantec Corporation Technical report, February 2010.
[2] “IBM X-Force 2011 Mid-year Trend and Risk Report,” IBM Corporation Technical report, September 2011.
[3] “McAfee Threats Report: First Quarter 2011,” McAfee Lab Technical report, 2011.
[4] “Key findings from the 2012 Global State of Information Security Survey,” PwC Technical report, 2011.
[5] Y. Huang, D. Arsenault and A. Sood, “Incorruptible System Self-cleansing for Intrusion Tolerance,” Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, IPCCC 2006. 25th IEEE International, 2006, pp.4 -496.
[6] Y. Huang, D. Arsenault and A. Sood, “Closing Cluster Attack Windows through Server Redundancy and Rotations," the Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2006.
[7] S. Xu, “Collaborative Attack vs. Collaborative Defense,” Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, 2009, Volume 10, Part 2, 217-228, 2009.
[8] R. J. Ellison, D. A. Fisher, R.C. Linger, H. F. Lipson, T. Longstaff and N. R. Mead, “Survivable Network Systems: An Emerging Discipline,” Technical Report CMU/SEI-97-TR-013, Novermber 1997.
[9] D. Medhi and D. Tipper, “Multi-layered Network Survivability-models, Analysis, Architecture, Framework and Implementation: An Overview,” Proceedings of DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition 2000 (DISCEX’00), Volume 1, pp. 173-186, January 2000.
[10] D. Zhou and S. Subramaniam, “Survivability in Optical Networks,” IEEE Network, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp. 16-23, November-December 2000.
[11] A.P. Moore and R.C. Linger, “Foundations for Survivable System Development: Service Traces, Intrusion Traces, and Evaluation Models,” Technical Report CMU/SEI-2001-TR-029, October 2001.
[12] V.R. Westmark, “A Definition for Information System Survivability,” Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 10, January 2004.
[13] A. Snow, G. Weckman, and P. Rastogi, “Assessing Dependability of Wireless Networks Using Neural Networks,” IEEE Military Communications Conference, 2005 (MILCOM’05), Vol. 5, pp. 2809-2815, October 2005.
[14] D. Tipper, K. Lu, and Y. Qian, “A Design for Secure and Survivable Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Wireless Communications, Vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 30-37, October 2007.
[15] P. E. Heegaard and K. S. Trivedi, "Network Survivability Modeling," Computer Networks, vol. 53, pp. 1215-1234, 2009.
[16] J. Huang, J. Jiang and L. Zhang, "A Novel Transient System Survivability Quantitative Evaluation Framework," Computer Engineering and Applications (ICCEA), 2010 Second International Conference on, pp. 34-39, 2010.
[17] S. Braynov and M. Jadiwala, “Representation and Analysis of Coordinated Attacks,” Proceedings of the 2003 ACM workshop on Formal methods in security engineering, pp. 43-51, October, 2003.
[18] M. Atighetchi, P. Pal, F. Webber and C. Jones, “Adaptive Use of Network-Centric Mechanisms in Cyber-Defense,” Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, pp. 183-192, May 2003.
[19] "Intrusion Detection Systems Definition, Need and Challenges," SANS Institute Technical report, 2001.
[20] K. Scarfone and P. Mell, "Guide to Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)," NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) - 800-94, 2007.
[21] M. Laureano, C. Maziero and E. Jamhou, "Intrusion Detection in Virtual Machine Environments," the Proceedings of the 30th EUROMICRO Conference, 2004.
[22] VMware. VMware vShieldTM Product Family. Available: http://www.vmware.com/products/vshield/
[23] T. Micro. Trend Micro Deep Security. Available: http://tw.trendmicro.com/tw/products/enterprise/deep-security/index.html
[24] P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing,” NIST Special Publication 800-145, September 2011.
[25] "Cloud Computing - Benefits, Risks and Recommendations for Information Security," European Network and Information Security Agency technical report, 2009.
[26] Zscaler Products. Available: http://www.zscaler.com/productsataglance.html
[27] F. Cohen, "Managing Network Security: Attack and Defence Strategies," Network Security, vol. 1999, pp. 7-11, 1999.
[28] G. Fandel, A. Giese and B. Mohn, “Measuring Synergy Effects of a Public Social Private Partnership,” International Journal of Production Economics, March, 2012.
[29] S. Saperdas, “Contest Success Functions,” Economic Theory, vol. 7, pp. 283-290, 1996.
[30] K. Hausken and G. Levitin, “Protection vs. Flase Targets in Series Systems,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 94, pp. 973-987, 2009.
[31] P. Ferrie, “Attacks on Virtual Machine Emulators,” Symantec Advanced Threat Research, 2006.
[32] M.H. Kalos and P.A. Whitlock, “Monte Carlo Methods,” John Wilet & Sons Incs, ISBN 978-3-527-40760-6, November 2008.
[33] S. Nagaraja and R. Anderson, “Dynamic Topologies for Robust Scale-Free Networks,” Bio-inspired Computing and Communication, pp. 411-426, 2008.
[34] J. Blitzstein and P. Diaconis, “A Seuential Improtance Sampling Algorihm for Generating Random Graphs with Prescribed Drgrees,” Internet Mathematics, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 489-522, March 2011.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊