臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來，由於人們不斷的追求更逼真的影像，因此3D立體顯示器成為平面顯示器中最閃亮的一顆新星，而不用配戴特殊裝置，即可觀賞到立體影像的裸眼式立體顯示器，由於更符合一般觀賞者的使用習慣，因此吸引許多科技大廠相繼投入研究。目前用於裸眼式立體顯示器的3D技術，主要有視差屏障和柱狀透鏡技術，而另一種電濕潤微稜鏡技術亦被提出。目前來說，尚無特定的裸眼式3D技術成為主流技術，主要由於這些技術目前尚有各自的優點及限制，較難一次滿足所有的需求。

為了更加了解使用這三種3D技術的裸眼式顯示器間觀賞品質的差異，加上顯示器的系統參數和其觀賞品質是彼此相關的，因此本論文提出一共同平台稱為觀賞參考面板，當作比較不同技術間觀賞品質的基準，透過這樣的方式使我們能夠客觀比較不同技術間的觀賞品質。我們使用光學模擬軟體LighttoolsTM建立裸眼式顯示器的模擬模型，並模擬其光學特性，並且探討面板的系統參數對於不同技術的觀賞品質之影響及趨勢。我們並從觀賞者的角度出發，比較觀賞者觀看顯示器時最在乎的幾項觀賞品質，包括光輝度的大小、均勻度、交互干擾值的大小、頭可左右擺動的幅度即觀賞區域的大小及可看到清晰3D影像的角度範圍即可視張角。

而由模擬結果可知，就光輝度來說柱狀透鏡式顯示器最佳，光輝度的均勻度則是電濕潤微稜鏡透鏡式顯示器最好，觀賞區域的寬度及可視張角則是視差障式顯示器最大，但其過高的亮度損失仍是需要被克服的。透過本篇論文的研究結果，能使我們對於這三種3D技術的光學特性及彼此間的差異更為了解，往後在設計顯示器時，我們可根據顯示器的使用用途及最在乎的觀賞品質項目，而使用不同的3D技術。

In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) displays have drawn great attention in the flat panel display industry due to the fact that viewers keep pursuing more realistic images. For such a reason, many technological giants have got involved in the field of 3D displays especially autostereoscopic displays without wearing additional accessories. For the current autostereoscopic displays that can be viewed with the naked eye, either a lenticular lens or a parallax barrier is mainly utilized. Besides, an autostereoscopic display based on electrowetting microprism (EMP) lens has been also introduced. At present, none of the autostereosopic 3D technology is dominant, because all of these technologies have their own superiority and limitation. It is difficult for them to satisfy all needs.

Considering that system parameters of a display are correlated to its visual performance, therefore, in order to understand the difference among autostereocopic displays based on parallax barrier, lenticular lens and EMP lens, we proposed a common platform called “Visual Based Panel” as the basis to evaluate these technologies. Through this way, we could objectively compare the visual performance of different autostereoscopic displays. Optical software LighttoolsTM is applied to construct the simulation models of autostereoscopic displays and simulate optical characteristics of them. Moreover, we also investigated the influence and tendency of system parameters of panels on the visual performance of different displays. From the viewer’s perspective, we compared several types of visual performance that the viewers mostly care about, including luminance, uniformity, crosstalk, viewing zone and viewing field angle.

By the simulation results, it is clear that in terms of luminance, the display based on lenticular lens is brightest while that based on EMP lens is superior in the uniformity of luminance. In addition, the display based on parallax barrier has the widest viewing zone and viewing field angle. However, its excessive loss of brightness is a major drawback which still needs to be overcome. Through the research of the paper, we could gain a better understanding of these three different 3D technologies in terms of their optical characteristics and individual differences, which offers a good reference for the future designing of displays that can choose a technology based on the purpose of usage and the most highly valued visual performance.

第1章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景 1
1-2 立體視覺之基本原理 2
1-3 3D立體顯示技術之分類 5
1-4 研究動機與目的 13
1-5 論文架構 14
第2章 裸眼式3D立體顯示技術設計方法 15
2-1 視差屏障技術 15
2-2 柱狀透鏡技術 18
2-3 電濕潤微稜鏡透鏡技術 22
第3章 研究方法 27
3-1 觀賞參考面板 (Visual Based Panel) 27
3-2 光學模擬模型之建立 27
3-3 光學模擬模型之驗證 30
3-4 3D顯示器觀賞品質之評價方法 37
3-4-1 光輝度與均勻度(Luminance and Uniformity) 37
3-4-2 交互干擾(Crosstalk) 39
3-4-3 觀賞區域(Viewing Zone) 39
3-4-4 可視張角(Viewing Field Angle) 40
第4章 模擬結果與討論 42
4-1 調變面板畫素開口率對觀賞品質之影響 44
4-2 調變面板畫素週期對觀賞品質之影響 55
4-3 調變觀看距離對觀賞品質之影響 65
4-4 調變視域數對觀賞品質之影響 76
第5章 結論與未來展望 87
參考文獻 89

[1] J. A. Castellano, “Handbook of Display Technology,” Academic Press, San Diego (1992).
[2] N. Holliman, “3-D Display Systems,” Department of Computer Science, University of Durham (2005).
[3] N, Holliman, “3D Display Systems,” Handbook of Optoelectronics, IOP Press (2002).
[4] 黃怡菁、黃乙白、謝漢萍，「3D立體顯示技術」，《科學發展》，451期，46~52頁，2010年7月。
[5] 群益金融證卷，「3D產業初探」，2010年。
[6] http://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/courses/cg/Web/intro_graphics/vr.html
[7] J. S. Kollin, S. A. Benton, M. L. Jepsen,”Real-Time Display of 3-D Computed Holograms by Scanning the Image of an Acoustic-Optic Modulator,” SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 1212, p. 174 (1990).
[8] 蔡朝旭，「前瞻3D顯示技術」，2006年1月。
[9] Toni Järvenpää, Marja Salmimaa,”Optical characterization of autostereoscopic 3-D displays,” Journal of the SID, Vol.16, p. 825 (2008).
[10] C. Berkel, “Image Preparation for 3D LCD,” SPIE Proceeding, Vol. 3639, p. 84 (1999).
[11] I. Sexton, “Parallax Barrier 3-D TV”, SPIE Proceeding, Vol. 1083, p. 84 (1989)
[12] Hui Nam, Jangdoo Lee, Hyoungwook Jang, Myoungseop Song, Beomsik kim, “Auto-Stereoscopic Swing 3D Display,” SID Digest, P. 94 (2005).
[13] M. F. Buchroithner, O. Wälder, K. Habermann, B. König, T. Gründemann, G. Neukum and the HRSC Co-Investigator Team, “True-3D Visualization of the Martian Surface Based on Lenticular Foil Technology Using HRSC Imagry,” Commission IV, WG IV/9
[14] Planar Systems, Inc, “3D Displays –Technologies & Testing Methods” (2011).
[15] H. W. Chang, “2D/3D Switchable Autostereoscopic Display with Electrowetting Microprism Lens,” Master Thesis of National Taiwan University (2010).
[16] 陳明宏、曾繁根，「數位化微流體操縱技術」，科學發展，2006年。
[17] Ho, C.M., ”Fluidics-the link between micro and nano sciences and technologies,” IEEE ,Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (2001).
[18] Hirotsugu Yamamoto, Tomoya Kimura, Shinya Matsumoto, and Shiro Suyama , “Viewing-Zone Control of Light-Emitting Diode Panel for Stereoscopic Display and Multiple Viewing Distances,” Displays, Vol. 6, p. 359 (2010).
[19] www.asus.com/Notebooks/Gaming_Powerhouse/G53SX/
[20] Chien-Yue Chen a, Tsung-Yen Hsieh a, Qing-Long Deng a, Wei-Chia Su b, Zhi-Sheng Cheng,“Design of a novel symmetric microprism array for dual-view display,” Displays, Vol. 31, p. 99 (2010).
[21] Chou-Lin Wu, Kuo-Chung Huang, Ching-Chiu Liao, Yi-hen Chen, Kuen Lee, “Autostereoscopic display optical properties evaluation,” SPIE, Vol. 7524 (2010).
[22] W. L. ILzerman, S. T. de Zwart, T. Dekker, Design of 2D/3D Switchable Displays, SID 05 Digest, p. 98 (2005).
[23] Wu-Xiang, Qiong-Hua Wang, Ai-Hong Wang, and Da-Hai Li, “Autostereoscopic Display Based o Two-layer Lenticular Lenses,” Optics Letters, Vol. 35, p. 4127 (2010).
[24] Marja Salmimaa, Toni Järvenpää, “Objective Evaluation of Multi-View Autostereoscopic 3D Displays,” Journal of the SID, Vol.16, p. 268 (2008).
[25] Salmimaa, M. and T. Jarvenpaa, “3D crosstalk and luminance uniformity from angular luminance profiles of multiview autostereoscopic 3D displays,” Journal of the SID, Vol.16, p. 1033 (2008).
[26] M. Salmimaa and T. Jarvenpaa, “Optical characterization and measurements of autostereoscopic 3D displays,” Proc. SPIE, Vol. 7001, p. 2 (2008).
[27] Kooi, F., and Toet, A., “Visual Comfort of Binocular and 3D Displays,” Displays, Vol.25, p. 99 (2004).
[28] R. Kaptein and I. Heynderickx, “Effect of Crosstalk in Multi-View Autostereoscopic 3D Displays on Perceived Image Quality,“ SID Digest, Vol. 38, p. 1220 (2007).
[29] Toni Järvenpää, Marja Salmimaa, Tapani Levola “Objective evaluation of qualified viewing spaces for near-to-eye and autostereoscopic two-view displays,” Journal of the SID, Vol. 19, p. 231 (2011).
[30] http://www.toshiba.co.jp/regza/option/gl1/design.html
[31] R. Fukushima, K. Taira, T. Saishu, Y. Momonoi, M. Kashiwagi, and Y. Hirayama, "Effect of light ray overlap between neighboring parallax images in autostereoscopic 3D displays,” Proc. SPIE, Vol. 2737, 72370W (2009).
[32] Kaptein, R. and Heynderickx, I., “Effect of crosstalk in multi-view autostereoscopic 3D displays on perceived mage quality,” SID Digest, Vol. 38, p. 1220 (2007).
[33] 「立體技術顯示簡介」，http://kheresy.wordpress.com