臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

此論文研究探討在魯西迪《午夜之子》中對印度近代歷史的另類書寫。文本中主角薩林姆以醃製印度風味歷史的手法處理歷史書寫與時間記憶等概念。他的處理手法成為一種歷史哲學。薩林姆在建構個人家族史，同時也批判了歷史書寫背後的權力操控以及對血統/啟源(origin)的迷思。第一章以系譜學的概念及架構探討歷史書寫，特別是從薩林姆的角度檢視歷史是如何被語言虛構及其虛構過程。另類系譜的建構揭露了被歷史大敘述掩埋的歷史縫隙(disparity)，藉由突顯歷史敘述中無法協調一致的時間敘述來尋求詮釋歷史的其他可能性。第二章以身體為歷史書寫的介面為理論基礎探討身體與歷史間的關係。當身體因為歷史暴力而產生變形進而醜化而顯得怪誕(grotesque)，藉由怪誕身體的意象反映出印度社會整體生理上的疾病，也同時具體的描繪出印度病態的歷史發展與過程。本文不僅檢視怪誕身體意象在語言結構之外的象徵性意義，並探討怪誕身體是如何成為個人身體與國家歷史間互動的主要媒介。

This thesis explores the alternative historiography of modern Indian history in Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children. The protagonist Saleem’s chutnification of history and pickling of time become a philosophy of history in which the alternative genealogy challenges not only official history but also the myth of origin. Chapter one develops the notion of history in genealogical framework in Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children, especially through the perspective of the protagonist Saleem Sinai. The construction of alternative genealogy suggests historical disparity buried under the master narrative of national documentations and exposes the fictionality of the myth of origin. The point of alternative genealogy is to explore the discordant nature of time in narrative, and therefore to reach the effects of interrogating historical truth and uncovering possible ways of interpretation of history at the same time. Chapter two explores the relation between body and history, and supposes that the body serves as the inscribed surface of history. When the body is deformed under historical violence and becomes grotesque, it shows the image of India’s pathological history and reflects the grotesque realities of the larger body of community with physical diseases. The supposition looks for the symbolic signification on the grotesque body outside linguistic construction and examines how the grotesque body becomes the prime agent of the interactive process between individual body and public history.

Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………..……i
Chinese Abstract………………………………………………………………….……ii
English Abstract…………………………………………………………………...…..iii
Introduction……………………………………………………………………....1
Chapter One: Privatization of History: Family Genealogy ……………………..10
1.1. Alternative Genealogy ………………………………………………………10
1.2. Chutnification of History and Pickling of Time ……………………………20
1.3. The In-Betweenness Attitude toward History ……………………………....35
1.4. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………..47
Chapter Two: The Reinscription of the Grotesque Body …………………………..48
2.1. Body and History …………………………………………………………..48
2.2. The Grotesque Body ………………………………………………………….58
2.3. Psychoanalysis of the Grotesque Body ………………………………………72
2.4. Conclusion ………………………………………………………………….81
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………83
Works Cited …………………………………………………………………………87

Agarwalla, Shyam. “Third World Literature as National Allegory: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children.” Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children. Ed. Reena Mitra. New Delhi: Atlantic, 2006. 60-81.
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Community. New York: Verso, 1991.
Brooks, Peter. Body Work: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1993.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Trans. Hélène Iswolsky. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1984.
Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. Ed. Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books, 1968.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for
‘Indian’ Pasts?” Representation 37 (1992): 1-26.
----. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. New Jersey: Princeton UP, 2008.
Collins, Larry, and Dominique Lapierre. Freedom at Midnight. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1975.
Freud, Sigmund. The Freud Reader. Ed. Peter Gay. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1989.
Foucault, Michel. “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” The Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. New York: Random House, 1984. 76-100.
Harpham, Geoffrey. “The Grotesque: First Principle.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34.4 (1976): 461-68.
Hawes, Clement. “Leading History by the Nose: The Turn to the Eighteenth Century in Midnight’s Children.” Modern Fiction Studies 39.1 (1993):147-68.
Hutcheon, Linda. The Politics of Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, 2002.
----. Narcissistic Narrative: The Metafictional Paradox. New York: Methuen, 1984.
Kane, Jean. “The Migrant Intellectual and the Body of History: Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children.” Contemporary Literature 37.1 (1996): 94-118.
Kimmich, Matt. Offspring Fictions: Salman Rushdie’s Family Novels. New York: Rodopi, 2008.
Kortnaar, Neil Ten. Self, Nation, Text in Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children.
London: McGill-Queen’s UP, 2004.
Merivale, Patricia. “Saleem Fathered by Oscar: Intertextual Strategies in Midnight’s Children and The Tin Drum.” Reading Rushdie: Perspectives on the Fiction of Salman Rushdie. Ed. D.M. Fletcher. Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994. 83-96.
Mezey, Jason Howard. “Neocolonial Narcissism and Postcolonial Paranoia: Midnight’s Children and the Psychoanalysis of the State.” Intervention 8.2 (2006): 178-92.
Rege, Josna E. “Victim into Protagonist? Midnight’s Children and the Post-Rushdie
National Narratives of the Eighties.” Studies in the Novel 29.3 (1997): 342-75.
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988.
Rushdie, Salman. Imaginary Homelands. London: Granta, 1991.
----. Midnight’s Children. New York: Random House, 2006.
Wilson, Keith. “Midnight’s Children and Reader Responsibility.” Reading Rushdie: Perspectives on the Fiction of Salman Rushdie. Ed. D.M. Fletcher. Atlanta: Rodopi, 1994. 55-68.