跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.213) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/08 00:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:洪季琦
研究生(外文):Chi-Chi Hung
論文名稱:使用 YouTube 提升以英語為外語學習者聽力理解之成效探討
論文名稱(外文):Using YouTube to Develop EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension
指導教授:施雅純施雅純引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ya-Chun Shih
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立東華大學
系所名稱:英美語文學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
論文頁數:105
中文關鍵詞:真實教材以英語為外語學習者聽力理解影片片段YouTube
外文關鍵詞:Authentic video materialsEFL learnersListening comprehensionVideo clipsYouTube
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:1422
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:211
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
儘管以影片為真實教材,並運用在語言教學上已被廣泛的探討過,但是以
YouTube 網的影片為教材,並運用至語言教學的研究相對缺乏。
此研究的主要目的是為了檢視 YouTube 的真實教材對於提升英語為外語學
習者的英語聽力理解之成效。在此研究中,使用質性研究(個案研究法)為主及量
化(時間序列法)為輔探究學生的聽力理解進步跟感知。總共有七位參與者自願參
加這研究,三位是非英語系大學部學生,而另外四位則是英語系的大學生。此研
究透過聽力理解考試、訪談記錄跟教室觀察日誌來收集質與量的資料。然後,以
時間序列法中的視覺分析法和 C 統計來分析學生的聽力理解進步。另外,透過
個別的分析來呈現質性資料。最後,研究者將質與量化資料分析結果實施三角檢
驗。
課程結束後,研究結果顯示學生在聽力理解有獲得正面的影響。根據視覺分
析法的結果指出,七位學習者當中,有五位在聽力理解上獲得明顯的進步。最後,
根據訪談記錄與課後觀察日誌的分析結果,亦幫助研究者了解到學生們對於
YouTube 課程的看法及感知,學生們認為此課程於提升英語學習者的英語聽力理
解、學生的興趣及態度上具有正面影響的。
While using video clips as the authentic video materials in the language instruction has been widely investigated, the YouTube website which is relatively
unexplored includes many themes of video clips utilizing in the language instruction.
This study focused on the effects of YouTube program on EFL (English as a foreign language) learners’ listening comprehension and their perception towards YouTube program. Both qualitative (case study) and quantitative research
(time-series design) were conducted to explore the learners’ listening comprehension development and perception. There were totally seven participants, three undergraduates were non-English major and four undergraduates were English major. In the study, both of the qualitative and quantitative data were collected through listening comprehension tests, semi-structured interviews and classroom observation. Furthermore, the quantitative data was carried out through visual inspection and C-statistic which analyzed the improvement of students’ listening comprehension. Additionally, qualitative data was analyzed case by case. Lastly, both qualitative and quantitative data were collected in order to triangulate the findings.
The findings indicated that students’ listening comprehension obtained the positive influences. According to the results of the visual inspection, there were five out of seven students having obvious improvement on their listening comprehension. Moreover, the analysis result of the interview and the classroom observation helped the researcher to understand that the students had their enjoyment and they felt that the YouTube program was beneficial for developing their English listening comprehension, interest and enjoyment, and attitude.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................ I
摘要 ........................................................... II
ABSTRACT ..................................................... III
TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................. IV
LIST OF FIGURES................................................VII
LIST OF TABLES .............................................. VIII
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION........................................1
1.1 Background of the Study .....................................1
1.2 Motivation ..................................................2
1.3 Statement of the Problems ...................................3
1.4 Purpose of the Study.........................................5
1.5 Research Questions ..........................................5
1.6 Significance of the Study ...................................5
1.7 Limitations of the Study ....................................6
1.8 Definition of Terms .........................................6
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................8
2.1 Listening Comprehension......................................8
2.2 Authentic Video Materials ...................................9
2.3 Using Authentic Video Materials in Listening Comprehension Instruction ....................................................11
CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY .....................................13
3.1 Research Methods ...........................................13
3.1.1 Case Study ...............................................13
3.1.2 Time-Series Design .......................................14
3.2 Context ....................................................18
3.3 Participant and Sampling ...................................19
3.4 Selection of Authentic Video Materials .....................20
3.5 Study Procedure ............................................22
3.6 Data Collection and Instrumentation ........................25
3.6.1 Listening Comprehension Tests ............................25
3.6.2 Interview ................................................26
3.6.3 Classroom Observation ....................................27
3.7 Data Analysis ..............................................27
3.7.1 Qualitative Data Analysis ................................27
3.7.2 Quantitative Data Analysis ...............................28
3.8 Trustworthiness ............................................29
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ...........................31
4.1 Results ....................................................32
4.1.1 Listening Comprehension Development ......................32
I. Non-English Major Group (NEMG) ..............................32
Student I : Liz ................................................32
Student II : Olivia ............................................37
Student III : Lena .............................................41
II. English Major Group (EMG) ..................................45
Student IV : Angela ............................................45
Student V : Jessica ............................................49
Student VI : Isabella ..........................................54
Student VII : Janice ...........................................59
4.1.2 Participants’ Perception towards YouTube Program .........63
I. Non-English Major Group (NEMG) ..............................63
Student I : Liz ................................................63
Student II : Olivia ............................................64
Student III : Lena .............................................65
II. English Major Group (EMG) ..................................66
Student IV : Angela ............................................66
Student V : Jessica ............................................68
Student VI : Isabella ..........................................68
Student VII : Janice ...........................................69
4.2 Discussion .................................................70
4.2.1 The Improvement of Learners’ Listening Comprehension .....70
4.2.2 Perception towards the YouTube Program ...................75
Perception for Improving Listening Comprehension ...............75
Perception concerning Effects on learners’ Interest and Enjoyment ................................................................75
Perception concerning Effects on Learners’ Attitudes ...........76
Perception concerning the Use of YouTube as a Source of Authentic Video Materials ................................................77
Perception concerning YouTube Topics ...........................77
Preferences and Dislikes .......................................78
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION .......................79
REFERENCES .....................................................81
APPENDICES .....................................................90
Appendix A: Pre-course Interview ...............................90
Appendix B: English Proficiency Test (Baseline Phase) ..........91
Appendix C: Achievement Test-Pretest ...........................95
Appendix D: Achievement Test-Posttest ..........................97
Appendix E: English Proficiency Test (Maintenance Phase) .......99
Appendix F: Semi-structured Interview Questions ...............105


LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1 Student’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph..........16
Figure 3.2 Arrangement of Classroom ............................18
Figure 3.4 Study Procedure .....................................23
Figure 3.5 Data Triangulation ..................................30
Figure 4.1 Liz’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph .............32
Figure 4.2 Olivia’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph ..........37
Figure 4.3 Lena’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph ............41
Figure 4.4 Angela’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph ..........45
Figure 4.5 Jessica’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph .........50
Figure 4.6 Isabella’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph ........55
Figure 4.7 Janice’s Scores of Visual Inspection Graph ..........59
Figure 4.8 Seven Students’ Scores of Visual Inspection Graph ...73


LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Data ...........17
Table 3.2 Changing Analysis between Phases of Data..............17
Table 3.3 Learners’ English Proficiency Level .................20
Table 3.4 Categories of Authentic Video Materials ............22
Table 3.5 The Coding System ..................................28
Table 3.6 Relation between Data Collection and Analysis ......30
Table 4.1 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Liz’s Data ....33
Table 4.2 Changing Analysis between Phases of Liz’s Data ......33
Table 4.3 Summary Table of C-statistic Analysis Result .......34
Table 4.4 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Olivia’s Data..38
Table 4.5 Changing Analysis between Phases of Olivia’s Data ...38
Table 4.6 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Lena’s Data ...42
Table 4.7 Changing Analysis between Phases of Lena’s Data.....42
Table 4.8 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Angela’s Data .46
Table 4.9 Changing Analysis between Phases of Angela’s Data ...46
Table 4.10 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Jessica’s Data ................................................................51 Table 4.11 Changing Analysis between Phases of Jessica’s Data ................................................................51 Table 4.12 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Isabella’s Data ................................................................56 Table 4.13 Changing Analysis between Phases of Isabella’s Data ................................................................56 Table 4.14 Analysis of Changes within a Phase of Janice’s Data ................................................................60 Table 4.15 Changing Analysis between Phases of Janice’s Data ..60
Table 4.16 Summary Table of Achievement Tests ................71
Table 4.17 Summary Table of Achievement Tests’ Gain ...........71
Table 4.18 Summary Table of Within Phase......................74
Table 4.19 Summary Table of Between Phases ...................74
REFERENCES
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Brown, G., &; Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breen, M. P. (1985). Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 60-70.
Bacon, S., &; Finneman, M. (1990). A study of attitudes, motives, and strategies of university foreign language students and their disposition to authentic oral and written input. Modern
Language Journal, 74(4), 459-73.
Bacon, S. M. (1992). Phases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 25(4), 317-334.
Beauvois, M. (1996). Personality types and megabytes: Student attitudes toward computer mediated communication (CMC) in the language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2-3),
27-45.
Brindley, G. (1998). Assessing listening abilities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 171-191.
Barbot, Marie-José &; Camatarri, Giovanni. (1999). Autonomie et apprentissage. L’innovation dans la formation. Éducation et Formation. Pédagogie théorie et critique, PUF.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Brent, K. (2009). Teaching EFL to the iGeneration: A survey of using YouTube as supplementary material with college EFL students in Taiwan. CALL-EJ Online, 10(2). Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://www.tell.is.ritsumei.ac.jp/ callejonline/journal/10-2/kelsen.html
Cathcart, R. L. (1989). Authentic discourse and the survival English curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 105-126.
Cornish, S. (1994). Video in the TESOL Classroom, in Erica Garvey’s reading text for language teaching methodologies. NCELTR, Macquarie University, Sydney- Australia, p: 25
Carla, M. (1996). Listening skills development through multimedia. Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(2), pp. 179-201. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://www.dcmp.org/caai/nadh166.pdf
Chen, Z. (2003). Authentic Materials. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from the integration of the internet into language teaching website: http://www.math.mun.ca/~yliang/authentic.htm
Cotton, R. (2005). Input Variables in Caption Research. Journal of Gifu University, 54, 17-22
Denzin, N. K., &; Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duh, J. (2006). Single subject research. Taipei:心理出版社.
Despagne, C. (2010). The Difficulties of Learning English: Perceptions and Attitude in Mexico. Canadian and International Education, 39(2), 55-74.
Enas, A. M. (2006). Using Authentic Materials in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teachers’ Perspectives in Saudi Arabia. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from Google Scholar website:
http://scholar.google.com.tw/scholarq=Using+Authentic+Materials+in+the+Foreign+Language+Classroom%3A+Teachers%E2%80%99+Perspectives+in+Saudi+Arabia&;hl=zh-TW&;btnG=%E6%90%9C%E5%B0%8B&;lr=
Frieze. I., Francis, W. &; Hanusa, B. (1983). Defining success in classroom settings. In J. Levine &; M. Wang (Eds.) Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning (p. 3-28). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Faerch, C. &; Kasper, G. (1986). The role comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 257-83.
Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P., (2000). Case study method. London: Sage.
Gast, D. L., &; Spriggs, A. D. (2012). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp.199-233). New Yeark: Routledge.
Haycraft, J. (1986). An Introduction to English Language Teaching. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from Google Scholar
https://books.google.com.tw/books/about/An_Introduction_to_English_Language_Teac.html?id=XYhOAAAAYAAJ&;redir_esc=y
Herron, C. A., &; Seay, I. (1991). The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 487-495.
Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. Harlow: Longman
Hwang, J. L. (2009). Using YouTube to teach regional English accents and culture. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from
http://libra.msra.cn/Publication/4977878/using-youtube-to-teach-regional-english-accents-and-culture
Jane, S. (2003). Using Authentic Video in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jihyun, J. (2007). A study of listening comprehension of academic lectures within the construction-integration model. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from
http://etd.ohiolink.edu/sendpdf.cgi/Jeon%20Jihyun.pdfosu1196100462
Jang, Y. (2009). A case study of applying audio/video data processing programs for the improvement of English listening proficiency of adult EFL learners. Retrieved February 15, 2015 from http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEEiCEER2009/full_papers/full_paper_216.pdf
Katchen, J. E., Lin, L. Y., Fox, T., &; Chun, V. (2001). Developments in Digital Video. Paper presented at the Third Pan-Asian Conference 2001: A Language Odyssey
Keslan, B. (2009). Teaching EFL to the iGeneration: A survey of using YouTube as supplementary material with college EFL students in Taiwan. Call-EJ Online, 10(2), 1-8.
Katsuhiro M. (2011). YouTube英語學習法. Taipei:如何出版社有限公司.
Lindsay, P., &; Norman, D. A. (1977). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Lincoln, Y. S., &; Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lee, W. (1995). Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal, 49(4), 323-328. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/4/323.abstract
Larimer, R. E. and Schleicher, L. (1999). New Ways in Using Authentic Materials in the Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Linder, D. (1999). Authentic Texts in ESL/EFL. TESOL Matters, 9:6, p. 17, Retrieved May 15, 2015 from the website: readwriteact.org/files/2013/02/authentic_texts_in_esl_efl.pdf
accessed on 04.04.2013
Lin, S. H. (2000). A Study of English Listening Comprehension Strategies Used by Senior High School Students in Taiwan. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from
https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgibin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=b7rzKv/fulltextdeclare?dbid=O__qrtyKQ%5DU%5DER&;imgtype=
Lin, L. Y. (2002). The effect of feature films upon learners’ motivation, listening and speaking skills: The learner-centered approach. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from
http://dcs.lib.ndhu.edu.tw/ndhuhyint/sendurl_api_v3.jspdbid=LDB3915
Lin, Y. J. (2003). A Case Study on the Effects of Applying Authentic Materials as Listening Comprehension Supplements for Senior High School Students. Retrieved December 11, 2014, from http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle /140.119/33414
Luo, J. J. (2004). Using DVD Films to Enhance College Freshmen's English Listening Comprehension and Motivation. Retrieved January 31, 2015, from http://nthur.lib.nthu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/7387
Morrow, K. (1977). Authentic texts and cultural authenticity: an editorial. Retrieved March 25, 2015, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.15404781.1989.tb05310.x/abstract
Morrison, B. (1989). Using news broadcasts for authentic listening comprehension. Retrieved January 25, 2015, from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/43/1/14.full.pdf
Miles, M. B., &; Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Mathur, S. R., Kavale, K. A., Ouinn, M. M., Forness, S. R., &;
Rutherford, R. B. (1998). Social skills interventions with
students with emotional and behavioral problems: A quantitative
synthesis of single-subject research. Retrieved March 25, 2015, from http://www.parentcenterhub.org/repository/abstract5/
Martinez, A. G. (2000). Authentic Materials: An overview. Karen’s Linguistic Issues, February 2002. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from
http://www3.telus.net/linguisticsissues/authenticmaterials.html
Morley, J. (2001). Aural comprehension instruction: Principles and practices. Retrieved May 20, 2015, from http://gaining.educ.msu.edu/resources/files/Teaching%20listening.Morley%202001.pdf
Nunan, D. (1989). The Use of Authentic Materials in Teaching EFL Listening. Retrieved June 14, 2015 from http://www.hltmag.co.uk/aug10/mart03.htm
Nowaczyk, R. (1998). Student perception of multimedia in the undergraduate classroom. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/1334211/student-perception-multimedia-undergraduate-classroom
Nunan, D. (1999). Second Language Teaching and Learning. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, NY : Newbury House.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., &; Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?. Retrieved May 10, 2015, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3#page-1
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Phillimore, J., &; Goodson, L. (2004). Qualitative Research in Tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from
https://books.google.com.tw/books/about/Qualitative_Research_in_Tourism.html?id=bgypAss8IU4C&;redir_esc=y
Pala, O. (2005). Teaching listening and reading comprehension in Turkish using web-based material. Retrieved January 21, 2015, from http://babel.uoregon.edu/ylc/selfstudy/turkish/lessons/Project.pdf
Penny, U. (1984). Teaching Listening Comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Paul, G. (2006). Playing the videotext:A media literacy perspective on video-mediated L2 listening. Retrieved February 11, 2015 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num2/pdf/gruba.pdf
Rankin, P. T. (1952). The measurement of the ability to understand spoken language. Retrieved February 10, 2015, from
http://www.worldcat.org/title/measurement-of-the-ability-to-understand-spoken-language/oclc/71439857
River, W. M. &; Temperely, M. S.(1978). A Practical Guide to the Teaching of English: As a second or Foreign Language. New York, NY: Oxford University.
Rost, M. (1990). Listening. In Carter, R. &; Nunan, D. (Ed). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rubin, J. (1990). Improving foreign language listening comprehension. In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1990 (pp. 309-316). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Rubin, J. (1994). Handbook of using testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Ricardo, S. (2007). Stephen Krashen's Theory of Second Language Acquisition. Retrieved December 12, 2014, from internet English Made in Brazil website: http://www.sk.com.br/sk-krash.html
Schiff, M. (1970). Some Theoretical Aspects of Attitudes and Perception. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://cospl.coalliance.org/fedora/repository/co:14168
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B., &; Escobar, C. (1986). Early interventions for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Retrieved March 15, 2015, from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/23882207?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Forness, S. R., &; Kavale, K. A. (1988). Early language intervention: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Retrieved March 17, 2015, from http://sed.sagepub.com/content/22/3/259.full.pdf
Strauss, A., &; Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student Perceptions on Language Learning in a Technological Environment: Implications for the New Millennium. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from
http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/pdf/steppgreany.pdf
Shu Y. M. (2004). Teaching Reform by Changing the Way of Examination. Retrieved May 23, 2015, from
http://search.nioerar.edu.tw/edu_paper/data_image/e0000784/0n2/20040400/p0000358.pdf
Smidt, E., &; Hegelheimer, V. (2004). Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, and strategy use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 517-556. Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ719382
Son, J. B. (2007). Learner experiences in web-based language learning. Retrieved January 20, 2015, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09588220601118495
Thanajaro, M. (2000). Using authentic materials to develop listening comprehension in the English as a second language classroom. Retrieved January 3, 2015, from
http://dcs.lib.ndhu.edu.tw:2126/ twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9974216
Teng, H. Y. (2002). Chinese students' performance in the pronunciation of English tense and lax vowels. Retrieved January 1, 2015, from MA. Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
Taylor, G. (2005). Perceived Processing Strategies of Students Watching Captioned Video. Retrieved June 8, 2015, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02228.x/epdf
Tamo, D. (2009). The Use of Authentic Materials in Classrooms. Retrieved May 13, 2015, from http://www.lcpj.pro/skedaret/127754768574_pdfsam_LCPJ,%20Per%20shtyp.pdf
Titis, S. (2010). The Impact of Teaching Listening Comprehension by Audio Video and Audio Picture Aids on The Third Semester Students’ Listening Proficiency of English Education
Department Students of Muria Kudus University in The Academic Year 2009/2010. Retrieved November 28, 2014, from
http://www.umk.ac.id/jurnal/jurnal/2011/sosbud%20juni%202011/THE%20IMPACT%20OF%20TEACHING%20LISTENING.pdf
Wolvin, A. D., &; Coakley, C. G. (1979). Listening instruction. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
Wolvin, A. D., and Coakley, C. G. (1988). Listening. Dubuque. IA: William C.Brown Publishers.
Widdowson, H. (1990): Aspects of Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.),
Multimedia language teaching. (pp.3-20). Tokyo: Logos International.
Warschauer, M., &; Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Retrieved November 25, 2014, from http://hstrik.ruhosting.nl/wordpress/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/Warschauer-Healey-1998.pdf
Wendt, O. (2007). Meta-analysis of single-subject experimental designs. Retrieved April 19, 2015, from
http://www.measuringbehavior.org/files/2012/ProceedingsPDF(website)/Posters/Ugille_MB2012.pdf
Wu, T. W. (2008). Advance organizers and subtitles on college student’s listening performance. Retrieved January 17, 2015, from http://etd.npue.edu.tw/ETD-db/ETD-search-c/view_etd?URN=etd-0619108-191307
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Doing case study research. (4
thed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. Retrieved May 17, 2015, from
http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/53/3/168.full.pdf
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency?. Retrieved March 22, 2015, from http://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2012/810129/
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊