跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.57) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/02/07 09:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林紘申
研究生(外文):Lin,Hung-Shen
論文名稱:RFID之產業接受因素分析-以台灣3C零售業為例
論文名稱(外文):Factor analysis of industrial acceptance of RFID as logistics technology - An empirical case of 3C retailing industry in Taiwan
指導教授:蔡明志蔡明志引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tsai,Ming-Chih
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:行銷學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:行銷與流通學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:英文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:無線射頻辨識系統科技接受模式零售業分析層級程序法
外文關鍵詞:RFIDTAMRetailing industryAHP
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:296
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:6
無線射頻辨識系統(RFID)應用在物流追蹤技術中的發展,愈來愈受到企業的重視,因此這項技術的產業接受議題也愈來愈受到產業界及學術界的關心。本研究目的在於發展一適用於產業接受RFID之關鍵因素的分析模式,根據科技接受模式(TAM)的演進,建立了4個內顯變數及14個外顯變數。本研究的訪談對象以台灣3C零售業為主,在受訪的零售商中,根據垂直整合程度將12個受訪廠商分成產銷合一型零售商及單純零售的契約型零售商兩群。首先利用Spearman rank檢定,得知兩個集群並沒有顯著的差異,接著透過分析層級程序法(AHP)了解各個變數的相對權重為何。結果顯示預期滿意度(anticipated satisfactions)是台灣3C零售業接受RFID時最重視的因素,其權重為0.63。原因可能是此技術目前處於起步階段,國內業者對於RFID的了解有限,所以系統的穩定性、準確度等功能性方面的指標是業界在現階段所重視的項目,使得「預期滿意度」成為3C零售業接受RFID時最重視的衡量構面。其次是預期容易度(expected simplicity)的權重為0.22,可反應出業者使用RFID技術時,這項技術容不容易使用,會不會造成員工操作上的障礙,能不能和其它資訊系統做配合,亦是3C零售主管們所在意的衡量構面。最後是社會及企業接受度(social and business approval)的權重為0.15。可反應主管們對於新技術的引進,是以實際能為公司內部帶來幫助為主要考量因素,重視能改善公司作業流程速度、節省成本等功能,因此相對無法同時兼顧到外界的看法。

關鍵字:無線射頻辨識系統,科技接受模式,零售業,分析層級程序法
The development of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) as a logistic tracking system has received great attentions in business units. Industrial acceptance of the emerging technology becomes important for assessments. This study aims to develop a model to analyze the important factors of industrial acceptance of the RFID. Retailing industry of 3C products in Taiwan was taken as empirical study. Based on technology acceptance model developed, 4 main factors with 14 items associated were established as an analytical structure. 12 retailing systems categorized into two groups as contractual chain systems and manufacturer-owned systems were interviewed for empirical results. In the result calibrations, the Spearman rank test concluded that the intentions of the two retailing categories are statistically indifferent. Thereby, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) justifies the important factors of the industrial acceptance numerically. Anticipated satisfactions are most concerned by the retailing systems when considering the new technology (weight of 0.63). It is followed by expected simplicity (0.22), and social and business approval (0.15).

Keywords: RFID, TAM, Retailing industry, AHP
中文摘要 1
ABSTRACT 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
CHAPTER1 INTRODUCTION 6
1.1 Research motivation 6
1.2 Research purpose 6
1.3 Research methodology 6
1.4 Research flow 7
CHAPTER2 LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.1 ICT practiced by retailers 9
2.1.1 Retailing 9
2.2 Radio Frequency Identification 10
2.2.1 Applications of RFID in varied industries 11
2.3 Technology Acceptance Model 14
2.4 Analytic Hierarchy Process 21
CHAPTER3 SYSTEM ESTABLISHMENT 25
3.1 ICT used in retailing 25
3.2 Components of the RFID 27
3.3 Benefits of the RFID 32
3.4 Current problems of RFID system 36
3.5 Logistics impacts of RFID applications 37
CHAPTER4 ANALYTICAL MODEL AND INDUSTRIAL SURVEY 41
4.1 Factor Structure 41
4.2 3C retailing industry 44
4.3 Survey 47
CHAPTER5 RESULT ANALYSIS 49
5.1 Consistency test 49
5.2 Relative weights of the factors 49
CHAPTER6 CONCLUDING REMARK 53
6.1 Findings and recommendation 53
6.2 Study limitations 55
References 56
Appendix 63
References
1.“Logistics/ Supply Chain”, Texas Instruments, www.ti.com/tiris/docs/solutions/supply/logsup.shtml, 2002
2.“Retailer Tests RFID on Garments”, RFID Journal, www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/491/1/1, 2004.
3.“RFID in Retail Apparel”, Texas Instruments, www.ti.com, 2002.
4.“RFID Solutions”, SoftLogistics, www.softlogistics.com/Solutions/RFIDSolutions.html, 2004
5.“Supply Chain on the radio”, Work study (2002) Vol. 51 No. 6.
6.“The RFID Weblog – Implementation and Application of RFID technology”, www.rfid-weblog.com/archives/cat_retail.html, 2004.
7.“UNDERSTANDING RFID FOR LIBRARIES”, TAGSYS, www.tagsys.com, 2002
8.“US retailer Target requires RFID from 2005”, www.rfidbuzz,com/news/2004/us_retailer_target_requires_rfid_from_2005.html, 2004.
9.“Visibility, Efficiency and Logistics”, RFID Journal, www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/498, 2004
10.“Wal-Mart Expands RFID Mandate”, RFID Journal, www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/539/1/1, 2004
11.“Wal-Mart: US retailer Imposes RFID system on vendors”, www.ebusinessforum.com/index.asp?layout=rich_story&doc_id=6817, 2003.
12.“What is Radio Frequency Identification(RFID)?”, www.aimglobal.org/technologies/rfid/what_is_rfid.htm, 2003
13.Alan D. Smith, (2005) “Exploring radio frequency identification technology and its impact on business systems”, Information Management & Computer Security, Vol.13, No.1, pp.16-28.
14.Albert L. Lederer, Donna J. Maupin, Mark P. Sena, Youlong Zhuang, (2000) “The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web” , Decision Support System, 29, 269-282.
15.Andy McCue, “U.K. retailer tests radio ID tags”, http://news.com.com/2100-1039_3-5092460.html?tag=nefd_top, 2003
16.Ann Johansmeyer, Peter Barry and Kevin Starke, “Supply-Chain Technology: Track(ing) to the future”, BEAR, STEARNS & CO. INC, www.bearsteans.com, 2003.
17.Carol Sliwa. (2005) “Retailers Drag Feet On RFID Initiatives”, Computerworld; Jan 24, VOL.39 NO.4.
18.Cate T. Corcoran, (2005) “Wal-Mart’s mandate: The retailer’s RFID initiative generates mixes signals”, WWD. New York: Jan 12, 2005. Vol. 189, lss. 8; pg. 16B.
19.Chorng-Shyong Ong, Jung-Yu Lai, Yi Shun Wang, (2004) “Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies”, Information & Management, 41, 795-804.
20.Christian Kern, (2004) “Radio-frequency-identification for security and media circulation in libraries”, The Electronic Library, Vol.22, No.4, pp.317-324.
21.Cynthia K. Riemenschneider, David A. Harrison, Peter P. Mykytyn Jr., (2003) “Understanding it adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories”, Information & Management, 40, 269-285.
22.Edmund Prater, Gregory V. Frazier, Pedro M. Reyes, (2005) “Future impacts of RFID on e-supply chains in grocery retailing”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal; Vol.10, No.2, pg.134-142.
23.Fran Howarth, “RFID for inbound logistics”,
www.it-director.com/article.php?articleid=11208, 2003
24.Fred D. Davis, Viswanath Venkatesh, (1996) “A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiment” , Human-Computer Studies, 45, 19-45.
25.G. Peter Dapiran, Sandra Hogarth-Scott, (2003) “Are co-operation and trust being confused with power? An analysis of food retailing in Australia and the UK”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol.31, No.5, pp.256-267.
26.Gordon Lowry, (2002) “Modeling user acceptance of building management systems”, Automation in Construction, 11, 695-705.
27.Guus G.M. Pijpers, Theo M.A. Bemelmans, Fred J. Heemstra, Kees A.G.M. van Montfort, (2001) “Senior executives’ use of information technology” , Information and Software Technology, 43, 959-971.
28.Hassan M. Selim, (2003) “An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course website” , Coputers & Education, 40, 343-360.
29.Heather Landy, (2005) “German retailer Metro Group offers high-tech vision of shopping future”, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, Washington: Jan 19,2005. pg.1
30.Heiko Knospe, Hartmut Pobl, (2004) “RFID Security”, Information Security Technical Report, Vol.9, No.4.
31.Henry C. Lucas Jr. , Valetie Spitler, (2000) “Implementation in a world of workstations and networks” , Information & Management, 38, 119-128.
32.James Y. L. Thong, Weiyin Hong, Kar-Yan Tam (2002) “Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?”, Human-Computer Studies, 57,215-242.
33.Ji-Won Moon, Young-Gul Kim, (2001) “Extention the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context”, Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
34.John Shoemaker, “RFID Use Limited Only By Imagination”, www.inboundlogistics.com/articles/itmatters/itmatters0403.shtml, 2003
35.Jozee Lapierre, Arnaud Denier, (2005) “ICT adoption and moderating effects of institutional factors on salesperson’s communication effectiveness: a contingency study in high-tech industries”, Technovation 25; pg.909-97.
36.Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin, Hsipeng Lu(2000)”Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site”, International Journal of Information Management , 20 , 197-208.
37.K.L. Vorst, R.H. Clarke, C.P. Allison, A.M. Booren, (2004) “A research note on radio frequency transponder effects on bloom of beef muscle”, Meat Science, 67, 179-182.
38.Lee Ann, (2004) “RFID Knowledge Enabled LOGISTICS”, Overhaul & Maintenance, vol.10, lss.5; pg.24.
39.Li-Min Chuang, (2005) “An Empirical Study of the Construction of Measuring Model for Organizational Innovation in Taiwanese High-tech Enterprises”, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge; Mar 2005; 6, 1; pg.299.
40.Mans B. Jansen, Wim Eradus, (1999) “Future developments on devices for animal radiofrequency identification”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 24, 109-117.
41.Mark Davies, (2001) “Adaptive AHP: a review of marketing applications with extensions”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.35, No.7/8, pp.872-893.
42.Mark T. Dishaw, Diane M. Strong, (1999) “Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs”, Information & Management, 36, 9-21.
43.Mary Margaret Weber, S. Prasad Kantamneni, (2002) “POS and EDI in retailing: an examination of underlying benefits and barriers”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal; Vol.7, No.5, pg.311-317.
44.Masood A. Badri, Mohammed H. Abdulla, (2004) “Awards of excellence in institutions of higher education: an AHP approach”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol.18, No.4, pp.224-242.
45.Matti Tuominen, (2004) “Channel collaboration and firm value proposition”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol.32, No.4, pp.178-189.
46.Mike Samuels, Russell Houchin, Eddy de Jong, “Overview of Radio Frequency Identification”, Exel, www.exel.com, 2003.
47.Mikko Karkkainen, (2003) “Increasing efficiency in the supply chain for short shelf life goods using RFID tagging”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Volume 31, Number 10, pp. 529-536.
48.Patrick Y.K. Chau, Paul Jen-Hwa Hu, (2002) “Investigating healthcare professionals’ decision to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories” , Information & Management, 39, 297-311.
49.Paul Jen-Hwa Hu, Theodore H.K. Clark, Will W. Ma, (2003) “Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study”, Information & Management, 41, 227-241.
50.Paul Legris, John Ingham, Pierre Collerette (2003) “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, 40,191-204.
51.Peter Jones, Colin Clarke-Hill, David Hillier, Peter Shears, Daphne Comfort, (2004) “Radio Frequency Identification in Retailing and Privacy and Public Policy Issues”, Management Research News; Vol.27, No.8/9.
52.Peter Jones, Colin Clarke-Hill, Peter Shears, Daphne Comfort and David Hillier, (2004) “Radio frequency identification in the UK: opportunities and challenges”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Volume32, Number3, 164-171.
53.Prasanta Kumar Dey, (2004) “Analytic hierarchy process helps evaluate project in Indian oil pipelines industry”, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol.24, No.6, pp.588-604
54.Ravi S. Achrol, Michael J.Etzel, (2003) “The Structure of Reseller Goals and Performance in Marketing Channels” Academy of Marketing Science. Journal; Vol.31, No.2, pg.146-163.
55.Robert A. Peterson, Sridhar Balasubramanian, (2002) “Retailing in the 21st century: reflections and prologue to research”, Journal of Retailing 78, pp.9-16.
56.Shirley Taylor, Peter Todd, (1995) “Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137-155.
57.Stephen Tierney, (2004) “Towards a new supply chain future”, Supply Chain Europe, Oct 2004, 13, 8, pg.56.
58.Thomas L. Saaty, (1986) “Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process”, Management Science; Jul 1986; 32, 7; pg. 741.
59.Tom Ryan, “RFID in the Consumer Industries: Being a Winner, Not a Follower”, Aberdeen Group, www.aberdeen.com/ab_company/hottopics/rfid/, 2004
60.Tony Ahn, Seewon Ryu, Ingoo Han, (2004) “The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 3, 405-420.
61.Yoram Wind, Thomas L. Saaty, (1980) “Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process”, Management Science; Jul 1980; 26, 7; pg. 641.
62.Yuan-Jye Tseng, Yu-Hua Lin, (2005) “A Model for Supplier Selection and Task Assignment”, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge; Mar 2005; 6, 2; pg. 197.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 二、王郡(2000)《海巡簡介與展望》,中國造船暨輪機工程師學會會刊
2. 一、丁維新(1993)《海洋政策與海上執法機構》,警學叢刊
3. 十四、鍾堅(1999)《增進全民經濟國防之探討》,理論與政策
4. 四、胡念祖、陳泰安(1993)《由海洋政策學論我國海域執法體制之建立》,警學叢刊
5. 三、王秉宏(2002)《國家海洋政策之定位與未來趨向》,海軍學術月刊
6. 四、尹章華、劉炳宏,《海域管理與海域執法之探討》,中華民國海運月刊
7. 五、田定忠,《兩岸直航與國防安全》,國防雜誌
8. 六、李哲威(2003)《兩岸「小三通」下之金門經貿往來》,今日海關
9. 七、宋秉忠(2003)《金門小三是禍不是福?》,天下雜誌
10. 八、吳佳玫(2003)《金馬小三通開放兩年成效總檢-不合法的「岸邊交易」越來越嚴重》,商業時代
11. 九、林政忠(2003)《體驗小三通兩週年-小三通有小財無大前途》,遠見雜誌
12. 十、林修全(2003)《體驗金馬小三通》,新新聞
13. 十三、楊志誠(2001)《新世紀全球化趨勢下我國國家安全的戰略規劃》,《逢甲人文社會學報》
14. 十五、楊志誠(2003)《兩岸情勢下我國內部國家安全之探討》,《逢甲人文社會學報》
15. 十六、楊志誠(1998)《開啟兩岸新關係:對「辜汪會談」的期望》,《海峽評論》