臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

合作學習是近些年來受到重視的教學策略，影響合作成效的因素相當多，本篇論文針對任務指派與思考風格二個主軸探討合作學習策略。
為探討不同思考風格小組在任務指派與不指派下的學習成效，將實驗過程分為二個階段，利用線上問卷調查，取得學生本身的思考風格，分為同質組、異質組、中低風格組，利用學習單、評分表、問卷，取得學生在群組活動的資料；將任務切割為獨立的子任務，每一成員負責任務的一部分，如此，我們可以觀察老師指派任務（實驗組），與老師不指派任務，由學生自行協調任務（對照組）在不同思考風格群組下的學習成效。
本研究成果統整如下：
一、任務不指派的中低風格組集體效能後測大於前測。
二、任務指派的同質組合作滿意度觀感優於任務不指派。
三、任務不指派的異質組合作滿意度優於任務指派。
四、任務不指派的各組小組成績優於任務指派。
透過量的分析與質的研究，我們統整出高中生最佳的分組模式為任務不指派的異質組提供教師於於教學活動中合作分組的參考。

Team–based cooperative learning has become an important learning method in the past few decades. Many factors of learning effect have been discussed. In this study, we aim at the assignment and the thinking styles of team members in the cooperative learning.
To thoroughly investigate the assignment effects on different thinking-style groups, this study divided the experiment into two stages. Using network questionnaire, we collect student’ thinking styles. Dividing into homogeneous group, heterogeneous group, and middle-low style group. Using the learning sheet, the evaluation sheet, and the questionnaires, we obtain information on students’ group activities. According to the thesis of cooperation, we divided the task into several tasks. Each member of the group has his own tasks. We could observe the assignment and the non-assignment of the group learning achievement in different thinking-style group.
In this study, the conclusions are as follows:
1. The post-test group efficacy of the non-assignment in the middle-low style group is better than pretest.
2. The group satisfaction perspective of the assignment in the homogeneous group is better than the non-assignment.
3. The group satisfaction of the non-assignment in the heterogeneous group is better than the assignment.
4. The achievement in each group in the non-assignment is better than
assignment.
Through quantitative study and qualitative research, we induced and obtained the optimal grouping model for senior high school students is the hetero-grouped team of the non-assignment. It can provide teachers’ future reference in designing a teaching activity.

1. 司徒達賢，「運用專案任務培養未來領導團隊」，天下雜誌，三O六期，70-74頁，民國93年9月。
2. 吳明雄，「從創造力的心理機制談創造力的啟發」，創意發展電子期刊，民國89年，http://www.ccda.org.tw/html/electric_magazine/science/science5.htm
3. 羅勃.史坦伯格（Sternberg, R. J.）著，活用智慧，洪蘭(譯)，台北，遠流，民國88年。
4. 羅勃.史坦伯格（Sternberg, R. J.）著，活用你的思考風格，薛絢(譯)，台北，天下遠見，民國88年。
5. Slavin, R. E. Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning (3rd ed.), Washington DC, National Education Association, 1991.
6. Roschelle J. & Teasley S. "The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving", In O'Malley C.E. (Ed), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
7. Dillenbourg P., Baker M., Blaye A. & O’Mallay C. "The Evolution of Research on Collaborative Learning", In P. Reimann & H. Spada (Eds), Learning in humans and machines. Towards an interdisciplinary learning science, 189- 211, London: Pergamon, 1995.
8. Johnson, R. T. & Johnson, D. W. "Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom", Science and Children, 24, pp.31-32, 1987.
9. Hooper, S. & Hannifin, M. J. “Cooperative CBI: the effects of heterogeneous versus homogeneous grouping on the learning of progressively complex concepts”, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, pp.413-424, 1988.
10. Elizabeth G. Cohen. Reatructuring the classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups, 1994.
11. Steiner. "Cooperation in the classroom", American Psychological Association Handbook 2004, 1972.
12. Bandura, A. "Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency", Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2, pp.128-163, 1990.
13. Sliver, W. S. and Bufanio, K. M. “The Impact of Group Efficacy and Group Goals on Group Task Performance”, Small Group Research, 27(3), pp.347-359, 1996.
14. Prussia, G. E. and Kinicki, A. J. “A Motivational Investigation of Group Effectiveness Using Social-Cognitive Theory”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), pp.187-198, 1996.
15. Shea, G. P. and Guzzo, R. A. “Group Effectiveness: What Really Matters? ”, Sloan Management Review, 28, pp.25-31, 1987.
16. Spink, K. S. “Group Cohesion and Collective Efficacy of Volleyball Teams”, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, pp.301-311, 1990.
17. Little, B. L. and Madigan, R. M. “The Relationship between Collective Efficacy and Performance”, In Manufacturing Work Teams, Small Group Research, 28(4), pp.517-534, 1997.
18. Gibson, C. B. “Do They Do What They Believe They Can? Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness Across Task and Cultures”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), pp.138-152, 1999.
19. Mulvey, P. W. and Ribbens, B. A. “The Effects of Intergroup Competition and Assigned Group Goals on Group Efficacy and Group Effectiveness”, Small Group Research, 30(6), pp.651-677, 1999.
20. 黃晴逸，「國小兒童思考風格量表之編製及其與創造力之相關研究」， 國立新竹師範學院，國民教育研究所碩士論文，民國92年。
21. 王佩琪，「國中生以思考風格組隊進行電腦簡報合作學習：學習、情意與互動之成效分析」， 國立交通大學，理學院網路學習碩士班論文，民國93年。
22. 林珊如，思考風格問卷及指導手冊，未出版，民國88年。
23. 王岱伊，「小組合作學習策略之研究」，國立交通大學，資訊科學研究所碩士論文，民國91年。