跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.59) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/13 16:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李振維
研究生(外文):Chen-Wei Li
論文名稱:肌肉疲勞後對內翻扭傷踝關節本體感覺之影響
論文名稱(外文):Effects of Muscle Fatigue on The Proprioception of Ankle Joint After Inversion Injury
指導教授:周適偉周適偉引用關係蔡櫻蘭蔡櫻蘭引用關係林燕慧林燕慧引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shih-Wei ChouYian-Lan TsaiYang-Hua Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立體育學院
系所名稱:運動傷害防護研究所
學門:民生學門
學類:運動科技學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:68
中文關鍵詞:內翻扭傷肌肉疲勞空間位置感踝關節本體感覺
外文關鍵詞:ankle jointproprioceptionposition sensemuscle fatigueinversion sprain
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:638
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:102
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
背景及目的:本研究目的在於針對有扭傷經驗之踝關節,於肌肉活動產生疲勞現象時對其踝關節之本體感覺的影響。方法:本研究徵召30位平均年齡為22.8±1.05歲的男女受測者,並以踝關節受傷經驗的有無,及踝關節本體感覺缺損的有無作為分組,共計有60隻踝關節進行測試。所有受測者踝關節受測時必須沒有任何的疼痛現象,且經由前拉測試(anterior drawer test)、距骨傾斜測試正常(talar tilt test negative)及平衡感測試(Romberg test)確認不具結構性和神經性的病變的問題。研究設備以等速肌力測試儀(Biodexsystem3 Isokinetic System)進行本體感覺測試,以及肌肉疲勞測試。實驗的進行為:所有受測者均接受兩階段本體感覺的測試,一為肌肉疲勞產生前,以及肌肉疲勞發生後。本體感覺測試以被動重複關節角度測試(RPP)進行,目標角度為內翻10度、內翻20度以及外翻10度,隨機安排測試角度之次序。每個目標角度重複三次測試。肌肉疲勞的產生將以每秒90度的角速度下進行等速踝關節內翻和外翻的交替動作,當收縮的力矩值連續三次低於50%的最大力矩值時,便定義為肌肉疲勞。統計方法:數據分析將以統計軟體SPSS進行,其中針對踝關節受傷經驗分組進行比較外,並根據文獻訂定內翻10度的誤差值3.1度訂為分組之臨界值,比較本體感覺缺損有無的分組,在肌肉疲勞狀況下的改變。結果:以受傷經驗分組進行獨立樣本檢定時,發現前後測中,只有前測的內翻10度有明顯差異,且受傷組優於健康組,當以相關樣本檢定來分析組內的前後測數據,健康組在前後測的比較中,所有的角度均沒有明顯差異,而受傷經驗組則是在小角度上均有明顯差異,而以本體感覺缺損分組進行獨立樣本檢定時,在前後測比較中,也僅有前測的外翻10度有明顯差異,當以相關樣本檢定來分析組內前後測,正常組在前後測的比較中,小角度均有明顯差異,而缺損組在外翻10度有差異。結論:在有受傷經驗的受測者身上,可以很明顯的看到肌肉疲勞產生的影響,所以將來的治療方式裡,不該只強調本體感覺的訓練,更應該強調肌肉的耐力訓練。
Background and purpose: Ankle sprain is the top one in the sports injuries occurring in sports participations. Deficits in joint proprioception are major problems for clinical rehabilitation. There is little evidence to investigate the influence of muscle fatigue on the joint proprioception after injuries. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of muscle fatigue on the proprioception of ankle joint after inversion injury. METHOD:Thirty subjects (mean age: 22.8 ± 1.05 years) recruited into this study, totally sixty ankle for the experiment. There are two kinds of the grouping method; one is according to the injury history, another is according to the proprioception deficit. All ankles are pain free and need to pass the few examinations include anterior drawer test, talar tilt test and Romberg’s test to rule out deficits in anatomical structures and neuralgic disorders. The Biodexsystem3 Isokinetic System will be used for the proprioception test demonstrated by passive repositioning error of ankle inversion and eversion. The proprioceptive test will be done before and after muscle fatigue of ankle muscles. There are three target angles (Inversion 10, inversion 20°, and eversion 10°) randomized assigned for the test sequences, and each target taken 3 trials. Muscle fatigue is defined as the maximal torque of ankle muscles declines below 50% peak torque by successive 3 repetitions during isokinetic contraction with 90°/second. ANALYSIS: Data analysis will be processed by SPSS 11.0 to compare the difference in repositioning errors of those subjects with the experience of ankle sprain or not and in that of subjects with proprioceptive deficit grouped by 3.1° the threshold limit value of 10° of ankle inversion under the condition of muscle fatigue. And compare different groups after muscle fatigue. RESULT: The data reveal the only significant difference exist at the 10° of ankle eversion in pre-fatigue test between the healthy and injury history groups. There were no significant differences in the healthy group after muscle fatigue. In injury history group, there were significant differences in the small angle after muscle fatigue. There was only significant difference exist at the 10° of ankle inversion in the pre-fatigue test between the normal and deficit groups. In normal groups, there were significant differences in the small angles. But there was significant difference at the 10° of ankle eversion in the deficit group. CONCLUSION: There were significant effects from muscle fatigue to the subjects, especially in the injury history group. The therapy design should not only emphasis proprioception. The muscle endurance training should be put more considerable.
第一章 緒論

第一節 前言-------------------------------------------------- 1
第二節 研究動機--------------------------------------------- 1
第三節 研究目的--------------------------------------------- 2
第四節 研究假設-------------------------------------------- 2

第二章 文獻探討

第一節 解剖構造--------------------------------------------- 3
第二節 受傷機制--------------------------------------------- 5
第三節 本體感覺--------------------------------------------- 5
第四節 受傷病史對本體感覺的影響----------------------- 12
第五節 肌肉疲勞與本體感覺------------------------------- 15

第三章 實驗方法

第一節 實驗設計--------------------------------------------- 18
第二節 受測者條件------------------------------------------ 18
第三節 儀器設備--------------------------------------------- 19
第四節 主要測量結果---------------------------------------- 22
第五節 實驗流程--------------------------------------------- 22
第六節 統計分析--------------------------------------------- 25

第四章 結果

第一節 偏態與峰度------------------------------------------ 26
第二節 全部受測者的實驗結果----------------------------- 26
第三節 以受傷經驗分組的實驗結果--------------------------- 26
第四節 以本體感覺缺損分組的實驗結果--------------------- 27

第五章 討論

第一節 傷害經驗與本體感覺------------------------------- 34
第二節 肌肉疲勞與本體感覺------------------------------- 38

第六章 結論

第一節 實驗限制--------------------------------------------- 45
第二節 臨床貢獻--------------------------------------------- 46

參考文獻------------------------------------------------------- 52

附錄
一 受試者同意書---------------------------------------- 57

表 目 錄

表 1 肌肉與關節中之本體感覺受器------------------------- 8
表 2 中樞神經的三個層級----------------------------------- 12
表 3 偏態與峰度的分析-------------------------------------- 28
表 4 全部受測者前後測的比較------------------------------ 29
表 5 依受傷經驗分組之比較--------------------------------- 30
表 6 健康組與受傷組在肌肉疲勞產生前、後本體感覺的
差異----------------------------------------------------- 31
表 7 依本體感覺缺損分組之比較---------------------------- 32
表 8 正常組與缺損組在肌肉疲勞產生前、後本體感覺的
差異----------------------------------------------------- 33
表 9 依受傷經驗分組的全比較------------------------------ 47
表 10 依本體感覺缺損的全比較------------------------------ 48

圖 目 錄

圖 1 Biodex Isokinetic System3 等速測力器--------------- 49
圖 2 本體感覺測試狀態正面-------------------------------- 50
圖 3 本體感覺測試狀態側面-------------------------------- 51
1.Brand, R.L., H.M. Black, and J.S. Cox, The natural history of inadequately treated ankle sprain. Am J Sports Med, 1977. 5(6): p. 248-9.
2.Garrick, J.G., The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med, 1977. 5(6): p. 241-2.
3.Gross, M.T., Effects of recurrent lateral ankle sprains on active and passive judgements of joint position. Phys Ther, 1987. 67(10): p. 1505-9.
4.Kannus, P. and P. Renstrom, Treatment for acute tears of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. Operation, cast, or early controlled mobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1991. 73(2): p. 305-12.
5.Ekstrand, J. and H. Tropp, The incidence of ankle sprains in soccer. Foot Ankle, 1990. 11(1): p. 41-4.
6.Eils, E. and D. Rosenbaum, A multi-station proprioceptive exercise program in patients with ankle instability. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2001. 33(12): p. 1991-8.
7.Taimela, S., M. Kankaanpaa, and S. Luoto, The effect of lumbar fatigue on the ability to sense a change in lumbar position. A controlled study. Spine, 1999. 24(13): p. 1322-7.
8.Voight, M.L., et al., The effects of muscle fatigue on and the relationship of arm dominance to shoulder proprioception. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1996. 23(6): p. 348-52.
9.Yaggie, J.A. and S.J. McGregor, Effects of isokinetic ankle fatigue on the maintenance of balance and postural limits. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2002. 83(2): p. 224-8.
10.Carpenter, J.E., R.B. Blasier, and G.G. Pellizzon, The effects of muscle fatigue on shoulder joint position sense. Am J Sports Med, 1998. 26(2): p. 262-5.
11.Aydin, T., et al., Proprioception of the ankle: a comparison between female teenaged gymnasts and controls. Foot Ankle Int, 2002. 23(2): p. 123-9.
12.Borsa, P.A., et al., The effects of joint position and direction of joint motion on proprioceptive sensibility in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient athletes. Am J Sports Med, 1997. 25(3): p. 336-40.
13.Lonn, J., et al., Position sense testing: influence of starting position and type of displacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2000. 81(5): p. 592-7.
14.Lentell, G., et al., The contributions of proprioceptive deficits, muscle function, and anatomic laxity to functional instability of the ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1995. 21(4): p. 206-15.
15.Karlsson, J., B.I. Eriksson, and P.A. Renstrom, Subtalar ankle instability. A review. Sports Med, 1997. 24(5): p. 337-46.
16.Konradsen, L., M. Voigt, and C. Hojsgaard, Ankle inversion injuries. The role of the dynamic defense mechanism. Am J Sports Med, 1997. 25(1): p. 54-8.
17.Stormont, D.M., et al., Stability of the loaded ankle. Relation between articular restraint and primary and secondary static restraints. Am J Sports Med, 1985. 13(5): p. 295-300.
18.Brunt, D., et al., Postural responses to lateral perturbation in healthy subjects and ankle sprain patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1992. 24(2): p. 171-6.
19.Glencross, D. and E. Thornton, Position sense following joint injury. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 1981. 21(1): p. 23-7.
20.Garn, S.N. and R.A. Newton, Kinesthetic awareness in subjects with multiple ankle sprains. Phys Ther, 1988. 68(11): p. 1667-71.
21.Konradsen, L., S. Olesen, and H.M. Hansen, Ankle sensorimotor control and eversion strength after acute ankle inversion injuries. Am J Sports Med, 1998. 26(1): p. 72-7.
22.Sharpe, M.H. and T.S. Miles, Position sense at the elbow after fatiguing contractions. Exp Brain Res, 1993. 94(1): p. 179-82.
23.Forestier, N., N. Teasdale, and V. Nougier, Alteration of the position sense at the ankle induced by muscular fatigue in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2002. 34(1): p. 117-22.
24.Bernier, J.N. and D.H. Perrin, Effect of coordination training on proprioception of the functionally unstable ankle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1998. 27(4): p. 264-75.
25.Ashton-Miller, J.A., et al., Can proprioception really be improved by exercises? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2001. 9(3): p. 128-36.
26.Hertel, J., Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain. Sports Med, 2000. 29(5): p. 361-71.
27.Gill, K.P. and M.J. Callaghan, The measurement of lumbar proprioception in individuals with and without low back pain. Spine, 1998. 23(3): p. 371-7.
28.Stillman, B.C., J.M. McMeeken, and R.A. Macdonell, Aftereffects of resisted muscle contractions on the accuracy of joint position sense in elite male athletes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1998. 79(10): p. 1250-4.
29.Bouet, V. and Y. Gahery, Muscular exercise improves knee position sense in humans. Neurosci Lett, 2000. 289(2): p. 143-6.
30. Sherrington CS: The integrative action of the nervous system. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1906.
31. Lephart SM, and Fu FH: Proprioception and neuromuscular control in joint stability. Human Kinetics, 2000.
32. O’Sullivan SB, and Schmitz TJ: Physical Rehabiltation: Assessment and Treatment 3rd. F.A Company. USA, pp. 83-95, 1995.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 帥化民(2001),〈公元2010年台海威脅與犯台作戰想定〉,《國家政策論壇》,http://www.npf.org.tw/monthly/00106/theme-128.htm,2004/11/1。
2. 鍾景生(2001),〈校園危機事件處理專家系統開發研究〉,《和春學報》,第8期,頁171~177。
3. 鄭美華(2000),〈危機管理制度之建立以校園危機事件為例〉,《人力發展月刊》,第83期,頁42~50。
4. 蔡德輝、鄭瑞隆(2000),〈校園暴力與危機處理〉,《高中教育雙月刊》,第15期,頁10~13。
5. 楊永明(2002),〈九一一事件影響下日本之安全政策與亞太安全環境的變化〉,《國際事務季刊》,第2期,頁58~81。
6. 張德銳(1997),〈校園衝突事件處理與策略〉,《教育資料與研究》,第12期,頁53-57。
7. 張錫模(2003),〈論武裝伊斯蘭主義〉,《新世紀宗教研究》,第2卷第1期,頁102~107。
8. 翁明賢(2003),〈國際恐怖主義與反恐行動的發展趨勢〉,《展望與探索月刊》,第1卷第6期,頁1~2。
9. 郭孚宏(2000),〈校園危機的防制與處理〉,《高中教育雙月刊》,第15期,頁14~17。
10. 孫本初(1997),〈校園危機管理策略〉,《教育資料與研究》,第14期,頁11~20。
11. 紀俊臣(1996),〈校園危機處理之法律問題探討〉,《教育資料與研究》,第14期,頁3-10。
12. 邱志淳(2002),〈危機管理與應變機制〉,《研習論壇》,19期,頁35~40。
13. 林吉郎(1997),〈後冷戰時期「危機管理」應用之研析〉,《國防雜誌》,第12卷10期,頁20~27。
14. 丘昌泰 (1994),〈危機狀態下的災變管理體系:美國經驗及其對我國的挑戰〉,《研考雙月刊》,第18卷4期,頁4~12。
15. 王叢桂(1998),〈師生間的衝突事件與處理〉,《學生輔導雙月刊》,第57期,頁42-51。