跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/01 19:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉秀美
研究生(外文):Hsiu-Mei Liu
論文名稱:現金增資宣告效果與公司治理關聯性之研究
論文名稱(外文):Seasoned Equity Offering Announcement Effect and Corporate Goverance
指導教授:李春安李春安引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chun-An Li
口試委員:楊踐為詹家昌
口試委員(外文):Jian-Wei YangChai-Chung Chan
口試日期:2015-07-10
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:財務金融系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2015
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:67
中文關鍵詞:現金增資(SEOs)公司治理宣告效果累積平均異常報酬
外文關鍵詞:Seasoned Equity Offerings (SEOs)corporate governanceannouncement effectsCAR
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:349
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:20
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
摘要
本研究係以2006-2013年臺灣上市公司的現金增資公告事件為樣本,以事件研究為分析方法,探討現金增資宣告後對股價之影響,並分析公司治理因素董監席次、董監持股比例、大股東持股比例、經理人持股比例、最終控制者個人董監席次比例、獨立董監席次比例及董事長兼任總經理與現金增資宣告效果之關聯,主要研究結果如下:董事會決議日現金增資宣告後,平均異常報酬有顯著且為負向。現金增資用途為長期股權投資,平均異常報酬有顯著正反應。增資用途為償還款充實營運資金,在宣告日前,平均異常報酬有顯著且為正,在宣告日後平均異常報酬有顯著且為負相關。增資用途為購置機器與廠房,在宣告日前、宣告日後平均異常報酬有顯著且為負相關。增資用途為其他綜合型,在宣告日前、宣告日後平均異常報酬有顯著且為正相關。關於公司治理變數,本研究選取董監席次、董監持股比例、大股東持股比例、經理人持股比例、最終控制者個人董事席次比例、獨立董監席次比例及董事長是否兼任總經理等7項為自變數,以公司治理變數對於現金增資用途累積平均異常報酬(CAR)做應變數複迴歸,研究結果顯示宣告日前,皆有顯著且為負反應,宣告日後皆有顯著且為正反應,驗證公司治理因素與現金增資用途有密切關係。








ABSTRACT
This study took announced events for seasoned equity offerings from Taiwan listed companies during 2006-2013 as samples, adopting event studies as research method to explore the influence of seasoned equity offerings on stock price after announcement and analyze the factor of corporate governance for the association of the number of directors/supervisors, shareholding percentage of directors/supervisors, shareholding percentage of the majority stockholder, shareholding percentage of managers, the number of individual directors/supervisors for the final controller, percentage of the number of independent directors/supervisors and chairperson of the Board holding the post of part-time general manager to the announcement effects of seasoned equity offerings.The main research results are as follows: If seasoned equity offerings are announced at the date of board of director’s resolution, average abnormal return is significant and negative reaction after announcement. If the purpose of seasoned equity offerings is for long-term share ownership investment, average abnormal return is significant and positive reaction. If seasoned equity offerings are used to fortify working capital with reimbursement amount, average abnormal return is significant and positive reaction before the date of announcement, significant and negative after the date of announcement. If seasoned equity offerings are used to purchase machine and factory, average abnormal return is significant and negative correlation before and after the date of announcement. If the purpose of seasoned equity offerings is other mixed type, average abnormal return is significant and positive correlation before and after the date of announcement.Regarding variables for corporate governance, this study selected the number of directors/supervisors, shareholding percentage of directors/supervisors, shareholding percentage of the majority stockholder, shareholding percentage of managers, the number of individual directors/supervisors for the final controller, percentage of the number of independent directors/supervisors, and chairperson of the Board holding the post of part-time general manager as 7 independent variables, adopting dependent variable multiple regression analysis for corporate governance variable towards cumulative average abnormal return (CAR) for the purpose of seasoned equity offerings, and showing that research result is significant and negative reaction before the date of announcement, significant and positive reaction after the date of announcement. Close relationship is verified between corporate governance and the purpose of seasoned equity offerings.
摘 要i
ABSTRACTii
誌 謝iv
目 錄v
表目錄vii
圖目錄ix
第一章緒論1
第一節研究背景與動機1
第二節研究目的2
第三節研究架構3
第二章文獻回顧5
第一節現金增資宣告對股價影響相關假說5
第二節國內外現金增資宣告效果文獻6
第三節公司治理相關文獻11
第三章研究方法13
第一節資料來源及期間13
第二節樣本蒐集13
第三節研究方法14
第四節敘述性統計19
第五節相關性分析20
第四章實證結果與分析23
第一節樣本特性23
第二節現金增資宣告效果分析25
第三節公司治理因素與現金增資宣告效果分析38
第五章結論與建議60
第一節研究結論60
第二節未來研究與建議62
參考文獻63


參考文獻
中文文獻
1.丁靜儀,2013,「公司特性對現金增資宣告效果的影響」,朝陽科技大學會計所碩士論文。
2.李馨蘋、莊宗憲(2007),「公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究」。東吳經濟商學學報。第57期,頁1-27。
3.沈志達,2009,「宣告日與送件日間距對現金增資宣告效果的影響」,國立臺北大學國際財務金融所碩士論文。
4.林佳鴻,2000,「強制性財務預測準確度分析及其董事會組織結構之關聯性研究」,東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
5.洪榮華、陳香如、王玉珍(2005),「公司內部治理機制與公司績效之關係-股權結構與董事會特性的觀點」。輔仁大學評論。第2卷,第3期,頁23-40。
6.范積藝,1995,「現金增資目的與宣告效果關聯性之實證研究」,國立台灣工業技術學院管理企業研究所企業管理碩士論文。
7.高貴美,2003,「現金增資宣告效果因素探討」,國立中山大學財務管理學所碩士論文。
8.陳婷雅,2014,「現金增資宣告效果對股價影響探討」。僑光科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
9.陳安琳、黎萬琳、陳振遠,2001,「成長潛力、內部人交易與現金增資之宣告效果」,中國財務學刊,第9卷第1期,頁1-25。
10.郭峰邑,2001,「不同產業與市場趨勢下現金增資宣告對股價的影響」,國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
11.曾建文,2008,「我國上市公司現金增資對股價的影響」,國立勤益科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
12.葉虹妤,2007,公司治理與資本結構之因果關係及其對價值之影響,國防管理學院碩士論文。
13.鄭莉貽,2008,「現金增資宣告效果對集團成員股價影響之探討」,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
14.薛明賢,2006,「探討企業生命週期對現金增資宣告之影響」,國立成功大學會計學系碩士論文。
15.謝書正,1998,「上市公司現金增資與股價關係之實證研究」,國立中興大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
16.顏燕萍,2001,「台灣上市公司現金增資宣告財富效果之再檢驗」,義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
17.蕭天厚,2000,「企業財務危機因素認知之研究-從公司監理角度之探討」,國立臺灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
18.蕭喆昊,2008,「台灣地區公司治理型態探討」,國中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
英文文獻
1. Agrawal,A.and Chadha,S.(2005),“Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals,”Journal of Law and Economics,48(3),371-406.
2. Agrawal,A.and Mandelker,G.N.(1990),“Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers:The Case of Antitakeover Charter
Amendments”,journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,25(2),143-161.
3. Asquith P.and W.Mullins(1986),“Equity Issues and Offering Dilution”,Journal of Financial Economics,15(1),61-90.
4. Brown,S.,and Warner,J.1985.Measuring security price performance.Journal of Financial Economics 14,3-31.
5. Choe,H.,R. W.Masulis and V. Nanda(1993),“Common Stock Offerings across the Business Cycle,”Journal of Empirical Finance
1,3-31.
6. Claessens,S.,S.Djankov,J.Fan,and H.P.Lang,2002,“Disentangling the Incetive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings
”Journal of Finance.
7. Cooney,J.W.and A.Kalay,1993, “Positive information from equity issue announcements,”Journal of Financial Economics 33
,139-172.
8. DeAngel,H.and R.W.Masulis,1980, “Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation,” Journal of Financial
Economics 8,2-29.
9. D,Mello,R.,O.Tawatnuntachai, and D.Yaman.,2003,“Does The Sequence of Seasoned Equity Offering Matter?“Financial Management
32,59-86.
10.Fama,E.F.,1970,“ Efficient Capital Markets:A Review of Theory and Empircal Work.”Journal of Finance 25,383-417.
11.Galai,D.and R.Masulis,1976, “The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock,“Journal of Financial Economics 3,53-
81.
12.Jensen,M.,1986,“Agency costs of free cash flow,Corporate finance,And takeovers,”Americans Economic Review 63,323-329.
13.Jensen, M.C. and Mecklng, W.H. (1976), “Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior,Agency Cost and Ownership Structure,”
Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360.
14.Jensen, M.C.(1993), “The Modern Industrial Revolution,Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems,”The Journal of
Finance,48(3),831-880.
15.Kiel, G.C. and Nicholson, G.J.(2003), “Board Composition and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs
East Asia,”Respindind to the Global Financial Crisis-World Bank mimeo.
26.Scholes,M.S.,1972, “The market for securities : substitution versus price pressure and the effect of the information on
share price,”Journal of Business 45,179-211.
27.Smith, C., and R. Watts.,1992,“The investment opportunity set and Corporate financing, dividend, and compensation Policies
.”Journal of Financial Economics 32,263-292.
28.Yeh,Y.H.,T.S.Lee and T.Woidtke,2001 “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan,” International Review
of Finance 2,21-48.








QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top