臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

Facebook做為近年來熱門的社群媒體，成為大量資訊流通與互動的場域，但事實上許多Facebook中所流傳的訊息往往是錯誤資訊或不實謠言，因此了解使用者如何基於自身媒介素養而對Facebook資訊進行判斷，進而影響與訊息的互動及再傳播行為，為本研究的研究方向。為深入了解Facebook中的此種現象，在整理過說服、資訊傳佈研究後，發現閱聽人在進行資訊處理的過程中會經歷近用、分析、評估、內容產製此四個程序，並且此四個程序與媒介素養概念所提出的的四面向一致。因此本研究以此四面向做為研究架構，以了解使用者在近用不同論點品質及來自不同社會連結的貼文時，是否會產生不同程度的情感、認知分析及資訊效能與資訊可信度評估，以及最後是否會基於這些分析與評估模式的不同而導致不同程度資訊再製意圖與行為。
本研究主要以大學生為樣本，採用實驗法，以2(強論點品質強/弱論點品質)×2(強連結/弱連結)組間設計，讓受試者分別觀看不同自變項操作設計的虛擬Facebook頁面，紀錄其Facebook互動行為後進行問卷填答。最終收得有效樣本128人。
研究結果發現僅有貼文者社會連結差異會影響使用者訊息處理與互動行為，論點品質則不會。此外，社會連結能夠同時引發情感與認知分析，進而對於訊息可信度與資訊效能評估造成影響，最終造成不同的訊息再製行為而影響資訊流通。研究結果顯示出Facebook的社交性對於資訊傳佈影響的重要性，並且雖然論點品質對於傳播行為或訊息處理並不會造成影響，但訊息內容本身對於閱聽人的影響在整體Facebook資訊傳佈的訊息處理路徑中卻扮演著著重要的中介作用。

Facebook, one of the most popular social media in recent years, has become the important field for information diffusion and interaction. There are often some incorrect information or rumors diffusing in Facebook. Therefore, the purposes of the research are to understand how user judge Facebook information based on their media literacy, and how these judgments affect their interaction with Facebook information and the subsequent sharing behavior. To further investigate this phenomenon, this study employed the concept from the media literacy, including Access, Analysis, Evaluation and Content Creation, to be the research framework. The focus is to understand whether different levels of argument quality in posts and different strength of social ties affect users’ information analysis; how argument quality and social ties influence users to take the affective or cognitive route to analyze information, which in turn changes their evaluations of information utility and believability; and finally, whether these different analyses and evaluation levels affect the intention of content recreation and behavior.
One hundred and twenty-eight students participated in a 2 (argument quality: strong vs. weak) x 2(Strength of tie: strong vs. weak) between-subjects experiment. In this experiment, participants used and interacted with the mock-up Facebook, such as click “like” button or share button. Their behavior was recorded by the specifically designed system designed. Participants completed a self-reported questionnaire assessing their underlying processes immediately after the experiment.
We found that only the tie strength of the poster affects users’ message processing and interaction. In addition, different tie strength induces both affective and cognitive analysis, which then impacts the information utility and believability evaluation. Eventually, different levels of content recreation are formed that construct the Facebook information diffusion Compared to the tie strength, argument quality does not influence any of the outcome variables. The results show how important sociality is in the process of Facebook information diffusion. Besides, though argument quality has no impact on communication behavior and message processing in Facebook, the message content itself is an important mediator of the influence of the entire message processing path of Facebook information diffusion.

壹、 序論 1
貳、 文獻探討 5
一、 媒介素養 5
二、 近用(Access) 8
三、 分析(Analysis) 19
四、 評估(Evaluation) 25
參、 研究方法 32
一、 研究架構 33
二、 實驗設計 34
三、 自變項操作 42
四、 中介變項測量 44
五、 依變項測量 47
肆、 研究結果分析 48
一、 樣本結構分析 48
二、 信度分析 49
三、 操弄檢定 50
四、 假設檢定 50
五、 模式驗證 52
伍、 結論與討論 62
一、 Facebook社交特質對於資訊傳佈的影響 63
二、 Facebook娛樂性動機對於資訊傳佈的影響 64
三、 媒介素養架構下的Facebook訊息處理路徑 65
四、 訊息面向因素對於資訊傳佈行為的影響 66
五、 訊息特質對於Facebook資訊傳佈行為的中介 67
六、 認知與情感對於在訊息分析階段的共同作用 67
七、 Facebook訊息處理路徑的討論 69
八、 小結 71
九、 研究限制與建議 71
陸、 參考文獻 74
附錄-實驗後問卷 84

Agarwal, Ritu, &; Karahanna, Elena. (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS quarterly, 665-694.
Allen, TJ. (1977). Managing the flow of technology. : Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Anagnostopoulos, Aris, Kumar, Ravi, &; Mahdian, Mohammad. (2008). Influence and correlation in social networks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining.
Andsager, Julie L, Bemker, Victoria, Choi, Hong-Lim, &; Torwel, Vitalis. (2006). Perceived similarity of exemplar traits and behavior effects on message evaluation. Communication Research, 33(1), 3-18.
Archer-Brown, Chris, Piercy, Niall, &; Joinson, Adam. (2013). Examining the information value of virtual communities: Factual versus opinion-based message content. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(3-4), 421-438.
Areni, Charles S, &; Lutz, Richard J. (1988). The role of argument quality in the elaboration likelihood model. Advances in consumer research, 15(1), 197-203.
Armstrong, Cory L, &; McAdams, Melinda J. (2009). Blogs of information: How gender cues and individual motivations influence perceptions of credibility. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(3), 435-456.
Atkin, Charles. (1973). Instrumental utilities and information seeking.
Aufderheide, Patricia. (1993). Media Literacy. A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy: ERIC.
Bakshy, Eytan, Rosenn, Itamar, Marlow, Cameron, &; Adamic, Lada. (2012). The role of social networks in information diffusion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web.
Bhattacherjee, Anol, &; Sanford, Clive. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: an elaboration likelihood model. MIS quarterly, 805-825.
Bian, Yanjie. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American sociological review, 366-385.
Bietila, David, Bloechl, Chris, &; Edwards, Elizabeth. (2009). Beyond the buzz: planning Library Facebook initiatives grounded in user needs. Paper presented at the ACRL National Conference.
Bond, Robert M, Fariss, Christopher J, Jones, Jason J, Kramer, Adam DI, Marlow, Cameron, Settle, Jaime E, &; Fowler, James H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295-298.
Bristor, Julia M. (1990). Enhanced explanations of word of mouth communications: the power of relationships. Research in consumer behavior, 4(1), 51-83.
Brown, Jacqueline Johnson, &; Reingen, Peter H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 350-362.
Buckingham, David. (1998). Media education in the UK: Moving beyond protectionism. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 33-43.
Burt, Ronald S. (2009). Structural holes: The social structure of competition: Harvard university press.
Cacioppo, John T, Harkins, Stephen G, &; Petty, Richard E. (1981). The nature of attitudes and cognitive responses and their relationships to behavior. Cognitive responses in persuasion, 31-54.
Castillo, Carlos, Mendoza, Marcelo, &; Poblete, Barbara. (2011). Information credibility on twitter. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web.
Centola, D, &; Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702–734.
Cheung, Christy MK, Lee, Matthew KO, &; Rabjohn, Neil. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229-247.
Cheung, Man Yee, Luo, Chuan, Sia, Choon Ling, &; Chen, Huaping. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of on-line consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9-38.
Chu, Shu-Chuan, &; Kamal, Sara. (2008). The effect of perceived blogger credibility and argument quality on message elaboration and brand attitudes: an exploratory study. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 26-37.
Coleman James, S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge MA (Belnkamp).
Cross, R. (2001). A relational view of information seeking: Tapping people and inanimate sources in intentional search. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
Davis, Fred D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Donohew, Lewis, Lorch, Elizabeth Pugzles, &; Palmgreen, Philip. (1998). Applications of a theoretic model of information exposure to health interventions. Human Communication Research, 24(3), 454-468.
Edwards, Kari, &; Smith, Edward E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5.
Ekström, Mats, &; Östman, Johan. (2013). Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of Internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research, 0093650213476295.
Ellison, Nicole B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Ellison, NICOLE B, &; Boyd, DANAH M. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. The Oxford handbook of internet studies, 151.
Ellison, Nicole B, Lampe, Cliff, &; Steinfield, Charles. (2009). FEATURE Social network sites and society: current trends and future possibilities. interactions, 16(1), 6-9.
Everett, Maureen W, &; Palmgreen, Philip. (1995). Influences of sensation seeking, message sensation value, and program context on effectiveness of anticocaine public service announcements. Health Communication, 7(3), 225-248.
Fang, Yu-Hui. (2014). Beyond the credibility of electronic word of mouth: Exploring eWOM adoption on social networking sites from affective and curiosity perspectives. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 18(3), 67-102.
Fishbein, Martin, &; Ajzen, Icek. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Flanagin, Andrew J, &; Metzger, Miriam J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism &; Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515-540.
Fogg, BJ, &; Tseng, Hsiang. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Frenzen, Jonathan, &; Nakamoto, Kent. (1993). Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 360-375.
Friedkin, Noah E. (1982). Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social networks, 3(4), 273-285.
Geuens, Maggie, &; De Pelsmacker, Patrick. (1998). Need for cognition and the moderating role of the intensity of warm and humorous advertising appeals. Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 74-80.
Gilbert, Eric, &; Karahalios, Karrie. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Granovetter. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380.
Granovetter. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, Mass : Harvard University Press.
Granovetter. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological theory, 1(1), 201-233.
Hallahan, Kirk. (1999). Content class as a contextual cue in the cognitive processing of publicity versus advertising. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(4), 293-320.
Hansen, Morten T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative science quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Harrington, Nancy Grant, Lane, Derek R, Donohew, Lewis, &; Zimmerman, Rick S. (2006). An extension of the activation model of information exposure: The addition of a cognitive variable to a model of attention. Media Psychology, 8(2), 139-164.
Haugtvedt, Curtis P, &; Petty, Richard E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 63(2), 308.
Hayes, Andrew F. (2008). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford Press.
Hayes, Andrew F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford Press.
Hill, Donna J, King, Maryon F, &; Cohen, Eli. (1996). The perceived utility of information presented via electronic decision aids: A consumer perspective. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19(2), 137-166.
Hovland, Carl I, Janis, Irving L, &; Kelley, Harold H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change.
Huh, Jisu, DeLorme, Denise E, &; Reid, Leonard N. (2004). The information utility of DTC prescription drug advertising. Journalism &; Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 788-806.
Johnson, Ralph H. (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument: Routledge.
Johnson, Thomas J, &; Kaye, Barbara K. (1998). Cruising is believing?: Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism &; Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 325-340.
Joinson, Adam N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
Kang, Yahui, Cappella, Joseph, &; Fishbein, Martin. (2006). The attentional mechanism of message sensation value: Interaction between message sensation value and argument quality on message effectiveness. Communication Monographs, 73(4), 351-378.
Kiousis, Spiro. (2006). Exploring the impact of modality on perceptions of credibility for online news stories. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 348-359.
Knobloch, Silvia, Carpentier, Francesca Dillman, &; Zillmann, Dolf. (2003). Effects of salience dimensions of informational utility on selective exposure to online news. Journalism &; mass communication quarterly, 80(1), 91-108.
Koltay, Tibor. (2011). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture &; Society, 33(2), 211-221.
Kostka, Jan, Oswald, Yvonne Anne, &; Wattenhofer, Roger. (2008). Word of mouth: Rumor dissemination in social networks Structural Information and Communication Complexity (pp. 185-196): Springer.
Kotlarsky, Julia, &; Oshri, Ilan. (2005). Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 37-48.
Krackhardt, David. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, 216, 239.
Kwon, K Hazel, Moon, Shin-Il, &; Stefanone, Michael A. (2014). Unspeaking on Facebook? Testing network effects on self-censorship of political expressions in social network sites. Quality &; Quantity, 1-19.
Lane, Derek R, Harrington, Nancy Grant, Donohew, Lewis, &; Zimmerman, Rick S. (2006). Dimensions and validation of a perceived message cognition value scale. Communication Research Reports, 23(3), 149-161.
Lazarus, Richard S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American psychologist, 37(9), 1019.
Lazurus, Richard S. (1984). On the Primacy of Cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124-129.
LeDoux, Joseph E. (1989). Cognitive-emotional interactions in the brain. Cognition &; Emotion, 3(4), 267-289.
Levin, Daniel Z, &; Cross, Rob. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
Li, Peter Ping. (2007). Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2), 227-246.
Lin, Nan. (1990). Social resources and social mobility: A structural theory of status attainment. Social mobility and social structure, 247-271.
Lin, Nan, Ensel, Walter M, &; Vaughn, John C. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American sociological review, 393-405.
Livingstone, Sonia. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3-14.
Luhmann, Niklas. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, 6, 94-107.
Luke, Carmen. (1989). Pedagogy, printing and protestantism: The discourse on childhood: SUNY Press.
Marsden, Peter V, &; Campbell, Karen E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social forces, 63(2), 482-501.
Martin, Brett AS, Lang, Bodo, Wong, Stephanie, &; Martin, Brett AS. (2003). Conclusion explicitness in advertising: The moderating role of need for cognition (NFC) and argument quality (AQ) on persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 57-66.
McKnight, D Harrison, &; Kacmar, Charles J. (2007). Factors and effects of information credibility. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce.
McKnight, Harrison, &; Kacmar, Chuck. (2006). Factors of information credibility for an internet advice site. Paper presented at the System Sciences, 2006. HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
Meyer, Philip. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism &; Mass Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 567-574.
Mittal, Vikas, Huppertz, John W, &; Khare, Adwait. (2008). Customer complaining: the role of tie strength and information control. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 195-204.
Moenaert, Rudy K, &; Souder, William E. (1996). Context and antecedents of information utility at the R&;D/marketing interface. Management science, 42(11), 1592-1610.
Murphy, Sheila T, &; Zajonc, Robert B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(5), 723.
Naumann, Ewald, Bartussek, Dieter, Diedrich, Oliver, &; Laufer, Manfred E. (1992). Assessing cognitive and affective information processing functions of the brain by means of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Journal of Psychophysiology.
Olson, James M, &; Zanna, Mark P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual review of psychology, 44(1), 117-154.
Palmgreen, Philip, Stephenson, Michael T, Everett, Maureen W, Baseheart, John R, &; Francies, Regina. (2002). Perceived message sensation value (PMSV) and the dimensions and validation of a PMSV scale. Health Communication, 14(4), 403-428.
Petty, Richard E, &; Cacioppo, John T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches, Dubuque, IA: WC Brown Co: Press.
Petty, Richard E, &; Cacioppo, John T. (1984a). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(1), 69.
Petty, Richard E, &; Cacioppo, John T. (1984b). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11(1), 668-672.
Petty, Richard E, &; Cacioppo, John T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change.
Petty, Richard E, &; Cacioppo, John T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 123-205.
Petty, Richard E, Cacioppo, John T, &; Goldman, Rachel. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology, 41(5), 847.
Petty, Richard E, Cacioppo, John T, &; Heesacker, Martin. (1981). Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 40(3), 432.
Petty, Richard E, Cacioppo, John T, &; Schumann, David. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of consumer research, 135-146.
Petty, Richard E, &; Wegener, Duane T. (2014). Thought systems, argument quality, and persuasion. Advances in social cognition, 4, 147-161.
Pornpitakpan, Chanthika, &; Francis, June NP. (2000). The effect of cultural differences, source expertise, and argument strength on persuasion: An experiment with Canadians and Thais. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 13(1), 77-101.
Priester, Joseph R, &; Petty, Richard E. (2003). The influence of spokesperson trustworthiness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 408-421.
Quandt, Richard E. (1956). A probabilistic theory of consumer behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 507-536.
Rogers Everett, M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York.
Ruef, Martin. (2002). Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 427-449.
Ruiz, Salvador, &; Sicilia, Marı́a. (2004). The impact of cognitive and/or affective processing styles on consumer response to advertising appeals. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 657-664.
Saadé, Raafat, &; Bahli, Bouchaib. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information &; Management, 42(2), 317-327.
Schierhorn, Carl, Wearden, Stanley T, Schierhorn, Ann B, Tabar, Pamela S, &; Andrews, Scott C. (1999). What digital formats do consumers prefer? Newspaper Research Journal, 20(3), 2.
Schwarz, Norbert, &; Clore, Gerald L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2, 385-407.
Silverstone, Roger. (1994). Television and everyday life: Routledge.
Singer, Dorothy G., &; Singer, Jerome L. (2001). Handbook of Children and the Media: Sage.
Slater, Michael D, &; Rouner, Donna. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism &; Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 974-991.
Smock, A. D, Ellison, N. B, Lampe, C., &; Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322-2329. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
Stephenson, Michael, &; Palmgreen, Philip. (2001). Sensation seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti-marijuana PSAs. Communication Monographs, 68(1), 49-71.
Sternthal, Brian, Dholakia, Ruby, &; Leavitt, Clark. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer research, 252-260.
Sundar, S Shyam. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. Digital media, youth, and credibility, 73-100.
Sussman, Stephanie Watts, &; Siegal, Wendy Schneier. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47-65.
Tong, Stephanie Tom, Van Der Heide, Brandon, Langwell, Lindsey, &; Walther, Joseph B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549.
Triandis, Harry Charalambos. (1995). Individualism &; collectivism: Westview press.
Van Dijck, José. (2011). Facebook as a tool for producing sociality and connectivity. Television &; New Media, 1527476411415291.
Van Hoye, Greet, &; Lievens, Filip. (2007). Social Influences on Organizational Attractiveness: Investigating If and When Word of Mouth Matters1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(9), 2024-2047.
Walther, Joseph B, Van Der Heide, Brandon, Hamel, Lauren M, &; Shulman, Hillary C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication a test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication research, 36(2), 229-253.
Walther, Joseph B, Van Der Heide, Brandon, Kim, Sang‐Yeon, Westerman, David, &; Tong, Stephanie Tom. (2008). The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34(1), 28-49.
Wang, Alex. (2006). When synergy in marketing communication online enhances audience response: The effects of varying advertising and product publicity messages. JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH-NEW YORK-, 46(2), 160.
Weenig, Mieneke W, &; Midden, Cees J. (1991). Communication network influences on information diffusion and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 734.
Wegener, Bernd. (1991). Job mobility and social ties: Social resources, prior job, and status attainment. American Sociological Review, 60-71.
Wellman, Barry, &; Wortley, Scot. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American journal of Sociology, 558-588.
Zajonc, Robert B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American psychologist, 35(2), 151.
Zhang, Wei, &; Watts, Stephanie A. (2008). Capitalizing on content: Information adoption in two online communities. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(2), 73-94.
高浩剛, 鄭秀芬, 江長唐, &; 楊銘賢. (2014). 社群網站上訊息轉載意願影響因素之研究. 資訊管理學報, 21(4), 365-389.
張郁敏. (2012). 跨媒介新聞資訊處理模型: 資訊來源擴大理論在新聞研究上的應用. 新聞學研究(110), 85-124.
劉政宏, 陳學志, 張文哲, &; 張仁和. (2011). 論點立場與品質對高中生論點贊否反應影響的意識處理機制 The Conscious Mechanisms of the Influences of Argument Position and Argument Quality on Senior High school Students’ Argument Agreement/Disagreement Responses. 教育心理學報, 42(3).

創世紀. (2015). 創世界市場研究顧問2015年1月台灣網路活動分析報告. 取自http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_03_27_15.html