臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘要
本論文旨在針對達悟語ma-型動詞有更深入的描述，並且以形式語言學理論分析達悟語ma-型動詞的句法、語意結構之衍生。Ma-型動詞為一多功能詞綴，並且常見於南島語中。根據何&董(2006)的分析，達悟語ma-型動詞可分為兩種，一為主事者語態ma-，另一個則是非主事者語態ma-。本文支持何&董的看法，並且將提供筆者新的發現與分析。
達悟語ma-型動詞，共有四種。第一類ma1-為主事者語態，南島語中，通常以重疊構詞來表示事件正在進行中，而此類的ma-型動詞容許重疊構詞出現，則其事件類型(event type)為動態動詞。第二類ma2-為非主事者語態，其事件類型為靜態事件，因此類的ma-不允許重疊構詞出現。第三類ma3-亦為非主事者語態，通常有表能力的語意產生，屬於能力情態，可作成就動詞用。第四類ma4-為被動語態，根據Chang(2004)，南島語中，若動詞上無黏著代名詞與動詞後的名詞組相互呼應，則該名詞組(論元)為非核心論元。而達悟語ma4-的動詞上出現的為經驗者，而非主事者，且主事者被標記為屬格格位。
本文對於達悟語ma-型動詞的句法、語意分析將分別採取Aldridge(2004)以及Haqcard(2006)的理論，並且聚焦在ma3-的討論。語意的部分，筆者認為，ma3-包含一個情境情態基底(circumstantial modal base)與偏稱(existential force)。因此一旦ma3-被定義，則真實性蘊含的解讀便會產生。句法的部分，筆者採用Aldridge(2004)的分析，假設達悟語的基本語序為VSO，對於ma3-來說，語態詞組會給主事者屬格格位，而主格格位則會來自輕動詞。本文並沒有論及語態詞組以上的組成成份，因為達悟語的TAM(時態、時式、情境)系統仍處不明狀態，對此，筆者留待未來有更深入的研究。

Abstract
This thesis aims to discuss the syntactic and semantic derivation of ma- verbs in Yami. Ma-, a multi-functional prefix, is commonly seen across Austronesian languages. According to Rau & Dong (2006), Yami ma- is a homopheme which can be divided into two categories: one belongs to agent voice and the other one belongs to non-agent voice.
This thesis, in addition to supporting Rau & Dong (2006)’s analyses of ma-, reveals four types of ma- verbs in Yami, which receive little attention in the literature. The first type of ma- verbs, referred to as MA1-, is used as the agent voice which tends to co-occur with reduplicated progressive affixes. The event type of MA1- is always active. As for the non-agent voice ma- verbs, they are not allowed to co-occur progressive affixes. The non-agent voice ma- verbs could be further categorized into MA2- and MA3- where the MA2- verbs are stative verbs and the MA3- verbs are modal verbs. The MA2- verbs denote only one event and are usually without agent while the MA3- verbs entail ability or potential of agent. The fourth type of ma- verbs is MA4-, which serves as PASSIVE VOICE.
Based on Aldridge (2004) and Hacqard (2006, 2009), this thesis focuses mainly on the discussion of syntactic and semantic derivation of MA3- in Yami. Generally speaking, the semantics of MA3- contains a circumstantial modal base and assumes existential force. That is, as long as MA3- is defined, an event denoted by MA3- must entail actuality entailment (Hacqard, 2006). In addition, following Aldridge (2004), I assume that the basic word order of MA3- Yami is VSO. In this case, Voice P will assign genitive cases to external arguments like agents. As for internal arguments, patients will receive nominative cases from vP. Nevertheless, since the TAM system of Yami requires further discussion, this thesis will not deal with the structure above Voice P.

目錄
第1章 簡介 1
1.1 語言介紹 2
1.2 達悟語ma- 2
1.3 本文發展 5
第2章 達悟語語法介紹 7
2.1 格位系統 7
2.2 代名詞 9
2.2.1 名詞組與代名詞 10
2.2.2 動詞組語代名詞 11
2.3 語態系統 12
2.3.1 主事者語態 13
2.3.2 受事者語態 14
2.3.3 處所語態 16
2.3.4 工具/受惠者語態 16
2.4 達悟語ma-型動詞之句法表現 18
2.4.1 ma-的主語 18
2.4.1.1 小結 21
2.4.2 ma-的及物性 22
2.4.2.1 ma-+名詞 22
2.4.2.2 ma-＋靜態動詞 23
2.4.2.3 ma-＋非靜態動詞 24
2.5 小結 27
2.6 達悟語ma-型動詞之語意表現 28
2.6.1 ma-的事件類型 28
2.6.1.1 靜態(stative) 29
2.6.1.2 終點性(telicity) 31
2.6.1.3 間距(durative) 33
2.7 達悟語ma-型動詞之主事者的施事性(agentivity) 35
2.8 情態：ma-為能力動詞 36
第3章 文獻回顧 39
3.1 句法 39
3.1.1 Aldridge(2004) 40
3.1.2 Y-Y Chang (2004b) 42
3.1.3 小結 43
3.2 語意 44
3.2.1 Kratzer (1981)：情態(modal)的定義 44
3.2.2 Bhatt (1999) 46
3.2.3 Hacquard (2006; 2009) 47
3.3 小結 50
第4章 分析與討論 51
4.1 句法 51
4.2 語意 53
4.3 例證 55
4.4 小結 58
第5章 ma-與被動語態 59
5.1 被動語態 59
5.1.1 ma-與-an連用 60
5.2 達悟語ma-的被動傾向 62
第6章 結論 67

參考文獻
Aldridge, E. (2004a). Antipassive and specificity in tagalog. In P. Law, ed., Proceedings of AFLA 11, 1-14. Berlin: ZAS Papers in Linguistics., 11, 1-14.
Aldridge, E. (2004b). Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. PhD diss., Cornell University.
Bhatt, R. (1999). Covert modality in non-finite contexts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
Bloomfield, Leonard (1917). Tagalog texts with grammatical analysis. University of Illinois.
Baker, M. (1996). The polysynthesis parameter. Oxford University Press, USA.
Bowers, J. (2002). Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 33(2), 183-224.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20.
Chung, S. (2003). The Syntax and Prosody of Weak Pronouns in Chamorro. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(4), 547-599.
Cooreman, A. (1984). A functional analysis of passives in chamorro narrative discourse. Paper in Linguistics, 17(4), 395 - 428.
Chang, M. Y. (2004). Subjecthood in Tsou grammar. PhD diss., National Tsing Hua University.
Chang, Y. (1997). Voice, case and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. PhD diss., National Tsing Hua University.
Chang, H. Y. (2004). AF verbs: transitive, intransitive, or both. Studies on.
Collins, C. (2005). A Smuggling Approach to Raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 註解 [A115]: ??? 36(2), 289-298.
Dhillon, P., Lee, K. S. K. & Massam, D. (2009). Resulting States in Niuean. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 31(0).
Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Springer.
Evans, B. & Ross, M. (2001). The History of Proto-Oceanic *ma. Oceanic Linguistics, 40(2), 269-290.
Grimshaw, J. (1991). Argument structure. MIT press Cambridge, MA.
Gehrke, B. & Grillo, N. (2009). How to become passive. Explorations of Phase Theory: Features, Arguments, and Interpretation at the Interfaces. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter, 231¡V268.
Huang, S. & Sung, L. (2008). The undergoer focus ma-in Kavalan. Oceanic Linguistics, 47(1), 159-184.
Himmelmann, N. (2006). How to miss a paradigm or two: Multifunctional ma-in Tagalog. Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, 487.
Hacquard, V. (2006). Aspects of Modality. PhD diss.MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
Hacquard, V. (2009). On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(3), 279-315.
Jaeggli, O. A. (1986). Passive. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol.17(No. 4 (Autumn, 1986)), pp. 587-622.
Krupa, V. (1982). The Polynesian languages: a guide. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. Words, worlds, and contexts, 38, 74.
Lakoff, G. (1966). Stative verbs and adjectives in English. Harvard Computational Labo-Ratory Report NSF, 17, 16.
McEwen, J. M. (1970). Niue dictionary. Dept. of Maori and Island Affairs.
Newell, L. E. (1993). Batad Ifugao Dictionary with Ethnographic notes. Summer Institue of Linguistics.
Pylkkanen, M. (2002). Introducing Arguments. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
Ross, M. (1995). Reconstructing Proto-Austronesian verbal morphology: evidence from Taiwan. Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, 727-791.
Reid, L. & Liao, H. (2004). A brief syntactic typology of Philippine languages. LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS-TAIPEI-, 5(2), 433.
Rau, D. & Dong, M. (2005). Yami reduplication. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 31(2), 57-87.
Reid, L. A. (to apear). Who Does What to Whom:Another Look at Role Relations in Philippine Languages.
Schachter, Paul, and Fe T. Otanes. 1972.Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Starosta, S., Pawley, A. & Reid, L. (1981). The evolution of focus in Austronesian. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan= National Center for Language Development, Ministry of Education and Culture.
Starosta, S. (1997). Formosan clause structure: Transitivity, ergativity, and case marking. Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China, 125-154.
Starosta, S. (1995). A grammatical subgrouping of Formosan languages. Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, 683-726.
Starosta, S., Pawley, A. & Reid, L. (1981). The evolution of focus in Austronesian. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan= National Center for Language Development, Ministry of Education and Culture.
Sperlich, W. (1997). Tohi Vagahau Niue: Niuean Dictionary.
Tanangkingsing, M. & Huang, S. (2007). Cebuano Passives Revisited. Oceanic Linguistics, 46(2), 554-584.
Travis, L. (2000). Event structure in syntax. Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax, 145-185.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143-160.
Wu, J. (2005). Ma-verbs in Amis: A role and reference grammar analysis. 2005 International Course and Conference on Role and Reference Grammar. Academia Sinica,Taipei, Taiwan.
Wu, J. (2007). "Voice" Markers in Amis: A Role and Reference Grammar Analysis. Language and Linguistics, 8(1), 95-142.

何德華 & 董瑪女 (2006). 達悟語﹕語料、參考語法、及詞彙. (Yami Texts with Reference Grammar and Dictionary). 中央研究院﹕《語言暨語言學》專刊 A-10. .
張郇慧 (2000). 雅美語參考語法. 遠流出版社.
黃婉婷 (2006) In Yami Voice System Revisited: with Particular Reference to the Ditranstive Construction政治大學, pp. -.
董瑪女 & 何德華 (2009). 達悟語學習詞典. 台中市.