臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　本研究依據Kaplan & Kaplan (1989)恢復性環境的觀點作為其理論架構切入點，透過景觀視覺模擬的手法來控制校園空間實質環境之特質，探討逢甲大學校園現有環境空間使用者恢復性環境知覺與心理效益知覺之關係。選擇以逢甲大學行政二館中庭空間作為空間設計範圍，針對逢甲大學在校學生進行實證研究。研究以模擬照片形式模擬療癒性景觀空間，研究採單組前後測的設計，找出校園空間導入療癒性景觀設計對於注意力疲勞的恢復能力、舒緩情緒與生活壓力之關係，進而探討校園庭園空間復癒之效益。調查對象以在校學生為主，同時回答前後測兩組問卷的有效樣本共計404人。
　　整體研究結果顯示，在四個構面中以「遠離」(M=3.31)與「魅力性」(M=3.50)感受程度最高。前後測成對樣本t檢定相較下，使用者對於模擬後療癒性庭園之恢復性環境特質在四個構面上都有顯著提昇。在使用者對於行政二館現況空間與模擬療癒性庭園之心理效益知覺方面，透過成對樣本t檢定分析結果，行政二館「療癒性庭園」相較於「現況環境空間」更能讓使用者感受到正向的心理效益，其中「心理情緒」(M=2.10→2.46)與「心理壓力」(M=2.32→2.46)兩個構面提升最多，具有顯著差異。
　　對於逢甲大學校園現有環境空間使用者恢復性環境知覺與心理效益知覺迴歸分析方面，當使用者對於「現況環境空間」恢復性環境知覺的「魅力性」感受越強，其對心理情緒舒緩效益知覺(R2=.136)感覺越佳；當使用者對於「現況環境空間」恢復性環境知覺的「遠離」、「相容性」感受越強，其對心理壓力舒緩效益知覺(R2=.124)感覺越佳。而使用者對於行政二館「模擬療癒性庭園」恢復性知覺，會顯著影響其對心理情緒舒緩效益知覺與心理壓力舒緩效益知覺，當使用者對於「模擬療癒性庭園」恢復性環境知覺的「遠離」、「延展性」、「魅力性」感受越強，其對心理情緒舒緩效益知覺(R2=.460)以及心理壓力舒緩效益知覺(R2=.432)感覺越佳。由迴歸係數可以得知，「模擬療癒性庭園」的方式，在心理舒緩效益解釋能力上有非常明顯的提升。

In this study, based on Kaplan & Kaplan (1989) restoration theoretical framework and landscape visual simulation techniques to control the characteristics of the physical environment, perception of the restorative environment of the Feng Chia University campus environment space were studied to explore the relationship between perception and psychological benefits. Select the Feng Chia University, Taking open space at 2nd administration Hall as study site, the study used single-group pretest and posttest design to find out the effect of attention fatigue recovery and relieve the pressure of emotions and life, and to explore the campus garden space complex the more the effectiveness. There were 404 student completed both pre and post test questionnaires.
　　The overall results show that " fascination " (M= 3.50) had the highest mean score of. Measured before and after paired t-test comparison, the simulation of healing garden restorative environmental characteristics of the four dimensions are significantly improved. "Healing garden" simulation has more positive psychological benefits than " original open space", particularly in "emotion" (M= 2.10→M= 2.46) and "pressure" (M= 2.32→M= 2.46) components.
　　In terms of regressional analysis, statistical results show that "Healing garden" simulation provide more explanation variance in restorative effect on both "emotion" (R2= 0.460) and "pressure" (R2= 0.432) psychological benefits. Furthermore, "being away", "extension", and "fascination" have significant influence on psychological benefits.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節　研究動機 1
第二節　研究目的 3
第三節　研究範圍與對象 3
第四節　研究限制 4
第五節　研究名詞定義 4
第六節　研究內容與流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧 8
第一節　恢復性環境知覺 8
第二節　心理效益知覺 10
第三節　復癒相關理論 12
第四節　校園空間 15
第三章 研究方法 18
第一節　研究基地選點 18
第二節　研究架構與假設 30
第三節　研究設計 31
第四節　復癒環境設計與模擬圖 33
第五節　測量工具與問卷設計 38
第六節　資料處理分析 45
第四章 分析結果 49
第一節　樣本描述 49
第二節　研究變項測量結果 54
第三節　假設檢定結果 63
第五章 結論與建議 83
第一節　結論 83
第二節　討論 85
第三節　建議 88
參考文獻 91
附　錄 100
附錄一　問卷設計 100
附錄二　施測附件 105

中文
王蓁蓁，(2001)，台北縣國中生之壓力源、因應方式與生活適應之相關研究，生活科學學報，7，61-86。
余依亭，(2007)，療癒性庭園對都市中老年人居家戶外空間需求相關性意義之研究，碩士論文，私立中國文化大學景觀學研究所，台北。
李欣瑩、姜逸群，(2001)，桃園市國中生主觀生活壓力、社會支持、因應行為與身心健康之關係研究，衛生教育學報，15，115-132。
李素馨，(1997)，都巿視覺景觀偏好之研究，行政院國家科學委員究計畫成會專題研果報告，NSC-86-2417-H-035-003。
凌德麟，(2002)，植栽設計的理論與實務，造園季刊，16(3)，24-45。
孫瑜成，(2006)，國中資優生人格特質、壓力調適及其相關因素之研究，資優教育研究，6(1)，41-68。
徐諶，(2001)，體驗感動，享受生命-謝智謀教授談休閒與人生，師友，(406)，5-9。
張俊彥，(2000)，造園設計中植栽色彩對觀賞者效益之研究，造園學報，7(1)，45-65。
張俊彥，(2009)，園藝治療與治療性景觀，臺大校友雙月刊，63，15-21。
張俊彥、周孟慈，（2004），園藝治療相關研究與發展之探討，造園季刊，52，45-55。
張俊彥、洪佳君，(2003)，景觀元素與生心理反應之研究，造園學報，9(2)，87-106。
張俊彥、彭家麟，(2000)，不同景觀型態刺激生、心理反應差異之研究--一個案例研究，中國園藝，46(1)，93-102。
張俊彥、萬麗玲，(1999)，鄉村與都市景觀對心理反應影響之研究，興大園藝，24(2)，95-108。
張純婉，(2011)，醫療院所內益康花園的恢復性環境知覺與生心理效益知覺之研究-以台中榮總為例，碩士論文，私立東海大學景觀學研究所，台中。
梁秀琴、陳韻淳(2002)，談資優生自殺問題，資優教育研究，1(2)，45-70。
郭毓仁，(2005)，治療性景觀與園藝療法，台北：詹氏。
曾慈慧，(2003)，景觀環境與福祉及相關復癒關係之研究，博士論文，國立台灣大學園藝學研究所，台北。
曾慈慧，(2004)，現地與非現地景觀體驗與健康復癒之探討，旅遊管理研究，4(2)，99-118。
曾慈慧、凌德麟、毛慧芬，(2002)，景觀環境的偏好，心理效益知覺認知與生理反應關係之研究，造園學報，8(2)，45-66。
游莞瑋、林彥州，(1999)，植栽量體及色彩對降低焦慮情緒效果之研究，中國園藝，45(4)，387-394。
湯志民，(1991)，台北市國民小學學校建築規劃、環境知覺與學生行為之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，台北。
湯志民，(1992)，學校建築與校園規劃（第一版）。台北市：五南圖書公司。
湯志民，(1994)，學校建築的人文教育環境規劃。初等教育學刊，3，237-264。
湯志民，(2000)，學校建築與校園規劃（第二版）。台北市：五南圖書公司。
黃章展、黃芳銘、周先捷，(2008)，環境偏好與環境恢復性知覺關係之研究-以山景景觀為例，戶外遊憩研究，21(1)，1-25。
藍采風，(2001)，壓力與適應，台北:幼獅。
侯錦雄，(1984)，利用攝影媒體表現景觀空間的研究，中國園藝，30(2)，135-147。
侯錦雄、王秀如，(1995)，景觀專業與非專業背景之大學生對二十種植物意象之研究，中國園藝，41(1)，30-40。
游菀瑋、林晏州、張育森，(2000)，影響都市植栽減輕焦慮情形效果之研究，中國園藝，46(3)，305-312。
曾慈慧、鄒佩蘅，(2006)，自然環境的慰藉與復癒力量-治療性景觀環境設計，台灣建築，126，60-83。
曾慈慧、鄒佩蘅，(2000)，由園藝治療理論談醫院景觀設計，第十二屆建築研究成果發表會論文集(頁329-332)，台北。
聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶譯，(2003)，P. A. Bell, T. C. Greene, J. D. Fisher, & A. Baum著，環境心理學，台北：桂冠。

英文
Baum, A., Fleming, R., & Singer, J. E. (1985). Understanding environmental stress: strategies for conceptual and methodological integration. In A. Baum, &J. E. Singer (Eds.). Advances in Environmental psychology (Vol. 5, pp.185-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Betrabet, G. (1996). The garden as a restorative environment: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 8, 15-20.
Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 422-433.
Burnett, J. E. (1997). The social construction of technologizing French 103: Case studies of teachers and computers. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(5), 1687.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cimprich, B. (1993). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16(2), 83-92.
Cooper,G & Taylor, G. (2000). Garden for the Future; Gesture against the wild. London: Conram Octopus.
Han, K. T. (2003). A reliable and valid self-rating measure of the restorative quality of natural environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 209-232.
Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 25(1,2), 17-36.
Hartig, T. A. & Evans, G. W. (1993). Psychological foundations of nature experience.In Garling, T. & Golledge, R. G. eds., Behavior and environment: psychologicaland geographical approaches (pp.427-457). Amsterdam: Elsevier/NorthHolland.
Hartig, T. A., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1997). Restorative effects of nature environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3-26.
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling. T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental psychology, 23(2), 109-123.
Hartig, T., Korpela, K. M., Evans, G. W., & Gärling, T. (1996). Validation of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Göteborg Psychological Reports, 26, 1-64.
Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G. W., & Garling, T. (1997). A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 14, 175-194.
Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1987). Perspectives on wilderness: Testing the theory of restorative environments, The Fourth Worm Wilderness Congress. Estes Park, Colorado.
Hartig, T.A., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26.
Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A., & Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and attention recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environment. Journal of Environmental psychology, 17(2), 165-170.
Herzog, T. R., Maguire, C. P., & Nebel, M. B. (2003). Assessing the restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23,159-170.
Kaplan, R. (1973). Some psychological benefits of gardening. Environment and Behavior, 5(2), 145-161.
Kaplan, R. (1978). Participation in environmental design: Some Considerations and a case study. In S. Kaplan, & R. Kaplan (Eds.). Humanscape: Environments for people (pp.427-438). Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context, In Altman, I., &Wohlwill, J. F. eds., Behavior and The Natural Environment (pp.127-162, vol.1-2.), New York: Plenum Press.
Kaplan, R. (1993). The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 193-201.
Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 507-542.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1990). Restorative experience: The healing power of nearby nature. In M. Francis, & R. T. Hester (Eds.). The Meaning of gardens: Idea, Place, and Action (pp.238-243). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kaplan, R., & Talbot, J. F. (1988). Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: A review and recent findings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 107-117.
Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition environment preference form an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3-32.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.
Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L. V., & Slakter, D. B. (1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment and Behavior, 25(6), 725-742.
Kaplan, S., Bardwell, L. V., & Slakter, D. B. (1993). The museum as a restorative environment. Environment and Behavior, 25(6), 725-742.
Laumann, K., Garling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2001). Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 31-44.
Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities, Science, 167, 1461-1468.
Paine, C. (1997). Landscapes for mental health: design and adaptation of early psychiatric hospitals. 1997 Annual Meeting Proceedings of the American Society of Landscape Architects (pp. 211-214).
Parsons, R. (1991). The potential influences of environmental perception on human health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(1), 1-23.
Parsons, R. (1995). Conflict between ecological sustainability and environment aesthetics: Conundrum, canard or curiosity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 227-244.
Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G., Ulrich, R. S., Hebl, M. R., & Grossman-Alexander, M. (1988). The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(2), 113-140.
Purcell, T., Peron, E., & Berto, R. (2001). Why do preferences differ between scene types? Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 93-106.
Relf, D. (1990). Putting the consumer in horticulture (Originally Published in PPGA News February 1990: 4-5). Retrieved March 30, 2011. from http://www.hort.vt.edu/HUMAN/putconh.htm
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment, In Altman, I., & Wohlwill, J. F. eds., Behavior and the Natureal Environment (pp.85-120, vol.1-2), New York: Plenum Press.
Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscape. In Kellert, S. R. & Wilsons, E.O. eds., The biophilia hypothesis (pp.73-137). Washinton, DC: Island/Shearwater Press.
Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Anxiety as An Emotional State. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research (Vol.1). NY: Academic Press.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Vagg, P R., & Jacobs, G.A. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B (1995). View to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental psychology, 15(1), 77-85.
Ulrich, R. S. (1979). Visual landscape and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4(1),17-23.
Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.
Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29-44.
Ulrich, R. S., & Simons, R. F. (1986). Recovery from stress during exposure to everyday outdoor environments. In: J. Winemand, R. Barnes, & C. Zimring (Eds.). Proceeding of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association (pp. 115-122). Washington, DC: EDRA.
Ulrich, R. S. (1991). Effect of interior design on wellness: Theory and recentscientific research. Journal of Health Care Interior Design, 3, 97-109.
Ulrich, R. S., Dimberg, U., & Driver, B L. (1991). Psychophysiological indicators of leisure benefits, In: B. L. Driver, P. J. Brown, & G. L. Peterson (Eds.). Benefits of Leisure (pp.73-89). State College, PA: Venture.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.
Ulrich, R. S., & Parsons, R. (1992). Influences of passive experiences with plants on individual well-being and health. In: D. Relf (Ed.). The Role of Horticulture in Human well-being and Social Development: A National Symposium (pp.93-105). Portland, OR: Timber Press.
Verderber, S. F. (1982). Designing for the therapeutic functions of windows in the hospital rehabilitation environment. In P. Bart, A. Chen, & G. Francescato (Eds.). Environmental Design Research Association 13: Knowledge for Design. (pp.476-492). Washington, DC: EDRA.