臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　　本文旨在以實證與理論兩個角度，分析美國自2009年起所實施的各期貨幣量化寬鬆(Quantitative Easing; QE)政策，對美國長短期公債利率與貨幣流動性之影響。首先本文以時間序列實證分析，發現美國在2009年實施貨幣量化寬鬆政策之前與之後，美國國內貨幣供給與短中期公債利率均維持負相關，但貨幣供給與長期公債利率的關係在量化寬鬆政策實施前為負相關，在政策實施後卻轉為正相關。其次，本文由實證結果推測實施貨幣量化寬鬆政策對於美國房屋價格之回升可能有所助益。再者，本文發現自2009年起所實施貨幣量化寬鬆政策之後，美國所有到期政府公債對於貨幣供給變動率之影響皆由負向轉為正向關係。

　　為探究美國量化寬鬆政策前後，美國貨幣供給溢量與貨幣流動性的差距，與造成此差距的構成要素，本文另設定兩個理論模型加以相互比較。第一個為未考量QE環境參數之理想性模型，第二個模型為考慮QE環境參數所設立之理論模型，這些QE環境參數都是由前述實證結果所獲得。本文依未實施貨幣量化寬鬆政策前、實施QE1及QE2、和實施QE3三種情況做討論。

　　本文發現，未實施貨幣量化寬鬆政策前，因為美國聯邦準備理事會的資產持有大部分以政府債券為主，故貨幣的流動性最小。實施貨幣量化寬鬆政策後，在QE1與QE2時期，由於美國政府同時購買不動產抵押貸款證券與政府公債，故貨幣流動性會比只購買政府公債時的貨幣流動性為大。而在QE3時期，因為不動產抵押貸款證券數量已遠超過政府公債數量，如此導致QE3的貨幣流動性為最大。

The purpose of this paper is to explain, in terms of empirical and theoretical aspects, the effects of US quantitative easing (QE) policy on money liquidity and the constant maturity rate of long-term and short-term treasuries. First, the time-series empirical results show that the negative relation of US money supply stocks and short- and medium-term constant maturity treasury rates remains before and after the implementation of QE policy. However, the implementation of QE policy turns the relation of US money supply stocks and long-term constant maturity treasury rate from negative to positive. Moreover, the evidence shows that the implementation of QE policy may help US housing prices to rise. Also, the paper finds that the impact of all kinds of US treasury securities on the variance of US money supply stocks turns to be positive after implementing QE policy.
To explore the difference of excess US money supply and the difference of money liquidity before and after the implementation of QE policy, the research builds up two theoretical models to study the factors that cause such differences. The first model is purely ideal without considering any parameters from QE environment, and the second model is based on parameters from QE environment from my empirical results. The research then discusses three cases: (a) before the implementation of OE, (b) QE1 and QE2, and (c) the implementation of QE3.
The paper shows that, the liquidity of money is the lowest before the implementation of QE because the most assets hold by the Fed are US treasury bonds. In the QE1 and QE2 period, the liquidity of money is higher than that before the implementation of QE because the Fed simultaneously purchases mortgage-backed securities and treasury bonds during QE1 and QE2. During QE3, the amount of mortgage-backed securities hold by the Fed is much larger than the amount of treasury bonds, which leads the liquidity of money to be the highest.

第一章　緒論 1
第一節　研究動機 1
第二節　研究目的 3
第三節　不動產抵押貸款證券(MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIZATION; MBS) 3
第二章　文獻回顧 5
第一節　貨幣政策文獻 5
第二節　時間序列文獻 7
第三章　研究方法 20
第一節　理論模型研究方法 20
第二節　時間序列的理論基礎 20
第四章　實證分析 24
第一節　時間序列資料分析 24
第二節　資料特性 28
第三節　實證檢定 35
第四節　實證結果分析 42
第五章　理論模型 50
第一節　理論模型之設定 50
第二節　BELLMAN方程式 53
第三節　考慮QE環境之模型設定 56
第四節　考未慮QE環境之理想模型與QE環境之比較 61

第六章　結論 67
參考文獻 69

(一)中文部分
沈中華，2002，金融市場，華泰書局。
沈中華，2011，金融市場—全球的觀點，新陸書局。
陳文達，廖咸興，李阿乙，2002，資產證券化－理論與實務，智勝出版社。
陳啟超，2011，「美國因應次貸危機之相關措施及退場機制」，中央銀行出國
報告。
陳佩玗，2010，「美國貨幣政策之執行」，中央銀行出國報告。
陳佳純，2010，「美國聯邦準備理事會處理次貸危機之各項金融穩定措施及後續發展」，中央銀行出國報告。
陳旭昇，2011，時間序列分析：總體經濟與財務金融之應用，東華書局。
黃台心，2009，計量經濟學，新陸書局。
黃昱程，2009，現代金融市場，華泰書局。
(二)英文部分
Adolfson, M., S. Laséen, J. Lindé, and M. Villani (2008), “Evaluating an estimated new keynesian small open economy model,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32(8), 2690-2721.
Agénor, P., and K. E. Aynaoui (2010), “Excess liquidity, bank pricing rules, and monetary policy,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(5), 923-933.
Cagan, P. (1958), “The demand for currency relative to total money supply,” Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 303-328.
Davig, T., and E. M. Leeper (2011), “Monetary–fiscal policy interactions and fiscal stimulus,” European Economic Review, 55(2), 211-227.
Dickey, D. A., and W. A. Fuller, (1979), “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431.
Dickey, D. A., and W. A. Fuller, (1981), “Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root,” Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
Dow, J. P. (1995), “The demand and liquidity effects of monetary shocks,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 36(1), 91-115.
Engle, R. F., and C. W. Granger, (1987), “Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing,” Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
Friedman, M. (1968), “The role of monetary policy,” Journal of Political Economy, 58(1)1-17.
Granger, C. W. J., and A. A. Weiss (1983): "Time Series Analysis of Error-Correcting Models," in Studies in Econometrics, Time Series, and Multivariate Statistics. New York: Academic Press, 255-278.
Hsiao, C. (1997), “Cointegration and dynamic simultaneous equations model,” Econometrica,65(3), 647-670.
Johansen, S. (1988), “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2), 231-254.
Johansen, S. (1991), “Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in gaussian vector autoregressive models,” Econometrica, 59(6), 1551-1580.
Johansen, S., and K. Juselius, (1990), “Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210.
Joyce, M., A. Lasaosa, I. Stevens, and M. Tong, (2010), “The financial market impact of quantitative easing,” Bank of England Working Paper No.393.
Jung, T., Y. Teranishi, and T.Watanabe, (2005), “Optimal monetary policy at the zero-interest-rate bound,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37(5), 813-835.
Krishnamurthy, A., and A. Vissing-Jorgensen, (2011), “The effects of quantitative easing on long-term interest rates,” Working paper, Northwestern University.
Ljungqvist, L., and T. J. Sargent, (2004), Recursive Macroeconomic Theory, The MIT Press.
Maddala, G. S., and I. Kim, (1999), Unit roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change, Cambridge University Press.
Newbold, P and C. W. J. Granger. (1974). “Experience with Forecasting Univariate Time Series and the Combination of Forecasts. ”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,137(2),131-165.
Obstfeld, M., and K. Rogoff, (1996), “Exchange rate dynamics redux,” Journal of Political Economy, 103(3), 624-660.
Perron, P. (1989), “The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis,” Econometrica, 57(6), 1361-1401.
Phillips, P. C. (1987), “Time series regression with a unit root,” Econometrica , 55(2), 277-301.
StataCorp, (2009), Stata time-series reference manual: Release 11. Statistical Software. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Taylor, J. B. (1993), “Discretion versus policy rules in practice,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 195-214.
Taylor, J. B. (2009), “Empirically evaluating economic policy in real time,” First Annual Martin Feldstein Lecture, Delivered to the National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
Yano, K., Y. Iida, and H. Wago, (2010), “Estimating new keynesian DSGE models in A liquidity trap using the monte carlo particle filter: An application to the japanese economy,” Econometric Society World Congress Working Paper (August 17-21, 2010).

(三)網路部分
Federal Reserve Bank of New York: http://www.newyorkfed.org/markets/opolicy/operating_policy_101103.html

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/

Oscar Torres-Reyna,(2007), “Time Series,” Princeton University.
http://dss.princeton.edu/training/TS101.pdf#page=2

Bernanke,(2012), “September 13, 2012 Chairman Bernanke's Press Conference”
http://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20120913.pdf

The Federal Housing Finance Agency:
http://www.fhfa.gov/Default.aspx?Page=87