跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.24) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/01 15:22
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:曾昱彰
研究生(外文):TSENG, YU-CHANG
論文名稱:群眾集資的社會資本、社會交換及價值創造之關係
論文名稱(外文):Social Capital, Social Exchange and Value Creation in Crowdfunding
指導教授:葉貞吟葉貞吟引用關係
指導教授(外文):YEH, JEN-YIN
口試委員:許淑寬林靜儀
口試委員(外文):HSU, SHU-KUANLIN, JING-YI
口試日期:2017-06-19
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立屏東大學
系所名稱:商業自動化與管理學系碩士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:67
中文關鍵詞:群眾集資社會資本社會交換價值創造
外文關鍵詞:CrowdfundingSocial CapitalSocial ExchangeValue Creation
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:452
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:8
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
  近年來盛行一種新興的籌資方式—群眾集資或稱群眾募資。讓許多企業躍躍欲試,目前群眾集資專案的數量越來越多,但成功達標的專案約為總案件數的一半,由此可知群眾集資專案仍有發展空間。因此,本研究針對台灣的群眾集資專案進行個案分析,希望了解群眾集資專案的價值為何,以及群眾集資專案如何影響價值創造。研究結果發現群眾集資透過參與社會議題、凝結群眾共識、找尋目標受眾,將共同喜好和興趣的群眾形成顧客網絡,並透過活動與群眾互動,產生社會互動連結。此外,也需要透過影片、舉辦活動與群眾互動和對話,讓更多群眾了解其專案的理念,增加群眾認同,進而利用網路平台即時說明計畫進度,獲得群眾信任。然而,群眾集資專案要與社會創新、文化、綠色永續等議題連結,讓集資專案與群眾擁有共同態度與看法,有助於彼此的溝通與合作。進而藉由集資專案與群眾的社會交換過程發現,不單只是金錢與物品、產品或服務的交換,也是信任與承諾的交換,更是為了共同理念而交換。群眾集資專案創造的不僅是單純的經濟價值,更是創造文化、教育、永續的社會價值,為群眾集資專案帶來更多的正面效益。本研究最後提出理論與具體實務意涵。
  Crowdfunding has become a valuable alternative source of funding for entrepreneurs seeking external financing. Crowdfunding platforms have been used to post creative projects seeking funding in return for a reward, often in the form of a tangible product or experience. This study contributes by exploring what and how value is created in crowdfunding process. The results provide insight into different crowdfunding types and different value creation. Further, Crowdfunding is often associated with community-based experiences that generate “community benefits” for participants. This study extends the prior effort that examines the effect of social networks. Based on social capital theory and social exchange theory, this study develops a research model and conducted a multiple case study to explore how an entrepreneur’s social capital impact crowdfunding value.
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目錄 III
圖、表目錄 V

第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究背景與動機 1
第二節、研究目的 4

第二章、文獻探討 5
第一節、群眾集資 5
第二節、社會資本理論 8
第三節、社會交換理論 10
第四節、價值創造 12

第三章、研究方法 14
第一節、研究設計 14
第二節、資料蒐集 16
第三節、個案介紹 19

第四章、研究發現 25
第一節、群眾集資的社會資本結構構面—社會互動連結 25
第二節、群眾集資的社會資本關係構面—認同 29
第三節、群眾集資的社會資本認知構面—共同遠景 32
第四節、群眾集資的社會交換過程—信任、承諾 36
第五節、群眾集資的價值創造—經濟價值、社會價值 40
第六節、命題推導 45

第五章、結論與建議 50
第一節、研究結果與討論 50
第二節、理論意涵 52
第三節、實務意涵 52
第四節、研究限制與未來研究之建議 53

參考文獻 54

附錄一 60
附錄二 61
附錄三 63
附錄四 66
附錄五 67
2016年台灣群眾集資專案大排行!(民105年2月2日)。 CrowdWatch群眾觀點。2017年5月6日,取自:http://crowdwatch.tw/reports/1190
Backer-Founder貝殼放大股份有限公司(民105)。 台灣群眾集資報告2011-2015回顧 &2016趨勢分析。2017年5月20日,取自:https://annual-report.crowdwatch.tw/2015#intro-section
卓秀足、胡哲生(民100)。 社會導向策略轉型與社會價值創造的企業重生:日月老茶廠案例。創業管理研究,6(1),1-27。
林雨岑(民103)。 群眾募資網站體驗價值與使用態度之研究(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。系統編號102YZU05676010
林亭佑 (民104)。 群眾募資專案成效之影響因素:台灣群眾募資平台 flyingV 之實證研究(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。系統編號103NTU05318052
施尚文 (民102)。 網路集資平台發展策略─ 以 Kickstarter, FlyingV 和嘖嘖網為例(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。系統編號101NTU05320014
韋秉仁(民105年3月7日)。 四年案件數成長超10倍!2016年台灣群眾募資的4大趨勢。Business Next 數位時代。2017年4月20日,取自:https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/38862/BN-2016-03-07-145801-197
陳世智、吳智鴻、吳彥濬、陳靚 (民103)。 探討影響 Facebook 粉絲專頁持續使用意圖之因素:社會資本觀點。中山管理評論,22(2),205-238。
楊燕枝、吳思華 (民94)。 文化創意產業的價值創造形塑之初探。行銷評論,2(3),313-338。
葉建亨、黃文楨 (民100)。 整合社會資本與社會交換理論探討虛擬社群知識分享意願。中華民國資訊管理學報,18 (3),76-100。
臺灣經濟研究月刊社論(民104)。 群眾募資為新創企業的融資管道另闢途徑。臺灣經濟研究月刊,38(7),6-7。
劉峯邑(民104)。 科技創新與商業模式之關聯性:以台灣大車隊與 Uber為例(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。系統編號103FCU05230020

Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253-274.
Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2016). Are syndicates the killer app of equity crowdfunding?. California management review, 58(2), 111-124.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Babbie, E. R. (1989). The practice of social research. Belmont :Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self‐categorization, affective commitment and group self‐esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577.
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British journal of management, 11(1), 1-15.
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of business venturing, 29(5), 585-609.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, 95-120.
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). Trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of marketing, 61, 35-51.
Denison, T., Hardy, G., Johanson, G., Stillman, L. and Schauder, D. (2002).Community networks: identities, taxonomies and evaluations. Proceedings of the Electronic Networking Building Community, 1-17.
Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241-263.
Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and networks. Sociological theories in progress, 2, 58-87.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California management review, 45(4), 35-51.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
Gambetta, D. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, 25, 56.
Gerber, E. M., Hui, J. S., & Kuo, P. Y. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design, Influence, and Social Technologies: Techniques, Impacts and Ethics ,11.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American journal of sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational researcher, 12(2), 14-19.
Hörisch, J. (2015). Crowdfunding for environmental ventures: an empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives. Journal of cleaner production, 107, 636-645.
Hobbs, J., Grigore, G., & Molesworth, M. (2016). Success in the management of crowdfunding projects in the creative industries. Internet Research, 26(1), 146-166.
J. N., & Kim, Y. G. (1999). Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation. Journal of Management information systems, 15(4), 29-61.
Kelly, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
Kleemann, F., Voß, G. G., & Rieder, K. (2008). Un (der) paid innovators: The commercial utiliza-tion of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, technology & innovation studies, 4(1), 5.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. London: Sage.
Lesser, E. L. (2000). Leveraging social capital in organizations. Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications, 3, 16.
Langerak, F.,Verhoef, P.C.,Verlegh, P.W.J.,De Valck, K.(2004).Satisfaction And Participation In Virtual Communities.Advances In Consumer Research,31,56-57.
Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). An empirical analysis of crowdfunding. Social Science Research Network, 1578175, 1-23.
Lin, K. Y., & Lu, H. P. (2011). Intention to continue using Facebook fan pages from the perspective of social capital theory. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(10), 565-570.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of marketing research, 29(3), 314.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
Meyskens, M. A., Carsrud, A. L., & Cardozo, R. (2010). The impact of resources on the success of social entrepreneurship organizations: The symbiosis of entities in the social engagement network. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(5), 425-455.
Misztal, B. (2013). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. Cambridge:Blackwell Publishers .
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of business venturing, 29(1), 1-16.
Meyskens, M., & Bird, L. (2015). Crowdfunding and value creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(2), 155-166.
Martin Zwilling. (2016, February 17). 7 Lessons They Don't Teach You In Crowdfunding School [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/270605
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
Neck, H., Brush, C., & Allen, E. (2009). The landscape of social entrepreneurship. Business horizons, 52(1), 13-19.
Porter, M. E., & Advantage, C. (1985). Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: FreePress.
Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American journal of sociology, 98(6), 1320-1350.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community. The american prospect, 4(13), 35-42.
Putnam, R. D., & Goss, K. A. (2002). Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of management Review, 31(2), 309-328.
Robison, L. J., Schmid, A. A., & Siles, M. E. (2002). Is social capital really capital?. Review of social economy, 60(1), 1-21.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. new york: Appleton-Century-Crofts. American Psychologist, 221, 233.
Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims Jr, H. P., O'Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative science quarterly, 39,412-438.
Snehota, I., & Hakansson, H. (Eds.). (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.
Stabell, C. B., & Fjeldstad, Ø. D. (1998). Configuring value for competitive advantage: on chains, shops, and networks. Strategic management journal, 19, 413-437.
Southern, A. (2001). What Matters Is What Works?-The Management of Regeneration. Local Economy, 16(4), 264-271.
Stanko, M. A., & Henard, D. H. (2017). Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation. Research Policy, 46(4), 784-798.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
Thürridl, C., & Kamleitner, B. (2016). What Goes Around Comes Around?. California Management Review, 58(2), 88-110.
Vulkan, N., Åstebro, T., & Sierra, M. F. (2016). Equity crowdfunding: A new phenomena. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 37-49.
Whitman, J. R. (2009). Measuring social values in philanthropic foundations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19(3), 305-325.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods . California : Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods, Applied social research methods series. California : Sage Publications.
Yang, Y., Wang, H. J., & Wang, G. (2016). Understanding Crowdfunding Processes: a dynamic evaluation and simulation approach. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 47.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top