跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.17) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/15 10:08
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:包長立
研究生(外文):Chang-li Pao
論文名稱:智慧型與傳統指針式手錶設計特徵所誘發之情感語意與認知探討
論文名稱(外文):Emotional-Aesthetics Values and Cognition Effects of Smart Watch and Traditional Watch Design Features
指導教授:楊朝陽楊朝陽引用關係王靜儀
指導教授(外文):Chao-Yang YangChing-Yi Wang
口試委員:楊朝陽王靜儀
口試委員(外文):Chao-Yang YangChing-Yi Wang
口試日期:2018-03-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大同大學
系所名稱:工業設計學系(所)
學門:設計學門
學類:產品設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:90
中文關鍵詞:事件相關電位手錶造形元素視覺情緒維度
外文關鍵詞:event-related potentialwatch designdesign elementsvisual featuresemotional dimension
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:402
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:54
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
近年來消費者選購商品的訴求,已從機能實用性轉為情感訴求。情感因子重大影響消費者購買產品的決策過程。本研究目的在喚起消費者購買的動機,而產品的情感訴求則成為設計中重要的核心。本研究以手錶為研究範例,探討其設計特徵對情緒的影響與關聯,並輔以量測腦波情緒的客觀反應。本研究分為二個階段的實驗。第一階段,邀請資深產品設計師分類與篩選360張手錶圖樣,並建構情感語彙資料,再依據其重要特徵找出具有代表性樣本,提供問卷調查30位受試者對手錶的情感意象。第二階段,利用腦波儀紀錄16位具有設計背景的受試者,以「事件相關腦電位」(Event-related Potentials, ERPs)紀錄LPC成分的反應腦區及振幅。研究結果發現,外形尖銳(三角形)或特殊造形(酒桶形)引發不協調的負面感受,但較能感受到有趣及現代。而舊款(圓形、方形)比新款的偏好程度高,均感受較偏正向情感,因大腦記憶保留過去固有的視覺特徵意象,並產生較高的LPC振幅。本研究以腦波作為客觀的評估工具,可相互佐證主觀問卷帶來的認知偏差問題,而其手錶的設計特徵確實可以測得明顯的ERP效果,並與情感評量有所呼應。期盼本研究結果能促進ERP量測工具融入到其他設計議題或研究中。此外,本研究整理的不同設計元素的組合搭配,亦可作為在數位模型創新上的設計參數,針對有效影響人們情緒的設計因子,提出系統性的情感設計。
In recent years, consumers have begun to demand emotional values from products in addition to functionality. Because emotional factors exert considerable influence on consumers’ decision-making process when purchasing a product, this study aimed to determine consumers’ purchasing motivations. Because creating emotional demand is the main focus of their product design, this study targeted watches to explore the effects of design features on emotions. Furthermore, correlations between design features and emotions were investigated; said investigation was complemented by analysis of objective emotional responses manifested in brain waves. This study comprised two stages of experiments. In the first stage, senior product designers were invited to categorize and screen 360 watch designs to establish emotional term data, among which representative samples were chosen on the basis of essential features. The resultant emotional terms were then applied in a questionnaire assessing the affective responses of 30 participants toward watches. An electroencephalogram machine was used in the second stage of the experiment to track the late positive component (LPC) amplitudes and brain responses of 16 participants with design proficiency; the results are indicated in event-related potentials (ERPs). This study discovered that angular (e.g., triangle) or unique (e.g., barrel-shaped) watch designs lefts an uncoordinated impression and thus stimulated negative feelings among participants. Even though such designs are arguably more fascinating and modern, participants still preferred conventional round or rectangular watch designs. Because of the existing memory of past visual features, the participants were prone to generate higher LPC amplitudes and experience positive emotions when exposed to conventional watch designs. This study studied brainwaves to objectively assess and demonstrate the cognition bias problem in subjective questionnaires. Significant ERP effects could indeed be elicited by design features of watches that resonate with emotions. The findings of this study may facilitate the integration of ERP assessment tools into other topics or research involving design. In addition, the combination of various design elements compiled by this study may be used as design parameters in digital model innovations that target design factors capable of affecting human emotions to propose systematic emotional designs.
誌謝 I
摘要 II
Abstract III
目次 V
表次 VII
圖次 IX
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究範圍限制 3
第四節 論文架構 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 使用者情感與造型認知 5
第二節 產品的美感和消費者的偏好 7
第三節 情感評估方式 8
第四節 參數式設計 10
第五節 腦電波基礎理論 11
第三章 卡片分類法篩選手錶樣式及形容詞語彙 19
第一節 研究目的 19
第二節 受測者 19
第三節 樣本 19
第四節 問卷設計 27
第五節 資料分析 28
第四章 腦波實驗檢測手錶之情緒表現與認知 29
第一節 研究目的 29
第二節 受測者 29
第三節 樣本 29
第四節 資料擷取與處理 32
第五章 研究結果 35
第一節 不同手錶造形在視覺上對情感評量尺度的影響 35
第二節 情感問卷vs.腦波問卷之間情感反應之比較 51
第三節 腦波LPC成分效果 52
第六章 討論 61
第一節 影響產品情緒效價的特徵 61
第二節 腦波情感評價之影響因素 65
第七章 結論與建議 67
第八章 參考文獻 68
中文部分 68
英文部分 68
附錄1 情感問卷 76
附錄2 所有手錶造形樣本 77
附錄3 情感問卷組與腦波問卷組之情感反應 78
中文部分
王靜儀, & 鍾雨蓁. (2017). 利用事件相關電位偵測語意一致性, 曖昧及不一致之差異. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 22(1).
趙惠玲, 丘永福, 張素卿, 傅斌暉, 曹筱玥, & 鍾政岳. (2006). 高中藝術領域課程輔助教學參考手冊. 臺北市: 國立臺灣藝術教育館.
英文部分
Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological science, 17(8), 645-648.
Baxter, M. R. (1995). Product Design: Practical methods for the systematic development of new products: Chapman & Hall.
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in neurosciences, 26(9), 507-513.
Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. The Journal of Marketing, 16-29.
Bloch, P. H., Brunel, F. F., & Arnold, T. J. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. Journal of consumer research, 29(4), 551-565.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59.
Brown, K. W., Goodman, R. J., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). Dispositional mindfulness and the attenuation of neural responses to emotional stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(1), 93-99.
Brown, S. B., van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P., de Rover, M., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Functional significance of the emotion-related late positive potential. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 6.
Carretié, L., Hinojosa, J. A., & Mercado, F. (2003). Cerebral patterns of attentional habituation to emotional visual stimuli. Psychophysiology, 40(3), 381-388.
Carretié, L., Iglesias, J., Garcia, T., & Ballesteros, M. (1997). N300, P300 and the emotional processing of visual stimuli. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 103(2), 298-303.
Carter, R., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Mapping the mind: Univ of California Press.
Chen, Y.-T., & Chuang, M.-C. (2014). The study of tactile feeling and It's expressing vocabulary. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 44(5), 675-684.
Chignell, A., & Costelloe, T. M. (2011). A Dialogue Concerning Aesthetics and Apolaustics: Edinburgh University Press 22 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LF UK.
Cho, H. S., & Lee, J. (2005). Development of a macroscopic model on recent fashion trends on the basis of consumer emotion. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 29(1), 17-33.
Christiaans, H. H. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Communication Research Journal, 14(1), 41-54.
Chuang, M.-C., & Ma, Y.-C. (2001). Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro-electronic products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27(4), 233-245.
Coates, D. (2003). Watches Tell More Than Time: Product Design. Information, and the Quest for Elegance.
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design studies, 25(6), 547-577.
Delplanque, S., Lavoie, M. E., Hot, P., Silvert, L., & Sequeira, H. (2004). Modulation of cognitive processing by emotional valence studied through event-related potentials in humans. Neuroscience letters, 356(1), 1-4.
Demirbilek, O., & Sener, B. (2003). Product design, semantics and emotional response. Ergonomics, 46(13-14), 1346-1360.
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of marketing research, 37(1), 60-71.
Dolcos, F., & Cabeza, R. (2002). Event-related potentials of emotional memory: encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(3), 252-263.
Gobell, J. L., Tseng, C.-h., & Sperling, G. (2004). The spatial distribution of visual attention. Vision research, 44(12), 1273-1296.
Hajcak, G., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(4), 291-297.
Han, S. H., & Hong, S. W. (2003). A systematic approach for coupling user satisfaction with product design. Ergonomics, 46(13-14), 1441-1461.
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychology science, 48(2), 157.
Helander, M. G. (2002). Hedonomics-affective human factors design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
Helander, M. G., & Khalid, H. M. (2006). Affective and pleasurable design. Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Third Edition, 543-572.
Henderson, J. M., Weeks Jr, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 25(1), 210.
Hesselgren, L., Charitou, R., & Dritsas, S. (2007). The Bishopsgate tower case study. International journal of architectural computing, 5(1), 61-81.
Hirschman, E. C. (1986). The effect of verbal and pictorial advertising stimuli on aesthetic, utilitarian and familiarity perceptions. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 27-34.
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. The Journal of Marketing, 92-101.
Höfel, L., & Jacobsen, T. (2007). Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(1), 20-31.
Hoyer, W. D., & Stokburger-Sauer, N. E. (2012). The role of aesthetic taste in consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 167-180.
Hsu, S. H., Chuang, M. C., & Chang, C. C. (2000). A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25(4), 375-391.
Huang, Y.-X., & Luo, Y.-J. (2006). Temporal course of emotional negativity bias: an ERP study. Neuroscience letters, 398(1-2), 91-96.
Hudson, R. (2010). Strategies for parametric design in architecture: an application of practice led research. University of Bath.
Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(4), 887.
Jacobsen, T., & Höfel, L. (2002). Aesthetic judgments of novel graphic patterns: analyses of individual judgments. Perceptual and motor skills, 95(3), 755-766.
Jang, N.-S., & Kim, S.-B. (2007). The product color effect on product color preference, product image and product attitude. Journal of Korean society of design science, 20.
Jenkins, S., Brown, R., & Rutterford, N. (2009). Comparing thermographic, EEG, and subjective measures of affective experience during simulated product interactions. International journal of Design, 3(2).
Jordan, P. W. (1998). Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied ergonomics, 29(1), 25-33.
Jung, J. Y., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2017). The Impact of Aesthetic Preference in Product Design–Golden Ratio and Korean’s Preference Proportion. Archives of Design Research, 30(4), 5-14.
Kern, R. P., Libkuman, T. M., Otani, H., & Holmes, K. (2005). Emotional stimuli, divided attention, and memory. Emotion, 5(4), 408.
Khalid, H. M., & Helander, M. G. (2004). A framework for affective customer needs in product design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(1), 27-42.
Kim, N. (2006). A history of design theory in art education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 40(2), 12-28.
Larson, C. L., Aronoff, J., & Steuer, E. L. (2012). Simple geometric shapes are implicitly associated with affective value. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 404-413.
Leder, H., Tinio, P. P., & Bar, M. (2011). Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects. Perception, 40(6), 649-655.
Lin, M.-H., Fang, Y.-M., & Wang, C.-Y. (2011). A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF APPLYING ERP ON USERS'REACTIONS TO WEB PAGES WITH DIFFERENT PRESENTATION FORMATS. Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 57(5), 89-98.
Lin, M.-h., Wang, C.-y., Cheng, S.-k., & Cheng, S.-h. (2011). An event-related potential study of semantic style-match judgments of artistic furniture. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82(2), 188-195.
Locher, P., & Nodine, C. (1989). The perceptual value of symmetry. Symmetry 2: Unifying human understanding, 475-484.
Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 4(4), 565.
Luck, S. J., & Kappenman, E. S. (2011). The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components: Oxford university press.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). A verbal measure of information rate for studies in environmental psychology. Environment and Behavior, 6(2), 233.
Montoya, P., & Sitges, C. (2006). Affective modulation of somatosensory-evoked potentials elicited by tactile stimulation. Brain Research, 1068(1), 205-212. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.019
Morton, J. (2010). Why color matters. COLORCOM. Retirado de http://www. colorcom. com/research/why-color-matters.
Na, N., & Suk, H. J. (2014). The emotional characteristics of white for applications of product color design Industrial Applications of Affective Engineering (pp. 253-264): Springer.
Nagamachi, M. (2002). Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. Applied ergonomics, 33(3), 289-294.
Nijdam, N. A. (2009). Mapping emotion to color. Book Mapping emotion to color, 2-9.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things: Basic Civitas Books.
Ohkura, M., Konuma, A., Murai, S., & Aoto, T. (2008). Systematic study for “kawaii” products (the second report)-commpmrison of “kawaii” colors and shapes. Paper presented at the SICE Annual Conference, 2008.
Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biological psychology, 77(3), 247-265.
Onton, J., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., & Makeig, S. (2006). Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 808-822.
Osgood, C. E. (1957). The measurement of meaning/Ch. E. Osgood, GJ Suci, PH Tannenbaum. Urbana, ILL: University of Illinois Press.
Picton, T., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S., Johnson, R., . . . Rugg, M. (2000). Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37(2), 127-152.
Picton, T., & Stuss, D. (1980). The component structure of the human event-related potentials. Progress in brain research, 54, 17-49.
Proverbio, A. M., Azzari, R., & Adorni, R. (2013). Is there a left hemispheric asymmetry for tool affordance processing? Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2690-2701.
Proverbio, A. M., Del Zotto, M., & Zani, A. (2007). The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition. BMC neuroscience, 8(1), 24.
Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of the mind: Studies with modern imaging techniques. Annual review of psychology, 45(1), 333-356.
Rajapakse, R. J., Jayasinghe, H., Tokuyama, Y., Miyata, K., & Marasinghe, A. (2009). The effect of variable base on perceiving gender kansei of 3D-shape. Paper presented at the Biometrics and Kansei Engineering, 2009. ICBAKE 2009. International Conference on.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372.
Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & cognition, 14(3), 191-201.
Riegel, M., Żurawski, Ł., Wierzba, M., Moslehi, A., Klocek, Ł., Horvat, M., . . . Marchewka, A. (2016). Characterization of the Nencki Affective Picture System by discrete emotional categories (NAPS BE). Behavior research methods, 48(2), 600-612.
Rugg, M., Fletcher, P., Frith, C., Frackowiak, R., & Dolan, R. (1996). Differential activation of the prefrontal cortex in successful and unsuccessful memory retrieval. Brain, 119(6), 2073-2083.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological review, 110(1), 145-172.
Russell, J. A., Ward, L. M., & Pratt, G. (1981). Affective quality attributed to environments: A factor analytic study. Environment and behavior, 13(3), 259-288.
Schifferstein, H. N., & Desmet, P. M. (2007). The effects of sensory impairments on product experience and personal well-being. Ergonomics, 50(12), 2026-2048.
Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2015). Perceived communicative context and emotional content amplify visual word processing in the fusiform gyrus. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 6010-6019.
Seva, R. R., Duh, H. B. L., & Helander, M. (2005). Development of a conceptual model of product emotion in the pre-purchase context. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, Las Vegas.
Shackman, A. J., McMenamin, B. W., Slagter, H. A., Maxwell, J. S., Greischar, L. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Electromyogenic artifacts and electroencephalographic inferences. Brain topography, 22(1), 7-12.
Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M. (2009). Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical studies of the arts, 27(1), 25-42.
Spreckelmeyer, K. N., Kutas, M., Urbach, T. P., Altenmüller, E., & Münte, T. F. (2006). Combined perception of emotion in pictures and musical sounds. Brain research, 1070(1), 160-170.
Straube, T., & Miltner, W. H. (2006). Zentralnervöse Korrelate der Verarbeitung bedrohungsrelevanter Reize bei Phobikern und Gesunden. Psychologische Rundschau, 57(3), 176-186.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊