跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.75) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/08/20 15:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張添瑋
研究生(外文):Tien-Wei Chang
論文名稱:應用專家決策樹改進教學評量系統
論文名稱(外文):Using Expert Decision Tree Algorithm in Computer Assisted Testing System
指導教授:賴泳伶
指導教授(外文):Yung-Ling Lai
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:資訊工程學系研究所
學門:工程學門
學類:電資工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:37
中文關鍵詞:KLSI適性化學習電腦教學評量系統學習策略決策樹
外文關鍵詞:Learning strategyadaptive learningKLSIcomputer aided assessment systemdecision tree
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:586
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:116
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在網路學習中,網路學習評量為目前廣泛使用來了解每一個學習過程的方法。由於每一個人適合的學習方法不盡相同,現有單一回饋機制的教學評量方式,較難讓學習者達成適性化學習的目標。本論文提出以專家決策樹演算法來建立學習型態與教學策略間的規則性,並將此規則性融入電腦教學系統中,建構出新的多元教學評量系統。本系統先依據KLSI量表知識庫測量學習者的學習習慣與學習週期中各階段的強度,判斷出學生的學習型態;同時由多位資深教師(專家)以他們在教學上的經驗制定出學習策略的規則;之後使用專家決策樹演算法,依據學習者對教材的反應及評量作答結果,分析每種學習型態適用的學習策略模式。本研究結果不但可提供教師針對不同學習型態的學生給予適合的學習策略;也可以讓學習者藉由適性化的學習策略,提升學習效能。
Since different person has different learning method that suits him/her, the adaptive learning is hard to be reached through the existed single feedback assessment mechanism. This thesis integrated a set of expert decision tree algorithm to build up the regularity between learning type and teaching strategy. The regularity is embedded into the computer assisted system to set up new diversified teaching assessment system. Experts’ teaching experiments and KLSI Inventory are used to set up the rules of learning type knowledge database in the system. Based on the learning type knowledge database, the system will judge learners’ strength in each stage of the learning period, and divided the learners into four learning types. Then based on the response from teaching material and assessment result, the learning strategy suitable for different types of learners is analyzed. After revise the knowledge regularity correlation, the system will propose a suggestion of learning strategy for the learners to enhance learning effectiveness.
中文摘要..................................................ii
Abstract.................................................iii
致謝......................................................iv
論文目錄...................................................v
圖目錄...................................................vii
表目錄..................................................viii
第1章 緒論.................................................1
1.1 研究背景...............................................1
1.2 研究動機與目的.........................................2
1.3 論文架構...............................................3
第2章 文獻探討.............................................4
2.1 專家系統...............................................4
2.2 KLSI量表...............................................5
2.3 學習策略...............................................7
2.4 網路評量系統...........................................8
2.5 決策樹演算法介紹.......................................9
第3章 系統流程............................................12
3.1 系統原理..............................................12
3.2 系統架構..............................................13
3.2.1 知識庫的建立........................................14
3.2.2 線上學習系統架構....................................17
3.3 系統實作..............................................18
3.3.1 實驗對象和實施......................................18
3.3.2 平台製做和功能簡介..................................20
第4章 資料分析............................................23
4.1 知識庫分析............................................23
4.2 線上學習系統成效比較..................................25
第五章 研究結論和未來研究方向.............................29
5.1 研究結論..............................................29
5.2 未來研究方向..........................................29
參考文獻..................................................31
附錄一....................................................35
[1]T. Abraham, Unlocking the Door to Special Collections: Using the Web Combination, Library Philosophy and Practice VOL. 3, pp 32-40, 2001.
[2]J. Bransford, A. Brown , How People Learn: Brain, Mind, and Experience & School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
[3]U. Cheema, Expert Systems for Earthquake Damage Assessment, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, VOL. 22, pp 6-10, 2007.
[4]C. M. Chen, C. H. Ma, B. S. Jong, Y. T. Hsia, T. W. Lin, Using Data Minging to Discover the Correlation between Web Learing Portfolios and Achievements, Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 38th Annual, IEEE, pp F2F9- F2F14, 2008.
[5]G. Guida, C. Tasso, Topics in Expert System Design, Elsevier Science Pub, 1989.
[6]B. K. Hayes, J. E. Taplin , Development of conceptual knowledge in children with mental retardation, American Journal of Mental Retardation, VOL. 298, pp 293-303, 1993.
[7]J. Jassó, A. Milani, S. Pallottelli, Blended e-learning: survey of on-line student assessment, 19th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Application, pp 626-630, 2008.
[8]A. Kardan, H. Monkaresi, Developing a Novel Framework for Effective Use of Implicit Feedback in Adaptive e-Learning, New Generations, ITNG Fifth International Conference on Information Technology IEEE, pp 955-960, 2008.
[9]T. Katase, H. Yamamoto, K. Mutsuura, Instructional Design Model Promoting Transfer Using Group Development Method of e-Learning Teaching Materials by Learners Themselves, Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, ITHET 7th International Conference, pp 134-141, 2006.
[10]J. W. Keefe, Learning Style Theory and Practice, Nation Association of Secondary School Principals, 1987.
[11]D. A. Kolb, Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source of Learning And Development, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1984.
[12]D. Kolb, R. Fry, Toward an applied theory of experiential learning, In C. L. Cooper (ed.) Theories of group processes. London: John Wiley and Sons, 1975.
[13]H. Kristina, Evaluating the utility and usability of an adaptive hypermedia system, Knowledge-Based Systems, VOL. 10, pp 311-319, 1998.
[14]R. Y. K. Lau, D. Song, Y. Li, Toward a Fuzzy Domain Ontology Extraction Method for Adaptive e-Learning, IEEE Transcations on Knowledge and Data Engineering, VOL. 21, pp 800-813, 2009.
[15]A. B. Lewis, R. E Mayer, Students’ miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems, Journal of educational psychology, VOL. 79, pp 363-371, 1987.
[16]C. Licia, D. B. Paul, A flexible hypertext courseware on the web based on a dynamic, Interacting with Computers, VOL. 10, pp143-154, 1998.
[17]G. Marchionini, Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos, Educational Technology, VOL. 28, pp 8-12, 1988.
[18]M. Sasakura, S. Yamasaki, A Framework for Adaptive e-Learning Systems in Higher Education with Information Visualization, 11th International Conference Information Visualization IEEE, pp 819-824, 2007.
[19]L. L. Schmidt, B. C. Amick, J. N. Katz, B. B. Ellis, Evaluation of an upper extremity student-role functioning scale using item response theory, Work 19, pp105–116, 2002.
[20]S. Sun, M. Joy, N. Griffiths, To Support Adaptivity in Agent-Based Learning Systems– The Use of Learning Objects and Learning Style, Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp 846-847, 2005.
[21]W. Sun, W. Zhang, The Research of Collaborative E-Learning System towards Knowledge Management, International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, pp 354-357, 2008.
[22]S.R. Terrell, The effect of learning style on doctoral course completion in Web–based learning environment, Internet and Higher Education, VOL. 5, pp 345–352, 2002.
[23]D. Tian, A Progress- Based Online Assessment System For First-Year Networking Classes, Frontiers in Education FIE Proceedings 35th Annual Conference, pp S2H 31-36, 2005.
[24]Z. Y. Yang, Y. C. Hung, Research of a teaching material system on SCORM using Bayesian network in learning Dreamweaver, Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation IEEE, VOL. 2, pp 647-651, 2008.
[25]Q. Yang, J. Yin, C. Ling and R. Pan, Extracting Actionable Knowledge from Decision Trees, IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, VOL. 19, pp 43-56, 2007.
[26]H. Umano, R. Sudha, Constrained Cascade Generalization of Decision Trees, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, VOL. 16, pp 727-739, 2004.
[27]科技產業資訊室(Kyle編撰),市場報導- 2012年全球有17個市場,寬頻普及率高於60%,2008/07/30,(科技產業資訊室報導網路普及率的相關資料和數據)http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/market/eetelecomm/2008/eetelecomm_08_033.htm。
[28]田冠鈞,台灣高等教育發展數位學習的瓶頸與展望,教育研究月刊,第125期,第17-26頁,2005。
[29]行政院國家科學委員會,數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫,2008(說明數位內容產業主要是包含:數位遊戲、電腦動畫、數位學習、數位影音應用、行動應用服務、內容軟體、網路服務、數位出版典藏等八大類)。
[30]林彥廷,數位學習環境下以決策樹為基礎之線上題庫難易度自動分級,南台科技大學資訊工程系碩士論文,2005。
[31]紀文章,專家系統在企業資訊管理實務中的定位。資訊與教育,57期,第42-49頁,1998。
[32]孫佩詩,視覺字彙教學對國小四年級學童認字、讀字和拼字之影響:類比法與看說法之比較研究,國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士論文,2007。
[33]陳星榮,工具機業顧客抱怨處理決策支援系統,東海大學工業工程研究所碩士論文,2002。
[34]郭美辰,問題解決教學策略應用於教學網路之研究─以大學「微處理機」課程為例,國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,2002。
[35]鄭淑真、林彥廷、黃悅民,智慧型行動裝置之網路瀏覽下載建議,第十屆人工智慧研討會,2005。
[36]鄭玉宙,類神經網路應用於降低武器及彈藥測試成本之研究,國防大學中正理工學院兵器系統工程研究所碩士論文,2002。
[37]顏義樺,以聯想法則概念網路為基礎之文章概念探索及相似性比對。東海大學資訊工程與科學系碩士論文,2003。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top