臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年來空間資訊的數量與日俱增，且許多資料以開放的方式發布在網路上，造成了資料異質性的議題。資料異質性意即資料眾多且格式不一，即使是相同類型的資料，也會發生因為格式不一而難以整合的問題，因此本研究以國際組織開放地理資訊協會(Open Geospatial Consortium，OGC)制定的通用國際標準，網路目錄服務(Catalogue Service for the Web，CSW)及感測器觀測服務(Sensor Observation Service，SOS)等，解決資料格式不一之問題，同時提升空間資料及網路服務的交互操作性。
本研究並透過聯邦式方法(The Federating Approach)以及仲介式方法(The Brokering Approach)兩種方法進行分析，找出兩方法之間的差異性、優缺點以及適用情況，並實際應用兩項方法進行系統的架設，以大甲溪流域包含德基水庫集水區為研究範圍，蒐集27個雨量站之雨量資料，將不同雨量發布單位之雨量資料利用標準方式進行整合，解決異質性資料的交互操作性議題，促進跨單位的資料整合，並以不同面向進行方法適用性的分析，說明在不同的狀況條件下，透過資料數量以及時間效能的分析，找出兩種方法論之系統架構在資料量與時間關係上的黃金交叉點，驗證當資料量過大時使用聯邦式方法架設之系統所產生的負荷程度較為顯著，因此當資料量達到一定規模時更適合使用仲介式方法。

Recently, the steadily increasing spatial data and more and more data published on the Internet had led to the issue of data heterogeneity. Data heterogeneity means that, even for the same type of data, there are many different kinds of data formats, resulting in problems of integration. Therefore, this study used the Catalogue Service for the Web (CSW) and Sensor Observation Service (SOS), which are standards developed by the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), to solve the problem of integration from different data formats, and promote the interoperability of spatial data.
This study used two methods, The Federating Approach and The Brokering Approach, to compare their efficiency and suitability and find out the difference. Both methods were applied in setting up systems in this study. The case study of Dajia River Basin was used, and the rainfall data of 27 stations was collected for integration study. The OGC standards were applied to integrate the rainfall data from different organizations, and the results showed that the interoperability issue of data heterogeneity was well handled by the proposed OGC standard-based systems among data providers (organizations).
This study also analyzed the applicability of two methods in terms of data quantity and processing time under different situations. The crossing point was found in the comparison of the two methods. Based on the results, The Federating Approach generated lots of system loadings while the data reached to a huge amount. Therefore, The Brokering Approach was more suitable when given a certain amount of data.

目錄
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究範圍 3
第四節 研究架構與流程 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 服務導向架構 8
第二節 OGC國際標準 15
第三節 方法探討 22
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究設計 26
第二節 研究材料說明 34
第三節 研究技術 36
第四章 實證分析 42
第一節 異質資料整合 42
第二節 數據統計及呈現 47
第三節 黃金交叉點 59
第五章 結論與建議 72
參考文獻 74

參考文獻
1.陳佳勳，2006，以目錄服務與空間資源詮釋資料提升空間資料基礎架構之互操作性，國立成功大學測量及空間資訊學系碩博士班碩士論文。
2.鄧岳荃，2007，以開放式地理資料提升空間服務導向架構之地圖介面內容互操作性，國立成功大學測量及空間資訊學系碩博士班碩士論文。
3.尹孝元、方耀民，2009，OGC SOA架構下感測器資訊標準在土石流觀測系統之應用，國土資訊系統通訊，第72期，頁37-51。
4.呂瑞麟，2000，XML 中文化對電子商務的應用-以 EDI為探討案例，朝陽學報，第5期，頁201-216。
5.段智華，2001，淺談SOAP。
6.翁偉翔，2012，經由IP網路遠端存取ZigBee感測網路之實作，南開科技大學電機與資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
7.Wohlstadter, E., Tai, S., Mikalsen, T., Diament, J., & Rouvellou, I., (2006). A Service-oriented Middleware for Runtime Web Services Interoperability.
8.Natis, Yefim V., (2003). Service-oriented architecture scenario.
9.Balzer, Yvonne., (2004). Improve your SOA project plans. IBM Global Services.
10.Ang, J., Arsanjani, A., Chua, S., Comte, P., Krogdahl, P., Luo, M., & Newling, T., (2004). Patterns: service-oriented architecture and web services. IBM Corporation, International Technical Support Organization.
11.Booth, D., Haas, H., McCabe, F., Newcomer, E., Champion, M., Ferris, C., Orchard, D., (2004). Web services architecture. W3C Working Group.
12.Newcomer, E., Lomow, G., (2005). Understanding SOA with Web services. Addison-Wesley professional.
13.Simonis, I., (2008). OGC sensor web enablement architecture. Open Geospatial Consortium.
14.Bröring, A., Stasch, C., Echterhoff, J., (2010). OGC® Sensor Observation Service Interface Standard (Version 2.0). Open Geospatial Consortium.
15.Botts, M., Robin, A., Univ. of Alabama., (2007). OpenGIS® Sensor Model Language (SensorML)Implementation Specification. Open Geospatial Consortium.
16.Nebert, D., Whiteside, A., Vretanos, P., (2007). OpenGIS® Catalogue Services Specification. Open Geospatial Consortium.
17.Nativi, S., Mazzetti, P., Saarenmaa, H., Kerr, J., & Tuama, É. Ó., (2009). Biodiversity and climate change use scenarios framework for the GEOSS interoperability pilot process. Ecological Informatics, 4.1: 23-33.
18.Nativi, S., Bigagli, L., Mazzetti, P., Boldrini, E., Papeschi, F., (2009). GI-cat: a mediation solution for building a clearinghouse catalog service. In: Advanced Geographic Information Systems & Web Services, 2009. GEOWS'09. International Conference on. IEEE, p. 68-74.
19.Nativi, S., Bigagli, L., (2009). Discovery, mediation, and access services for earth observation data. Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of, 2.4: 233-240.
20.Giuliani, G., Papeschi, F., Mlisa, A., Lacroix, P. M. A., Santoro, M., Nonguierma, A., Guigoz, Y., (2015). Enabling Discovery of African Geospatial Resources. South-Eastern European Journal Issue of Earth Observation and Geomatics, 4.1S: 1-16.
21.Nativi, S., Craglia, M., Pearlman, J., (2013). Earth science infrastructures interoperability: the brokering approach. Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of, 6.3: 1118-1129.
22.Vretanos, P., (2014). OGC® CHISP-1 Engineering Report. Open Geospatial Consortium.
23.Nativi, S., Craglia, M., Pearlman, J., (2012). The brokering approach for multidisciplinary interoperability: A position paper. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 7: 1-15.
24.Nativi, S., Mazzetti, P., Santoro, M., Boldrini, E., Manzella, G.M.R., Schaap, D.M.A., (2010). CDI/THREDDS interoperability in the SeaDataNet framework. Advances in Geosciences, 28.28: 17-27.
25.Pearlman, J., Craglia, M., Bertrand, F., Nativi, S., Gaigalas, G., Dubois, G., Niemeyer, S., Fritz, S., (2011). EuroGEOSS: an interdisciplinary approach to research and applications for forestry, biodiversity and drought. In: Proceedings of the 34th international symposium on remote sensing of environment. p. 1-4.
26.Broughton, D., (2004). Gnss-a users' perspective in 2010. In: Electronics in Marine, 2004. Proceedings Elmar 2004. 46th International Symposium. IEEE, p. 1-4.
27.Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Meredith, G., & Weerawarana, S., (2001). Web services description language (WSDL) 1.1.
28.Vretanos, P., (2005). OpenGIS® Web Feature Service (WFS) Implementation Specification. OpenGIS Implementation Specification, OGC document, 04-094.
29.Degrossi, L. C., do Amaral, G. G., de Vasconcelos, E. S., de Albuquerque, J. P., & Ueyama, J., (2013). Using wireless sensor networks in the sensor web for flood monitoring in Brazil. In 10th ISCRAM Conference (pp. 458-462).
30.Pyster, A., Olwell, D.H. (Eds.), (2013). The Guide to the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK), vol. 1.2. The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ. www.sebokwiki.org/ (accessed 15.11.13.).
31.Nativi, S., Mazzetti, P., Santoro, M., Papeschi, F., Craglia, M., & Ochiai, O., (2015). Big Data challenges in building the global earth observation system of systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 68, 1-26.