跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.10) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/01 01:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:洪翔詩
研究生(外文):Hsiang-Shih Hung
論文名稱:公司治理與股利政策
論文名稱(外文):Corporate Governance and Dividend Policy
指導教授:李存修李存修引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:財務金融學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2004
畢業學年度:92
語文別:英文
論文頁數:35
中文關鍵詞:股利政策公司治理
外文關鍵詞:corporate governancedividend policy
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:448
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本文以民國89至91年之台灣上市公司排除金融業為研究對象,探討控制股東之股權結構及董事會組成是否對股利政策產生負的侵占效果。研究結果顯示當控制股東之現金權與董事會席次之偏離情況越嚴重時,會降低現金股利的發放,此結果符合負的侵占效果假說。此外,在控制股東的控制權大於20%時,此侵占效果愈明顯。
This paper tests two models of dividends in Taiwan during the period of 2000-2002. And the empirical results in Taiwan support the expropriation hypothesis which argues that dividends signal the severity of the conflict between controlling and small shareholder. That is firms with weak corporate governance are associated with fewer cash dividend paying. However, the expropriation phenomenon is not such obvious gauged by deviations from control rights to cash flow rights. But if we replace deviations from control rights to cash flow rights with deviations from the percentage of board seats controlling shareholders occupy to cash flow rights, the expropriation by not paying dividends to shareholders becomes significant. This variable is proven to be more representative of conflicting interests between minority and majority shareholders in our regressions and proves controlling shareholders will exert their power in the board of directors to affect corporate dividend policy.
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. LITERATURE REVIEW 3
II.1. Dividend Policy 3
II.2. Corporate Governance 4
II.3. CG & Dividend Policy 6
III. THE HYPOTHESES 10
Hypothesis 1: Dividends as an Outcome of Protection of Shareholders 10
Hypothesis 2: Dividends as a Vehicle to Reducing Conflicting Interests between Minority and Majority Shareholders 10
IV. METHODOLOGY 11
IV.1. The Sample 11
IV.2. The Empirical Model 11
IV.2.1. Dependent variable 11
IV.2.2. Corporate Governance Variables 13
IV.2.3. Control Variables 15
V. EMPIRICAL RESULTS 17
V.1. Descriptive Statistics 17
V.2. Simple Statistics 20
V.3. Regressions 22
V.3.1. Dividend Yield 22
V.3.2. Dividend Payout Ratio 24
V.3.3. Cash Dividends to Total Dividends Ratio 26
V.3.4. Stock Dividends and Total Dividends 28
VI. CONCLUSIONS 32
REFERENCES 33
Brennan, M., 1971, “A Note on Dividend Irrelevance and the Gordon Valuation Model”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 26, pp. 1115-1121
Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan and L.H.P Lang, 2002, “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58, pp. 81-112
Crutchely, C.E. and R.S., Hansen, 1989, “A Test of the agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends”, Financial Management, Vol. 18, pp. 36-46
Easterbrook, F.H., 1984, “Two Agency Costs Explanations of Dividends”, American Economic Review, Vol. 74, pp. 650-659
Eugene F. Fama, Kenneth R. French, 2001, “Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay?”, Journal of Financial Economics , Vol. 60, pp. 3-43
Faccio, M., Lang, L.H.P., Young, L., 2001, “Dividends and Expropriation”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp. 54-78
Farrar, D., and L. Selwyn, 1967, “Taxes, Corporate Financial Policy and Return to Investors”, National Tax Journal, Vol. 20, pp. 444-454
Frank H. Easterbrook, 1984, “Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends”, American Economic Review, Vol. 74, pp. 650-659
Gordon, M.J., 1963, “Optimal Investment and Financing Policy”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 18, pp. 264-272
Grossman, S. J., and O. D. Hart, 1980, “Takeover Bids, the Free Rider Problem and the Theory of the Corporation,” Bell Journal of Economics, Vol.11, pp.42-64
Holderness, C. and Sheehan, D., 1988, “The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 317-346
Jensen, M. C., and W.H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305-360
Jensen, M. C., 1986, “Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp. 323-329
Klaus Gugler, 2003, “Corporate Governance, Dividend Payout Policy, and the Interrelation between Dividends, R&D, and Capital Investment”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 27, pp. 1297-1321
Klaus Gugler, B. Burcin Yurtoglu, 2002, “Corporate Governance and Dividend Pay-out Policy in Germany”, European Economic Review, Vol. 47, pp. 731-758
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1999, “Corporate Ownership around the World,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, pp. 471-517
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 2000, “Investor Protection and Corporate Governance,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58, pp. 3-27
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 2000, “Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, pp. 1-33
Miller, Merton H. and Franco Modigliani, 1961, “Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares”, Journal of Business, Vol. 34, pp. 411-433
Shleifer A., Vishny, R, 1997, “A Survey of Corporate Governance”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, pp. 737-783
Shleifer A., Vishny, R, 1986, “Larger Shareholders and Corporate Control”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp. 461-488
Claessens S, Simeon Djankov, Joseph P.H. Fan, and Larry H.P. Lang, 1999, “Expropriation of Minority Shareholders; Evidence from East Asia”, Working Paper
Tsun-Siou Lee, Yin-Hua Yeh, “Corporate Governance and Financial Distress: Evidence from Taiwan”, Working Paper
Yeh, Yin-Hua, Tsun-Siou Lee, and Tracie Woidtke, 2001, “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Taiwan”, International Review of Finance, Forthcoming
Yin-Hua Yeh, and Tracie Woidtke, “Commitment or Entrenchment?: Controlling Shareholders and Board Composition”, Working Paper
李曼玲 (Li), 1998, “我國上司公司股利發放之決策與公司特質關連性之實證研究”, 第四屆中華民國台灣地區會計審計理論與實務研討會
林博政 (Lin), 1997, “台灣上市公司股利發放模式之實證研究”, 東海大學管理研究所碩士論文
邱郁茹, 2002, “台灣商業銀行股權結構與經營績效風險關聯性之研究”, 台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文
洪振虔 (Hong), 1988, “台灣地區上市公司股利發放之探討”, 國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
張恆華, 2002, “兩稅合一制對公司股利政策影響之再探討”, 逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文
張錦娥 (Zhang) ,1992, “所得稅對資本結構及股利政策影響之研究”, 東東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文
陳舒怡 (Chen), 1996, “上市公司發放現金股利與無償配股問題之研究”, 東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文
葉春岑, 2000, “成長機會、資訊不對稱與可支配現金流量對股利政策影響之研究”, 朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
葉文郁 (Yen), 1995, “上市公司股利發放模式及現金股利顧客效果之研究”, 政治大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文
黃智群 (Huang), 2001, “兩稅合一對公司股利政策之影響--傳統產業與高科技產業比較”, 國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
盧育仕 (Lu), 1999, “兩稅合一對我國上市公司股利政策影響之實證研究”, 逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文
謝奐儀 (Hsieh), 2002, “公司治理與融資決策”, 台灣大學商研所碩士論文
謝祁凌, 2000, “從代理理論觀點探索公司股利政策與經營績效關聯性之研究”, 東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 廖英明。1998。菇類中的許不了:樟芝。農業世界雜誌,176: 76-79。
2. 楊國卿、賴俊雄、王建民、劉紹興、林春蓮、楊燦、許昭純、趙秀琳、劉淑芬、吳聰能。1996。鉛污染中藥冬蟲夏草造成的鉛危害:四個案例分析。中華職業醫學雜誌,3: 73-77。
3. 黃惠君。2004。食藥用菇的營養與藥用價值。食品工業,36: 25-32。
4. 黃仕政、陳勁初。2000。發酵生物技術在菇類食品的應用,中華食品工業雜誌,40: 62-67。
5. 陳啟楨。1999。菇類二次代謝物質及其利用。食品工業,31: 1-11。
6. 陳美瑩。2003a。照射技術及其在食品中之應用。食品工業,35: 47-60。
7. 陳勁初、黃仕政。2000。菇菌類機能性食品之開發。生物產業,11: 164-172。
8. 陳勁初、林文鑫、陳清農、許勝傑、黃仕政、陳炎鍊。2001a。台灣特有真菌--樟芝菌絲體之開發。中華真菌學會會刊,16: 7-22。
9. 畢培曦、馬平。1995。香港市售冬蟲夏草偽品之生藥鑒定。中醫藥雜誌,6: 259-264。
10. 林婉茹、劉黃碧圓、林芳存、李堂察、洪進雄。2004。溫度對巴西蘑菇儲藏壽命及品質之影響。中華真菌學會會刊,19: 169-179。
11. 王伯徹。2004b。菇類菌種之長期保存。食品工業,36: 16-24。
12. 王伯徹。2004a。綜論菇類大型真菌的利用與開發。食品工業,36: 1-3。
13. 王伯徹、邱世浩、黃仁彰。1998a。食用菇保健食品專輯。食品工業,30:1-36。
14. 王伯徹、林錦堂、華傑。1990。靈芝菌種之長期保存。中國農業化學會誌,28: 86-93。