臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究之實證結果可以觀察到1990~2005年間，半導體廠商的專利引證網絡特性對於提升其技術水準的影響。我們發現引證程度中心性，可以提升這些廠商的技術能力。我們更進一步探討先後進廠商之比較時，發現到後進廠商透過專利引證來學習技術的方式，對提升技術能力的幅度明顯超越先進國家，且越到後期顯著性更強、幅度更大。另外這些廠商的中介中心性若越高，代表他們佔據引證網絡越重要的位置，而其技術能力就越強。同樣的在探討後進廠商的中介中心性時，雖然先後進廠商都佔據網絡的重要位置，但是在最後一期(2001~2005)後進廠商的技術能力強過先進廠商。

This study examines the impact of patent citation networks on technology capability in the semiconductors industry among advanced firms in US, Japan, Germany, France and Netherlands and latecomer firms in Taiwan, Korea and Singapore during 1990-2005. We find that learning could improve semiconductors firms’ technology capability. Moreover, the level of improvement in latecomer firms was greater than advanced ones. In addition, the more important position a firm had in the patent citation network, the better technology capability it had and latecomer firms were significantly better than advanced ones only in recent years, i.e. 2001-2005.

目次
口試委員會審定書...................i
誌謝...............................ii
中文摘要...........................iii
Abstract...........................iv
圖目錄.............................vii
表目錄.............................viii
第一章 前言.......................1
第二章 文獻回顧...................3
第三章 計量模型的設立.............7
3.1迴歸模型.......................7
3.2網絡變數-社會網絡理論..........9
3.3其他變數和處理.................15
第四章 資料來源及變數說明.........18
4.1資料來源.......................18
4.2變數定義與樣本統計分析.........22
第五章 實證結果分析...............28
第六章 結論.......................33
參考文獻...........................34
附錄一：網絡連結屬多次且具方向性...37
附錄二：迴歸樣本的廠商名單.........38
附錄三：重要變數統計分析表.........40
附錄四：其他迴歸結果-(RD,RDS)......41

中文部份

張火燦和劉淑寧 (2002) “從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享” 人力資源管理學報 秋季號 第二卷 第三期, 101-113

曾志弘 (2001) “多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究以多國籍
企業在台子公司為例” 中山大學企業管理學系博士論文

蔣禮芸 (2001) “我國資訊電子業公司專利引用網路與技術分類關係之研究”
台灣大學圖書資訊學系碩士論文

鄭秀玲與張淑卿 (2005) “專利引證和國際知識外溢：以電子產業為例” 經濟論文 Vol 33:1, 103-140

英文部分

Berstein, J. I. and P. Mohnen (1998) “International R&D spillovers between U.S. and Japanese R&D intensive Sectors” Journal of International Economics 44, 315-338

Branstetter, L. G. (2001) “Are knowledge spillovers international or international in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the U.S. and Japan” Journal of International Economics 53, 53-79

Freeman, L. (1979) “Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification” Social networks, 1: 215-239

Hall, B.H. and R.H. Ziedonis (2001) “The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1797-1995” Rand Journal of Economics 32, 102-128

Hu, A. and A. Jaffe (2003) “Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan” International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, 849-880

Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson (1993) “Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3), 577-598

Jaffe, A. and M. Trajtenberg (1996) “Flows of university and federal labs: Modeling the flow of patent citationsover time and across institutional and geographic boundaries” NBER Working Paper, No. 5712

Jaffe, A. and M. Trajtenberg (1999) “International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations” Economics of Innovation & New Technology 8(1-2), 105-136

Jang, Show-Ling and Guo-Gang Huang (2005) “Public R&D and industrial innovations at the project levels: An exploration of Taiwan’s public research projects” Contemporary Economic Policy 23(4), 636-646


Liao, Shu-Hsien and Ta-Chien Hu (2007) “Knowledge transfer and competitive advantage on environmental uncertainty: An empirical study of the Taiwan semiconductor industry” Technovation 27, 402-411

Mitchell, J.C. (1969) “Social networks and urban situations” Manchester University Press

Park, K.H. and K. Lee (2006) “Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US patent data” Industrial and Corporate Change 15(4), 715-753

Senge, P. (1998) “Sharing knowledge” Executive Excellence, 15(6): 11-12

Spencer, J.W. (2003) “Global gatekeeping, representation, and network structure：a longitudinal analysis of regional and global knowledge networks” Journal of International Bussiness Studies 34, 428-422