臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資策會產業情報所(MIC)指出隨著網路環境的成熟及線上購物行為日趨普及，台灣網購市場規模每年至少呈現20%以上的高度成長，經濟部商業司更預測，台灣網購市場產值在2015年將達1兆台幣，在在顯現網購市場是值得關注的市場。
台灣電子商務網站的經營者若要在網購市場中搶得商機，必需要能夠洞悉提升消費者使用網路購物的關鍵因素，因此，進一步瞭解台灣消費者對網路購物的相關消費行為，將有助於提高業者經營上的競爭優勢。據此，本研究的目的有三，將探討台灣網購市場中：
1.網購的知覺易用性與知覺有用性分別對網購態度的影響。
2.網購態度對網購的行為意圖的影響。
3.社會性規範對台灣消費者網購態度及網購的行為意圖的影響。

經由問卷回收後之資料分析，本研究結果為：
1.在台灣網購市場中，網購態度的知覺易用性及知覺有用性分別對網購態度都有顯著的影響。
2.在台灣網購市場中，網購的態度對行為意圖成正面且顯著的影響。
3.對台灣消費者而言，社會性規範對網購的態度及行為意圖都有正面的影響。

According to Market Intelligence & Consulting Institute (MIC), the gradual popularity of the Internet and on-line shopping causes Taiwan’s online shopping market to grow by 20% annually. Moreover, the Dept. of Commerce, Ministry of Economic Affairs predicts that the yield of Taiwan’s on-line shopping market will be up to NTD 1 trillion in 2015. Apparently, online shopping market is worth studying in every way.
If a manager of e-Commerce website intends to be successful in the market, it is necessary for this individual to comprehend the key factors to increasing consumers’ use of online shopping. In other words, the understanding of consumers’ online shopping behavior will benefit the corporations and improve their competitiveness in the market. Therefore, this study is aimed at discussing the following three issues:
1.How does the perceived ease of use of online shopping and the perceived usefulness affect consumers’ attitude toward online shopping respectively?
2.How does consumers’ attitude toward online shopping affect their behavioral intention of online shopping?
3.How does subjective norms affect consumers’ attitude toward online shopping and their behavioral intention of online shopping?

After analyzing the data collected through questionnaire survey, this study concludes its results as follows:
1.In Taiwan’s online shopping market, both the perceived ease of use and the perceived usefulness of online shopping have a significant impact on consumers’ attitude toward online shopping.
2.In Taiwan’s online shopping market, consumers’ attitude toward online shopping has a positive and significant impact on their behavioral intention.
3.To consumers on the island, subjective norms have a positive impact on consumers’ attitude toward online shopping and their behavioral intention.

目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… I
表目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… III

圖目錄 ……………………………………………………………………… V

第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節 研究背景……………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究動機……………………………………………………… 5
第三節 研究目的……………………………………………………… 8
第四節 研究範圍與對象……………………………………………… 9
第五節 研究流程……………………………………………………… 10
第二章 文獻回顧與探討…………………………………………………… 11
第一節 電子商務……………………………………………………… 11
第二節 網路購物……………………………………………………… 16
第三節 社會影響……………………………………………………… 20
第四節 理性行為理論及科技接受模式……………………………… 23
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………… 31
第一節 觀念架構……………………………………………………… 31
第二節 研究假說……………………………………………………… 32
第三節 研究變數與操作性定義……………………………………… 35
第四節 研究設計……………………………………………………… 40
第五節 資料分析方法………………………………………………… 41
第四章 資料分析與結果……………………………………………………… 44
第一節 敘述性統計分析……………………………………………… 44
第二節 信度分析……………………………………………………… 55
第三節 結構方程式分析……………………………………………… 58
第五章 研究結論與建議…………………………………………………… 70
第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………… 70
第二節 研究發現……………………………………………………… 72
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議…………………………………… 76
參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………… 77
附錄 研究問卷………………………………………………………………… 85

表目錄
表2-1 從不同角度對電子商務定義之彙整表………………………… 12
表2-2 電子商務特性之彙整表………………………………………… 14
表2-3 網路行銷的定義之彙整表……………………………………… 17
表2-4 網路購物與傳統實體商店通路之比較彙整表………………… 19
表2-5 社群所帶來的影響因素………………………………………… 21
表3-1 知覺易用性之操作性定義與衡量題項………………………… 35
表3-2 知覺有用性之操作性定義與衡量題項………………………… 36
表3-3 社會性規範的操作性定義和衡量題項………………………… 37
表3-4 網購態度的操作性定義與衡量題項…………………………… 38
表3-5 行為意圖的操作性定義和衡量題項…………………………… 39
表3-6 問卷回收情況…………………………………………………… 40
表3-7 整體配適度指標與理想準則…………………………………… 42
表4-1 有無網購經驗…………………………………………………… 44
表4-2 不使用網購的原因……………………………………………… 45
表4-3 常使用的購物網站……………………………………………… 46
表4-4 網購頻率………………………………………………………… 46
表4-5 平均每次網購金額……………………………………………… 47
表4-6 最常網購的商品類型…………………………………………… 48
表4-7 網購使用年資…………………………………………………… 49
表4-8 有效樣本的性別資料…………………………………………… 50
表4-9 有效樣本的年齡資料…………………………………………… 51
表4-10 有效樣本的教育程度資料……………………………………… 52
表4-11 有效樣本的婚姻狀況資料……………………………………… 52
 
表4-12 有效樣本的職業資料…………………………………………… 53
表4-13 有效樣本的每月所得資料……………………………………… 54
表4-14 本研究各構面之Cronbach''s α……………………………… 56
表4-15 結構方程式之參數說明………………………………………… 60
表4-16 整體配適度衡量結果…………………………………………… 63
表4-17 基本配適度指標分析結果……………………………………… 65
表4-18 模型之研究假說與驗證結果…………………………………… 66
表4-19 路徑效果分析…………………………………………………… 69

 
圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程………………………………………………………… 10
圖2-1 理性行為理論(TRA)架構圖……………………………………… 24
圖2-2 科技接受模式理論(TAM)架構圖………………………………… 27
圖3-1 本研究觀念架構………………………………………………… 31
圖4-1 本研究的線性結構圖…………………………………………… 59
圖4-2 本研究線性結構路徑關係圖…………………………………… 67

一、中文部份
1蔡勇美與郭文雄(1987)，都市社會學，台北：巨流。
2官振華(1996)，「WWW使用者運用電子購物意願之研究-以人格特質, 購買涉入與網路使用行為探討」，國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。

3資策會系統工程處(1997)，電子商店經營管理指引，台北：經濟部商業司
4欒斌與羅凱揚(1999)，電子商務(初版)，台北：滄海書局。
5李宛穎(1999)，「線上銷售考量因素之研究」，國立中山大學，企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。

6吳靜宜（2000），「購買過程中運用網際網路與實體商店之比較研究」，國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
7陳莉娟（2000），「一對一網路行銷之探索性研究」，台灣科技大學管理研究所碩士論文。
8周文賢 (2002)，多變量統計分析：SAS/STAT 使用方法，台北：智勝文化。
9劉文良 (2010)，電子商務與網路行銷 (三版)，台北：碁峯資訊。






 
二、英文部份
1Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.P. and Todd, P.A.(1992), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication,” MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247.
2Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999), “Are individual difference germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 2, 361-391.
3Ajzen, I. (1985), “From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviorin Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. (Eds) ,” Springer Series in Social Psychology, Springer, Berlin, 11-39.
4Ajzen, I. (1991), “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,Vol. 50, 179-211.
5Ajzen, I. and Fishbein M. (1980), “Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6Ajzen, I. and Thomas J. Madden (1985), “Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453-474.
7Alba, Joseph, John Lynch, Barton Weitz, Chris Janiszewski, Richard Lutz, Alan Sawyer and Stacy Wood (1997), “Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplaces,” Journal of Marketing, 61, 38-53.
8Bagozzi, R. P. and Y. Yi (1988), “On The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models,” Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
9Bearden, W. O. and Etzel, M. J. (1982), “Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 183–94.
10Bearden, W., Netemeyer, R., and Teel, J. (1989), “Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 473-481.
11Bentler, P. M. (1990), “Comparative Fit Index in Structure Models,” Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.
12Bentler, P. M. and D. G. Bonett (1980), “Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in Analysis of Covariance Structure,” Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
13Bigne-Alcaniz, E., Ruiz-Mafe, C., Aldas-Manzano, J. and Sanz-Blas, S. (2008), “Influence of online shopping information dependency and innovativeness on internet shopping adoption,” Online Information Review, 32(5), 648-667.
14Bosnjak, M., Obermeier, D. and Tuten, T. L. (2006), “Predicting and explaining the propensity to bid in online auctions: A comparison of two action-theoretical models,” Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. 5, No. 2, 102-115.
15Burt, R.S.(1982), “Toward a Structure Theory of Action： Network Models of Social Structure, Perceptions and Action.,” New York: Academic.
16Chen, L. D. and Tan, J. (2004), “Technology adaptation in e-commerce: Key determinants of virtual stores acceptance,” European Management Journal, Vol. 22,No. 1, 74-86.
17Chen, L., Gillenson, M.L., and Sherrell, D.L.(2002), “Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective,” Information and Management, 39, 705-709.
18Childers, T. L. and Rao, A. R. (1992), “The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (September), 198–211.
19Chin, W.C. and Todd, P.A.(1995), “On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution,” MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237-246.
20Cross, R. and S. Janet(1995), “Internet Marketing That Works for Consumers (Part I),” Directing Marketing, Vol. 58, 22-23.
21Davis, F. D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 319-340.
22Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, 982-1003.
23Dellarocas, C. (2003), “The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms,” Management Science, 49(10), 1407.
24Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. G. (1955), “A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influence upon Individual Judgment,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, vol.51,629-636.
25DeVellis, R. F. (1998), “Scale Development: Theory and Applications,” Newbury Park, CA: Stage.
26Dominique, Narciso Perales (1998), “Exchange Costs as Determinants of Electronic Markets Bearings,”Electronic Markets, 8(1), 3-6.
27Eagly, A H. and Chaiken, S. (1993), “The psychology of attitude,” Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
28Fischer, C.S., Jackson, R.M., Stueve, C.A., Gerson, K., Jones, L.M., and Baldassare, M.(1977), “Networks and Places: Social Relations in The Urban Setting,” New York: Free Press.
29Fishbein and Ajzen(1975), “Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research,” Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
30Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W.(2003), “Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: an Integrated Model,” MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
31Gefen, David (2002), “Customer Loyalty in E-Commerce,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3 (51), 27–51.
32Granovetter, M.(1982), “The Strength of Weak Ties: A network Theory Revisited in Marsden, P.V. and Lin, N. (ed.),” Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hills: Sage, 105-130.
33Haines, V. Y. and Petit, A. (1997), “Conditions for successful human resource information systems,” Human Resource Management, Vol. 36, No. 2, 261-275.
34Hamel, G. (2001), “Is This All You Can Build With The Net? Think Bigger Enough of this B2B talk. Use the Net to construct a unique company. How? Ask your customers,” Fortune, New York, 143(9), 134-138.
35Hanson, W.(2000), “Internet Marketing,” South-Western College Publishing,21.
36Hartwick, J. and H. Barki（1994）, “Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information Systems Use,” Management Science, Vol. 40, No. 4, 440-465.
37Haynes, T. (1995), “The Electronic Commerce Dictionary,” Robleda Company, Menlo Park, CA.
38Hodges, M, E. J. Markey and L. Winner (1999), “Is Web Business Good Business? ,” Technology Review,100(6), 22-32
39Hoffman, Donna L. and Homas P. Novak(1997), “A New Marketing Paradigm for Electronic Commerce, ” The Information Society,13, 43-54.
40Hsu, M.H., and Chiu, C.M. (2004), “Internet Self-Efficacy and Electronic Service Acceptance,” Decision Support Systems (38), 369–381.
41Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance,” Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1): 1-55.
42Igbaria, M. and Tan, M. (1997), “The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance,” Information and Management, Vol. 32, No. 3,113-121.
43Jackson, C. M., S. Chow and R. A. Leitch（1997）, “Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intension to Use an Information System,” Decision Science, Vol. 28, No. 2, 357-289.
44Kalakota, R. and Andrew B. Whinston (1996), “Frontiers of Electronic Commerce,” 1st ed., Addison-Wesley.
45Kalakota, R. and A. B. Whinston (1997), “Electronic Commerce: A Manager’s Guide,” Addison-Wesley.
46Karahanna, E., D. Straub and N. Chervany（1999）, “Information Technlolgy Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, 183-213.
47Kau, A. K., Tang, Y. E. and Ghose, S. (2003), “ Typology of online shoppers,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(2), 139-156.
48Kelman, H.C. (1961), “Processes of Opinion Change.” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 25,winter, 57-78.
49Kiang, Melody Y., T. S. Raghu and Kevin Huei-Min Shang (2000), “Marketing on the Internet-Who Can Benefit from an Online Marketing Approach? ,” Decision Support Systems, 27, 383-393.
50Klein, L.(1998), “ Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods”, Journal of Business Research, 41(3), 195-203.
51Kollock, P. (1999), “The Economics of Online Cooperation：Gift and Public Goods in Cyberspace,” In M.A. Smith and P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in Cyberspace, Lodon：Routledge, 220-239.
52Kotler, P.(1996), “Marketing Management : Analysis, Planning, Implement and control,9th edition,” Prentice-Hall Inc.
53Laudon, K. C. and Traver, C. G. (2004), “E-commerce: business、technology、society,” NY: Addison-Wesley.
54Legris, P., Ingham, J., and Collerette, P.(2003), “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model ”, Information and management, 40, 191-204.
55Li, H., C. ,Kuo and M.G. ,Russell (1999), “The Impact of Perceived Channel Utilities, Shopping Orientations, and Demographics on the Consumer’s Online Buying Behavior,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.5, No.2.
56Liang, Ting-Peng and Jin-Shiang Huang (1998), “An Empirical Study on Consumer Acceptance of Products in Electronic Markets: a Transaction Cost Model, ” Decision Support Systems, 24,29-43.
57Liao, S., Y. P. Shao, H. Wang and A. Chen (1999), “The Adoption of Virtual Banking: an Empirical Study,” International Journal of Information Management, 19, 63-74.
58Lin J. C.C. and Lu, H.(2000), “Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a web site,” International Journal of Information Management ,20, 197-208.
59Lou, H., Luo, W., and Strong, D., (2000), “Perceived Critical Mass Effect on Groupware Acceptance,” European Journal of Information System, vol.9, no.2, 91-103.
60Manstead, ASR(2004), “Attitudes and behavior: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences,” Publisher: Elsevier,909-913.
61McMillian, D. W., and Chavis, D. M., (1986), “Sense of community: A definition and theory,” Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 14, 6-23.
62Merrilees, B. (2001), “Do traditional strategic concepts apply in the E-marketing context? ,” Journal of Business Strategies, 18(2), 177-190.
63Metha, Raj and Eugene Sivadas (1995), “Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail survey,” Journal of the Market Research Society, 37(4).
64Methieson, K., Peacock, E. and Chin, W. (2001), “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources,” DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3):86-112.
65Mitchell, J.C. (1969), “Social Networks in Urban Situations,” Manchester: Manchester University Press.
66Moon, J. W. and Kim, Y. G. (2001), “Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context,” Information and Management, Vol. 38, No. 4,217-230.
67Moon, B.J. (2004), “Consumer adoption of the Internet as an information search and product purchase channel: Some research hypotheses,” International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising,” Vol. 1, No. 1, 104-118.
68Morris, M. G. and Dillon, A. (1997), “How User Perceptions Influence Software Use,” IEEE Software, 144: 58-65.
69Morrison, Pamela D. and John H. Roberts (1998), “Matching Electronic Distribution Channels to Product Characteristics: The Role of Congruence in Consideration Set Formation,” Journal of Business Research, 41, 223-229.
70Mulaik, S. A., L. R. James, J. Van Alstine, N. Bennett, S. Lind, and C. D. Stilwell(1989), “Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models,” Psychological Bulletin , 105(3), 430-445.
71Nisenholtz, K., E. Martin (1994), “How to Market in the Net,” Advertising Age,Vol.65,Iss.29, 28.
72Oliver, P.E. and Marwell, G. (2001), “Whatever Happened to Critical Mass Theory? A Retrospective and Assessment,” Sociological Theory, 19, 292-311.
73Olivia, Ralph (1998), “Playing the ‘Web Wild Card,” Marketing Management, 7 (1), 51–52.
74Palmer, Jonathan W. (1996), “Electronic Commerce in Retailing: Differences Across Retail Formats,” The Information Society, 13, 75-91.
75Park, C. Whan and V. Parker Lessig, (1977), “Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influences,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.4, Sep., 102-110.
76Peterson, R. A., S. Balasubramanian and B. J. Bronnenberg (1997), “Exploring the Implications of the Internet for Consumer Marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25, 329-346.
77Poel, D. V. and Leunis, J. (1999), “Consumer acceptance of internet as a channel of distribution,” Journal of Business Research, 45, 249-256
78Price, Linda and Feick(1984), “The Role of Interpersonal Sources in External Search: An Informational Perspective,” Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 250-255.
79Punj, Girish N., and Richard Staelin (1983), “A Model of Consumer Information Search Behavior for New Automobiles,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (4), 366–380.
80Reichheld and Phil Schefter (2000), “E-Loyalty, Your Secret Weapon,” Harvard Business Review, 78 (6), 105–113.
81Rice, Ronald E., August E. Grant, and Joseph Schmitz, (1990), “Individual and Network Influences on theAdoption and Perceived Outcomes of Electronic Messaging,” Social Networks, (12), 27-55.
82Richard Croome, Meredith Lawley and Bishnu Sharma (2010), “Antecedents of Purchase in the Online Buying Process,” Journal of Internet Business, issue 8.
83Rogers, E. (1995), “Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.),” New York: Free Press.
84Rolph E. Anderson and Srinivasan Swaminathan(2011), “Customer Satisfaction and loyalty in E-markets: A PLS Path Modeling Approach,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practive, Vol. 19, no. 2, 221-234.
85Ruyter K. D., Martin Wetzels and Mirella Kleijnen (2001), “Customer adoption of E-service: An experimental study,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(2), 184-207.
86Sears, D. O., L. A. Peplau, and S. E. Taylor (1991), “Social Psychology, 7th ed.,” Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall.
87Segev, A., Wan, D. and Beam, C. (1995), “Designing Electronic Catalogs for Business Value: Results of the Commerce Net Pilot,” California: Berkeley.
88Sinioukov, T. (1999), “Mastering the Web by the Book,” BookTech, 2 (March), 50–54.
89Strader, Troy J. and Michael J. Shaw (1997), “Characteristics of Electronic Markets,” Decision Support Systems, 21, 185-198.
90Swanson, E. B. (1982), “Measuring user attitudes in MIS research: A review,” OMEGA, Vol. 10, No. 2, 157-165.
91Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A.(1995), “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information System Research, 6(2), 145-176,
92Vallerand, R.J., Deshaies, P., Cuerrier, J., Pelletier, L.G., and Mongeau, C.(1992), “Ajzen and Fishbein’s Theory of Reasoned Action as Applied to Moral Behavior: A Confirmatory Analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (62), 89-109.
93Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D.(2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
94Yang, Kiseol (2010), “Determinants of US consumer mobile shopping services adoption: implications for designing mobile shopping services,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Volume 27(3), 262–270.