跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.59) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/15 04:47
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:李忠穎
研究生(外文):Joving Li
論文名稱:台灣現貨與期貨市場價格行為∼小型台指期貨創立之影響
指導教授:蕭榮烈蕭榮烈引用關係周文賢周文賢引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:合作經濟學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2002
畢業學年度:90
語文別:中文
論文頁數:105
中文關鍵詞:異質條件變異數模型門檻異質條件變異數模型二元指數型異質條件變異數模型小型台指期貨期貨市場現貨市場虛擬變數不對稱波動性
外文關鍵詞:GARCHThreshold GARCHBivariate Exponential GARCHMTXFutures MarketSpot MarketDummy VariableAsymmetric Volatility
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:412
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:76
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
台灣期貨交易所於2001年4月9日推出新的金融商品~小型台指期貨,讓台灣的金融市場更趨多元化。股價指數期貨具有避險效果、價格發現與投機操作等功能。雖然小型台指期貨較晚於衍生性金融商品市場中推出,卻是極受歡迎的衍生性商品之一。
本研究使用台灣股價指數與台灣期貨指數之日資料,研究樣本期間自1999年7月21日至2001年11月30日,分析採用TGARCH模式與Bi-EGARCH模式,探討小型台指期貨上市,對現貨與期貨市場波動性與不對稱性波動的影響。在此探討的主題有三:一、加入一個虛擬變數於模式(TGARCH)中,檢視台灣股價指數現貨市場之波動性與不對稱性之反應,是否因小型台指期貨期貨之上市而改變。二、引進小型台指期貨交易,是否對市場結構產生變化。三、探討小型台指期貨交易,是否造成現貨與期貨市場不對稱性波動改變。
由實證結果得知以下結論:第一,引進小型台指期貨後,現貨市場與期貨市場之波動性皆增加。第二,市場結構並未因小型台指期貨加入產生顯著的改變。第三,根據TGARCH模式實證結果,台灣現貨市場引進小型台指期貨交易之不對稱性分析中,可知電子類股指數市場出現槓桿效果,而金融保險類股市場產生逆槓桿效果。Bi-EGARCH誤差修正模式實證結果顯示,台股指數與現貨市場之不對稱性檢定結果出現槓桿效果。
The Taiwan Futures Exchange launched the mini Taiwan stock index future (MTX) on April 9, 2001 that made Taiwan’s financial market to diversify. Stock index futures has the functions of hedging effect, price discovery and speculations. Although MTX, one kind of derivative contracts, was developed late in the derivatives market, it is also the most popular one.
This research used the daily closing prices of the Taiwan stock index and Taiwan futures index. The sample extends from July 21,1999 to November 30,2001. The analysis models are based on Threshold GARCH Model (TGARCH) and Bivariate Exponential GARCH Model (Bi-EGARCH) to explore the effects of MTX trading on spot market and future market volatility and the asymmetric responses of volatility.
The major stages of the study are 1.Threshold GARCH analyzes the questions of whether MTX trading ha increased or decreased the level of volatility or the asymmetric responses of volatility in spot market with a dummy variable.2.research analyzes the question of whether MTX trading has changed or unchanged the market structures.3.to determine whether the MTX trading has led to changes in the asymmetric response of volatility is analyzed by Bi-EGARCH with a dummy variable. Stock and Futures data are used in estimating asymmetric models to assess the extent to which the asymmetric responses of volatility in the spot market and futures market are different from the other market. From the empirical results, the major findings of the paper are 1.from empirical results, spot market and futures market added rises to volatility. 2.no significant differences are found to introduce MTX in the market structure. 3. from TGARCH model estimation, the introduction of MTX really made leverage in electrical index, but made adverse-leverage in financial index; from Bi-EGARCH model estimation, there is the leverage in TAIEX index.
摘要 Ⅰ
目次 Ⅲ
表次 Ⅴ
圖次 Ⅶ
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機 2
1.3 研究目的 3
1.4 研究架構 3
1.5 期貨概述 4
第二章 文獻回顧 11
2.1 指數期貨上市與現貨市場波動性之關係 11
2.2 股價指數現貨與期貨之關係 24
2.3 小結 34
第三章 研究方法 35
3.1 觀念性架構 35
3.2 波動性分析 36
3.3 序列穩定性檢定 36
3.4 異質條件變異數模式 38
3.5 小結 44
第四章 實證分析 45
4.1 資料選取處理與期間 45
4.2 敘述統計 46
4.3 單根檢定與序列相關檢定 49
4.4 共整合關係檢定 54
4.5 TGARCH模式 57
4.6 BI-EGARCH誤差修正模式 66
4.7 小結 80
第五章 結論與建議 82
5.1 研究發現 82
5.2 策略涵義 83
5.3 研究貢獻 84
5.4 研究限制 85
5.5 後續研究建議 86
參考文獻 87
附錄A 現貨與期貨走勢圖 A
參考文獻
一、中文部分
1.王信琮(1999),股價指數期貨上市對現貨市場股價指數報酬率及成交量之影響~以SIMEX發行之摩根台指期貨為例,朝陽大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
2.王淑芬(1999),期貨與選擇權,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
3.田佳弘(2000),台灣股價指數期貨交易對股票價格波動之影響~以TAIFEX和SIMEX兩市場分析,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
4.吳珮渝(2000),股價指數期貨交易對其現貨的影響,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
5.邱志偉(1999),台股指數期貨上市對現貨波動性之影響,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
6.徐菽銘(1998),SIMEX台股指數期貨上市對現貨波動性之影響,國立台灣大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
7.黃也白(1994),股價指數期貨上市對股價波動性的影響,國立台灣大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
8.游兆源(1999),台股指數期貨上市對台灣股市的波動性影響,國立台北大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
9.詹博欽(2000),類股指數期貨交易對現貨及台股指數期貨市場之影響,國立中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
10.勵志雄(1999),開放摩根臺股指數期貨交易對臺灣股市波動與資訊傳遞影響之研究,高雄第一科技大學金融營運系碩士班碩士論文。
11.顏榮邦(2001),小型台指期貨上市前後市況觀察,台灣期貨市場,頁42-47。
12.蕭榮烈(2001),金融市場,台北:新陸書局。
二、英文部分
1.Abhyankar, A.H. (1998), “Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality: Evidence from the U.K. Stock Index Futures Market”, Journal Futures Markets, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 519-540.
2.Aggarwal, R. (1988), “Stock Index Futures and Cash Market Volatility”, Review of Futures Markets, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 290-299.
3.Antonios, A. and P. Holmes (1995), ”Futures Trading and Spot Price Volatility: Evidence for FTSE-100 Stock Index Futures Contract Using GARCH”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vo. 19, pp. 117-129.
4.Bessembinder, H., and P.J. Seguin (1992), “Future Trading Activity and Stock Price Volatility”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 47, pp. 2015-2034.
5.Bollerslev, T. (1986), “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskcedasticity ” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 31, pp. 307-327.
6.Bollerslev, T, E.F. Robert, and W.M. Jeffrey (1988), “A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time Varying Covariance”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 96, pp. 116-131.
7.Chu, Q.C., W.G. Hsieh, and Y. Tse (1998), “Price Discovery on The S&P500 Index Markets: An Analysis of Spot Index, Index Futures and SPDRS”, Working Paper.
8.Damodaran, A. (1990), “Index Futures and Stock Market volatility”, Review of Futures Markets, Vol. 9, pp. 442-457.
9.Doldado, J., T. Jenkinson, and S. Sosvilla-Rivero (1990), “Cointegration and Unit Roots. ”, Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 4, pp. 249-273.
10.Edwards, F.R (1988), “Futures Trading and Cash Market Volatility: Stock Index and Interest Rate Futures”, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 251-276.
11.Engle, R.F., C.W.J., and Granger (1987), “Cointegration and Error-Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, Vol. 55, pp. 251-276.
12.Ghosh, A. (1993), “Cointegration and Error Correction Models: Intertemporal Causality between Index and Futures Prices”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 13, pp. 193-198.
13.Green W.H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
14.Harris, L. (1989), “S&P500 Cash Stock Price Volatility”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 1155-1176.
15.Herbst, A.F., J.P. McCormack, and E.N. West (1987), “Investigation of a Lead-Lag Relationship between Spot Stock Indices and Their Futures Contracts”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 7, pp. 373-381.
16.Kamara, A., W. Miller, Jr., and F. Siegel (1992), “The Effect of Futures Trading on the Stability of Standard and Poor 500 returns”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 12, No. 6, December, pp. 645-658.
17.Kawaller, I.G., P.D. Koch, and T.W. Koch (1987), “The Temporal Price Relationship between S&P 500 Futures and the S&P 500 Index”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 42, pp. 1309-1329.
18.Koutmos, G. and M. Tucker (1996), “Temporal Relationships and Dynamic Interactions between Spot and Futures Stock Markets”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 55-69.
19.Lihara, Y., K. Kato, and T. Tokunaga (1996), “Intraday Return Dynamics between the Cash and the Futures Markets in Japan”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 16, pp. 147-162.
20.Lee, S.B. and K.Y. Ohk (1992), “Stock and Index Futures Listing and Structure Change in Time-Varying Volatility”, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 493-509.
21.Martin, J. and A. Senchack (1991), “Index of Futures, Program Trading, and the Covariability of the Major Index Stocks”, Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 11, pp. 95-111.
22.Mckemzie, D.M., T.J. Brailsford, and R. W. Faff (2001), “New Insights Impact of the Introduction of Futures Trading on Stock Price Volatility”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 237-255.
23.Min, J.H., and M. Najand (1999), “A Further Investigation of the Lead-Lag Relationship between the Spot Market and Stock Index Futures: Early Evidence from Korea”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 19, pp. 217-232.
24.Nelson, D. (1991), “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Return: A New Approach”, Econometrica, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 347-370.
25.Pizzi, M.A., A.J. Economopoulos, and H.M. O’Neill (1998), “An Examination of the Relationship between Stock Index Cash and Futures Markets: A Cointegration Approach”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 18, pp. 297-305.
26.Shyy, Gang, Vijayraghavan, Vasumathi, and B. Scott-Quinn (1996), “A Futher Investigation of the Lead-Lag Relationship between the Cash Market and Stock Index Futures Market with the Use of Bid/Ask Quotes: the case of France”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 405-420.
27.Stoll, H.R. and R.E. Whaley (1990), “The Dynamics of Stock Index and Stock Index Futures Returns”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 441-468.
28.Takato H., M.D. Edein, and T. Nobuya (1995), “The Information Content of End-of-Day Futures Returns: International Evidence from Osaka Nikkei 225 Futures Contract”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp.921-936.
29.Tse, Y.K. (1995), “Lead-Lag Relationship between Spot Index and Futures Price of the Nikkei Stock Average”, Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 14, pp.553-563.
30.Wahab, M. and M. Lashgaari (1993), “Price Dynamics and Error Correction in Stock Index and Stock Index Futures Markets: A Cointegration Approach”, The Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 13, pp. 711-742.
31.Zakoian, J.M. (1994), “The Threshold Heteroskedastic Models”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 18, pp. 931-995.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊