臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

背景：「以家庭為中心的服務(Family-Centered Service, FCS)」是目前國內外兒童復健界的目標。身心障礙兒童的家長比起一般兒童之家長有較多的親職壓力、情緒困擾，若服務提供者能提供「以家庭為中心的服務」可促進家長心理層面的健康與安適，然而臺灣目前僅有少數文獻探討家長對兒童復健之滿意度，因此「以家庭為中心的服務」之情形仍然未知，也需要進一步探究其影響因素。「照護過程評量表(Measure of Processes of Care, MPOC-20)」是目前國際上最常用於評量身心障礙兒童的家長感受兒童復健服務過程之「以家庭為中心」的程度的工具之一，但尚需評估其繁體中文版在臺灣使用的適用性及心理計量特性。
目的：第一部分：將「MPOC-20繁體中文版」本土化為「MPOC-20臺灣版」並驗證其心理計量特性(請見「工具」)。第二部份：(1)調查臺北地區家長感受兒童復健服務過程之「以家庭為中心」的程度，及(2)探討其影響因子。
工具：MPOC-20為家長自填式問卷，共20題，原始架構為5個向度：賦能及合作(3題)、提供一般資訊(5題)、提供具體資訊(3題)、全面及一致(4題)、尊重及支持(5題)，採用李克氏7點量尺作答，範圍自1分(完全沒有)到7分(極大的程度)，另有0分(不適用)。「MPOC-20臺灣版」經過兩回專家問卷針對其適用性及語意清析度進行修改，具良好內容效度，且透過田野測試進一步對問卷之文字敘述進行修正，確保家長能理解問卷內容。驗證性因素分析顯示「MPOC-20臺灣版」原始5個向度與本土樣本並不適配，而探索性因素分析顯示「MPOC-20臺灣版」之20題共可萃取出3個因素(合作與完整及支持、提供一般資訊、提供具體資訊)。本研究驗證「MPOC-20臺灣版」具有良好之心理計量特性，包含建構效度、同時效度(與家長滿意度評量呈現中度正相關)、內部一致性(Cronbach’s α介於0.83至0.95)、及再測信度(組內相關係數值介於0.80至0.87)。
樣本：本研究於2011年11月16日至2012年1月12日由研究者於臺北市及新北市親自進行問卷收集，共12個兒童復健單位、68位治療師及476位有接受兒童復健服務之家長參與此研究。家長完成MPOC-20臺灣版及基本資料問卷，兒童復健單位主管及治療師完成自填基本資料問卷。
資料分析：樣本基本資料、「以家庭為中心的服務」概況以描述性統計方式呈現。本研究以多元線性迴歸分析「服務相關因素」對MPOC-20臺灣版3個向度各自之平均分數的影響，並同時控制「服務提供者」及「服務接受者」特性。
結果：(1)第1向度「合作與完整及支持」之平均分數最高(平均數=5.39、標準差=1.04)，第3向度「提供具體資訊」(平均數=4.80、標準差=1.38)次之，第2向度「提供一般資訊」之平均分數最低(平均數=4.41、標準差=1.32)。(2)控制了單位、治療師、家長及兒童的特性之後，治療模式為個別治療、每次治療時間為40~60分鐘、治療期間為1年以上未滿2年及2年以上，對於家長感受兒童復健服務過程之「以家庭為中心」的程度各有其正面的影響，治療頻率則無顯著影響。
結論與建議：目前臺北地區兒童復健服務能夠給予家長尊重及支持，並提供全面及一致的照護，然而，兒童之治療相關書面資訊及療育相關訊息的提供則相當不足。早期療育政策、健保給付制度、臨床服務制度與評鑑均應支持FCS，並考量服務相關因素對於提供FCS的影響，且進行適當調整，以期提升發展遲緩或身心障礙兒童及其家庭的健康與安適。

Background: Family-Centered Service (FCS) has been acknowledged as the ‘best-practice’ model in pediatric rehabilitation. Parents of children with disabilities have greater parental stress than parents of typically developing children. There is evidence that FCS results in better parental psychosocial well-being and better psychological adjustment of children. However, the extent of FCS implemented in pediatric rehabilitation programs as perceived by parents in Taiwan has not been investigated before, and a limited number of studies have addressed the service-related variables that contribute to parents’ perceptions of FCS in pediatric rehabilitation service. Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20) is widely used to evaluate the extent to which the service was family-centered from the parents’ perspectives. The questionnaire had been translated to traditional Chinese. Yet, it has not yet been cross-culturally adapted, neither the cross-cultural validation has been conducted when used in Chinese-speaking society.
Objectives: The first part of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the traditional Chinese translation of MPOC-20 and to examine its validity and reliability for use in Taiwanese context (see ‘instrument’ as follows). There were 2 aims in the second part of this study: (1) to describe parents’ perceptions of the extent to which FCS behaviors occurred in outpatient pediatric rehabilitation facilities in metropolitan Taipei, and (2) to examine factors influencing parents’ perceptions of the family centeredness of care.
Instrument: MPOC-20, a 20-item self-report measure, originally comprises of five scales:(1)Enabling and partnership; (2)Providing general information; (3)Providing specific information about the child; (4)Coordinated and comprehensive care and (5)Respectful and supportive care. The answers are given on a seven-point scale from ‘to a great extent (7)’ to ‘never (1)’, with an additional alternative of ‘not applicable (0)’. We conducted the cross-cultural adaptation by consulting 11 experts in the field of pediatric rehabilitation twice to confirm the content validity, in terms of the applicability and clarity of each item in the traditional Chinese translation of MPOC-20. After we accomplished a revision based on experts’ comments, we carried out a field test to make sure that the wording of the traditional Chinese (Taiwanese context) version of MPOC-20 is understandable by parents. The Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) showed that the original model which contained 5 factors extracted from 20 items is not fit with Taiwanese sample, so we further performed the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) which indicated there are 3 factors among the 20 items including ‘cooperative, integrated and supportive care’, ‘Providing general information’, and ‘Providing specific information about the child’. The concurrent validity was confirmed by positive correlations between MPOC-20 scale scores and a Parent Satisfaction Questionnaire(r 0.54~0.78). The internal consistency analyses (Cronbach’s α 0.83~0.95) and the test-retest analyses (intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) 0.80~0.87) showed that the traditional Chinese (Taiwanese context) version of MPOC-20 is a reliable tool.
Subjects：476 parents and 68 therapists from 12 outpatient pediatric rehabilitation facilities in metropolitan Taipei participated in this study from November 16th, 2011, to January 12th, 2012. Parents answered the traditional Chinese (Taiwanese context) version of MPOC-20 and an attached demographic questions sheet, while therapists were asked to provide demographic information.
Statistics: Descriptive analyses were used for showing demographic characteristics of the participants and the results of the traditional Chinese (Taiwanese context) version of MPOC-20. Multiple linear regressions with both service providers/receivers variables entered were performed to determine whether service-related variables affecting parents’ perceptions of FCS.
Results: (1) Parents rated higher in ‘cooperative, integrated and supportive care’ (M=5.39, SD=1.04), while the lower 2 ratings were given to ‘Providing general information’ (M=4.41, SD=1.32) and ‘Providing specific information’ (M=4.80, SD=1.38). (2) Controlling the variables of service providers/receivers, we found that individual therapy, length of each therapy session between 40 to 60 minutes, and duration of therapy beyond 1 year are the positive factors associated with some or all aspects of FCS, while frequency of therapy is not significantly associated with FCS in the view of parents.
Conclusions and policy implications：The parents in metropolitan Taipei felt the services respectful, supportive, coordinated, and comprehensive; however, parents perceived they received insufficient information from therapists. In order to promote the health and well-being of children with developmental problems and their families, FCS provision should be considered as a priority in policy of early intervention, payment system in Taiwan national health insurance, clinical service delivery and service evaluation; furthermore, service-related variables should be taken into account in the planning and delivery of FCS.

口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii
中文摘要 iii
Abstract v
目錄 viii
圖目錄 xi
表目錄 xii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究重要性 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 臺灣兒童復健服務概況 4
第二節 「以家庭為中心的服務」介紹 8
第三節 「以家庭為中心的服務」之評量工具 10
第四節 兒童復健品質之影響因子 12
第五節 「照護過程評量表」分數之影響因子 13
第六節 兒童復健治療模式與成效 16
第三章 研究設計與方法 19
（一）「照護過程評量表」本土化及心理計量特性驗證 19
第一節 問卷本土化 19
第二節 問卷心理計量特性驗證方法 22
第三節 樣本特性 27
第四節 效度 31
第五節 信度 37
第六節 小結 40
（二）兒童復健服務過程的調查研究 41
第七節 研究設計 41
第八節 研究工具 43
第九節 樣本與程序 45
第十節 資料分析 47
第四章 研究結果 48
第一節 樣本特質描述 48
第二節 家長感受兒童復健服務過程之「以家庭為中心」的程度 54
第三節 家長感受服務之「以家庭為中心」的程度的影響因子 58
第五章 討論 61
第一節 研究設計與方法討論 61
第二節 研究結果討論 63
第三節 研究限制 68
第六章 結論與建議 69
第一節 結論 69
第二節 對未來研究的建議 69
第三節 對現況的建議 70
參考文獻 74
中文文獻 74
英文文獻 76
附錄一：照護過程評量表(MPOC-20)本土化之專家名單 81
附錄二：照護過程評量表(MPOC-20)英文原版 82
附錄三：照護過程評量表(MPOC-20)繁體中文版 85
附錄四：照護過程評量表(MPOC-20)臺灣版 88
附錄五：通過研究倫理委員會審查通知 91
附錄六：研究受訪者說明及同意書 93
附錄七：兒童復健服務調查問卷－家長 96
附錄八：兒童復健服務調查問卷－單位 100
附錄九：兒童復健服務調查問卷－治療師 101
附錄十：雙變項分析 102

中文文獻
內政部兒童局（2007）。發展遲緩兒童早期療育服務流程。上網日期：2013年1月28日。網址：http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/upload/4b105c5d-4008-400f-ad57-f1b1eeaf1b3a.pdf
內政部兒童局（2013）。早期療育的歷史與發展。上網日期：2013年1月28日。網址：http://www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/doc/doc_detail.aspx?uid=229&docid=1249
內政部統計處（2011）。99年發展遲緩兒童早期療育服務概況。上網日期：2013年1月28日。網址：http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/week10012.doc。
王天苗（1996）。台灣地區心智發展障礙幼兒早期療育服務供需及相關問題之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，14，21-44。
王天苗、廖華芳（2007）。嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗之判定準確度及切截點分析。特殊教育研究學刊，32（2），1-15。
立法院（2011）。委員會紀錄。立法院公報，100（36），261-313。
行政院衛生署（2011）。我國早期療育政策之發展、現況與問題：專案報告。上網日期：2013年1月28日。網址：https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.doh.gov.tw%2Fufile%2Fdoc%2F0425%25E6%2597%25A9%25E7%2599%2582%25E5%25B0%2588%25E6%25A1%2588%25E5%25A0%25B1%25E5%2591%258A_all.pdf&ei=JTgGUZjsJ6-HmQXYlIH4Dw&usg=AFQjCNFJIjs2c1Cup9Uh-9uEFNJZ994hoA&sig2=HdaQGtMO3NWuHqEdsgAoiA
行政院衛生署中央健康保險局（2013）。全民健康保險醫療服務給付項目及支付標準：支付標準壓縮檔第二部第二章第四節。上網日期：2013年1月28日。網址： http://www.nhi.gov.tw/Resource/webdata/17270_1_107%E6%94%AF%E4%BB%98%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96%E4%BB%A3%E7%A2%BC-1020101(1)%E4%BF%AE%E8%A8%82%E5%86%8A%E5%88%A5-1020115.zip
吳裕益（2012）。結構方程模式的理論與應用。未出版之手稿，國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系。
兒童及少年福利與權益保障法施行細則（2012）
林巾凱、傅秀媚、張秀玉、劉芷瑩（2010）。家長主觀評量早期療育對發展遲緩兒童發展改善之研究。身心障礙研究，8（1），40-54。
林美瑗（2010）。慢飛天使－發展遲緩兒童之早期療育。醫療品質雜誌，4（1），9-14。
林雅容、蘇健華、林麗莉、林蘋、張雅惠、吳靜萍（2010）。家長使用早期療育服務之經驗：服務可近性的啟思。兒童及少年福利期刊，17，41-59。
唐美華、陳君薇、蔡森蔚、陳昭惠、林巾凱（2010）。以「居家活動」介入對發展遲緩幼童之影響。職能治療學會雜誌，28（2），31-45。
孫世恆（2011）。臺灣地區發展遲緩兒童相關療育資源現況調查之先驅研究。在中華民國發展遲緩兒童早期療育協會編。第十二屆國際發展遲緩兒童早期療育論文發表大會論文集（頁8-27）。花蓮市：中華民國發展遲緩兒童早期療育協會。
張介信、黃君代、邵文娟、向時賢（2011）。早期療育之發展遲緩兒童行爲發展成效評估。中南盟研究年刊，4（1），9-22。
張彝平（2011）。臺灣家長對於早期療育服務之滿意度。未出版之碩士論文，長庚大學早期療育研究所，桃園縣。
陳雅鈴、許玫玲（2009）。家長對發展遲緩兒童早期療育復健治療的滿意度之研究。醫務管理期刊，10（4），289-308。
黃惠玲、謝玉蓮、陳震宇、鐘育志（2002）。Concurrent validity of the scale for screening of developmental delay。The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences，18（10），517-522。
蔡政道、郭煌宗、周宜卿、蔡明瑀、蔡長海（2005）。A clinical analysis of children with developmental delay。Acta Paediatrica Taiwanica，46（4），192-195。
蔡淑桂（2009）。家庭服務導向之親職教育方案對發展遲緩幼兒的父母教養能力、家庭功能之研究。教育研究學報，43（1），107-132。
鄭翠娟（2004）。早期療育與家庭參與。在許天威編著，早期療育概論。台北縣：群英出版社。
儲鳳英（2005）。發展遲緩兒童早期療育醫療資源之利用及其影響因素分析。未出版之碩士論文，臺北醫學大學醫務管理學系，台北市。
鍾燕宜、潘雨辰、陳右振、郭煌宗（2010）。發展遲緩兒童母親親職壓力之初探。身心障礙研究，8（2），83-98。
 
英文文獻
Arnadottir, U., & Egilson, S. T. (2012). Evaluation of therapy services with the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20): the perspectives of Icelandic parents of children with physical disability. Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community, 16(1), 62-74.
Bell, A., Corfield, M., Davies, J., & Richardson, N. (2010). Collaborative transdisciplinary intervention in early years - putting theory into practice. Child: care, health and development, 36(1), 142-148.
Bjerre, I. M., Larsson, M., Franzon, A. M., Nilsson, M. S., Stromberg, G., & Westbom, L. M. (2004). Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC) applied to measure parent''s perception of the habilitation process in Sweden. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t]. Child: care, health and development, 30(2), 123-130.
Camden, C., Swaine, B., Tetreault, S., & Brodeur, M. M. (2010). Reorganizing pediatric rehabilitation services to improve accessibility: do we sacrifice quality? BMC health services research, 10, 227.
Camden, C., Tetreault, S., & Swaine, B. (2011). Increasing the Use of Group Interventions in a Pediatric Rehabilitation Program: Perceptions of Administrators, Therapists, and Parents. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.
CanChild. (2012a). About FCS Sheets. Retrieved 7/17, 2012, from http://www.canchild.ca/en/childrenfamilies/fcs_sheet.asp
CanChild. (2012b). Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC). Retrieved 8/24, 2011, from http://www.canchild.ca/en/measures/mpoc56_mpoc20.asp
Darrah, J., Wiart, L., Magill-Evans, J., Ray, L., & Andersen, J. (2012). Are family-centred principles, functional goal setting and transition planning evident in therapy services for children with cerebral palsy? [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t]. Child: care, health and development, 38(1), 41-47.
Davies, P. L., & Gavin, W. J. (1994). Comparison of Individual and Group/Consultation Treatment Methods for Preschool Children With Developmental Delays. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(2), 155-161.
Dempsey, I., Keen, D., Pennell, D., O''Reilly, J., & Neilands, J. (2009). Parent stress, parenting competence and family-centered support to young children with an intellectual or developmental disability. Research in developmental disabilities, 30(3), 558-566.
Dickens, K., Matthews, L. R., & Thompson, J. (2011). Parent and service providers'' perceptions regarding the delivery of family-centred paediatric rehabilitation services in a children''s hospital. Child: care, health and development, 37(1), 64-73.
Dickson, K., Marshall, M., Boyle, J., McCartney, E., O''Hare, A., & Forbes, J. (2009). Cost analysis of direct versus indirect and individual versus group modes of manual-based speech-and-language therapy for primary school-age children with primary language impairment. [Randomized Controlled Trial]. International journal of language & communication disorders / Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, 44(3), 369-381.
Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (2007). Meta-analysis of family-centered helpgiving practices research. [Meta-Analysis]. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 13(4), 370-378.
Dyke, P., Buttigieg, P., Blackmore, A. M., & Ghose, A. (2006). Use of the measure of process of care for families (MPOC-56) and service providers (MPOC-SP) to evaluate family-centred services in a paediatric disability setting. Child: care, health and development, 32(2), 167-176.
Granat, T., Lagander, B., & Borjesson, M. C. (2002). Parental participation in the habilitation process - evaluation from a user perspective. Child Care Health and Development, 28(6), 459-467.
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Hung, W. W. Y., & Pang, M. Y. C. (2010). Effects of Group-Based Versus Individual-Based Exercise Training on Motor Performance in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(2), 122-128.
Innocenti, M. S., Huh, K., & Boyce, G. C. (1992). Families of Children with Disabilities - Normative Data and Other Considerations on Parenting Stress. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12(3), 403-427.
Jeglinsky, I., Autti-Ramo, I., & Brogren Carlberg, E. (2012). Two sides of the mirror: parents'' and service providers'' view on the family-centredness of care for children with cerebral palsy. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t]. Child: care, health and development, 38(1), 79-86.
King, G., King, S., Law, M., Kertoy, M., Rosenbaum, P., & Hurley, P. (2002). Family-Centred Service in Ontario: A ''Best Practice'' Approach for children with Disabilities and Their Families.
King, G., King, S., Rosenbaum, P., & Goffin, R. (1999). Family-centered caregiving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities: Linking process with outcome. Journal of pediatric psychology, 24(1), 41.
King, G. A., King, S. M., & Rosenbaum, P. L. (1996). How mothers and fathers view professional caregiving for children with disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38(5), 397-407.
King, G. A., Rosenbaum, P. L., & King, S. M. (1997). Evaluating family-centred service using a measure of parents'' perceptions. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t]. Child: care, health and development, 23(1), 47-62.
King, S., King, G., & Rosenbaum, P. (2004). Evaluating health service delivery to children with chronic conditions and their families: Development of a refined Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC-20). Childrens Health Care, 33(1), 35-57.
King, S., Rosenbaum, P., & King, G. (1995). The Measure of Processes of Care: A means to assess family-centred behaviours of health care providers. Hamilton: McMaster University, Neurodevelopmental Clinical Research Unit.
King, S. M., Rosenbaum, P. L., & King, G. A. (1996). Parents'' perceptions of caregiving: Development and validation of a measure of processes. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 38(9), 757-772.
Laforme, A. C., & Effgen, S. K. (2007). Use of Groups in Pediatric Physical Therapy: Survey of Current Practices. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 18(1), 96.
Law, M., Hanna, S., King, G., Hurley, P., King, S., Kertoy, M., et al. (2003). Factors affecting family-centred service delivery for children with disabilities. [Research Support, U.S. Gov''t, P.H.S.]. Child: care, health and development, 29(5), 357-366.
Lung, F. W., Shu, B. C., Chiang, T. L., & Lin, S. J. (2011). Maternal mental health and childrearing context in the development of children at 6, 18 and 36 months: a Taiwan birth cohort pilot study. Child Care Health and Development, 37(2), 211-223.
Mazer, B., Feldman, D., Majnemer, A., Gosselin, J., & Kehayia, E. (2006). Rehabilitation services for children: therapists'' perceptions. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t]. Pediatric rehabilitation, 9(4), 340-350.
McConachie, H., & Logan, S. (2003). Validation of the measure of processes of care for use when there is no Child Development Centre. [Validation Studies]. Child: care, health and development, 29(1), 35-45.
Mensah, F. K., & Kiernan, K. E. (2011). Maternal general health and children''s cognitive development and behaviour in the early years: findings from the Millennium Cohort Study. Child Care Health and Development, 37(1), 44-54.
Miller, A. R., Armstrong, R. W., Masse, L. C., Klassen, A. F., Shen, J., & O''Donnell, M. E. (2008). Waiting for child developmental and rehabilitation services: an overview of issues and needs. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t Review]. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50(11), 815-821.
Moore, M. H., Mah, J. K., & Trute, B. (2009). Family-centred care and health-related quality of life of patients in paediatric neurosciences. Child: care, health and development, 35(4), 454-461.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory.
O''Neil, M. E., Palisano, R. J., & Westcott, S. L. (2001). Relationship of therapists'' attitudes, children''s motor ability, and parenting stress to mothers'' perceptions of therapists'' behaviors during early intervention. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t
Research Support, U.S. Gov''t, P.H.S.]. Physical therapy, 81(8), 1412-1424.
Odom, S. L., Yoder, P., & Hill, G. (1988). Developmental Intervention for Infants with Handicaps - Purposes and Programs. Journal of Special Education, 22(1), 11-24.
Prince, B., Markrides, L., & Richman, J. (1980). Research methodology and applied statistics. Part 2: the literature search. Physiotherapy Canada, 32, 201-206.
Raghavendra, P., Murchland, S., Bentley, M., Wake-Dyster, W., & Lyons, T. (2007). Parents'' and service providers'' perceptions of family-centred practice in a community-based, paediatric disability service in Australia. Child: care, health and development, 33(5), 586-592.
Rogers, C. R. (1946). Significant aspects of client-centered therapy. The American psychologist, 1(10), 415-422.
Rosenbaum, P., King, S., Law, M., King, G., & Evans, J. (1998). Family-Centred Service: A Conceptual Framework and Research Review. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics, 18(1), 1-20.
Rosenbaum, P. L., King, S. M., & Cadman, D. T. (1992). Measuring processes of caregiving to physically disabled children and their families. I: Identifying relevant components of care. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t]. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 34(2), 103-114.
Schreiber, J., Benger, J., Salls, J., Marchetti, G., & Reed, L. (2011). Parent Perspectives on Rehabilitation Services for Their Children with Disabilities: A Mixed Methods Approach. Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
van Schie, P. E., Siebes, R. C., Ketelaar, M., & Vermeer, A. (2004). The measure of processes of care (MPOC): validation of the Dutch translation. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov''t Validation Studies]. Child: care, health and development, 30(5), 529-539.
Woodside, J. M., Rosenbaum, P. L., King, S. M., & King, G. A. (2001). Family-centered service: developing and validating a self-assessment tool for pediatric service providers. Children''s health care, 30(3), 237-252.