臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本文主要在探討傳統追求產能平衡的生產線設計與限制驅導式排程與管理（Drum-Buffer-Rope, DBR)斜坡保護產能的生產線設計之優劣比較。良好的生產製造系統能夠降低生產週期時間與提高達交率。為了達成這些目標，製造系統必須應付各種變異事件與隨機波動的影響，同時要使生產成本極小化。鑑於此，傳統生產上追求產能平衡並在各製程前面設置大量在製品，來保護整個生產線，此導致較長的生產週期時間，容易傷害交期的可靠度。而由限制理論(Theory of Constraints, TOC)所延伸出來的DBR生產，是藉由初始投料與瓶頸的控制，讓系統的產出與瓶頸同步，達到生產線流量(Flow)平衡，並配合斜坡式的保護產能，來保護整個生產線，此外斜坡產能投資額的大小會因瓶頸的位置而異，一般斜坡產能投資金額會比以傳統追求產能平衡的設計高很多，但是它對於降低在製品，生產週期時間與交期產出產生不錯的效益，至於效益有多大，本研究方法將以一虛擬的生產線，分別以傳統與DBR方式來規劃設計，再以EM-Plant軟體建構模擬系統來模擬實際生產運作的結果。

The purpose of this paper is to compare the benefits of two ways of production line design. One is traditional capacity balance design, and the other is DBR（Drum-Buffer-Rope, DBR）ramp-up protective capacity design.
A good manufacturing system is enable to reduce production cycle time and raises the reliability of due day. In order to reach the objectives, manufacturing system must overcome the effects of various variable events, random fluctuation on production line, and minimum of the production cost as well. In view of the foregoing, traditional production system pursues capacity balance and places work-in-process (WIP) inventory in front of every machines to protect overall line, which will lead to production cycle time raise and lower the reliability of due day. Meanwhile, the DBR production system pursues flow balance and ramp-up capacity to protect overall line, ramp-up capacity investment will change by line bottleneck’s location. In general, ramp-up capacity investment will greater than traditional capacity balance, but it will show good results in lowering WIP, cycle time, and due day. As to the results, how many the benefits will be?
In order to answer the benefits, this research builds a simulation production line (DBR and traditional system) with EM-Plant software to simulate and analyze the results of both production line design concepts. It shows that the DBR system gets better results than traditional system as a whole.

第一章 序論
1-1 研究背景與動機…………………………………………………………1
1-2 研究目的…………………………………………………………………2
1-3 研究流程…………………………………………………………………3
第二章 文獻探討
2-1 限制理論TOC之簡介…………………………………………………… 4
2-1-1 限制理論的基本原則…………………………………………………4
2-1-2 限制理論的績效衡量指標……………………………………………6
2-1-3 限制理論解決問題的程序……………………………………………8
2-2 DBR生產系統簡介……………………………………………………… 8
第三章 生產線設計
3-1 傳統生產的規劃與控制……………………………………………… 10
3-2 DBR生產模式的規劃與控制……………………………………………12
3-3 模擬生產線的描述…………………………………………………… 15
3-4 生產模式模擬………………………………………………………… 16
第四章 模擬結果的分析與比較
4-1 傳統模式模擬分析…………………………………………………… 21
4-2 DBR模式模擬分析………………………………………………………22
4-3 傳統模式與DBR模式比較………………………………………………23
第五章 結論與建議
5-1 研究結論……………………………………………………………… 26
5-2 研究限制……………………………………………………………… 26
5-3 後續研究及建議……………………………………………………… 27
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………28

李榮貴(1992)，限制理論-製造管理的新觀念，機械工業117民81.12頁
212-223。
李榮貴、蔡志宏(1996)，最佳化生產技術，機械工業162民85.09 頁247-
261。
林則孟(2001)，系統模擬-理論與應用，台中：滄海。
高德拉特 (Eliyahu Goldratt)、科克斯(Jeff Cox)著(1997)，目標-簡單
而有效的常識管理，第一版，台北市：天下遠見。
賴士葆(1995)，生產作業管理-理論與實務，第二版，台北：華泰。
Avraham Y. Goldratt Institute (2002), AGI Goldratt institute.
Ching-En Lee and Yu-Hsin Lin (1998), A WIP Model for wafer
fabrication with the consideration of the variability of
processing time”, Journal of the Chinese of Industrial
Engineers, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 255-267.
Dr. Donald P. Martin (1997), ”How the Law of Unanticipated
Consequences Can Nullify the Theory of Constraints: The Case
for Balanced Capacity in a Semiconductor Manufacturing
Line”, IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing
Conference, pp. 380~385.
Leslie K. Duclos、 Michael S. Spencer(1995), The impact of a
constraint buffer in a flow shop, International Journal of
production economics, 42 pp.175-185.