跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.62) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/18 01:12
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:吳明鴻
研究生(外文):Wu, Minghung
論文名稱:利率的下降能刺激股市上漲嗎?使用門檻迴歸模型
論文名稱(外文):Can Interest Rate Cuts Stimulate Stock Prices? Using A Threshold Regression Model
指導教授:陳冠儒陳冠儒引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chen, Guanru
口試委員:陳冠儒林雅玲陳勤明
口試委員(外文):Chen, GuanruLin, YalingChen, Chinming
口試日期:2012-05-25
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:財務金融學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:27
中文關鍵詞:門檻迴歸模型共整合誤差修正模型貨幣政策
外文關鍵詞:Threshold Regression ModelCointegrationError Correction ModelMonetary Policy
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:1508
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:23
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究利用門檻迴歸模型探討各國的利率與股價指數間,在央行升息前後是否存在非線性的關係。本研究選取美國、澳洲、印度與台灣等四個國家,將資料區分為央行調升利率與央行調降利率兩段時期,分別探討利率對股價的門檻效果,並且為了避免假性迴歸的可能性,本研究檢視模型變數間是否存在共整合關係。依傳統經濟理論來說,如果利率水準越低,越有助於降低資金成本並促進投資,所以利率與股價應呈現反向變動的關係,但實證結果顯示,當央行在調升或調降利率的初期,利率與股價之間卻是呈現正向的變動關係,且當利率調升或調降至某一門檻值時,利率與股價才會呈現反向的變動關係。在探討共整合關係之後,發現不論在央行調升利率與央行調降利率的期間,模型變數間皆存在長期穩定的關係,表示各國間股價與利率的關係不會因為假性迴歸的可能性而否決經濟意義。本研究使用門檻模型的實證結果發現,利率與股價並非全然和傳統經濟理論所提及的單向的反向變動關係相符,而是呈現非線性的關係,此結果可以提供投資者進行投資管理與政府機關實施貨幣政策時的重要參考依據。
This study employs a threshold regression model to see if there is a nonlinear relationship between the interest rates and stock index before and after the central banks cut interest rates. This study uses the data from America, Australia, India and Taiwan, and divides the data into two periods: the period when central banks increase the interest rates and the period when central banks cut the interest rates, and investigate whether there are threshold effects of interest rates on stock prices. To avoid the spurious regression problem, this study applies the cointegration test to see if there is long-run relationship among model’s variables. Based on the traditional economic theory, the lower the interest rate is, the lower the cost of capital is and the more investment incentives there are, so interest rates and stock prices should be negatively correlated. However, empirical results indicate that interest rates and stock prices are positively correlated as the interest rates start to increase; the negative relationship appears only after interest rates cross above a threshold. In the period when central banks cut the interest rates, there is a positive relationship between interest rates and stock prices as the interest rates start to fall, the negative relationship appears only after interest rates fall below a threshold. In addition, the cointegration test finds a significant cointegration relationship before and after central banks cut the interest rates. The threshold regression model shows a nonlinear relationship that differs from the traditional economic wisdom; it not only provides investment strategies for stock investors but also policy implications for central banks.
謝誌I
摘要II
Abstract III
目錄IV
表目錄V
第一章 緒論1
第二章 研究範圍與資料收集3
第三章 研究方法5
第一節 ADF 單根檢定(Augmented Dickey and Fuller)5
第二節 門檻迴歸模型(Threshold Regression Model)5
第三節 共整合檢定(Cointegrationtest)8
第四節 誤差修正模型(Error Correction Model)8
第四章 實證結果9
第一節 單根檢定9
第二節 門檻迴歸模型10
第三節 共整合檢定14
第五章 結論17
參考文獻18
表目錄
表1. 股價與利率的名稱3
表2. 利率階段之敘述統計3
表3. 調降利率階段之敘述統計4
表4. 調升利率之ADF單根檢定表10
表5. 調降利率之ADF單根檢定表10
表6.1 美國股價、利率的門檻迴歸分析12
表6.2 澳洲股價、利率的門檻迴歸分析12
表6.3 印度股價、利率的門檻迴歸分析12
表6.4 台灣股價、利率的門檻迴歸分析13
表7. 利率的門檻檢定14
表8. 共整合檢定15
表9.1 美國誤差修正分析15
表9.2 澳洲誤差修正分析16
表9.3 印度誤差修正分析16
表9.4 台灣誤差修正分析16
中文部份
[1]李建強(2006),金融發展、經濟成長與通貨膨脹的門檻效果,中央研究院經濟研究所,36(2),77-113
英文部份
[1]Abdullah, D., A. Hayworth, and C. Steven (1993), “Macroeconometrics of Stock Price Fluctuations,” Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, 50-68.
[2]Andrews, D. W. K. (1993), “Tests for Parameter Instability and Structural Change with Unknown Change Point,” Econometrics, Vol. 61, No.4, 821-856.
[3]Apergis, N. and S. Eleftheriou (2002), “Interest Rates, Inflation, and Stock Prices: the Case of the Athens Stock Exchange,” Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 24, No. 3, 231-236.
[4]Arango, L. E., A. Gonza, Âles and C. E. Posada (2002),“Returns and the Interest Rate: a Non-linear Relationship in the Bogotá Stock Market,” Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 12, No. 11, 835-842.
[5]Alam M. and G. S. Uddin (2009), “Relationship between Interest Rate and Stock Price: Empirical Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries,” International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, 44-51.
[6]Booth, J. R. and D. T. Officer (1985), “Expectations, Interest Rates, and Commercial Bank Stocks,” Journal of Financial Research,Vol. 8, No. 1, 51-58.
[7]Bernanke, B. S. and K. N.Kuttner (2005), “What Explains the Stock Market’s Reaction to Federal Reserve Policy?”Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, No. 3, 1221-1257.
[8]Cheol, S. E. and S. Shim (1989), “International Transmission of Stock Market Movements,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 2, 241-255.
[9]Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregression Time Series with a Unit Root,” Journal of American Statistical Association, Vol. 74, No. 366, 427-432.
[10]Dickey, D. A. and W.A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root,” Econometrics, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1057-1072.
[11]Domian, D. L., J. E. Gilster, and D. Louton (1996), “An Expected Inflation, Interest Rates, and Stock Returns,” The Financial Review, Vol. 31,No. 4, 809-830.
[12]Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger (1987), “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,” Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, 251-276.
[13]Elyasiani, E. and I. Mansur (1998), “Sensitivity of the Bank Stock Returns Distribution to Changes in the Level and Volatility of Interest Rate: A GARCH-M Model,” Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 22, No. 5, 535-563.
[14]Enders, W. and C. W. J. Granger (1998), “Unit Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 304-311.
[15]Fama, E. (1981),“Stock returns, real activity, inflation and money,”American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, 545-564.
[16]Flannery, M. J. and C. M. James (1984), “The Effect Interest Rate Changes on the Common Stock Returns of Financial Institutions,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, No. 4, 1141-1153.
[17]Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold (1974), “Spurious Regression in Econometrics,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 2, No. 2, 111-120.
[18]Hansen, B.E. (1996), “Inference When a Nuisance Parameter is not Identified under theNull Hypothesis,” Econometrica, Vol. 64, No. 2, 413-430.
[19]Hansen, B. E.(1999), “Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic Panel: Estimation, Testing and Inference,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 93, No. 2,345-368.
[20]Hansen, B. E. (2000), “Sample splitting and threshold estimation,”Econometrica, Vol. 68, No. 3, 575-603.
[21]Hsing, Y. (2004), “Impacts of Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy, and Exchange Rate Policy on Real GDP in Brazil: A VAR Model.” Brazilian Electronic Journal of Economics, Vol. 6 No. 1, 1-12
[22]Kim, S., and D. Q. T. Nguyen (2009), “The Spillover Effects of Target Interest Rate News from the U.S. Fed and the European Central Bank on the Asia-Pacific Stock markets,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, Vol. 9,No. 3, 415-431.
[23]Kasman, S., G. Vardar and G. Tunç (2011), “The Impact of Interest Rate and Exchange Rate Volatility on Banks' Stock Returns and Volatility: Evidence from Turkey,” Economic Modelling, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1328–1334.
[24]Mckinnon, R. (1973), Money and Capital in Economic Development, The Brookings Institution, Washington, D. C.
[25]Shaw, E. (1973), “Financial Deepening in Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa,” Canadian Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 21, No. 2, 265-293.
[26]Schwert, G. W. (1989), “Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics,” American Statistical Association, Vol.7, No. 2, 147-59.
[27]Tong, H. (1978), On a threshold model. In Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing(ed. C. H. Chen).Amsterdan: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
[28]Titman, S. and A. Warga (1989), “Stock Returns as Predictors of Interest Rates and Inflation,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 1, 47-58.
[29]Uddin, M. G. S. and M. M.Alam (2007), “The Impacts of Interest Rate on Stock Market: Empirical Evidence from Dhaka Stock Exchange.” South Asian Journal of Management and Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 2, 123-132.
[30]Zordan, D. J. (2005), “Stock Prices, Interest Rates, Investment Survival.” Econometrica USA, Illinois.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. [1]李建強(2006),金融發展、經濟成長與通貨膨脹的門檻效果,中央研究院經濟研究所,36(2),77-113
2. 李建良,基本權利理論體系之構成及其思考層次,憲法理論與實踐(一),2003年2月第2版
3. 汪南均,電子監控技術設備於刑事司法之實務運用(一),法務通訊,第2398期,2008年7月10日
4. 汪南均,電子監控技術設備於刑事司法之實務運用(二),法務通訊,第2399期,2008年7月17日
5. 汪南均,電子監控技術設備於刑事司法之實務運用(三),法務通訊,第2400期,2008年7月24日
6. 汪南均,電子監控技術設備於刑事司法之實務運用(四),法務通訊,第2401期,2008年7月31日
7. 汪南均,電子監控技術設備於刑事司法之實務運用(五),法務通訊,第2402期,2008年8月7日
8. 汪南均,電子監控技術設備於刑事司法之實務運用(六),法務通訊,第2403期,2008年8月14日
9. 吳景欽,利用電子監控解消性侵害犯再犯疑慮之立法評析,軍法專刊,第51卷第8期,2005年8月1日
10. 吳景欽,電子監控於刑事偵查的運用,刑事法雜誌,第53卷第1期,2009年2月
11. 李佳玟,近年來性侵害犯罪之刑事政策分析—從婦運的角度觀察,2005年
12. 李佳玟,預防性羈押:刑事程序中的風險管理,月旦法學教室,第36期,2005年10月
13. 周愫嫻,危險的美德—論假釋制度中無理性節制的赦免與同情,月旦法學雜誌,第167期,2009年4月
14. 林明傑,性犯罪之再犯率、危險評估及未來法律展望,律師雜誌,第301期,2004年10月
15. 林順昌,破除「電子監控」之迷思-論回歸實益性之犯罪者處遇政策,亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,第5卷第2期,2009年