臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘要
本文以2004~2008年239家台灣資訊電子業(IE)共計915筆非平衡追蹤資料，利用主成份分析法將大陸資產佔資產總額比率(FCTA)、其他地區資產佔資產總額比率(FFTA)、大陸子公司(NC)與其他地區子公司(NF)萃取成單一國際化指標(INT)，並以「存量」的觀念建構創新活動與品牌權益之變數，利用隨機邊界生產函數與Tobit迴歸模型，來探討微笑曲線與技術效率之關聯性，並以國際化為中介效果探討微笑曲線的兩端技術效率的變化，最後以無母數檢定法檢定國際化程度與技術效率是否有顯著的影響。
研究結果發現(1) 台灣資訊電子業勞力與資產投入量對附加價值產出量呈顯著的正相關，而在CD生產函數中勞動與資產的係數相加小於1，故生產技術呈規模報酬遞減，表示台灣資訊電子業如果要達到最適規模，還有改善效率的空間。 (2)國際化程度與廠商的技術效率呈負相關，代表台灣資訊電子業國際化目前海外投資還沒有到回收的階段，仍處於國際化劣勢。(3)創新活動與技術效率呈正相關，代表研發有利於技術效率的增加；而創新活動中介國際化與技術效率是顯著的負相關，代表國內的研發中介國際化會降低技術效率。(4)品牌權益與技術效率呈顯著正相關，代表台灣資訊電子業走品牌路線是可以提升技術效率；而品牌權益中介國際化與技術效率是顯著正相關，表示台灣品牌若走上國際是可以對技術效率是有加乘效果。 (5)整合本文之實證結果，發現台灣資訊電子業可藉由微笑曲線右端之品牌權益(OBM)與國際化策略來搭配來提升技術效率的創造；而微笑曲線左端創新活動(ODM)中介國際化，反而降低了技術效率的創造。(6) 以無母數檢定法檢定國際化程度與技術效率皆呈顯著差異，且國際化程度與技術效率負相關，表示目前台灣資訊電子業國際化程度愈高，技術效率值愈低，說明了目前台灣資訊電子業仍處於國際劣勢。

Abstract
This thesis is to study Smiling Curve and Technology Efficiency which Imediating Effect of Internationalization .Using Taiwan’s Information-Electronic (IE) Industry 2004~2008 total 5 year’s data and 239 companys sample. Integrating data 4 to 1, applying the principal component analysis, four internationalization indexes, China assets ratio (FCTA), oversea assets ratio (FFTA) , China branches (NC) and oversea branches (NF) into single index (INT). Innovation activities and brand equity is constructed by concept of stock. The R&D stock and the patent stock be regarded as a proxy variable for innovation activities. Buildng stochastic frontier production function and Tobit regression model to explain smiling curve and technology efficiency which imediating effect of internationalization. Finally using Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test to test the level of internationalization and technology efficiency if have Significant relationship. The results show that(1) From stochastic frontier production function,the manpower input(LL) and asset input (LK) will increase value-added,and the production scale is degree because the coefficient of LL and LK we added is lower than 1 (2)Internationalization will degree technology efficiency (3) Innovation activities and brand equity will increase technology efficiency (4) Imediating internationalization we find that brand equity will increase technology efficiency but innovation activities have no effect of internationalization. (5) Conclusion of this study we find Taiwan’s IE industry can run the smiling curve right side (OBM) and immediate internationalization effect to improve technology efficiency to get rid of low profit ratio (OEM) situation. At the present stage innovation activities (ODM) is limit in Taiwan to increase technology efficiency . (6)Using Non-parametric test the degree of internationalization and technical efficiency if highly significant differences. The result is that the degree of internationalization is relative to the technical efficiency and the lower the degree of
internationalization is ,the higher technical efficiency is.

摘要
Abstract
目錄
圖目錄
表目錄
第一章 緒論1
第一節 研究背景與目的1
第二節 研究流程與方法2
第二章 理論基礎與文獻回顧4
第一節 理論基礎4
第二節 相關文獻10
第三章 實證模型與變數考量13
第一節 實證模型13
第二節 待證假說15
第三節 資料來源與變數說明17
第四章 實證結果23
第一節 資料來源與敘述統計23
第二節 隨機邊界生產函數24
第三節 Tobit迴歸推估結果27
第四節 國際化與技術效率之相關性29
第五章 結論與研究限制31
第一節 結論31
第二節 研究限制與建議32
參考文獻33
附錄38

朱博湧、陳佳誼與陳俊廷 (2008)，「台灣企業品牌價值與股價報酬關係之實證研究」，《管理學報》，26(6)，637-651。
林灼榮、徐啟升、陳志雄與李淯靖(2005)，「研究發展與專利金支出對台灣光電產業長短期績效之影響」，兩岸環境保護與可持續發展研討會，新疆：新疆大學。
林灼榮、張國雄、徐啟升、吳秀真與康家維(2007)，「台灣資訊電子業廠商西進、品牌開拓潛能與營運績效之攸關性研究」，《經濟與管理論叢》，3，17-48。
林灼榮、曾俊堯、洪諄任與蕭莉芃(2007)，「西進、研發與廣告之績效評估：台灣IT產業微笑曲線之驗證」，2007海外台商經營管理學術與實務研討會，台中：僑光技術學院。
林灼榮與施雅琴(2004)，《國際貿易理論．政策．實證》，台北：新陸書局。
林婷鈴、陳靜怡與任立中 (2007)，「解析自有品牌策略與績效關係的迷思：層級貝式迴歸模式之運用」，《台大管理論叢》，18(1)，117-150。
曹壽民與陳光政(2010)，「創新活動、國際化與公司績效：以台灣上市公司之國外直接投資檢測」，《管理學報》，27(3)，205-224。
黃俊傑(2009)，「台灣資訊電子產業最適國際化策略之模擬」，東海大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
楊志梅與陳忠榮(2001)，「研究發展、技術引進與專利-一般動差法於可數追蹤資料的應用」，《經濟論文叢刊》，29，69-87。
楊志梅與陳忠榮(2002)，「研究發展，專利與生產力-台灣製造業的實證研究」，《經濟論文叢刊》，30，27-48。
潘蒨怡(2010)，《台灣資訊電子業創新活動、品牌權益與國際化策略之績效評估》，東海大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
Aaker, D. A. and R. Jacobson (1994), “The Financial Information Content of Perceived Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 191-201.
Aaker, D. A. and R. Jacobson (2001), “The Value Relevance of Brand Attitude in High-Technology Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38(4), 485-493.
Barney, J. B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
Barth, M. E., Clement M. B., Foster G. and R Kasznik (1998), “Brand Values and Capital Market Valuation,” Reviews of Accounting Studies, 3, 41-68.
Battese, G. E. a. C., T.J. (1995), "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data" Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332
Battese, G.E. and T. J. Coelli (1995), "A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data" Empirical Economics, 20, 325-332
Battese, G.E.Coelli and T.J. (1992), "Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmers in India" Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3, 153-169
Bosworth, D. and M. Roger (2001), “Market Value, R&D and Intellectual Property: An Empirical Analysis of Large Australian Firm,” Economic Record, 77, 323-337.
Caves, R. E. (1974),“Causes of Direct Investment: Foreign Firms' Shares in Canadian and United Kingdom Manufacturing Industries,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(3), 279-293.
Coase, R. H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
Coelli, T. J. (1996), A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England,
Conchar, M. P., M. R. Crask and G. M. Zinkhan (2005), “Market Valuation Models of the Effect of advertising and Promotional Spending: A Reviews and Meta-analysis,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 445-460.
Contractor, F. J., Kundu S.K., and C. C. Hsu (2003), “A Three-Stage Theory of International Expansion: The Link between Multinationality and Performance in the Service Sector,” Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 5-18.
Davidson, W. H. (1980), “The Location of Foreign Investment Activity: Country Characteristics and Experience Effects,” Journal of International Business Studies, 11, 9-22.
Dunning, J. H. (1980),“Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some Empirical Test,”Journal of International Business Studies, 9-31.
Farrel, M. J. (1957), "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency" Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120, 253–290
Fiorenza Belussi, S. R. S. (2010), Advances in International Management-Managing the Fragmented Value Chain of Global Business: Exploitative and Explorative Offshoring Toward Emerging Market Economies, Padova, Italy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Gomes, L. and K. Ramaswamy (1999), “ An Empirical Examination of the Form of the Relationship between Multinationality and Performance,” Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 173-187.
Grant, R. M. (1987), “Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies,” Journal of International Business Studies, 18, 79-89.
Grant, R. M., Jammine, A.P. and H. Thomas (1988), “Diversity, Diversification, and Profitability Among British Manufacturing Companies,” Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 771-801.
Grant, Robert M. (1980), “Multinationality and Performance among British Manufacturing Companies,” Journal of International Business Studies, 18, 79-89.
Griliches, Z. (1981), “Market Value, R&D, and Patents,” Economics Letters, 7(2), 183-187.
Hall, L.A. and Bagchi-Sen (2007), “An Analysis of Firm-Level Innovation Strategies in the US Biotechnology Industry,” Technovation, 27, 4-14.
Hong, S. and R. Wyner (1990), “Determinants of product evaluation: Effects of the time interval between knowledge of a product’s country of origin and information about it’s specific attributes,” Journal of Consumer research, 17(3), 277-288.
Hufbauer, G. C. (1970), “The Impact of National Characteristics and Technology on the Commodity Composition of Trade in Manufactured Goods,” In Raymond Vernon, ed., The Technology Factor in International Trade. New York: Columbia University Press, 145-231.
Hymer, S. (1960), The International Operations of National Firm : A Study of Direct Foreign Investment , Cambridge , Mass : MIT Press.
Kim, W. C., Hwang P. and W. P. Burgers (1989), “Global Diversification Strategy and Corporate Profit Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 10, 45-57.
Kogut, B. (1985), “Designing Global Strategies: Profiting from Operational Flexibility,” Sloan Management Review, 27, 27-38.
Kotabe, M. (1990), “The Relationship between Offshore Sourcing and Innovativeness,” Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 623-639.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1995), “Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Makino, S., P. W. Beamish and N. B. Zhao (2004),“The Characteristics and Performance of Japanese FDI in Less Developed and Developed Countries,”Journal of World Business, 39(4), 377-392.
Mansfield, E. (1981), “Composition of R&D Expenditures Relationship to Size of Firm, Concentration, and Innovative Output,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, 610-615.
Michel, A. and I. Shaked (1986), “Multinational Corporations vs. Domestic Corporations: Financial Performance and Characteristics,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17, 89-100.
Mudambi, R. (2008), "Location, control and innovation in knowledgeintensive industries" Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 699-725
Nelson, R. (1998), “The Co-Evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions,” in Dosi, G., D. Teece, and J. Chytry eds., Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness, Oxford University Press: NY, 319-335.
Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982), “An evolutionary theory of economic change,” Cambridge, Mass:Belknap Press.
Pakes, A. (1985), “Patents, R and D, and the Stock Market Rate of Return,” Journal of Political Economy, 93,390-409.
Pakes, A. and Z. Griliches (1984), “Patents and R&D at the firm level: a first look,” In Z. Griliches(ed), R&D, Patents and Productivity, National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicage Press.
Papadopoulos, N. (1988), “Inventory, Taxonomy and Assessment of Methods for International Market Selection, ” International Marketing Review, 5, 38.
Porter, M. E. (1985), “Competitive Advantage,” New York: Free Press.
Stalk, G. J. and M. T. Hout (1990), “Competing Against Time: How time-Based Competition Is Reshaping Global Market,” (1 st ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Tallman S and J. Li (1996), “Effect of International Diversity and Product Diversity on the Performance of Multinational Firms,” Academy of Management Journal,39, 179-196.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. and A. Shuen (1997), “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-Based View of The Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.