跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/08 01:34
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:鐘晨翰
研究生(外文):Chen-Han, Jhong
論文名稱:台灣地區本國商業銀行績效分析─兩階段DEA
論文名稱(外文):Performance Evaluation of Domestic Commercial Banks in Taiwan─Two Stage DEA
指導教授:邱永和邱永和引用關係黃晉偉黃晉偉引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yung-Ho, ChiuChin-Wei, Huang
口試委員:邱永和黃晉偉張民忠陳玉娟柯慈儀
口試委員(外文):Yung-Ho, ChiuChin-Wei, HuangMing-Chung, ChangYu-Chuan, ChenTsz-Yi, Ke
口試日期:2014-06-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東吳大學
系所名稱:經濟學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:經濟學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:84
中文關鍵詞:銀行兩階段資料包絡法管理矩陣績效
外文關鍵詞:BankTwo-stage DEAManagement matrixPerformance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:652
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:72
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究將台灣地區本國商業銀行作為研究主體,採用兩階段資料包絡分析法的非合作(Leader-Follower)模型與合作模型,評估台灣銀行產業在2009年至2012年分別以獲利效率為領導者、以市場效率為領導者以及獲利效率與市場效率為合作之情況下,整體效率表現及兩階段之效率變化,並結合管理矩陣分析各DMU之管理意涵,及Wilcoxon雙樣本檢定使數據分析更扎實。
本文將兩階段分為獲利效率與經營效率,第一階段探討獲利效率,以員工人數、固定資產、存款總額作為第一階段投入變數,利息收入、放款、投資為第一階段產出變數;第二階段探討經營效率,將第一階段產出變數作為第二階段投入變數,而第二階段產出變數為淨值、資產報酬率、每股盈餘。
實證結果顯示:
1.以獲利效率為領導者時,兩階段效率差距最大,而以市場效率為領導者時,兩階段效率差距最小,且有逐年縮小之趨勢,表示以市場效率為領導者時,兩階段之效率發展較為平均。
2.所評估之整體效率值在合作與非合作模式下,合作模式之整體效率值並無明顯高於非合作模式下之效率值,且以市場效率為領導者的兩階段效率值差距小於在合作模式下兩階段效率值之差距。
3.在高於效率平均值時,舊銀行家數在獲利效率多於新銀行家數,而新銀行家數在市場效率上多於舊銀行家數,而在整體效率方面,新舊銀行家數無明顯差距。

This thesis applies Leader-Follower model and Cooperation model data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of bank industry in Taiwan during the year 2009 to 2012. Also, it combined with management matrix analysis and management implications of each DMUs, and Wilcoxon two-sample test analysis of the data more solid.
This paper will be divided into two stages, called profitability efficiency and operating efficiency. In the first stage, input items are fixed aeests, number of employees and total deposits; interest income, loans and investments are chosen as the output variables for first stage and the input variable for the second stage; as for the output variables of the second are net value, return on assets and earnings per share.
The empirical results show:
1.When profitability is regarded as the leader, the biggest gap between the two stage efficiency;when marketability is considered to be the leader, the smallest gap between the two stage efficiency, and reduced year by year, which means that when marketability is considered to be the leader, the efficiency of the two-stage development more evenly.
2.Compare with cooperation and non-cooperative mode, the overall efficiency of the value of the cooperation are not significantly higher than the non-cooperative mode.
3.Higher than the average efficiency, old banks are more than new banks in profitability efficiency, and new banks are more than old banks in marketing efficiency, finally old and new banks are almost the same in overall efficiency.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景
第二節 研究動機與目的
第三節 研究架構與流程
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 DEA法與兩階段DEA法之相關文獻
第二節 國內外DEA相關文獻彙總
第三章 研究方法
第一節 定義各類經濟效率指標
第二節 資料包絡分析法
第三節 兩階段資料包絡分析法
第四章 實證結果與分析
第一節 資料來源與變數說明
第二節 實證結果分析
第三節 管理矩陣分析
第四節 無母數檢定
第五章 結論
參考文獻

壹、中文文獻
方嘉閩(2010),台灣、中國之銀行績效分析,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。
王火炎(2006),銀行分支機構經營效率分析─三階段DEA方法之應用,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所在職專班碩士論文。
甘永成(2007),本國商業銀行與外商銀行之經營績效評估與分析,東吳大學經濟學系碩士論文。
李儀貞(2013),運用二階段DEA法評估台灣產險業自留業務效率之研究,淡江大學保險學系保險經營碩士在職班碩士論文。
周紜如(2008),台灣金控公司之經營績效評估─應用二階段資料包絡,朝陽科技大學保險金融管理系碩士論文。
洪薏婷(2013),台灣地區金融控股公司績效評估─兩階段賽局DEA之應用,東吳大學經濟學系碩士論文。
胡均立、尤雪娥、林芳麗(2012),「臺灣地區人壽保險公司的效率分析-兩階段資料包絡分析方法之應用」,保險經營與制度,11(1),頁21-42。
徐清俊、黃俊誠(2004),「探討金控公司子銀行之經營績效─以台灣為例」,遠東學報,第21卷第2期,頁259-270。
梁文奎(2008),台灣上市櫃證券商經營效率與市場效率之研究─資料包絡分析法之應用,國立台灣科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
許晉銘(2006),台灣地區機場績效評估─二階段資料包絡分析法之應用,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
陳富強、馮淑琴、方顯光(2011),「探討台灣地區本國銀行獲利能力與市場能力─二階段 DEA」,華人經濟研究,9(2),頁33-52。
黃旭男、高棟樑(2005),「台灣地區產險業經營績效之評估:二階段資料包絡分析法之應用」,保險專刊,第21卷,頁57-59。
黃惠玲(2012),台灣金控公司旗下銀行部門之經營績效評估─以兩階段資料包絡分析,國立屏東商業技術學院國際企業所碩士論文。
詹維玲、劉景中(2006),「金融自由化後台灣銀行的效率及生產力」,經濟論文, 34(2),頁251-300。
蔡淑敏、黃財源、潘明皇(2011),「金融中介機構經營效率之個案研究:利用二階段資料包絡分析」,管理學報,28(3),頁247-265。
魏惠姍(2011),台灣與中國大陸證券公司經營效率之研究,元智大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。

貳、英文文獻
Alam, I. M. S.(2001). A Nonparametric Approach for Assessing Productivity Dynamics of Large US Banks. Journal of Money, Credit & Banking (Ohio State University Press), 33(1).
Al‐Sharkas, A. A., M. K. Hassan and S. Lawrence (2008). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on the efficiency of the US banking industry: further evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(1‐2), 50-70.
Aly, H. Y., R. Grabowski, C. Pasurka and N. Rangan (1990). Technical, scale, and allocative efficiencies in US banking: an empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 211-218.
Ayadi, I. (2013). Determinants of Tunisian Bank Efficiency: A DEA Analysis. International Journal of Financial Research, 4(4).
Banker, R. D., A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Chang, T. C.,and Y. H. Chiu(2006). Affecting factors on risk‐adjusted efficiency in Taiwan's banking industry. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(4), 634-648.
Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
Chen, T.-Y.(2004). A study of cost efficiency and privatisation in Taiwan's banks: the impact of the Asian financial crisis. The Service Industries Journal, 24(5), 137-151.
Chen, T.-Y. and T.-L. Yeh (2000). A measurement of bank efficiency, ownership and productivity changes in Taiwan. Service Industries Journal, 20(1), 95-109.
Chen, Y. and J. Zhu (2004). Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance. Information Technology and Management, 5(1-2), 9-22.
Chen, Y.-H., M.-C. Kao and C.-Y. Lin (2011). Do efficiency improvements from mergers and acquisitions occur in Taiwanese banking industry? An application of data envelopment analysis. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics(73), 161-170.
Chiu, Y.-H. and Y.-C. Chen (2009). The analysis of Taiwanese bank efficiency: incorporating both external environment risk and internal risk. Economic Modelling, 26(2), 456-463.
Chiu, Y.-H., Y.-C. Chen and X.-J. Bai (2011). Efficiency and risk in Taiwan banking: SBM super-DEA estimation. Applied Economics, 43(5), 587-602.
Drake, L. and M. J. Hall (2003). Efficiency in Japanese banking: an empirical analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(5), 891-917.
Färe R, S. Grosskopf (1996). Productivity and Intermediate Products: A Frontier Approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65-70.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 253-290.
Guzman, I. and C. Reverte (2008). Productivity and efficiency change and shareholder value: evidence from the Spanish banking sector. Applied Economics, 40(15), 2037-2044.
Kao, C. and S.-N. Hwang (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418-429.
Kumar, M., L. F. Zegarra and B. Avolio (2011). Benchmarking Peruvian banks using data envelopment analysis. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra•Volume, 4(2), 147-164.
Liang, L., W. D. Cook and J. Zhu (2008). DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55(7), 643-653.
Liang, L., J. Wu, W. D. Cook and J. Zhu (2008). The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 56(5), 1278-1288.
Liang, L., F Yang, W. D Cook and J. Zhu (2006). DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operations Research, 145(1), 35-49.
Lim, G. H. and D. S. Randhawa (2005). Competition, liberalization and efficiency: evidence from a two-stage banking model on banks in Hong Kong and Singapore. Managerial Finance, 31(1), 52-77.
Lozano-Vivas, A., J. T. Pastor and J. M. Pastor (2002). An efficiency comparison of European banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18(1), 59-77.
Luo, X.(2003). Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: An application of data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business research, 56(8), 627-635.
Mariappan, P. and G. Sreeaarthi (2013). Application of Data Envelopment Analysis [DEA] to study the Performance Efficiency of the Scheduled Commercial Banks of India. International Journals of Marketing and Technology, 3(8), 52-70.
Neupane, B.(2013). Efficiency and Productivity of Commercial Banks in Nepal: A Malmquist Index Approach. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 5(2), 220-243.
Pancurova, D. and S. Lyocsa (2013). Determinants of Commercial Banks’ Efficiency: Evidence from 11 CEE Countries. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), 63(2), 152-179.
Pasiouras, F.(2008). International evidence on the impact of regulations and supervision on banks’ technical efficiency: an application of two-stage data envelopment analysis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 30(2), 187-223.
Pastor, J. M.(2002). Credit risk and efficiency in the European banking system: A three-stage analysis. Applied Financial Economics, 12(12), 895-911.
Payan, A., A. Noora, F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi and A. Khodabakhshi (2013). Relative Efficiency in Two-Stage Dea and Its Application to Bank Branches.
Sakar, B. (2006). A study on efficiency and productivity of Turkish banks in Istanbul Stock Exchange using Malmquist DEA. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(2), 145-155.
Sanjeev, G. M. (2006). Does Banks'size Matter In India? Journal of Services Research, 6(2).
Sathye, M.(2001). X-efficiency in Australian banking: An empirical investigation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(3), 613-630.
Seiford, L. M. and J. Zhu (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. management science, 45(9), 1270-1288.
Sexton, T. R. and H. F. Lewis (2003). Two-stage DEA: An application to major league baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2-3), 227-249.
Sherman, H. D. and F. Gold (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 9(2), 297-315.
Siems, T. F. (1992). Quantifying Management's Role in Bank Survival. Economic Review - Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 29.
Thagunna, K. S. and S. Poudel (2013). Measuring Bank Performance of Nepali Banks: A Data Envelopment Analysis Perspective. International Journal of Economics & Financial Issues, 3(1).
Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2003). Nontraditional activities and bank efficiency revisited: a distributional analysis for Spanish financial institutions. Journal of Economics and Business, 55(4), 371-395.
Wang W.-K., H.-C. Huang and M.-C. Lai (2005). Measuring the Relative Efficiency of Commercial Banks: A Comparative Study on Different Ownership Modes in China. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 7(2), 219-223.
Yen, G.-F. and Y.-H. Yang (2013). Measuring Managerial Efficiency Of Securities Investment Trust Firms Under Taiwanese Financial Holding Companies: Aa Application Of The Two-Stage DEA Approch. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 6(1).
Yue, P. (1992). Data envelopment analysis and commercial bank performance: a primer with applications to Missouri banks. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 74(January/February 1992).
Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(1), 105-124.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top