跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.81) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/05 05:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳姵瑱
研究生(外文):Pien-Shen Chen
論文名稱:偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者在人格傾向、生活瑣事、認知評估、因應策略與情緒的特徵
論文名稱(外文):Patterns of personality, daily hassles, appraisal, coping and emotion in migraine and tension-type headache.
指導教授:陳秀蓉陳秀蓉引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:輔仁大學
系所名稱:心理學系
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:心理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:143
中文關鍵詞:偏頭痛緊張型頭痛生活瑣事認知評估因應因應滿意度因應有效性情緒狀態人格傾向
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:1448
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:505
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
研究問題:目前文獻中對於頭痛與壓力的研究較缺乏完整性的探討,只是選擇壓力歷程其中的向度,基於此本研究提出兩個主要的研究目的,第一為探討偏頭痛患者、緊張型頭痛患者與控制組在壓力相關變項上有其特殊性與差異性,壓力相關變項包含:人格傾向、主觀之生活瑣事的頻率與影響嚴重度、對生活瑣事的認知評估、對生活瑣事的因應策略、因應有效性與滿意度、情緒狀態,且探討偏頭痛患者與緊張型頭痛患者在主觀頭痛特性、對頭痛的認知評估、對頭痛的因應策略、因應有效性與滿意度的差異。另外,在Lazarus與Folkman(1984)所提出的壓力交流理論為背景之下,第二個研究目的為分別探討偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者其壓力相關變項之間的關係。

研究方法:本研究以50位偏頭痛患者、45位緊張型頭痛患者與41位控制組為研究對象。採用橫斷研究法與立意取樣,偏頭痛患者與緊張型頭痛患者填寫「壓力經驗問卷」,其中包含了:個人基本資料、生活瑣事量表、生活瑣事評估量表、因應策略量表、頭痛評估量表、慢性疼痛因應量表、情緒量表與人格傾向量表共八部分。控制組的參與者除了頭痛評估量表與慢性疼痛因應量表未填寫之外,他們填寫其他六部分。在資料分析方面,使用獨立樣本t檢定、卡方檢定、單因子變異數分析、邏輯斯迴歸與典型相關檢驗研究假設。

研究結果:研究結果分別如下:(1)在人格傾向方面,偏頭痛組的神經質、焦慮、生氣敵意、憂鬱顯著高於控制組,而外向性、溫暖、合群顯著低於控制組;緊張型頭痛組的神經質、焦慮顯著高於控制組,而深思熟慮顯著低於控制組。(2)在生活瑣事方面,偏頭痛組比控制組有顯著較高的頻率、嚴重度與密度(頻率成嚴重度)。(3)在生活瑣事的認知評估方面,偏頭痛組的重要性、威脅、動機不一致評估顯著高於控制組,而控制、有效性、情緒焦點因應的可能性評估顯著低於控制組;緊張型頭痛組的重要性評估顯著高於控制組;偏頭痛組的威脅評估顯著高於緊張型頭痛組。(4)在頭痛的特性方面,偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組之頭痛部位有顯著的不同。(5)在生活瑣事的因應方面,偏頭痛組比控制組顯著更常使用自我責備、社會退縮與情緒焦點的逃離,緊張型頭痛組比控制組顯著更不常使用社會支持。在因應的有效性與滿意度方面,偏頭痛組的因應有效性顯著低於控制組。(6)在對頭痛的因應策略方面,偏頭痛組的使用藥物天數顯著比緊張型頭痛組多,而兩組患者的因應有效性與滿意度無顯著差異。(7)在情緒狀態方面,偏頭痛組的廣泛擔心、症狀擔心、憂鬱、緊繃不安與心情低落顯著高於控制組;緊張型頭痛組的症狀擔心顯著高於控制組;偏頭痛組的心情低落顯著高於緊張型頭痛組。(8)使用邏輯斯迴歸發現疾病的特殊性方面,最能區分控制組與偏頭痛組的變項為焦慮人格傾向、合群人格傾向與瑣事威脅評估;最能區分控制組與緊張型頭痛組的變項為焦慮人格傾向、瑣事重要性評估、瑣事情緒焦點因應的可能性評估與社會支持;最能區分緊張型頭痛組與偏頭痛組的變項為瑣事嚴重度與瑣事威脅評估。(9)在偏頭痛組的典型相關結果方面,偏頭痛患者的神經質人格越高、生活瑣事頻率越高、生活瑣事嚴重度越高,則越會對於生活瑣事做出高威脅性的認知評估;對生活瑣事評估積極性越低,則越不常使用投入因應、越常使用逃離因應;越常使用逃離因應,則其因應效果越低、越常經驗到負面情緒。在緊張型頭痛組的典型相關結果方面,緊張型頭痛患者的神經質人格越高、生活瑣事頻率越高、生活瑣事嚴重度越高,則越會對於生活瑣事做出威脅性的認知評估、越不會對生活瑣事做出積極性的認知評估;越對瑣事做出高威脅性的認知評估,則越常使用投入與逃離的因應策略;越對瑣事所出低積極性認知評估時,則越常使用逃離的因應策略;越常使用投入與逃離的因應策略,則越常經驗到負面的情緒。

討論:研究結果讓我們瞭解偏頭痛組、緊張型頭痛組與控制組在各壓力相關變項上的差異,並且瞭解偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者的特殊性,透過壓力模式與典型相關的分析,分別瞭解偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組其各變項之間的影響。從本研究的發現可提出針對偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者在臨床上的治療建議。
Research background & aim: Considering researches about stress on headache haven’t completed which they have just studied parts of variables in stress process, so this study has two purposes. The first purpose was to investigate differences and specialty in each stress variables among migraine headache (MH), tension-type headache (TH) and control group. Variables of stress included personality factors, density of daily hassles, appraisals and coping of daily hassles, effectiveness and satisfaction of coping and emotional outcomes. We also investigate differences in subjective characteristics of headache, appraisals of headache, coping with headache, effectiveness and satisfaction of headache coping between MH and TH groups. Furthermore, based on transactional model of stress of Lazarus and Folkman, the second purpose of this study was to test pattern of relationship of stress variables in MH or TH groups.

Methods: Fifty MH suffers, forty-five TH suffers, and forty-one controls were scheduled in our study. Both of headache participators were asked to complete a package questionnaires there included the demographic data, the Daily Hassle Scale, the Cognitive Appraisal of Daily Hassle, the Coping Strategies Inventory, the Cognitive Appraisal of headache, the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, the Emotion Inventory, and the NEO PI-R. The control group had also completed those questionnaires except the Cognitive Appraisal of headache and the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory. For examining the hypothesis of this study, the independent-samples t test, the Chi-square, one-way ANOVA, the logistic regression, and the canonical correlation were conducted for statistics analysis.

Result: (1) In terms of personality, MH group had significantly higher scores on neuroticism, anxiety, anger hostility, depression and lower scores on extraversion, warmth, and gregariousness than controls. TH group had significantly higher scores on neuroticism and anxiety and lower scores on deliberation than controls. (2) MH group reported higher frequency, severity and density of daily hassles than control group. (3) In appraisals of daily hassles, MH group perceived more importance, threat, motivational incongruence and less control, effectiveness, emotion-focused coping potential than control group, but TH group perceived only more importance than control group, MH group perceived more threat than TH group. (4) MH and TH suffers had different pain characteristics such as pain location. (5) In copings with daily hassles, MH group reported greater use of self criticism, social withdraw, and emotion disengagement than control group. TH group reported fewer use of social support than control group. MH group perceived lower effectiveness of coping than control group. (6) In ways of coping with headache, MH group were more than TH group in days of taking medications, but two groups did not differ in effectiveness and satisfaction of coping. (7) Compared to controls, MH group showed higher levels of extensive worry, somatic worry, depression, disquiet and dysthymia. Compared to controls, TH group showed higher level of somatic worry. MH showed higher level of dysthymia than TH group. (8) Logistic regression revealed that: (a) Personality of anxiety and gregariousness, and appraisals of threat reliably differentiated MH and controls; (b) Personality of anxiety, appraisals of importance and emotion-focused coping potential and coping of social support reliably differentiated TH and controls; (c) Severity of daily hassles and appraisals of threat reliably differentiated two headache groups. (9) In the MH group, results of canonical correlation indicated that: (a) higher neuroticism and frequency and severity of daily hassles were associated with higher negative appraisal; (b) lower positive appraisal was associated with fewer use of engagement and more use of disengagement coping; (c) more use of disengagement coping was associated with lower effectiveness of coping and higher negative emotion. In the TH group, results of canonical correlation indicated that: (a) higher neuroticism and frequency and severity of daily hassles were associated with higher negative and lower positive appraisal; (b) higher negative appraisal was associated with more use of engagement and disengagement coping; (c) lower positive appraisal was associated with more use of disengagement coping; (d) more use of engagement and disengagement coping were associated with higher negative emotion.

Conclusions: Our results showed MH, TH and control groups differed in term of personality, daily hassles, appraisal, coping, effectiveness of coping, and emotions. From the stress model and canonical correlation results, we confirmed that variables of stress presented the contributions on two types of headache in the different combinations each other. This finding can also suggest using in clinical practice as therapeutic regimens on headache patients.
摘要...i
目錄...v
圖表目錄...vii
第一章 緒論
 第一節 研究動機與目的...1
第二章 文獻探討
 第一節 偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛之定義與特徵...4
 第二節 壓力的概念...17
 第三節 偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者的人格傾向...29
 第四節 偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者的主觀壓力知覺...38
 第五節 偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者的認知評估...42
 第六節 偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者的因應策略...45
 第七節 偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛患者的情緒狀態...51
 第八節 研究架構與研究假設...54
第三章 研究方法
 第一節 研究對象...60
 第二節 研究工具...63
 第三節 研究程序...71
 第四節 資料分析...72
第四章 研究結果
 第一節 偏頭痛組、緊張型頭痛組與控制組在各變項上的差異...73
 第二節 偏頭痛組、緊張型頭痛組與控制組在壓力相關變項上的特殊性...86
 第三節 偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組各壓力變項之間的相關...90
第五節 討論與建議
 第一節 討論...99
 第二節 建議...108
參考文獻
 中文資料...111
 西文資料...111
附錄
 附錄一 無預兆偏頭痛與有預兆偏頭痛的診斷準則...121
 附錄二 陣發性緊張型頭痛與慢性緊張型頭痛的診斷準則...122
 附錄三 頭痛特性調查表...123
附錄四 壓力經驗量表(頭痛患者組)...124
 附錄五 壓力經驗量表(控制組)...142
附錄六 台灣版NEO PI-R使用同意書...143
圖表目錄
圖目錄
圖2.2-1 疾病的特定性模式...21
圖2.2-2 壓力、因應與適應的理論概要圖...21
圖2.8-1 研究架構圖...54
圖4.3-1 偏頭痛組之典型相關路徑圖-1...91
圖4.3-2 偏頭痛組之典型相關路徑圖-2...92
圖4.3-3 偏頭痛組之典型相關路徑圖-3...93
圖4.3-4 緊張型頭痛組之典型相關路徑圖-1...95
圖4.3-5 緊張型頭痛組之典型相關路徑圖-2...96
圖4.3-6 緊張型頭痛組之典型相關路徑圖-3...97

表目錄
表2.1-1 偏頭痛與緊張型頭痛之特性比較...7
表2.3-1 頭痛患者人格傾向之研究比較表...35
表2.4-1 頭痛患者主觀壓力知覺之研究比較表...40
表2.5-1 頭痛患者認知評估之研究比較表...44
表2.6-1 頭痛患者因應策略之研究比較表...49
表2.7-1 頭痛患者情緒狀態之研究比較表...52
表3.1-1 受試者的人口統計學資料之次數分配與變異數分析...61
表3.1-2 受試者的人口統計學資料之次數分配與適合度考驗...62
表3.2-1 台灣版NEO PI-R分量表之得分解釋...63
表3.2-2 台灣版NEO PI-R的α信度...64
表3.2-3 因應策略量表分量表間的關係...67
表3.2-4 因應策略量表分量表之解釋...68
表3.2-5 慢性疼痛因應量表分量表之解釋...70
表4.1-1 不同組別在神經質人格向度與相關切面上的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...74
表4.1-2 不同組別在外向性人格向度與相關切面上的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...75
表4.1-3 不同組別在嚴謹性人格向度與相關切面上的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...76
表4.1-4 不同組別在生活瑣事上的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...77
表4.1-5 不同組別對生活瑣事的認知評估的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...78
表4.1-6 偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組在主觀的頭痛特性的分佈與卡方分析...79
表4.1-7 偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組第一次頭痛年齡的平均數、標準差與t檢定...79
表4.1-8 偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組在對頭痛的認知評估的平均數、標準差與t檢定...80
表4.1-9 不同組別在對生活瑣事的因應策略的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...82
表4.1-10不同組別在對生活瑣事的因應有效性與因應滿意度的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...83
表4.1-11偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組對頭痛的因應策略的平均數、標準差與t檢定...84
表4.1-12偏頭痛組與緊張型頭痛組對頭痛因應策略的有效性與滿意度之平均數、標準差與t檢定...85
表4.1-13不同組別的情緒狀態之平均數、標準差、變異數分析...85
表4.2-1 以壓力相關變項區辨控制組或偏頭痛組之邏輯斯迴歸分析摘要表...87
表4.2-2 以壓力相關變項區辨控制組或緊張型頭痛組之邏輯斯迴歸分析摘要表...88
表4.2-3 以壓力相關變項區辨緊張型頭痛組或偏頭痛之邏輯斯迴歸分析摘要表...89
表4.3-1 偏頭痛組的典型相關分析摘要表-1...91
表4.3-2 偏頭痛組的典型相關分析摘要表-2...92
表4.3-3 偏頭痛組的典型相關分析摘要表-3...93
表4.3-4 緊張型頭痛組的典型相關分析摘要表-1...94
表4.3-5 緊張型頭痛組的典型相關分析摘要表-2...96
表4.3-6 緊張型頭痛組的典型相關分析摘要表-3...97
表5.1-1 受試者每日使用電腦時數的平均數、標準差與變異數分析...102
一、中文部分
呂碧鴻、陳秀蓉(民87)。日常生活事件與症狀歸因組型對高血壓疾病患者因應行為之影響。行政院國科學委會專題研究成果報告(報告編號:NSC-86-2413-H-002-009-G7)。
Sarafino, E. P.(1994/1997)。「健康心理學」(Health Psychology;蕭仁釗、林耀盛與鄭逸如譯)。台北:桂冠。
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. (1988/1993)。「頭痛,顱神經痛,及顏面痛之分類與診斷基準」(Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgia, and facial pain;洪祖培、李克怡與陳威宏譯)。台灣:中華民國神經學學會。

二、西文部分
Aguirre, J., Gallardo, R., Pareja, J. A., & Pérez-Miranda, M. (2000). Cluster of MMPI personality profiles in chronic tension-type headache and predictable responses to Fluoxetine. Cephalalgia, 20, 51-56.
Aktekin, B., Yaltkaya, K., Ozkaynak, S., & Oguz, Y. (2001). Recovery cycle of the blink reflex and exteroceptive suppression of temporalis muscle activity in migraine and tension-type headache. Headache, 41, 142-149.
Ashina, M. (2002). Calcitonin gene-related peptide in tension-type headache [Abstruct]. Thescientificworldjournal, 2, 1527-1531.
Ashina, M. (2004). Neurobiology of chronic tension-type headache. Cephalagia, 24, 161-172.
Ashina, M., Bendtsen, L., Jensen, R., Ekman, R., & Olesen, J. (1999). Plasma levels of substance P, neuropeptide Y and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in patients with chronic tension-type headache. Pain, 83(3), 541-547.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bendtsen, L. (2000). Central sensitization in tension-type headache-possible pathophysiological mechanisms. Cephalalgia, 20(5), 486-508.
Bendtsen, L., Jensen, R., Brennum, J., Arerndt-Nielser, L., & Olesen, J. (1996). Exteroceptive suppression of temporal muscle activity is normal in chronic tension-type headache and not related to actual headache state. Cephalalgia, 16, 251-256.
Bendtsen, L., Jensen, R., & Olesen, J. (1996). Decreased pain detection and tolerance thresholds in chronic tension-type headache. Archives of Neurology,53, 373-376.
Bennett, P., Lowe, R., & Honey, K. L. (2003). Appraisals, core relational themes, and emotions: a test of the consistency of reporting and their associations. Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 511-520.
Bergdahl, J., & Bergdahl, M. (2002). Perceived stress in adults: prevalence and association of depression, anxiety and medication in a Swedish population. Stress and Health, 18, 235-241.
Blalock, J. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2000). Interaction of cognitive avoidance coping and stress in predicting depression/ anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 47-65.
Bolay, H., Reuter, U., Dunn, A. K., Huang, Z., Boas, D. A. & Moskowitz, M. A. (2002). Intrinsic brain activity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model. Nature Medicine, 8, 136-142.
Brandt, J., Celentano, D., Stewart, W., Linet, M., & Folstein, M. F. (1990). Personality and emotional disorder in a community sample of migraine headache suffers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 303-308.
Brebner, J. (2001). Personality and stress coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 317-327.
Breslau, N., & Andreski, P. (1995). Migraine, personality, and psychiatric comorbidity. Headache, 35, 382-386.
Cady, R., Schreiber, C., Farmer, K., & Sheftell, F. (2002). Primary headaches: a convergence hypothesis. Headache, 42, 204-216.
Cao, M., Zhang, S., Wang, K., Wang, Y., & Wang, W. (2002). Personality traits in migraine and tension-type headaches: a five-factor model study. Paychopathology, 35, 254-258.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267-283.
Chang, E. C. (1998). Dispositional optimism and primary and secondary appraisal of a stressor: controlling for confounding influences and relations to coping and psychological and physical adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 1109-1120.
Chen, M. C., & Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Development and validation of the NEO PI-R for a Taiwanese Sample. In T. Sugiman, M. Karasawa, J. H. Liu, & C. Ward, (Eds.), Progress in Asian Social Psychology, (Volume II): Theoretical and Empirical Contributions (pp. 105-118). Korea: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa Publishing Company.
Cheung, R. T. F. (2000). Prevalence of migraine, tension-type headache, and other headaches in Hong Kong. Headache, 40(6), 473-479.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, EL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1990). Personality: another “hidden factor” in stress research. Psychological Inquiry, 1(1), 22-24.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, EL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. P., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for Agreeableness and Conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887-898.
David, J. P., & Suls, J. (1999). Coping efforts in daily life: role of big five traits and problem appraisals. Journal of Personality, 67, 265-294.
De Benedittis, G. & Lorenzetti, A. (1992a). Minor stressful life events (daily hassles) in chronic primary headache: relationship with MMPI personality patterns. Headache, 32, 330-332.
De Benedittis, G. & Lorenzetti, A. (1992b). The role of stressful life event in the persistence of primary headache: major events vs. daily hassles. Pain, 51, 35-42.
Di Piero,V., Bruti, G., Venturi, P., Talamonti, F., Biondi, M., Di Legge, S., & Lenzi G. L. (2001). Aminergic tone correlates of migraine and tension-type headache: a study using the tridimensional personality questionnaire. Headache, 41, 63-71.
Dunkel-Schetter, D., & Bennett, T. L. (1990). Differentiating the cognitive and behavioral aspects of social support. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 267-296). New York: Wiley.
Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854.
Fan, A. Y., Gu, Ren-Juan, & Zhou, An-nan. (1995). An MMPI control study: chinese migraineurs during frequent headache attack intervals. Headache, 35, 475-478.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219-239.
Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J., & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 571-579.
Goadsby, P. J., Edvinsson, L., & Ekman, R. (1990). Vasoactive peptide release in the extracerebral circulation of humans during migraine headache. Annals of Neurology, 28, 183-187.
Granham, J. R., & Wolff, H. G. (1938). Mechanism of migraine headache and action of ergotamine tartrate. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 39, 737-763.
Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., MacLeod, F. K., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (1999). Validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory. Pain, 80, 471-481.
Hassinger, H. J., Semenchuk, E. M., & O’Brien, W. H. (1999). Appraisal and coping responses to pain and stress in migraine headache suffers. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22(4), 327-340.
Hassinger, H. J. (2001). Appraisal, coping, and cardiovascular responses to acute pain and stress in female migraine and tension-type headache sufferers. [Abstract]. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 61(11-B), 6176.
Hatch, J. P. (1992). Headache. In R. J. Gatchl & E. B. Blanchard (Eds), Psychophysiological disorder (pp. 111-149). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hatch, J. P., Schoenfeld, L. S., Boutros, N. N., Seleshi, E., Moore, P. J., & Cry-Provost, M. (1991). Anger and hostility in tension-type headache. Headache, 31, 302-304.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. (1988). Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgia, and facial pain. Cephalalgia, 8(Suppl. 7), 1-96.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731-739.
Hogan, J., & Ones, D. S. (1997). Conscientiousness and integrity at work. In R. Hogan & J.A. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 849-870). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Holm, J. E., Bury, L., & Suda, K. T. (1996). The relationship between stress, headache, and the menstrual cycle in young female migraineurs. Headache, 36, 531-537.
Holm, J. E., Holroyd, K. A., Hursey, K. G., & Penzien, D. B. (1986). The role of stress in recurrent tension headache. Headache, 26, 160-167.
Holm, J. E., Lokken, C., & Myers, T. C. (1997). Migraine and stress: a daily examination of temporal relationships in woman migraineurs. Headache, 37, 553-558.
Holroyd, K. A., Stensland, M., Lipchik, G. L., Hill, K. R., O’Donnell, F. S., & Cordingley, G. (2000). Psychosocial correlates and impact of chronic tension-type headache. Headache, 40, 3-16.
Huber, D., & Henrich, G. (2003). Personality traits and stress sensitivity in migraine patients. Behavioral Medicine, 29(1), 4-13.
Inan, L., Soykan, C., & Tulunay, F. C. (1994). MMPI profiles of Turkish headache suffers. Headache, 34, 152-154.
International Association for the Study of Pain. (1986). Classification of chronic pain, Pain Suppl., 3, S1-S226.
Jensen, M. R., Turner, J. A., Romano, J. M., & Strom, S. E. (1995). The Chronic Pain Coping Inventory: development and preliminary validation. Pain, 60, 203-216.
Jensen, R. (1999). Pathophysiological mechanisms of tension-type headache: a review of epidemiological and experimental studies. Cephalalgia, 19, 602-621.
Jensen, R. (2003). Peripheral and central mechanisms in tension-type headache: an update. Cephalalgia, 23, 49-52.
Jensen, R., Bendtsen, L., & Olesen, J. (1998). Muscular factors are of importance in tension-type headache. Headache, 38, 10-17.
Jensen, R., Rasmussen, B. K., Pedersen, B., & Olesen, J. (1993). Muscle tenderness and pressure pain thresholds in headache. A population study. Pain, 52(2), 193-199.
Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 1-39.
Kolotylo, C. J., & Broome, M. E. (2000). Exploration of migraine pain, disability, depressive symptomatology, and coping: a pilot study. Health Care for Women International, 21, 203-218.
Kowacs, F., Socal, M. P., Ziomkowski, S. C., Borges-Neto, V. F., Toniolo, D. P., Francesconi, C. R. M., & Chaves, M. L. F. (2003). Symptoms of depression and anxiety, and screening for mental disorders in migrainous patients. Cephalagia, 23, 79-89.
Lampl, C., Heuberger, B., Haas, S., Yazdi, K., Buzath, A., & Kemetzhofer, P. (2003). Relationship of locus of control in women with migraine and healthy volunteers. Headache, 43, 878-883.
Lazarus, R. S., & Cohen, J. B. (1977). Environmental stress. In I. Altman and J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and the environment: Current theory and research. New York: Plenum.
Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company Inc.
Leao, A. (1944). Spreading depression of activity in the cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 7, 359-390.
Levor, R. M., Cohen, M. J., Naliboff, B. D., McArthur, D., & Heuser, G. (1986). Psychosocial precursors and correlates of migraine headache. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54(3), 347-353.
Lipchik, G. L., Holroyd, K. A., France, C. R., Kvaal, S. A., Segal, D., Cordingley, G. E., Rokicki, L. A., & McCool, H. R. (1996). Central and peripheral mechanisms in chronic tension-type headache. Pain, 64, 467-475.
Lipton, R. B., Stewart, W. F., Diamond, S., Diamond, M. L., & Reed, M. (2001). Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II. Headache, 41(7), 646-657.
Lowe, R., & Bennett, P. (2003). Exploring coping reactions to work-stress: application of an appraisal theory. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 393-400.
Lowe, R., Vedhara, K., Bennett, P., Brookes, E., Gale, L., Munnoch, K., Schreiber-Kounine, C., Fowler, C., Rayter, Z., Sammon, A., & Farndon, J. (2003). Emotion-related primary and secondary appraisals, adjustment and coping: associations in women awaiting breast disease diagnosis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 377-391.
Materazzo, F., Cathcart, S., & Pritchard, D. (2000). Anger, depression, and coping interactions in headache activity and adjustment: a controlled study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 49, 69-75..
Martin, P. R., & Theunissen, C. (1993). The role of life events stress, coping and social support in chronic headaches. Headache, 33, 301-306.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of personality, 54, 385-405.
Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1982). The challenge of pain. New York: Basic Books.
Merikangas, K. R., Stevens, D. E., & Angst, J. (1993). Headache and personality: results of a community sample of young adults. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 27, 187-196.
Merskey, H. (1994). Pain and psychological medicine. In P. D.Wall & R. Melzack(Eds.), Textbook of pain (pp. 903-920). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Mongini, F. (1999). Headache and Facial Pain. New York: Thieme New York.
Myers, T. C., Wittrock, D. A., & Foreman, G. W. (1998). Appraisal of subjective stress in individuals with tension-type headache: the influence of baseline measures. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(5), 469-484.
Nardone, R., & Tezzon, F. (2003). The tirgemino-cervical reflex in tension-type headache. European Journal of Neurology, 10, 307-312.
Nezu, A. M. (1986). Negative life stress and anxiety: problem solving as a moderator variable. Psychological Reports, 58, 279-283.
Noack, H., & Rothrock, J. F. (1996). Migraine: definitions, mechanisms, and treatment. Southern Medical Journal, 89(8), 762-769.
Nylander, Per-Olof, Schlette, P., Brändström, S., Nilsson, M., Forsgren, T., Forsgren, L., & Adolfsson, R. (1996). Migraine: temperament and character. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 30(5), 359-368.
Olesen, J., Friberg, L., Olsen, T. S., Iversen, H. K., Lassen, N. A., Andersen, A. R., & Karle, A. (1990). Timing and topography of cerebral blood flow, aura, and headache during migraine attacks. Annals of Neurology, 28(6), 791-798.
Olesen, J. (1991). Clinical and pathophysiological observations in migraine and tension-type headache explained by integration of vascular, supraspinal and myofascial inputs. Pain, 46, 125-132.
Olesen, J. (1993). Synthesis of migraine mechanisms. In J. Olesen, P. Tfelt-Hansen & K. M. A. Welch (Eds.), The Headache (pp. 247-253). New York: Raven Press.
Olesen, J., & Schoenen, J. (1993). Synthesis. In J. Olesen, P. Tfelt-Hansen & K. M. A. Welch (Eds.), The Headache (pp. 493-496). New York: Raven Press.
Passchier, J., & Orlebeke, J. F. (1985). Headache and stress in schoolchildren: an epidemiological study. Cephalalgia, 5, 167-176.
Passchier, J., & Van der Helm-Hylkema, H., & Orlebeke, J. F. (1984). Personality and headache type: a controlled study. Headache, 24, 140-146.
Penley, J. A., & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1215-1228.
Persson, B. (1996). Growth environment and personality in adult migraineurs and their migraine-free siblings. Headache, 37, 159-168.
Pop, P. H. M., Gierveld, C. M., Karis, H. A. M., & Tiedink, H.G. M. (2002). Epidemiology aspects of headache in a workplace setting and the impact on the economic loss. European Journal of Neurology, 9, 171-174.
Rollnik, J. D., Karst, M., Fink, M., & Dengler, R. (2001). Coping strategies in episodic and chronic tension-type headache. Headache, 41, 297-302.
Russell, D. W., Booth, B., Reed, D., & Laughlin, P. R. (1997). Personality, social networks, and perceived social support among alcoholics: a structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 649-692.
Sakai, F., Ebihara, S., Akiyama, M., & Horikawa, M. (1995). Pericranial muscle hardness in tension-type headache. A non-invasive measurement method and its clinical application. Brain, 118, 523-531.
Sanchez del Rio, M., Bakker, D., Wu, O., Agosti, R., Mitsikostas, D. D., Ostergaard, L., Wells, W. A., Rosen, B. R., Sorensen, G., Moskowitz, M. A., & Cutrer, F. M. (1999). Perfusion weighted imaging during migraine: spontaneous visual aura and headache. Cephalalgia, 19(8), 701-707.
Schneider, T. R. (2004). The role of neuroticism on psychological and physiological stress responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 795-804.
Schoenen, J., Ambrosini, A., Sándor, P. S., & de Noordhout, A. M. (2003). Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 955-972.
Schwartz, B. S., Stewart, W. F., Simon, D., & Lipton, R. B. (1998). Epidemiology of tension-type headache. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(5), 381-383.
Scopp, A. L. (2003). Cognitive therapy, part 2: making it work in clinical practice[Abstruct]. Headache & Pain: Diagnostic Challenges, current therapy, 14(4), 164-172.
Silberstein, S. D., Lipton, R. B., & Goadsby, P. J. (1998). Headache in Clinical Practice. UK: Isis Medical Media Ltd.
Shewchuk, R. M., Elliott, T. R., MacNair-Semands, R. R., & Harkins, S. (1999). Trait influences on stress appraisal and coping: An evaluation of alternative frameworks. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(4), 685-704.
Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233-269.
Sorbi, M., & Tellegen, B. (1988). Stress-coping in migraine. Social Science & Medicine, 26(3), 351-358.
Spierings, E. L. H. (2003). Migraine mechanism and management. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 36, 1063-1078.
Stewart, W. F., Lipton, R. B., Celentano, D. D., & Reed, M. L. (1992). Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(1), 64-9.
Stronks, D. L., Tulen, J. H. M., Pepplinkhuizen, L., Verheij, R., Mantel, G. W. H., Spinhoven, P., & Passchier, J. (1999). Personality traits and psychological reactions to mental stress of female migraine patients. Cephalalgia, 19, 566-574.
Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., & Reynolds, R. V. C. (1984). Users manual for the coping strategies inventory. Athens: OH, Department of Psychology, Ohio University.
Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., Reynolds, R. V., & Wigal, J. A. (1989). The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 13(4), 343-361.
Uddman, R., Edvinsson, L., Ekman, R., Kingman, T., & McCulloch, J. (1985). Innervation of the feline cerebral vasculature by nerve fibers containing calcitonin gene-related peptide: trigeminal origin and co-existence with substance P. Neuroscience Letters, 62, 131-136.
Ukestad, L. K. & Wittrock, D. A. (1996). Pain perception and coping in female tension headache suffers and headache-free controls. Health Psychology, 15(1), 65-68.
Van den Bergh, V., Amery, W. K., & Waelkens, J. (1987). Triggers factors in migraine: a study conducted by the Belgian migraine society. Headache, 27, 191-196.
Voelker, R. (1997). Migraine in Japan. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(14), 1105.
Vollrath, M. (2000). Personality and hassles among university students: a three-year longitudinal study. European journal of personality, 14, 199-215.
Vollrath, M. (2001). Personality and stress. Scandinarian Journal of Personality, 42, 335-347.
Wacogne, C., Lacoste, J. P., Guillibert, E., Hugues, F. C., & Le Jeunne, C. (2003). Stress, anxiety, depression and migraine. Cephalalgia, 23, 451-455.
Waldie, K. E. (2001). Childhood headache, stress in adolescence, and primary headache in young adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study. Headache, 41, 1-10.
Waldie, K. E., & Poulton, R. (2002). Physical and psychological correlates of primary headache in young adulthood: a 26 year longitudinal study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 72(1), 86-92.
Wallasch, T-M., Reinecke, M., & Langohr, H-D. (1991). EMG analysis of the late exteroceptive suppression period of temporal muscle activity in episodic and chronic tension-type headaches. Cephalalgia, 11, 109-112.
Wang, S. J., Fuh, J. L., Young, Y. H., Lu, S. R., & Shia, B. C. (2000). Prevalence of migraine in Taipei, Taiwan: a population-based survey. Cephalalgia, 20(6), 566-572.
Wang, W., & Schoenen, J. (1994). Reduction of temporalis exteroceptive suppression by peripheral electrical stimulation in migraine and tension-type headaches. Pain, 59, 327-334.
Wang, W., Wang, Ye-Han, Fu, Xian-Ming., Sun, Zi-Min., & Schoenen, J. (1999). Auditory evoked potentials and multiple personality measures in migraine and post-traumatic headaches. Pain, 79, 235-242.
Watson, D., & Hubbard, B. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositsional structure: Coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64, 737-774.
Welch, K. M. A. (2003). Contemporary concepts of migraine pathogenesis. Neurology, 61, S2-S8.
Welch, K. M., Barkley. G. L., Tepley, N., & Ramadan, N. M. (1993). Central neurogenic mechanisms of migraine. Neurology, 43(suppl), S21-S25.
Wittrock, D. A., & Myers, T. C. (1998). The comparison of individuals with recurrent tension-type headache and headache-free controls in physiological response, appraisal, and coping with stressors: a review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20(2), 118-134.
Wolff, H. G., & Tunis, M. M. (1952). Analysis of cranial artery pressure pulse waves in patients with vascular headache of the migraine type. Transactions of the Association of American Physicians, 65, 240-244.
Yücel, B., Kora, K., Özyalçín, S., Alçalar, N., Özdemir, Ö., & Yücel, A. (2002). Depression, automatic thoughts, alexithymia, and assertiveness in patients with tension-type headache. Headache, 42, 194-199.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top