跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.109) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/19 21:25
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃維崇
研究生(外文):Wei-chung Huang
論文名稱:無側撐之多節式挫屈束制斜撐的研究
論文名稱(外文):Research on Multi-Curve Buckling Restrained Brace without Lateral Support
指導教授:蔡崇興
指導教授(外文):Tsai - chung Hsing
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:逢甲大學
系所名稱:土木工程所
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:69
中文關鍵詞:隔震消能斜撐
外文關鍵詞:multi-curve buckling restrained braceBase Isolationstructural control
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:277
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:56
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
近年來國內外之結構耐震技術已進一步發展為消能、減震及隔震設計,其中有關結構控制方法及裝置的研究更是如雨後春筍般紛紛展現其成果,各種的控制方法及裝置各有千秋,也各有其優缺點。 本文所提出之新型挫屈束制斜撐包含新型無側撐挫屈束制斜撐及新型側撐挫屈束制斜撐,其整體構造採用全鋼材設計,無需披覆任何脫層材料。經由法規測試結果能夠瞭解,新型挫屈束制斜撐之行為相當穩定,且拉力及壓力之差異小。同時藉由增量型文氏模式能夠掌握新型挫屈束制斜撐於反覆荷重作用下之行為。
Recently, engergy absorption and base isolation technolgies in seismic mitigation for structures have been developed to resist earthquakes. Many studies on structural control methods and devices have been unfolded. Different control methods and devices have their own merits and deficiencies. The advanced BRBs proposed in this study include the new multi-curve buckling restrained brace without the lateral support and new multi-curve buckling restrained brace with lateral support. The advanced BRBs were made of the steel material without debonding material or mortart. In addition, it can be found from experiment results that the mechanical behavior of the advanced BRBs were very stable under the cyclic loadings and that the distinction between the tensile and compressive forces was much smaller than the provision requirement. Furthermore, the nonlinear behavior under cyclic loadings can be well simulated by the Wen’s modal in an increment form.
目 錄
摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目 錄 III
圖目錄 V
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 研究背景與目的 2
1.3 研究內容 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
2.1 消能元件之分類及特性 5
2.2 速度相依阻尼器 6
2.3 位移相依阻尼器 7
2.4 日本相關文獻回顧 8
2.5 美國相關文獻回顧 8
2.6 台灣相關文獻回顧 9
2.7 新型挫屈束制斜撐簡介 10
第三章 新型挫屈束制斜撐之力學行為及分析模式 18
3.1 新型無側撐挫屈束制斜撐之等效勁度 18
3.2 新型側撐挫屈束制斜撐之等效勁度 20
3.3 新型挫屈束制斜撐之分析模式 21
3.3.1 增量型文氏模式 21
3.3.2新型挫屈束制斜撐之雙降伏面分析模式 22
第四章縮尺新型挫屈束制斜撐之元件測試及數值模擬 30
4.1 儀器設備以及測試程序 30
4.1.1 彈性試驗 32
4.1.2 標準加載試驗 32
4.1.3 疲勞加載試驗 33
4.2 新型挫屈束制斜撐之元件測試結果 33
4.3 新型挫屈束制斜撐之非線性遲滯行為模擬 34
第五章 結論與建議 54
5.1結論 54
5.2 建議 54
參考文獻
[1]Soong, T.T. and Constantinou, M. C. (1994a), “Passive and Active Structural Vibration Control in Civil Engineering”, Springer-Verlag, New York, U. S. A..

[2]Tsai, C. S., Chung, L. L. and Chen, K. C. (1999), “Shaking Table Tests of Structures Equipped with RADAS Dampers”, Seismic Engineering 1999, ASME, U. S. A., Edited by M. E. Nitzel, 221-227.

[3]Wakabayashi, M., Nakamura, T., et al. (1973a), “Experimental Study on the Elasto-Plastic Behavior of Braces Enclosed by Precast Concrete Panals Under Horizontal Cyclic Loading: Part 1 and 2”,Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan, Structural Engineering Section,Vol.10,1041-1044.(in Japanese)

[4]Wakabayashi, M., Nakamura, T., et al. (1973b), “Experimental Study on the Elasto-Plastic Behavior of Braces Enclosed byPrecastConcrete Panals Under Horizontal Cyclic Loading: Part 1 and 2”,Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Kinki Branch ofArchitectural Institute of Japan, Vol. 6, 121-128. (in Japanese)

[5]Wakabayashi, M., Nakamura, T., Kashibara, A., Morizono, T. And Yokoyama, H (1973c), “Experimental Study on the Elasto-Plastic Properties of Precast Concrete Wall Panels with Built-In Insulating Braces”, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting,Architectural Institute of Japan, 1041-1044. (in Japanese)

[6]Fujimoto, M., Wada, A. et al (1988a), “A Study on the Unbonded Brace Encased in Buckling-Restraining Concrete and Steel Tube”,Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol.34B, 249-258.(in Japanese)

[7]Fujimoto, M., Wada, A. et al (1988b), “A Study on Brace Enclosed in Buckling-Restraining Mortar and Steel Tube: Part 1 and 2”,Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting, Architectural Institute of Japan, Structural Engineering Section(II), 1339-1342. (in Japanese)

[8]Hasegawa, H., Takeuchi, T., Nakata, Y., Iwata, M., Yamada, S.,Akiyama, H. (1999), “Experimental Study on Dynamic Behavior of Unbonded Braces”, AIJ J. Technol. Des. No. 9, 103-106. (in Japanese)

[9]Black, C., Makris, N., Ian Aiken (2002), “Component Testing,Stability Analysis and Characterization of Buckling-Restrained Unbonded Braces”, PEER Report 2002/08.

[10]Sabelli, R., Mahin, S. and Chang, C. (2003), "Seismic Demands on Steel Braced Frame Buildings with Buckling-restrained Braces,"Engineering Structures, Elsevier, Vol. 25, No. 5, 655-666.

[11]Chen, C. C., Chen, S. Y. and Liaw, J. J. (2001a), “Application of Low Yield Strength Steel on Controlled Plastification Ductile Concentrically Brace Frames”, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering,Vol. 28, 823-836.

[12]Chen, C. C., Wang, C. H. and Hwang, T. C. (2001b) , “Buckling Strength of Buckling Inhibited Braces”, Proc. 3rd Japan-Korea-Taiwan Joint Seminar on Earthquake Engineering for Building Structures, Taipei, Taiwan, 265-271.

[13]黃添進(1999),「韌性斜撐構材之斷裂行為與挫屈強度研究」,國立台灣科技大學營建工程系,碩士學位論文。

[14]蔡克銓 (2002), “結構控制技術與系統識別研究-子計畫:鋼骨消能斜撐構架之耐震試驗與分析研究”,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC 90-2625-Z-002-028-)。
[15]賴俊維(2001),「鋼骨消能支撐構架之耐震行為研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士學位論文。
[16]翁崇興(2002),「雙鋼管型挫屈束制消能支撐之耐震行為與應用研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士學位論文。
[17]黃彥智(2002),「含挫屈束制消能支撐構架耐震性能之試驗與分析研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士學位論文。
[18]林聖霖(2003),「全鋼型與可拆型挫屈束制消能支撐之實驗與研究」,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士學位論文。
[19]蕭博謙(2004),「實尺寸三層樓挫屈束制支撐CFT 柱構架擬動態試驗行為與分析」,國立台灣大學土木工程研究所,碩士學位論文。
[20]Tsai, C.S., Chen, W.S. and Chen, K.C. (2005d),“Shaking Table Test of Structure with Reinforced Buckling Restrained Braces”, Seismic Engineering 2005, ASME,Edited by Tsai, C.S., Denver, Colorado, U.S.A., July 17-21, Vol. 8, 307-312.

[21]Tsai, C.S., Chen, W.S. and Chen, B.J. (2006e), “Component Tests and Simulation of Advanced Buckling Restrained Braces”, Seismic Engineering 2006, ASME, Edited by Tom Clark, Vancouver, BC,Canada, July 23-27.

[22]Tsai, C.S., Chen, W.S., Lin Y. C., Yang C. T. and Tsou C. P.(2007f),“Seismic Responses of a Full-Scale Steel Structure Using Multi-Curved Buckling Restrained Braces”, Seismic Engineering 2007, ASME, Edited by Tom Clark, San Antonio, Texas, U.S.A., July 22-26, NO. PVP2007-26554.

[23]蔡崇興 (2005) “全尺度強化式挫屈束制斜撐之三向度防震效
益” , 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告(NSC94-2211-E-035-015-)。

[24]Wen, Y. K. (1976a), “Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems”, Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol.102, No. 2, 249-263.

[25]Wen, Y. K. (1980b), “Equivalent Linearization for Hysteretic Systems under Random Excitation”, Journal of Applied Mechanics,Vol. 47, 150-154.

[26]Tsai, C.S., Chiang, T. C., Chen, B. J. and Lin, S. B. (2003h), “An Advanced Analytical Model for High Damping Rubber Bearings”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 32,1373-1387.

[27]陳貴麒(2005),「速度相依及位移相依之組合式阻尼器於建築結構系統之防震效益」,逢甲大學土木及水利工程研究所,博士學位論文。
[28]陳文信(2007),「各種強化式挫屈束制斜撐之力學特性及其防震效益」,逢甲大學土木及水利工程研究所,博士學位論文。
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊