跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.182) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/10 04:06
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳珮青
研究生(外文):Pei-Ching Chen
論文名稱:區域醫療資源及論質計酬對不同社經位置糖尿病患健康照護品質與健康結果的影響-多層次分析
論文名稱(外文):The impact of regional medical resources and pay for performance on socioeconomics inequities in health care quality and health outcome of diabetic patients - A multilevel analysis
指導教授:李玉春李玉春引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yue-Chune Lee
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:衛生福利研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:公共衛生學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:213
中文關鍵詞:糖尿病社經位置論質支付區域醫療資源健康照護品質健康結果
外文關鍵詞:diabetes mellitussocio-economic positionpay-for-performanceregional medical resourcehealthcare qualityhealth outcome
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:826
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
近年來健康差異議題逐漸受到注意,社經位置地位及種族在健康照護品質上的差異也大量被指出,消除社經位置與族群在健康照護的差異已成為各國政策推動的焦點。
糖尿病是全球的健康問題,全世界將近6%%的成人有糖尿病,回顧過去研究發現低社經位置地位的糖尿病人獲得較差的照護品質及健康結果。在過去探討個人或區域社經位置與健康之關係,僅在同一層次分析,較少同時探討個體與區域效果,且沒有處理資料具階層結構問題。
近年來使用多層次分析探討社經位置與健康研究有增多趨勢,使用多層次分析可以同時處理個人層次與區域層次在健康結果上的效果,也可以處理跨層次交互效果。但尚未有研究探討過不同層次社經位置的糖尿病人在健康照護品質及健康結果之差異,也尚未探討過區域醫療資源對不同社經位置糖尿病人與健康照護品質及健康結果之影響。
為了改善照護品質,越來越多國家健康照護系統採行論質計酬,即以財務誘因提供給醫療照護服務提供者,使其達到預先訂定品質目標,提供高品質之照護服務。而中央健保局在2001年11月開始實施五大疾病論質支付的醫療服務改善方案試辦計畫,糖尿病亦在其中。國內外研究大多證實論質計酬能提升品質,但有關論質計酬對健康不平等的影響,大多探討種族間的不平等,但結果尚無定論。然而,有效果的政策是否能使全民都提升達相同的照護品質,而提升照護品質後,是否能使全民的健康結果都變好?還是會因不同社經位置而有差異?或者是否會使不同社經位置糖尿病人的健康照護品質或健康結果的差距會變小呢?
本研究以多層次分析採回溯性縱貫研究,使用國衛院2005年健保歸人檔,研究對象針對1999-2004年糖尿病人進行追蹤,瞭解不同層次社經位置糖尿病人在健康照護品質與健康結果的差異,並探討區域醫療資源對不同社經位置糖尿病人與健康照護品質與健康結果關係之影響。另一研究對象針對2000-2005年新發生糖尿病人進行追蹤,探討論質計酬政策對不同層次社經位置糖尿病人與健康照護品質與健康結果關係之影響。研究設計為準實驗設計的僅為後測控制設計,觀察實驗組與控制組在糖尿病論質計酬方案介入後一年時間。
本研究樣本篩選每年至少2次門診主次診斷為糖尿病、或1次因糖尿病住院的為確診的糖尿病人,且有固定門診照護機構之病人。社經位置,包含區域社經位置,如所得與教育,與個人社經位置,如收入與職業,健康照護品質為照護過程品質盡責度,包含10項糖尿病必要之生理檢查,健康結果為照護結果,包括急診、及可避免住院。實驗組定義為2001年11月到2005年12月期間申報過三種論質計酬,且在同一機構完整照護一年以上。而在相同期間從來沒有申報過論質計酬個案即為控制組。由於論質計酬方案並非隨機分配,為了增加實驗組跟控制組的可比較性並減少選擇偏誤,控制組的選取係使用傾向分數配對。資料以SAS 9.13套裝軟體進行處理與除錯後進行統計分析,再使用HLM軟體進行多層次分析模型。
本研究發現有以下三點:
1.糖尿病人在個人社經位置的健康照護品質及健康結果存在不平等,區域社經位置則僅在糖尿病可避免住院結果有影響,存在區域社經位置之不平等。整體來看,個人社經位置在健康照護品質及健康結果不平等的效果較區域社經位置顯著,收入高的人其健康照護及健康結果較佳,而地區人口及低收入者的健康照護與健康結果較差。
2.區域醫療資源除了糖尿病可避免住院結果外,對於個人社經位置與健康照護品質或健康結果有跨層次的調節作用,醫療資源可用性有縮減不同職業糖尿病人在健康照護品質及健康結果之差距,但區域醫療人力與醫療設施的作用不同,醫療設施減弱地區人口及低收入者其獲得較低的照護盡責度,而醫療人力減弱地區人口者其較低可能發生糖尿病急診。
3.論質計酬僅對健康照護品質有正向影響,而論質對個人社經位置與健康照護品質及健康結果有影響,論質會縮減不同職業及收入糖尿病人在健康照護品質及健康結果之差距。
根據上述研究發現提出以下建議:
一、對政策的建議
1.建議政府仍應持續透過政策介入,來改善不同社經位置糖尿病人在健康照護及健康結果之不平等,如不同職業類別的糖尿病人,特別是軍榮民、地區人口、低收入者其健康較差,應設法了解其照護的需要。
2.建議強化糖尿病共同照護網的功能,特別是在糖尿病醫師數多、大型醫院數多的區域,透過基層醫師與醫院間的合作,來形成病人的照護網路,以病人為中心提供照護,減少病人發生急診的情形。
3.建議持續推動糖尿病論質計酬,並對於不同社經位置之糖尿病人特別是社經位置弱勢者,應監測其健康照護品質及健康結果,並將負向的健康結果如急診或可避免住院發生納入評估的指標。
二、對未來研究的建議
1.建議後續研究者進一步探討,不同職業類別糖尿病人其健康照護及健康結果較差的原因。
2.建議後續研究者可採用不同醫療資源變項,如新陳代謝專科醫師數與一般醫師數比、或每人口專科醫師數,來釐清醫療人力與個人社經位置與健康交互作用。
3.建議後續研究者進行長期追蹤研究,採用其他健康結果作為測量指標,如失明、洗腎或者死亡,進一步了解論質計酬對於長期健康的影響。

Diabetes is a global health problem, there are nearly 6%% of adults have diabetes in the world. Past studies found that low socio-economic position of people with diabetes obtain the poor quality of care and health outcomes. However, no study explored the different levels of socio-economic position simultaneously with diabetes patients in healthcare quality and health outcomes disparities, and there was no study had explored the impact of the regional health care resources on these disparities. The purpose of this article is to assess the inequities on healthcare quality and health outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus with different levels of socio-economic position and to assess the impact of the regional health care resources on those inequities by using multi-level analysis.
The reform of payment policies by using quality and performance as the incentive mechanism to improve the quality of health care, also referred to as Pay-for-Performance (P4P), has become increasingly popular in the world. In 2001, the Bureau of National Health Insurance in Taiwan implemented a quality-based payment system or P4P program for five diseases, one of which was diabetes mellitus. Previous studies reported that positive results through improved performance and better outcomes. Some studies had explored the impacts of P4P on racial or ethnical disparities, but there was no study explored the impacts of P4P on socio-economic disparities. This article is the first one to assess the impact of P4P on socio-economic position inequities in healthcare quality and health outcomes for patients with diabetes mellitus.
This study used the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005), with a population–representative cohort of 1 million out of the 22.72 million National Health Insurance enrollees. The study had two population consisted of patients having a regular place of care diagnosed with DM between 1999 and 2004, and with new DM case between 2000 and 2005. The socio-economic position included two parts: one is neighborhood level incluing the average discretionary income each person of one year and the proportion of residents with a university degree, and the other is individual level including income and occupation. The healthcare quality is measuring process quality of care for diabetes mellitus patients. The P4P requestes 10 types of regular examinations for diabetes patients, such as HbA1c, lipid, and ophthalmoscopic etc. The healthcare outcomes constituted binary variables are measuring the utilization of an emergency or a preventable hospitalization.
The patients were divided into two groups: (1) the P4P group, who had received comprehensive care for at least one year between 2001 and 2005, (2) the control group, who were never enrolled in the diabetes mellitus pay-for-performance programs. Because the diabetes P4P program is voluntary for the health care providers, and providers are given the freedom to decide which patients to enroll in the program, we adopted the propensity score matching in this study. The P4P and the non-P4P groups were 1:4 matched using the greedy matching algorithm from an initial 8-digit to 1-digit. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software, version 9.1 and HLM 6.08, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
There were three findings in this study:
1. There are individual socio-economics position inequities on healthcare quality and health outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus. The inequitiesof neighborhood socio-economics position was only on health outcome of preventable hospitalization.
2. The regional health care resources had impacts on socio-economics position inequities in healthcare quality and health outcomes, except on emergency utilization.
3. The DM P4P can reduce the inequalities of socio-economics position on healthcare quality and health outcomes.
Based on the above findings, we have three recommendations:
1. The govement should have policies to improve the socio-economics position inequities, especially for the low socio-economics position patients with diabetes.
2. Continually promote the diabetes shared-care network, through cooperations between the physicians and hospitals to form a network to provide care for the diabetes patient and reduce the increase of emergency situations.
3. Continually execute the P4P program, and monitor the healthcare inequities for the low socio-economics position patients. The assess indicator should including negative health outcome such as emergency or preventable hospitalization.
We also have three suggestions for future research:
1.To explore the reasons why different occupation of patients have worse health outcome.
2.To use different medical resources, such as the number of metabolic specialist physician, to clarify the regional medical resources interaction effect between socio-economic position and health.
3.To conduct a long-term follow-up study using other health outcome indicators, such as blindness, kidney dialysis or death, to explore the long-term health outcome of the P4P program.

誌謝 I
中文摘要 II
ABSTRACT V
目錄 VIII
圖目錄 X
表目錄 XI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究問題 3
第四節 研究重要性 4
第五節 重要名詞解釋 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 健康不平等概念、定義與測量 5
第二節 糖尿病照護與評估 10
第三節 糖尿病人健康不平等架構及實證研究 20
第四節 多層次分析與實證研究 34
第五節 健康政策評估、論質計酬與實證研究 46
第六節 論質計酬對健康不平等之影響 63
第七節 文獻小結 69
第三章 研究方法 70
第一節 研究設計 70
第二節 研究架構 73
第三節 研究假說 74
第四節 研究對象及樣本 75
第五節 資料來源 76
第六節 研究變項定義及測量 79
第七節 資料處理流程 82
第八節 統計分析方法 86
第四章 研究結果 92
第一節 社經位置與糖尿病患之健康照護與健康之關係 92
第二節 區域資源對社經位置與糖尿病患之健康照護與健康關係之影響 105
第三節 論質對不同社經位置糖尿病患之健康照護品質與健康結果影響 113
第四節 研究結果綜合比較 123
第五章 討論 169
第一節 研究方法的討論 169
第二節 研究結果的討論 173
第三節 研究限制 183
第六章 結論與建議 185
第一節 結論 185
第二節 建議 186
參考文獻 187
附錄1:投保單位屬性分類表 198
附錄2:AHRQ 中與糖尿病有關PQI之條件範圍 199
附錄2:AHRQ 中與糖尿病有關PQI之條件範圍(續) 200
附錄2:AHRQ 中與糖尿病有關PQI之條件範圍(續) 201
附錄2:AHRQ 中與糖尿病有關PQI之條件範圍(續) 202
附錄3:ELIXHAUSER之共病 類別與ICD-9對照碼 203
附錄4:急診個案撈取代碼 205
附錄5:照護盡責度醫令撈取代碼 205
附錄6:糖尿病醫療給付方案修訂第三版 206
附件一:全民健康保險糖尿病醫療給付改善方案支付標準 209

Adams, R. J., Howard, N., Tucker, G., Appleton, S., Taylor, A. W., Chittleborough, C., . . . Wilson, D. H. (2009). Effects of area deprivation on health risks and outcomes: a multilevel, cross-sectional, Australian population study. International Journal of Public Health, 54(3), 183-192.
Aday, L. A. (2004). Evaluating the healthcare system : effectiveness, efficiency, and equity (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Agabiti, N., Pirani, M., Schifano, P., Cesaroni, G., Davoli, M., Bisanti, L., . . . Perucci, C. A. (2009). Income level and chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions in adults: a multicity population-based study in Italy. BMC Public Health, 9, 457.
Alliance, N. D. Q. I. (2003). National Diabetes Quality Improvement Alliance performance measurement set for adult diabetes. Retrieved March, 2010, from http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=4086
American Diabetes Association. (2008). Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007. Diabetes Care, 31(3), 596-615.
American Diabetes Association. (2010). Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care, 33 Suppl 1, S11-61.
Beckles, G. L., Engelgau, M. M., Narayan, K. M., Herman, W. H., Aubert, R. E., & Williamson, D. F. (1998). Population-based assessment of the level of care among adults with diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care, 21(9), 1432-1438.
Bihan, H., Laurent, S., Sass, C., Nguyen, G., Huot, C., Moulin, J. J., . . . Cohen, R. (2005). Association among individual deprivation, glycemic control, and diabetes complications: the EPICES score. Diabetes Care, 28(11), 2680-2685.
Billings, J., Anderson, G. M., & Newman, L. S. (1996). Recent findings on preventable hospitalizations. Health Affairs, 15(3), 239-249.
Billings, J., Zeitel, L., Lukomnik, J., Carey, T. S., Blank, A. E., & Newman, L. (1993). Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Affairs, 12(1), 162-173.
Blustein, J., Hanson, K., & Shea, S. (1998). Preventable hospitalizations and socioeconomic status. Health Affairs, 17(2), 177-189.
Booth, G. L., & Hux, J. E. (2003). Relationship between avoidable hospitalizations for diabetes mellitus and income level. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163(1), 101-106.
Brown, Ettner, S. L., Piette, J., Weinberger, M., Gregg, E., Shapiro, M. F., . . . Beckles, G. L. (2004). Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: a conceptual framework and review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev, 26, 63-77.
Brown, A. D., Goldacre, M. J., Hicks, N., Rourke, J. T., McMurtry, R. Y., Brown, J. D., & Anderson, G. M. (2001). Hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions: a method for comparative access and quality studies using routinely collected statistics. Can J Public Health, 92(2), 155-159.
Brown, A. F., Ang, A., & Pebley, A. R. (2007). The relationship between neighborhood characteristics and self-rated health for adults with chronic conditions. American Journal of Public Health, 97(5), 926-932.
Brown, A. F., Gregg, E. W., Stevens, M. R., Karter, A. J., Weinberger, M., Safford, M. M., . . . Beckles, G. L. (2005). Race, ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and quality of care for adults with diabetes enrolled in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care, 28(12), 2864-2870.
Bynum, J. P., Fisher, E. S., Song, Y., Skinner, J., & Chandra, A. (2010). Measuring racial disparities in the quality of ambulatory diabetes care. Medical Care, 48(12), 1057-1063.
Caminal, J., Starfield, B., Sanchez, E., Casanova, C., & Morales, M. (2004). The role of primary care in preventing ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Eur J Public Health, 14(3), 246-251.
Carter-Pokras, O., & Baquet, C. (2002). What is a "health disparity"? Public Health Rep, 117(5), 426-434.
Casalino, L. P., Elster, A., Eisenberg, A., Lewis, E., Montgomery, J., & Ramos, D. (2007). Will pay-for-performance and quality reporting affect health care disparities? Health Affairs, 26(3), w405-414.
Cavalini, L. T., & de Leon, A. C. (2008). Morbidity and mortality in Brazilian municipalities: a multilevel study of the association between socioeconomic and healthcare indicators. Int J Epidemiol, 37(4), 775-783.
Chaturvedi, N., Jarrett, J., Shipley, M. J., & Fuller, J. H. (1998). Socioeconomic gradient in morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes: cohort study findings from the Whitehall Study and the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. BMJ, 316(7125), 100-105.
Chen, J. Y., Tian, H., Taira Juarez, D., Hodges, K. A., Jr., Brand, J. C., Chung, R. S., & Legorreta, A. P. (2010). The effect of a PPO pay-for-performance program on patients with diabetes. American Journal of Managed Care, 16(1), e11-19.
Chen, L. W., Zhang, W., Sun, J., & Mueller, K. J. (2009). The magnitude, variation, and determinants of rural hospital resource utilization associated with hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 15(3), 216-222.
Chuang, Y. C., Li, Y. S., Wu, Y. H., & Chao, H. J. (2007). A multilevel analysis of neighborhood and individual effects on individual smoking and drinking in Taiwan. BMC Public Health, 7, 151.
Coleman, K., Reiter, K. L., & Fulwiler, D. (2007). The impact of pay-for-performance on diabetes care in a large network of community health centers. J Health Care Poor Underserved, 18(4), 966-983.
Crawley, D., Ng, A., Mainous, A. G., 3rd, Majeed, A., & Millett, C. (2009). Impact of pay for performance on quality of chronic disease management by social class group in England. J R Soc Med, 102(3), 103-107.
Culler, S. D., Parchman, M. L., & Przybylski, M. (1998). Factors related to potentially preventable hospitalizations among the elderly. Medical Care, 36(6), 804-817.
Diez-Roux, A. V. (1998). Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 88(2), 216-222.
Diez-Roux, A. V. (2000). Multilevel analysis in public health research. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 171-192.
Donabedian, A. (1966). Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 44(3), Suppl:166-206.
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care. How can it be assessed? Jama, 260(12), 1743-1748.
Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Gravelle, H., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Hiroeh, U., . . . Roland, M. (2006). Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.[see comment]. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(4), 375-384.
Edwards, R., Burns, J. A., McElduff, P., Young, R. J., & New, J. P. (2003). Variations in process and outcomes of diabetes care by socio-economic status in Salford, UK. Diabetologia, 46(6), 750-759.
Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., Harris, D. R., Coffey, R. M., Elixhauser, A., Steiner, C., . . . Coffey, R. M. (1998). Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.[see comment]. Medical Care, 36(1), 8-27.
Epstein, A. J. (2001). The role of public clinics in preventable hospitalizations among vulnerable populations. Health Services Research, 36(2), 405-420.
Evans, R. G., Barer, M. L., & Marmor, T. R. (1994). Why are some people healthy and others not? : the determinants of health of populations. New York: A. de Gruyter.
Fiscella, K., Franks, P., Gold, M. R., & Clancy, C. M. (2000). Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA, 283(19), 2579-2584.
Fleming, B. B., Greenfield, S., Engelgau, M. M., Pogach, L. M., Clauser, S. B., & Parrott, M. A. (2001). The Diabetes Quality Improvement Project: moving science into health policy to gain an edge on the diabetes epidemic.[erratum appears in Diabetes Care 2002 Jan;25(1):249]. Diabetes Care, 24(10), 1815-1820.
Fukuda, Y., Nakamura, K., & Takano, T. (2005). Accumulation of health risk behaviours is associated with lower socioeconomic status and women's urban residence: a multilevel analysis in Japan. BMC Public Health, 5, 53.
Gary, T. L., Safford, M. M., Gerzoff, R. B., Ettner, S. L., Karter, A. J., Beckles, G. L., & Brown, A. F. (2008). Perception of neighborhood problems, health behaviors, and diabetes outcomes among adults with diabetes in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care, 31(2), 273-278.
Gray, J., Millett, C., O'Sullivan, C., Omar, R. Z., & Majeed, A. (2006). Association of age, sex and deprivation with quality indicators for diabetes: population-based cross sectional survey in primary care. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(11), 576-581.
Gray, J., Millett, C., Saxena, S., Netuveli, G., Khunti, K., & Majeed, A. (2007). Ethnicity and quality of diabetes care in a health system with universal coverage: population-based cross-sectional survey in primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(9), 1317-1320.
Greene, S. E., & Nash, D. B. (2009). Pay for performance: an overview of the literature. American Journal of Medical Quality, 24(2), 140-163.
Hebert, P. L., Geiss, L. S., Tierney, E. F., Engelgau, M. M., Yawn, B. P., & McBean, A. M. (1999). Identifying persons with diabetes using Medicare claims data. American Journal of Medical Quality, 14(6), 270-277.
Hux, J. E., Ivis, F., Flintoft, V., & Bica, A. (2002). Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Diabetes Care, 25(3), 512-516.
Iezzoni, L. I. (2003). Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes (3rd ed.). Chicago: Health Administration Press.
Kahn, C. N., 3rd, Ault, T., Isenstein, H., Potetz, L., Van Gelder, S., Kahn, C. N., 3rd, . . . Van Gelder, S. (2006). Snapshot of hospital quality reporting and pay-for-performance under Medicare. Health Affairs, 25(1), 148-162.
Karter, A. J., Stevens, M. R., Brown, A. F., Duru, O. K., Gregg, E. W., Gary, T. L., . . . Ettner, S. L. (2007). Educational disparities in health behaviors among patients with diabetes: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) Study. BMC Public Health, 7, 308.
Karve, A. M., Ou, F. S., Lytle, B. L., & Peterson, E. D. (2008). Potential unintended financial consequences of pay-for-performance on the quality of care for minority patients. Am Heart J, 155(3), 571-576.
Knight, K., Badamgarav, E., Henning, J. M., Hasselblad, V., Gano, A. D., Jr., Ofman, J. J., & Weingarten, S. R. (2005). A systematic review of diabetes disease management programs. American Journal of Managed Care, 11(4), 242-250.
Krakauer, H., Jacoby, I., Millman, M., & Lukomnik, J. E. (1996). Physician impact on hospital admission and on mortality rates in the Medicare population. Health Services Research, 31(2), 191-211.
Laditka, J. N. (2003). Hazards of hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions among older women: evidence of greater risks for African Americans and Hispanics. Medical Care Research & Review, 60(4), 468-495; discussion 496-508.
Laditka, J. N., Laditka, S. B., & Mastanduno, M. P. (2003). Hospital utilization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: health outcome disparities associated with race and ethnicity. Social Science & Medicine, 57(8), 1429-1441.
Lee, T. T., Cheng, S. H., Chen, C. C., & Lai, M. S. (2010). A pay-for-performance program for diabetes care in Taiwan: a preliminary assessment. American Journal of Managed Care, 16(1), 65-69.
Leyland, A. H., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2003). Multilevel modelling and public health policy. Scand J Public Health, 31(4), 267-274.
Lin, C. C., Lai, M. S., Syu, C. Y., Chang, S. C., & Tseng, F. Y. (2005). Accuracy of diabetes diagnosis in health insurance claims data in Taiwan. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 104(3), 157-163.
Magan, P., Alberquilla, A., Otero, A., & Ribera, J. M. (2011). Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions and quality of primary care: their relation with socioeconomic and health care variables in the Madrid regional health service (Spain). Medical Care, 49(1), 17-23.
Marmot. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet, 365(9464), 1099-1104.
Marmot, & Wilkinson, R. G. (2006). Social determinants of health (2nd ed.). Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Mayor, S. (2006). Diabetes affects nearly 6% of the world's adults. BMJ, 333(7580), 1191.
Medicine, I. o. (1993). Access to health care in America. Washington, D.C. : National Academy Press.
Millett, C., Gray, J., Bottle, A., & Majeed, A. (2008). Ethnic disparities in blood pressure management in patients with hypertension after the introduction of pay for performance. Annals of Family Medicine, 6(6), 490-496.
Millett, C., Gray, J., Saxena, S., Netuveli, G., Khunti, K., & Majeed, A. (2007). Ethnic disparities in diabetes management and pay-for-performance in the UK: the Wandsworth Prospective Diabetes Study. PLoS Medicine / Public Library of Science, 4(6), e191.
Millett, C., Gray, J., Saxena, S., Netuveli, G., Khunti, K., & Majeed, A. (2007). Ethnic disparities in diabetes management and pay-for-performance in the UK: the Wandsworth Prospective Diabetes Study. PLoS Med, 4(6), e191.
Millett, C., Gray, J., Wall, M., & Majeed, A. (2009). Ethnic disparities in coronary heart disease management and pay for performance in the UK. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(1), 8-13.
Millett, C., Netuveli, G., Saxena, S., & Majeed, A. (2009). Impact of pay for performance on ethnic disparities in intermediate outcomes for diabetes: a longitudinal study. Diabetes Care, 32(3), 404-409.
Moy, E., Greenberg, L. G., & Borsky, A. E. (2008). Community variation: disparities in health care quality between Asian and white medicare beneficiaries. Health Affairs, 27(2), 538-549.
Muhlhauser, I., Overmann, H., Bender, R., Bott, U., Jorgens, V., Trautner, C., . . . Berger, M. (1998). Social status and the quality of care for adult people with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus--a population-based study. Diabetologia, 41(10), 1139-1150.
Nayar, P., Nguyen, A. T., Apenteng, B., & Yu, F. (2011). Preventable Hospitalizations: Does Rurality or Non-Physician Clinician Supply Matter? Journal of Community Health.
NCQHC. (2006). CEO Survival Guide Pay for performance Washington: National Committee for Quality Health Care.
Oladele, C. R., & Barnett, E. (2006). Racial/Ethnic and social class differences in preventive care practices among persons with diabetes. BMC Public Health, 6, 259.
Parsons, L. S. (2004). Performing a 1:N case–control match on propensity score. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 29th SAS Users Group International (SUGI) Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Peek, M. E., Cargill, A., & Huang, E. S. (2007). Diabetes health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions. Medical Care Research & Review, 64(5 Suppl), 101S-156S.
Petersen, L. A., Woodard, L. D., Urech, T., Daw, C., & Sookanan, S. (2006). Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(4), 265-272.
Petersen, L. A., Woodard, L. D., Urech, T., Daw, C., Sookanan, S., Petersen, L. A., . . . Sookanan, S. (2006). Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(4), 265-272.
Petrelli, A., Gnavi, R., Marinacci, C., & Costa, G. (2006). Socioeconomic inequalities in coronary heart disease in Italy: a multilevel population-based study. Social Science & Medicine, 63(2), 446-456.
Pickett, K. E., & Pearl, M. (2001). Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health, 55(2), 111-122.
Pracht, E. E., Orban, B. L., Comins, M. M., Large, J. T., & Asin-Oostburg, V. (2011). The relative effectiveness of managed care penetration and the healthcare safety net in reducing avoidable hospitalizations. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 33(4), 42-51; quiz 51-43.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models : applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Regidor, E. (2004a). Measures of health inequalities: part 1. J Epidemiol Community Health, 58(10), 858-861.
Regidor, E. (2004b). Measures of health inequalities: part 2. J Epidemiol Community Health, 58(11), 900-903.
Robinson, J. C. (2001). Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 149-177.
Robinson, N., Lloyd, C. E., & Stevens, L. K. (1998). Social deprivation and mortality in adults with diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Medicine, 15(3), 205-212.
Roland, M. (2004). Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(14), 1448-1454.
Roper, N. A., Bilous, R. W., Kelly, W. F., Unwin, N. C., & Connolly, V. M. (2001). Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ, 322(7299), 1389-1393.
Rosenthal, M. B., Fernandopulle, R., Song, H. R., & Landon, B. (2004). Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement.[see comment]. Health Affairs, 23(2), 127-141.
Rosenthal, M. B., & Frank, R. G. (2006). What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care? Medical Care Research and Review, 63(2), 135-157.
Rosenthal, M. B., Frank, R. G., Li, Z., & Epstein, A. M. (2005). Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA, 294(14), 1788-1793.
Rowe, J. W., & Rowe, J. W. (2006). Pay-for-performance and accountability: related themes in improving health care.[see comment][erratum appears in Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jan 16;146(2):151]. Annals of Internal Medicine, 145(9), 695-699.
Rubin, D. B. (1997). Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(8 Pt 2), 757-763.
Sequist, T. D., Fitzmaurice, G. M., Marshall, R., Shaykevich, S., Safran, D. G., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2008). Physician performance and racial disparities in diabetes mellitus care. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(11), 1145-1151.
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010). Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87(1), 4-14.
Snyder, L., & Neubauer, R. L. (2007). Pay-for-performance principles that promote patient-centered care: an ethics manifesto. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(11), 792-794.
Solberg, L. I., Engebretson, K. I., Sperl-Hillen, J. M., Hroscikoski, M. C., & O'Connor, P. J. (2006). Are claims data accurate enough to identify patients for performance measures or quality improvement? The case of diabetes, heart disease, and depression. American Journal of Medical Quality, 21(4), 238-245.
Southern, D. A., Quan, H., & Ghali, W. A. (2004). Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data. Medical Care, 42(4), 355-360.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. (1995). Implementation of treatment protocols in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care, 18(3), 361-376.
Trivedi, A. N., Zaslavsky, A. M., Schneider, E. C., & Ayanian, J. Z. (2006). Relationship between quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare health plans. JAMA, 296(16), 1998-2004.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010 : Understanding and Improving Health (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. (1998a). Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet, 352(9131), 854-865.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. (1998b). Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). . Lancet, 352(9131), 837-853.
Veugelers, P. J., Yip, A. M., & Kephart, G. (2001). Proximate and contextual socioeconomic determinants of mortality: multilevel approaches in a setting with universal health care coverage. Am J Epidemiol, 154(8), 725-732.
Wagstaff, A., Paci, P., & van Doorslaer, E. (1991). On the measurement of inequalities in health. Social Science & Medicine, 33(5), 545-557.
Wainwright, N. W., & Surtees, P. G. (2004). Places, people, and their physical and mental functional health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(4), 333-339.
Weissman, J. S., Gatsonis, C., & Epstein, A. M. (1992). Rates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA, 268(17), 2388-2394.
Wen, M., Browning, C. R., & Cagney, K. A. (2003). Poverty, affluence, and income inequality: neighborhood economic structure and its implications for health. Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), 843-860.
Weng, C., Coppini, D. V., & Sonksen, P. H. (2000). Geographic and social factors are related to increased morbidity and mortality rates in diabetic patients. Diabetic Medicine, 17(8), 612-617.
Whitehead, M. (1992). The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv, 22(3), 429-445.
Whiting, D. R., Guariguata, L., Weil, C., & Shaw, J. (2011). IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 94(3), 311-321.
WHO, I. (1990). Diabetes care and research in Europe: the Saint Vincent declaration. Diabetic Medicine, 7(4), 360.
Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., & King, H. (2004). Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27(5), 1047-1053.
Young, G. J., White, B., Burgess, J. F., Jr., Berlowitz, D., Meterko, M., Guldin, M. R., & Bokhour, B. G. (2005). Conceptual Issues in the Design and Implementation of Pay-for-Quality Programs (Vol. 20, pp. 144-150).
方俞尹. (2009). 全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案長期影響評估. 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti GCScholar database.
朱育增, 吳肖琪, 李玉春, 賴美淑, & 譚醒朝. (2010). 探討共病測量方法於健保次級資料之應用. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌, 29(3), 191-200.
吳秋芬, 吳肖琪, 石富元, & 許銘能. (2008). 影響急診病患暫留時間之相關因素探討. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌, 27(6), 507-518.
宋銘展. (2009). 全民健康保險糖尿病醫療給付改善方案五年影響評估. 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti GCScholar database.
李玉春. (2003). 建立全民健保以共同照護模式為基礎的糖尿病疾病管理計畫先導性研究(全程計劃總報告) 行政院衛生署委託研究計畫. 台北市: 中央健康保險局.
李玉春. (2006). 台灣地區醫療院所糖尿病照護品質之監控及比較研究(全程執行總報告) 國民健康局科技研究發展計畫. 台北市: 國民健康局.
李玉春, & 鄧宗業. (2004). 建構權責相符的醫療服務支付制度. In 賴美淑 (Ed.), 二代健保規劃叢書 (pp. 11-3154). 台北市: 行政院衛生署.
李待弟. (2007). 全民健康保險糖尿病醫療給付改善方案初步影響評估. 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti GCScholar database.
李婉萍, 許玫玲, 吳怡君, 湯澡薰, 黃國哲, & 莊志杰. (2008). 醫院結核病個案管理模式之探討. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌(27卷5期), 12.
周怡伶. (2009). 糖尿病病患健康狀況差異與糖尿病醫療給付改善方案初步成效之分析. 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti GCScholar database.
林文德, 謝其政, 邱尚志, 吳慧俞, & 黃一展. (2010). 以傾向分數配對法評估糖尿病論質計酬方案之成效. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌(29卷1期), 63.
侯佳雯. (2005). 「糖尿病醫療服務改善方案」試辦計畫對第二型糖尿病人醫療資源利用之影響. 臺灣大學. Available from Airiti GCScholar database. (2005年)
洪乙禎, & 林錦鴻. (2010). 探討醫療資源和民眾健康差異的相關性-以台灣二十三縣市粗死亡率和事故傷害死亡率為例. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌, 29(4), 347-359.
徐慧君, 翁慧卿, 林育慈, 陳淑銘, 李佩儒, 李集美, . . . 李洮俊. (2004). 糖尿病患介入疾病管理在經濟面、臨床面及滿意度成效評估之初探-以南部某區域醫院糖尿病病患為例. 醫務管理期刊(5卷2期), 21.
翁瑞亨, 徐瑞祥, & 謝玉娟. (2002). 台灣地區糖尿病共同照護現況. 臺灣醫學, 6(4), 569-573.
張順全, 賴美淑, & 徐豈庸. (2005). 台灣地理區域社經差異與糖尿病患罹病、死亡的關聯性探討. 醫護科技學刊(7卷2期), 9.
梁亞文, 陳芬如, & 鄭瑛琳. (2008). 台灣的可避免住院及其病患社經狀態. 臺灣公共衛生雜誌(27卷1期), 90.
郭志剛, 譯. (2008). 階層線性模式:資料分析方法與應用. 臺北市: 五南.
陳宗泰, 鍾國彪, & 賴美淑. (2007). 另一種流行趨勢-論成效計酬的趨勢與展望. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 26(5), 353-370.
陳明君, 陳啟禎, & 錢慶文. (2003). 論質計酬制度對糖尿病患門診醫療費用之可能影響評估. 醫務管理期刊(4卷4期), 13.
溫福星. (2006). 階層線性模式: 原理、方法與應用. 台北市: 雙葉書廊.
劉見祥, 曲同光, & 陳玉敏. (2002). 糖尿病共同照護與健保給付. 臺灣醫學, 6(4), 581-584.
劉貞娟, 翁慧卿, & 蔡魯. (2006). 氣喘疾病管理在醫療資源耗用、臨床指標改善與自我照護能力的影響. 福爾摩莎醫務管理雜誌(2卷1期), 11.
顏幸達. (2008). 參與糖尿病照護論質計酬計畫之社會不平等. 碩士, 國立成功大學.
蘇有村, 陳國俊, 吳展耀, 翁慧卿, 陳施如, 劉惠君, . . . 牛震廣. (2008). 全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案改善多數兒童氣喘疾病嚴重度. 中華民國兒童胸腔醫學會雜誌(5卷4期), 10.



連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top