跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.182) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/10/09 19:20
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林姿儀
研究生(外文):Tze-Yi Lin
論文名稱:金融危機之商業銀行市場效率性
論文名稱(外文):Commercial Bank Market Efficiency in Financial Crisis
指導教授:蘇永成蘇永成引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:財務金融學研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:財務金融學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:英文
論文頁數:141
中文關鍵詞:市場效率性買賣單不平衡
外文關鍵詞:order imbalancemarket efficiency trading strategyGARCH(11) model
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:306
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
論文摘要
這次的金融海嘯再度引發對於市場效率假說的批評,有些學者甚至認為這次的金融危機部分歸因於太相信市場是有效率的,而使資產泡沫的危機長期的被低估。我們在這邊想要探討的便是針對商業銀行來研究在金融危機下市場是否仍具效率性。
首先我們以多元線性回歸模型檢驗同期或前期之日內買賣單不平衡對股票報酬率的影響,並分成三個情況討論:全部樣本、個股買賣單不平衡對本身報酬率、個股買賣單不平衡對其他個股報酬率。實證結果顯示,同期之買賣單不平衡對報酬率在三種情況下皆有顯著之正向影響;前一期的買賣單不平衡對報酬在沒有考慮當期時,在全部樣本以及個股買賣單不平衡對其他個股報酬率的情況下其影響方向都為正,但不如Chordia and Subrahmanya (2004)的結果來的顯著,而在考慮當期後,前期買賣單不平衡對報酬的影響在三種情況下皆變成負向關係。
再來我們以GARCH(1,1)模型觀察同期買賣單不平衡對報酬率的影響,結果顯示有正顯著之關係,並且可觀察到市場效率之收斂過程。另外,我們也以GARCH(1,1)模型觀察股價波動性與買賣單不平衡之間的關係,研究顯示其關係並不顯著,代表造市者對股價波動性的控制良好。
最後,我們以買賣單不平衡為指標來建立日內的交易策略,並測試是否能夠獲得超額報酬。實證結果發現無法擊敗個股之原始報酬率。


Abstract

In recent years, there has been a dramatic proliferation of research concerned with market efficiency while recent global financial crisis has led to renewed criticism of the hypothesis. The main purpose of our study is to investigate commercial bank market efficiency in financial crisis.
First, we use a multi-regression model to examine the relation between returns and contemporaneous as well as lagged order imbalances. We divide our sample into overall effect, autocorrelated effect and cross-correlated effect situation to discuss separately. The empirical result shows that the contemporaneous order imbalances have a significantly positive impact on returns in all three situations, and the lagged-one imbalances also have a positive impact on returns disregarding the contemporaneous imbalances in overall effect condition and cross-correlated effect condition, but the positive relation is not as significant as the empirical result of Chordia and Subrahmanyam (2004). Once we condition on the contemporaneous imbalances, most of the coefficients of lagged-one imbalances turn to be significantly negative, which is consistent with Chordia and Subrahmanyam (2004).
Besides, we adopt GARCH(1,1) model and observe positive relation between contemporaneous order imbalances and returns. We also find there exists the convergence process toward efficiency. In addition, we examine the relation between volatility and order imbalances by using a GARCH(1,1) model. We observe low connection between order imbalances and price volatility, and it could be explained that market makers have good control on commercial banks’ price volatility.
Finally, we form an intraday trading strategy based on the sign of large order imbalances to test if the trading strategy can beat the market or not. We find our trading strategy cannot beat the market.


Contents

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 MOTIVES AND PURPOSES 1
1.2 FRAME WORK OF THE THESIS 12
CHAPTER 2 DATA AND METHODOLOGY 13
2.1 THE DATA 13
2.1.1 Data Sources 13
2.1.2 Data Processing Methods 13
2.1.3 Descriptive Statistics 14
2.2 METHODOLOGY 15
2.2.1 Unconditional Lagged Return-Order Imbalances OLS Model 15
2.2.2 Conditional Contemporaneous Return-Order Imbalances OLS Model 16
2.2.3 Dynamic Return-Order Imbalance GARCH(1, 1) Model 17
2.2.4 Dynamic Volatility-Order Imbalance GARCH(1, 1) Model 18
CHAPTER 3 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 20
3.1 UNCONDITIONAL LAGGED RETURN-ORDER IMBALANCES RELATION 20
3.2 CONDITIONAL CONTEMPORANEOUS RETURN-ORDER IMBALANCES RELATION 25
3.3 DYNAMIC RETURN -ORDER IMBALANCE GARCH(1, 1) RELATION 26
3.3 DYNAMIC VOLATILITY -ORDER IMBALANCE GARCH(1, 1) RELATION 28
3.5 TRADING STRATEGY 30
CHAPTER 4 CONCLUSION 33
REFERENCES 37



References
1.Admati, A. and P. Pfleiderer, 1988, “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability,” Review of Financial Studies, 1, 3-40.
2.Andrade S.C., Chang C., and Seasholes M.S., 2008, “Trading imbalances, predictable reversals, and cross-correlated effect price pressure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 406-423.
3.Barclay, M. and J. Warner, 1993, “Stealth Trading and Volatility,” Journal of Financial Economics 34, 281-305.
4.Barclay, M. J., T. Hendershott and D. T. Mccormick, 2003,“Competition Among Trading Venues: Information and Trading on Electronic Communications Networks, “Journal of Finance 58, 2637-2666.
5.Bernard, B. S., 2002, “An Empirical Study of the Mixture of Time and Movements in Prices, “Department of Finance and Statistics, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.
6.Bessembinder, H. and M. Kaufman, 1997, “A Cross-exchange Comparison of Execution Costs and Information Flow for NYSE-listed Stocks,” Journal of Financial Economics 46, 293-320.
7.Bollerslev, T., 1986, “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics 31, 307-327.
8.Booth, G. G., J. C. Lin, T. Martikainen, and Y. Tse, 2002, “Trading and Pricing in Upstairs and Downstairs Stock Markets,” Review of Financial Studies 15, 1111-1135.
9.Bradley, M., 1980, “Interfirm Tender Offers and the Market for Corporate Control,” Journal of Business, 53(4), 345-376.
10.Bradley, M., Desai, A., Kim, E.H., 1982, “Specialized Resources and Competition in the Market for Corporate Control,” Unpublished Working paper, University of Michigan
11.Bradley, M., Desai A., Kim, E.H., 1983, “The Rationale Behind Interfirm Tender Offers Information or Synergy?,” Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 183-206
12.Bhagat, S., Dong, M., Hirshleifer, D., Noah, R., 2005, “Do Tender Offer Create Value? New Methods and Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 3-60
13.Campbell, J. Y., S. J. Grossman, and J. Wang, 1993, “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 905-939.
14.Chakravarty, S., 2001, “Stealth-trading: Which Traders’ Trades Move Stock Prices?” Journal of Financial Economics 61, 289-307.
15.Chordia T. and A. Subrahmanyam, 1998, “Order Imbalance and Individual Stock Returns,” the eScholarship Repository, University of California.
16.Chordia, T. R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2004, “Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics 72, 486-518.
17.Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2002, “Order Imbalance, Liquidity, and Market Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 111-130.
18.Chordia, T., R. Roll, and A. Subrahmanyam, 2005, “Evidence on the Speed of Convergence to Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 271-292.
19.Cheong, C.W., A. H. S. M. Nor, and Z. Isa, 2007, “Asymmetry and long-memory volatility: Some empirical evidence using GARCH,” Physica A, 373, 651-664.
20.Ciner C., 2003, “Return-Volume Dynamics of Individual Stocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market,” College of Business Administration of Northeastern University.
21.Copeland, T. E., 1976, “A model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival,” Journal of Finance 31, 1149-1168.
22.Easley, D., N. Kiefer, and M. O’Hara, 1997b, “One Day in the Life of a Very Common Stock,” Review of Financial Studies 10, 805-835.
23.Easley, D., N. Kiefer, and M. O’Hara, 1997a, “The Information Content of the Trading Process,” Journal of Empirical Finance 4, 159-186.
24.Epps, T. and M. Epps, 1976, “The Stochastic Dependence of Security Price Changes and Transaction Volumes: Implications for the Mixture-of-distributions Hypothesis,” Econometrica 44, 305-321.
25.Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1994, “Strategic Trading with Asymmetric Informed Traders and Long-lived Information,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29, 499-518.
26.Foster, D. F. and S. Viswanathan, 1996, “Strategic Trading When Agents Forecast the Forecasts of Others,” Journal of Finance 51, 1437-1478.
27.Gallant, R., P. Rossi, and G. Tauchen, 1992, “Stock Prices and Volume,” Review of Financial Studies 5, 199-242.
28.Grossman, S. J., 1975, “On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets where Trades Have Diverse Information.” Journal of Finance, 31(2), 573-608.
29.Grossman, S. J., Stiglitz, J. E., 1980, On the impossibility of
informationally efficient markets, American Economic Review 70, 393-408.
30.Grossman, S. J., O. D. Hart, 1980, “Takeover Bids, the Free-Rider Problem and the Theory of the Corporation,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 42-64.
31.He, H., and J. Wang, 1995, “Differential Information and Dynamic Behavior of Trading Volume,” Review of Financial Studies 8, 919-972.
32.Heflin, F., and K. W. Shaw, 2000, “Trade Size and the Adverse Selection Component of the Spread: Which Trades are “Big”?”
33.Holden, C. W., A. Subrahmanyam, 1992, “Long-lived private Information and imperfect competition,” Journal of Finance, 47, 247-270
34.Hong, H., and J. Wang, 2000, “Trading and Returns under Periodic Market Closures,” Journal of Finance 55, 297-354.
35.Hoque H. A. A. B., J. H. Kimb, and C. S. Pyun, 2007, “A comparison of variance ratio tests of random walk: A case of Asian emerging stock markets,” International Review of Economics & Finance, 16, 488-502.
36.Huang H. C., 2006, “Dynamic Causality between Intraday Return and Order Imbalance in NASDAQ Speculative Top Gainers, “Graduate Institute of Finance of National Taiwan University.
37.Jennings, R. H., L. T. Starks, and J. C. Fellingham, 1081, “An Equilibrium Model of Asset Trading with Sequential Information Arrival,” Journal of Finance 36, 143-161.
38.Jones, C., G. Kaul, and M. Lipson, 1994, “Transactions, Volume and Volatility,” Review of Financial Studies 7, 631-652.
39.Kahneman, D. and A. tversky, 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263-291.
40.Karpoff, J., 1987, “The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 109-126.
41.Kim, J. H., & A. Shamsuddin, 2006, “Are Asian stock markets efficient? Evidence from new multiple variance ration tests, Mimeo, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash University.
42.Kyle, A., 1985, “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica, 53, 1315-1335
43.Kyle, A. S., J. L. Vila, 1991, “Noise Trading and Takeovers,” The Rand Journal of Economics, 22, 54-71.
44.Lamoureux, C., and W. Lastrapes, 1990, “Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects,” Journal of Finance 45, 221-229.
45.Lang, L., R. Stulz, R. Walking, 1989, “Tobin’s Q and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers,” Journal of Financial Economics, 24, 137-154
46.Lee, M. C., M. J. Ready, 1991, “Inferring Trade Direction from Intraday Data,” Journal of Finance, 46, 733-746.
47.Lee, Y. T., Y. J. Liu, R. Roll and A. Subrahmanyam, 2003, “Order Imbalances and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 01
48.Lim K. P., R. D. Brooks, and J. H. Kim, 2008, “Financial crisis and stock market efficiency: Empirical evidence from Asian countries,” International Review of Financial Analysis, 17, 571-591.
49.Lin, C. M., 2003, “Information Asymmetry and Return-Volume Relation: A Time Varying Model based upon Order Imbalance and Individual Stock,” Graduate Institute of Finance of National Taiwan University.
50.Lin, J. C., 2004, “Price-Volume Relation: A Time Varying Model with Censored and Camouflage Effects,” Graduate Institute of Finance of National Taiwan University.
51.Lin, J. C., G. C. Sanger, and G. G. Booth, 1995, “Trade Size and Components of the Bid-ask Spread,” Review of Financial Studies 8, 1153-1183.
52.Llorente, G., R. Michaely, G. Saar, J. Wang, 2002, “Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks,” Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1005-1047.
53.Lo, A. and J. Wang, 2000, “Trading Volume: Definitions, Data Analysis, and Implication of Portfolio Theory,” Review of Financial Studies 13, 257-300.
54.Lo, A. W. and A. C. MacKinlay, 1990, “An Econometric Analysis of Nonsynchronous Trading, “Journal of Econometrics 45, 181-211.
55.Lo, A. W., and A. C. MacKinlay, 1988, “Stock Market Prices do not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test,” Review of Financial Studies 1, 41-66.
56.Shleifer, A., R. W. Vishny, 1986, “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.
57.Wang F. A., 1998, “Strategic Trading, Asymmetric Information and Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs,” Journal of Financial Markets 1, 321-352.
58.Wang, J., 1993, “A Model of Intertemporal Asset Prices under Asymmetric Information,” Review of Economic Studies, 60, 249-282.
59.Wang, J., 1994, “A Model of Competitive Stock Trading Volume,” Journal of Political Economy, 102, 127-168.
60.Yu, Y. H., 2002, “Information Asymmetry and Price-Volume Relations,” Graduate Institute of Business Administration of National Taiwan University


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 施啟揚,經濟犯與經濟刑法﹍簡述西德「經濟刑法」,軍法專刊第20卷第4期,台北,1974年4月。
2. 周志榮,自由經濟市場的神秘殿堂—從二次金改檢討報告談起,刑事法雜誌第53卷第3期,台北,2009年6月。
3. 王文宇,金融法,月旦法學教室第24期,元照,台北,2004年9月。
4. 邱智宏,博達案帶給我們的法律省思,月旦法學雜誌第133期,元照,台北,2006年6月。
5. 林盛煌,論金控法之背信罪及其適用問題---以「中信金插旗兆豐金」乙案為例,月旦法學雜誌第144期,元照,台北,2007年5月。
6. 林國全,證券交易法第157條之一內部人交易禁止規定之探討,政大法學評論第45期,台北,1992年6月。
7. 陳志龍,探討金融集團之法制角色,月旦法學雜誌第144期,元照,台北,2007年5月。
8. 陳真珍,股票上市公司終結者—私募基金,會計研究月刊第260期,台北,2007年7月。
9. 詹德恩,2000年聯合國打擊跨國組織公約淺釋,法務通訊第2028-2029期,台北,2001年4月。
10. 詹德恩,從犯罪學理論探討跨國經濟犯罪,法令月刊第53卷第9期,台北,2002年9月。
11. 曾淑瑜,犯罪收益之沒收與保全﹍從日本法之觀點探論,月旦法學雜誌第144期,台北,2007年5月。
12. 黃朝義,論經濟犯罪及其對策,法學叢刊第169期,台北,1998年1月。
13. 戴敬哲,我國金控跨業經營規範檢討﹍以金控公司為重心,月旦法學雜誌第144期,元照,台北,2007年5月。
14. 蘇俊雄,經濟犯在刑法概念上的基本問題,刑事法雜誌第18卷第1期,台北,1974年2月。