臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

促銷可以刺激消費者的購買，使廠商達到短期的銷售目的，然而促銷可能會使消費者產生負面的產品品質認知。雖然，促銷能為消費者帶來金錢上的節省，進而減少消費者的貨幣犧牲，但同時也可能會對消費者的知覺品質產生負面影響，因為消費者認為降低後的折扣價格為產品的真實價格，如此可能改變對產品品質的推斷，所以，透過貨幣犧牲與品質認知的抵換後，折扣降價是否會使消費者產生負面的品質推斷，並且導致知覺價值的降低，以及贈品比折扣是否能維持產品的品質認知是本研究想探討的。
本研究主要目的在探討不同類別的促銷方式下，對消費者知覺品質與知覺價值的影響，以及知覺品質與知覺價值、知覺價值與購買意願的關係，並進一步檢視在價格水準(高定價與低定價)下所產生的影響及差異。本研究選擇以有形商品與無形服務比例相近的餐飲服務為欲實驗探討的商品。以實驗設計的方式，採用的自變數為促銷方式的類別，分別為價格導向類(降價)、非價格導向類(贈品)與未促銷類，未促銷類為實驗對照組，以此比較價格導向類的促銷方式是否會使消費者產生負面的知覺品質與知覺價值。經由敘述統計、信度分析、因素分析、t檢定與變異數分析等驗證研究假設。
研究結果顯示：
1. 價格導向類的促銷方式不會使消費者產生負面的知覺品質。
2. 非價格導向類的促銷方式比價格導向類的促銷方式更能維持消費者對產品品質的評價。
3. 高定價水準之消費者知覺品質高於低定價水準之消費者知覺品質。
4. 價格水準與促銷類別的交互作用不會有顯著的影響效果。
5. 價格導向類的促銷方式之消費者知覺價值高於非價格導向類的促銷方式
6. 價格導向類的促銷方式不會引起消費者產生負面的知覺價值
7. 知覺品質與知覺價值有正向的影響關係
8. 知覺價值與購買意願呈現正向關係

Many company use sale promotion to stimulate consumer’s purchase, however, sale promotion would cause negative quality of product on consumer’s perception. Although consumer could save their expense by sale promotion, they think the price of discount is the true price and change their evaluation from positive attitude to negative attitude. From the counteraction of the money reduction and quality perception, would consumers feel negative perceived quality and perceived value by price discount, and would they feel higher quality perception in gift promotion than in price promotion?
The purpose of this research is to investigate consumer’s perceived quality and perceived value by different type of promotion, and the relation of perceived quality and perceived value, perceived value and purchase desire. Furthermore, to examine the effect and variation by high price level and low price level. The experiment product is food service for the similar proportion product and service. A 3*2 factorial design experiment was employed in this study. Descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, factor analysis, one-way ANOVA and T-test was used to test the hypotheses.
The major findings of this experiment include:
1. The consumer won’t perceive negative quality by price promotion.
2. The consumer’s perceived quality is higher in non-price promotion than in price promotion.
3. The consumer’s perceived quality is higher in the price level than in the low price level.
4. The price level and the promotion type will not have interaction on consumer’s perceived quality.
5. The consumer will feel higher perceived value in price promotion than in non-price promotion.
6. The consumer will not perceive negative value by price promotion.
7. The relation of consumer’s perceived quality and perceived value is positive.
8. The relation of consumer’s perceived value and purchase is positive.

中 文 摘 要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌 謝 III
目 錄 IV
表 目 錄 V
圖 目 錄 VII
第一章 緒 論 1
1.1 研究動機 1
1.2 研究目的 3
1.3 研究流程 4
第二章 文 獻 探 討 5
2.1 促銷活動的理論基礎 5
2.2 促銷的定義、種類及分類方式 8
2.3 知覺品質 19
2.4 知覺價值 25
2.5 促銷類別對消費者知覺品質與知覺價值的影響 29
第三章 研 究 方 法 33
3.1 研究架構 33
3.2 研究假說 34
3.3 變數的操作性定義 35
3.4 研究設計 36
3.5 統計方法 43
第四章 資 料 分 析 與 結 果 45
4.1 樣本結構 45
4.2 信度與效度分析 46
4.3 假設檢定 50
4.4 假設驗證彙總 61
第五章 結 論 與 建 議 62
5.1 研究結論 62
5.2 實務建議 66
5.3 後續研究建議 67
5.4 研究限制 67
參 考 文 獻 68
一、中文部份 68
二、西文部份 69
附 錄： 問 卷 73

一、中文部份
1. 王民雲，「參考價格區間與知覺品質對知覺價值與購買意願之影響」，東吳大學，企業管理系，碩士論文，民國89年
2. 林坤源，「促銷策略對消費者行為影響之研究－以加油站為例」，國立高雄第一科技大學行銷與流通管理所，碩士論文，民國90年
3. 李曉青，「折扣比例、品牌形象和產品種類對知覺品質和知覺風險的影響」，國立成功大學交通管理學系，碩士論文，民國88年
4. 徐心怡，「消費者促銷知覺價值與促銷偏好程度之研究-產品類別干擾效果之探討」，元智大學管理研究所，碩士論文，民國88年
5. 楊筑鈞，「產品創新、品牌形象、價格對知覺價影響之研究-以女性內衣場為例」，輔仁大學，織品服裝研究所，碩士論文，民國92年
6. 蔡鴻文，「價格促銷頻率、幅度與外部參考價格對消費者行為之影響」，台灣大學，商學研究所，碩士論文，民國90年
7. 謝千之，「產品資訊情境、參考價格與知覺品質對消費者購買行為之影響」，東吳大學，企業管理系，碩士論文，民國88年
8. Kolter原著，方世榮譯，行銷管理學，東華書局，1998年
9. Schultz & Robinson原著，莊麗卿譯，實用促銷手冊，遠流出版社，1992年
10. 邱皓政，量化研究與統計分析，五南出版社，2004年
11. 淺井 慶三郎、清水 滋 原著，鄒永仁 等譯，服務業行銷：理論與實務，日之昇文化，1999年
12. 劉典嚴，服務業行銷，滄海書局，2004年
13. 劉美琪，促銷管理理論與實務，正中出版社，1995年
二、西文部份
1. Aaker, David A. (1996), Building Strong Brand, New York, The Free Press.
2. A. Parasuraman, V.A. Zeithaml, and L.L. Berry. (1988), “SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perception of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, pp.38-40
3. Bhuian, Shahid N. (1997), “Marketing Cues and Perceived Quality: Perceptions of Saudi Consumers toward Products of The U.S., Japan, Germany, Italy, U.K. and France,” Journal of Quality Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp.217-235.
4. Calder, Bobby J., Lynn W. Phillips, and Alice M. Tybout (1981), “Designing Research for Application,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.8, September, pp.197-207.
5. Campbell, Leland, & Diamond, William D. (1990), “Framing and sales promotions: The Characteristics of a Good Deal,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7, pp.25-31.
6. Chapman, Joseph D. and Kent B. Monroe (1990), “The Framing Effects of Alternative Price Promotions on Buyers’Subjective Product Evaluations,” working paper, Department of Marketing, Bell State University.
7. Compeau, Larry D., & Grewal, Dhruv.(1998). “Comparative price advertising: An integrated review,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 17, pp.257-273
8. Dommermuth, W. P. (1989), Promotion: Analysis, Creativity and Strategy, 2nd edition. Boston, Mass. PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
9. Dodds, William B., Kent B. Monroe, and Dhruv Grewal (1991), “The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’Product Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 August, pp.307-319.
10. Garretson, Judith A. and Kenneth E. Clow (1999), “The Influence of Coupon Face Value on Service Quality Expectation, Risk Perceptions and Purchase Intentions in The Dental Industry,” The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol. 13, No.1, pp.59-70.
11. Garvin, David A. (1983), “Quality on the Line,” Harvard Business Review, 61(Septemper-October), pp. 65-73.
12. Garvin, David A. (1987), “Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, 65(November-December), pp. 101-109.
13. Grewal, Dhruv, R. Krishnan, Julie Baker and Norm Borin (1998), “The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of retailing, Vol. 74, No. 3, Fall, pp.331-352.
14. Holbrook, M.B. and K.P. Corfman（1983）, “Quality and Other Types of Value in the Consumption Experience: Paedrus Rides Again,” Working Paper, N.Y.: Columbia University.
15. Holbrook, M.B. and K.P. Corfman（1985）, “Quality and Value in the Consumption Experience: Phaedrus Rides Again,” in Perceived Quality, ed by J. Jacoby.
16. Lutz, Richard (1986), “Quality is as Quality Does: An Attitudinal Perspective on Consumer Quality Judgements,” presentation to the Marketing Science Institute Trustees’ Meeting, Cambridge, MA.
17. Monroe, K. B. and Krishnan, R. (1985), “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluation,” In Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise. Ed by Jacob and Jerry C. Olson. Lexington. MA: Lexington Books, pp.209-232.
18. Myers, James H. and Allan D. Shocker (1981), “The Nature of Product- Related Attributes,” Research in Marketing, Vol.5, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Inc., pp.211-236.
19. Nord, W. R. and P. Peter (1980), “A Behavior Modification Perspective on Marketing,”Journal of Marketing, Vol.44, pp.36-47
20. Olson, Jerry C. and J. Jacoby (1972), “Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process,” in Proceeding of the Third Annual Conference of the Association For Consumer Research, Venkatesan, M., ed., Iowa City: Association for Consumer Research pp. 167-179.
21. Olson, Jerry C. and Thomas J. Reynolds (1983), “Understanding Consumers’ Cognitive Structures: Implications for Advertising Strategy,” Advertising and Consumer
22. Olson, Jerry C. (1977), “Price as an Information Cue: Effects in Product Evaluation,” in Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior, Woodside, Arch G., Jagdish N. Sheh, and Peter D. Bennet, eds., New York: North Holland Publishing Company, pp. 267-286.
23. Ortmeyer, Gwen, Quelch S John, A., and Salmon, Walter (1991), “Restoring Credibility to Retail Pricing,” Sloan Management Review, pp.55-66.
24. Peter R. Darke, Cindy M. Y. Chung (2005), “Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: it depends on how you frame it.” Journal of Retailing, 81, pp.35-47.
25. Pierre, Chandon, Brian, Wansink, and Gilles, Laurent, (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, 64, pp.65-81.
26. Quelch, J. A. (1989), Sales Promotion Management, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
27. Raghubir, Priya, and Corfman, Kim (1999), “When do Price Promotions Affect Pretrial Brand evaluations?”, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, pp.211-222.
28. Raju, P. S. (1977), “Product Familiarity, Brand Name and Price Influences on Product Evaluation,” Advances in Consumer Research, 4, pp.64-71.
29. Sawyer, A. G., Peter R. Dickson (1984), “Psychological Perspective on Consumer Response to Sales Promotion,” Marketing Science Institue Collected Paper, pp.1-21.
30. Scott, Carol A., and Yalch, Richard F. (1980), “Consumer Response to Initial Product Trial: A Bayesian Analysis, Journal of Consumer Research, 7, pp.32-41.
31. Shimp, T. A. (1993), Promotion Management and Marketing Communications, Chicago, IL: Dryden Press.
32. Shimp, T.A. (1997), Advertising, Promotion, and Supplemental Aspects Integrated Marketing Communications, 4th edition. Harcourt Brace Chicago, Dryden Press.
33. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. (1990), “Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process,” Journal of Business Research, 21, pp309-333.
34. Thaler, Richard (1985), “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 4, pp.199-244.
35. Young, Shirley and Barbara Feigin (1975), “Using the Benefit Chain for Improved Strategy Formulation,” Journal of Marketing, 39(July), pp. 72-74.
36. Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Amma Kirmani (1993), “Advertising, Perceived Quality, and Brand Image,” in Aaker, David A. and Alexander L. Biel, eds., Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’ Role in Building Strong Brands, Iowa City: Lawrence Erlbaum Associations, Inc., pp.143-161.
37. Ziethaml, Valarie A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52(July), pp. 2-22.