臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

企業國際擴張決策是新興經濟體中企業成長的重要策略，以台灣為例，近年也在國際經貿中嶄露頭角。本研究聚焦於企業國際擴張決策之前因探討，所關注的主要自變數為所有權結構中之家族持股，探討其對企業國際擴張決策之影響。過去研究多在探討家族持股的高低與企業國際擴張決策之關聯，研究結論並不一致，本研究考慮三種情境：其一，家族持股高低與企業國際擴張程度呈現先減後增的U型關係；其二，考慮亞洲新興國家重要的金字塔結構現象，以股份盈餘差來衡量股權偏離的情形，探討其對企業國際擴張決策的負向調節作用；其三，除持股高低外，本研究並進一步探討股權的分佈狀況，以HHI指數衡量股權集中度，探討對企業國際擴張決策的負向調節效果。本研究以台灣IT產業作為研究對象，資料型態為panel data，總計蒐集3,912筆樣本。根據實證結果發現，本研究所提出之三項假說均獲得支持，家族持股比例與企業國際擴張決策呈現U型關係，其最低點為38.7%。而此研究結果能對新興國家特有的家族特性所有權結構與企業國際擴張決策的關係，提供一個更清晰的分析架構。

Over the past decade, the world has witnessed what is arguably a new wave of globalization, by way of outward internationalization from emerging markets, including Taiwan. Many emerging economies firms are characterized as having family control. According prior studies, family owners may take risk-averse attitudes toward interna-tionalization and hence be reluctant to pursue internationalization until their ownership reaches the point where there is minimal threat of control loss. However, when family ownership is large enough to ensure family control, family owners have strong incentives to pursue ID to enhance long-term competitive advantage and spread their wealth outside the home country. Therefore, the level of family ownership in emerging econo-my firms will have a U-shaped relationship with internationalization. Two overlapping but distinct ownership characteristics, family control and ownership concentration, can be found in emerging economies. We employ the degrees of ownership as the measure-ment of family control, and use the Herfindahl index for all shareholdings to capture the overall degree of ownership concentration. It can similarly be argued that since owner-ship concentration, by definition, concentrates voting power in the hands of relatively few shareholders, it is easier to conjure majority support for initiatives such as outward internationalization. However, a number of factors offset this potentially positive relationship between ownership concentration and outward internationalization. And we think ownership concentration will moderated the negative relationship between family ownership and internationalization. Besides, prior studies also observe the phenomenon of excessive family control (through pyramid structures and cross-holdings) on the economic structure of East Asian societies, and find that the family has effective control over investment decisions in many companies and may channel these resources toward their own interest. It is expected that such tightly held and managed family firms will choose to expand operations locally rather than to pursue high-risk foreign market investments, thus avoiding the possibility of expropriation by outside investors. There-fore, we think excess family control will moderated the negative relationship between family ownership and internationalization. We using data on 789 publicly listed infor-mation technology industry firms in Taiwan during the 2003 to 2008 period and panel data regression models for analysis. This paper finds empirical evidence in support of our hypotheses.

中文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． iii
英文摘要　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． iv
誌謝辭　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． vi
內容目錄　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． viii
表目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． ix
圖目錄　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． x
第一章　　緒論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第一節　　研究背景與動機．．．．．．．．．．．． 1
　　第二節　　研究問題與目的．．．．．．．．．．．． 5
　　第三節　　概念性研究架構．．．．．．．．．．．． 6
　　註　釋　　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 7
第二章　　文獻探討與研究假設．．．．．．．．．．．． 8
　　第一節　　企業國際擴張的決策動機．．．．．．．． 8
　　第二節　　家族持股與企業國際擴張決策．．．．．． 10
　　第三節　　股權偏離與企業國際擴張決策．．．．．． 16
　　第四節　　股權集中度與企業國際擴張決策．．．．． 18
第三章　　研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 22
　　第一節　　研究架構．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 22
　　第二節　　變數定義．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 23
　　第三節　　資料來源與樣本選取．．．．．．．．．． 26
　　第四節　　研究方法．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 28
第四章　　實證研究之結果．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 35
　　第一節　　資料特性分析．．．．．．．．．．．．． 35
　　第二節　　研究假設之驗證．．．．．．．．．．．． 38
第五章　　結論與建議．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 47
　　第一節　　研究結論．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 47
　　第二節　　管理意涵．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 48
　　第三節　　研究限制與後續研究建議．．．．．．．． 50
參考文獻　．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．．． 51

一、中文部分

台灣經濟新報(2012)，TEJ Profile[線上資料]，來源：http://www.tej.com.tw/twsite/ [不詳]。

李永全，馬黛(2006)，臺灣家族公司負債融資成本之研究，管理評論，25(3)，69-91。

許崇源，李怡宗，林宛瑩，鄭桂蕙(2003)，控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之衡量(上)，貨幣觀測與信用評等雙月刊，42，15-31。

葉銀華，蘇裕惠，柯承恩，李德冠(2003)，公司治理機制對於關係人交易的影響，證券市場發展季刊，15(4)，69-104。

二、英文部分

Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Ng, F. M. C., & Chan, C. M. (2004). High technology and globalization challenges facing overseas Chinese entrepreneurs. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 69(2), 28-38.

Anand, J., & Delios, A. (2002). Absolute and relative resources as determinants of international expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 119-134.
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1327.

Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209-237.

Arregle, J. L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73-95.

Bajaj, M., Chan, Y. S., & Dasgupta, S. (1998). The relationship between ownership, financing decisions and firm performance: A signaling Model. International Economic Review, 39(3), 723-744.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., & Pal, S. (2010). Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 1437-1450.

Calof, J. L., & Beamish, P. W. (1995). Adapting to foreign markets: Explaining internationalization. International Business Review, 4(2), 115-139.

Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance. Journal of Management, 30(4), 509-528.

Carney, M. (1998). A management capacity constraint? Obstacles to the development of the overseas Chinese family business. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2), 137-162.

Casson, M. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 47(1), 10-23.

Chandler, A. D. (1990). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Cho, M. H. (1998). Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 47(1), 103-121.

Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. (2008). Institutional logics or agency costs: The influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organization Science, 19(5), 766-784.

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.

Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 401-417.

Demsetz, H. (1983) The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 375-390.

Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownerships: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155-1171.

Donckels, R., & Fröhlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, 4(2), 149-160.

Dunning, J. H. (1981). International production and the multinational enterprise. London: Allen and Unwin.

Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.

Elango, B., & Sethi, S. P. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between country of origin (COE) and the internationaliza-tion-performance paradigm. Management International Review, 47(3), 369-392.

Ellstrand, A. E., Tihanyi L., & Johnson, J. L. (2002). Board structure and international political risk. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 769-777.

Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365-395.

Fernández, Z., & Nieto, M. J. (2006). Impact of ownership on the International involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 340-351.

García-Marcoa, T., & Robles-Fernándezb, M. D. (2008). Risk-taking behaviour and ownership in the banking industry: The Spanish evidence. Journal of Economics and Business, 60(4), 332-254.

Gomes, L., & Ramaswamy, K. (1999). An empirical examination of the form of the relationship between multinationality and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 173-187.

Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Núñez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81-95.

Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.

Henderson, A. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1996). Information-processing demands as a determinants of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 575-606.

Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., Essen, V. M., & Oosterhout, J. V. (2009). Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: Towards a more fine-grained understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 481-512.

Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. (1988) External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577-590.

Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. (1989). Effects on ownership and control on corporate productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 25-46.

Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798.

Hitt, M. A., Tihanyi, L., Miller, T., & Connelly, B. (2006). International diversification: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 32(6), 831-867.

Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.

Jensen, M. G., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.

Kim, H., & Lee, P. M. (2008). Ownership structure and the relationship between financial slack and R&D investments: Evidence from Korean firms. Organization Science, 19(3), 404-418.

Kafouros, M. I. (2005). R&D and productivity growth: Evidence from the UK. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(6), 479-497.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-520.
Lee, J. (2006). Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 19(2), 103-114.

Lien, Y. C., Piesse, J., Strange, R., & Filatotchev, I. (2005). The role of corporate governance in FDI decisions: Evidence from Taiwan. International Business Review, 14(6), 739-763.

Lins, K. V. (2003). Equity ownership and firm value in emerging markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 159-184.

Liu, Y., Lin, W. T., & Cheng, K. Y. (2011). Family ownership and the international involvement of Taiwan’s high-technology firms: The moderating effect of high-discretion organizational slack. Management and Organization Review, 7(2), 201-222.

Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 565-586.

Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598-609.

Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78.

Mitton, T. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 215-241.

Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 184-221.

Okoroafo, S. C. (1999). Internationalization of family businesses: Evidence from Northwest Ohio, USA. Family Business Review, 12(2), 147-158.

Pettey, C. (2011). Gartner says worldwide PC shipments grew 3.2 percent in third quarter of 2011. Gartner [Online]. Available: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1821731 [2011, Oct 12].

Ramaswamy, K. (1992). Multinationality and performance: A synthesis and redirection. Advances in International Comparative Management, 7, 241-267.

Rugman, A. M. (1981). Inside the multinationals: The economics of international markets. London: Croom Helm.

Sambharya, R. B. (1995). The combined effect of international diversification and product diversification strategies on the performance of U.S.-based multinational corporations. Management International Review, 35(3), 197-218.

Sapienza, H. J., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 917-933.

Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99-116.

Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., Astrachan, J. H., & Pieper, T. (2010). The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: Exploring nonlinear effects (doi:10.1007/s11187-010-9264-9). Small Business Economics [Online]. Available: http://www.springerlink.com/content/h7378046654253w6/abstract [2010, Mar 07].

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217-226.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.

Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9-38.

Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1157-1177.

Tosi, H. L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1989). The decoupling of CEO pay and performance: An agency theory perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(2), 169-189.

Tsang, E. W. K. (2002). Learning from overseas venturing experience, the case of Chinese family businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1), 21-40.

Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay: The multinational spread of US enterprises. New York: Basic Books.

Witkowski, T. H., & Thibodeau, E. J. (1999). Personal bonding processes in international marketing relationships. Journal of Business Research, 46(3), 315-325.

Yin, X., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The strategy/governance structure fit relationship: Theory and evidence in franchising arrangements. Strategic Management Journal, 25(4), 365-383.

Yip, G. S., Biscarri, J. G., & Monti, J. A. (2000). The role of the internationalization process in the performance of newly internationalizing firms. Journal of International Marketing, 8(3), 10-35.

Zahra, S. A. (2003). International expansion of US manufacturing family business: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495-503.

Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23-40.