跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.14) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/12/24 23:36
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林芳莉
研究生(外文):Fang-Li Lin
論文名稱:最適資訊設備維護廠商遴選模式之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study for the Best Suitable Survey Method of IT Equipment Maintenance supplier
指導教授:薄喬萍薄喬萍引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chiao Ping Bao
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:義守大學
系所名稱:管理碩博士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:73
中文關鍵詞:專家權重法層級分析法資料包絡分析法共同權重
外文關鍵詞:Expert Weight MethodAnalytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)Common Weight(CW)
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:296
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究主要目的在評估眾多資訊設備維護廠商效能之優先順序,做為資訊部門遴選維護廠商之依據。
本研究以專家權重法(Expert Weight Method)求得遴選廠商在技術層面、預算效益、營運層面、管理層面等四個評估準則的權重值,並以資料包絡分析法(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA)中的共同權重模式(Common Weight, CW)決定五家遴選廠商的效能值,再配合層級分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)架構,評估得出各廠商效能表現優先順序。
研究結果發現,目前多數企業採取政府採購法中最低價格標決標原則來決定廠商,但實例資料分析得出報價最低的廠商其效能表現並非最佳。若單以價格遴選廠商,不一定能遴選到效能最佳的資訊設備維護廠商,需加入技術、管理、營運等層面的考量,才得以遴選出效能最佳資訊設備維護廠商。

To evaluate the effectiveness priority of IT equipment maintenance suppliers in order to be, as a base, the selection of maintenance supplier for IT department is the major purpose of this study.
In the study, according to Expert Weight Method, there are weighting values come out against four evaluation principles, technology, budgetary effectiveness, operation and management, from the supplier candidates. Secondly, the data came out from the Common Weight Models in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is to determine effectiveness values of five supplier candidates. Finally, come out the effectiveness priority of each evaluated supplier by structure of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
The study results presented that most of enterprises follow the rule of lowest pricing took the order as same as the principle of government procurement rules as order decision to supplier. However the analysis data showed that the effectiveness performance of supplier which selected by the lowest pricing rule is not the best one.
The best supplier can''t be selected only by the lowest pricing principle for IT equipment maintenance. In order to select the best supplier for IT equipment maintenance, technology, management and operation have to put into consideration.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 資訊設備維修委外決策考慮之因素 5
第二節 供應商評估及遴選方式 13
第三節 層級分析法 17
第四節 資料包絡分析法 22
第三章 研究方法 31
第一節 最佳模式評估準則要項選定 31
第二節 層級分析法運用於本研究架構 33
第三節 專家權重法(EXPERT WEIGHT METHOD) 36
第四節 資料包絡分析法中的共同權重模式 40
第五節 信度與效度 42
第四章 實例研究資料分析 44
第一節 問卷設計 44
第二節 廠商遴選模式分析 46
第五章 結論 55
參考文獻 56
中文部份 56
英文部份 58
附 錄 62
附錄A 62
附錄B 63



中文部份
戎懷章(1999)。資訊業務委外管理機制之設計與應用。淡江大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
江俊霖(2008)。以資料包絡法探討企業整合之生產效率研究。國立交通大學工業工程與管理學系研究所碩士論文。
江柏謙(2003)。以層級分析法探討海軍裝備系統維修廠商評選之研究。義守大學工業工程與管理學院碩士論文。
吳萬益、林清河(2005)。企業研究方法。華泰文化。
李建發(2009)。醫院資訊系統委外策略之研究。暨南大學理學院碩士論文。
李蕙敏(2009)。企業資訊系統評選模式之建構-應用分析網路程序法。中原大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
周明昌(1997)。委外承包商評估準則模式之建構。國立政治大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
延念竹(2012)。空用無線電機最佳供料遴選模式之研究。義守大學工業工程與管理學院碩士論文。
林子銘、李東峰、林文修(2001)。台灣中小企業資訊委外意向研究。Internet Pioneer網際先鋒,第83期,pp.77-81。
林華駿(2008)。企業評選資訊系統委外廠商之屬性偏好結構:聯合分析法之應用。銘傳大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文。
邱紹成(2002)。以資料包絡分析法評估國內育成中心營運效率之研究。國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
俞洪亮,蔡義清,莊懿妃(2007)。商管研究資料分析/SPSS的應用。華泰文化。
孫遜(1997)。資料包絡分析法-理論與應用。揚智文化。
傅振焜譯,Peter Drucker著(1994)。後資本主義社會。時報文化。
曾國雄、鄧振源,1989,「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」,中國統計學報,27(6),頁5-12。
曾國雄、鄧振源,1989,「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下)」,中國統計學報,27(7),頁1-19。
張有恆、徐村和(1993)。模糊度量AHP法-交通運輸計劃評估新模式。中華民國第一屆模糊理論與應用研討會。pp.365-371。
楊建樑(2007)。模糊層級多準則評選最適供應商之研究。2008 ERP學術與實務研討會。pp.63-76。
薄喬萍(2007)。績效評估之資料包絡分析法。五南圖書出版公司。
薄喬萍(2008)。D. B. A在績效評估之綜合運用。五南圖書出版公司。
薄喬萍、廖川景(2008)。國軍晉任遴選之人員績效評估。黃埔學報,第五十五期,pp.1-20。
闕頌廉(1994)。應用模糊數學。科技圖書股份有限公司。
英文部份
Banker, R.D., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper,(1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, pp.1078-1092.
Bao,chiao ping , Yu-ping Lee, Ching-Yaw Chen,(2013). Enhancement Of Quality Function Deployment Based On Chinkless-Teaching Concept Design courses. the International Journal of Organizational Innovation Vol 5 Num 3 January 2013.
Barbarosoglu, G. and Yaxgac, T., (1997). An Application of the Analytic Hierrchy Process to The Supplier Selection Problem. Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1,pp.14-21.
Belton, V. &; Gear, A.E. (1985). The Legitimacy of Rank Reversal-A Comment. Vol.13, Omega pp.227-230.
Boussofiane, A., R. G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis, (1991). Applied Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 52, pp.1-15.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes E., (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 49-444.
Cheon, M. and Grover, V. and TENG, J. T. C., (1995), Theoretical Perspectives on The Outsourcing of Information Systems. Journal of Information Technology 1995/10,209-219.
Choi, T. Y. and J. L. Hartley, (1996) . An Exploration of Supplier Selection Practices Across the Supply Chain. Journal of Operations Management 14, pp.333-343.
Carolyn Boyce, MA Palena Neale, (2006).Conducting in-depthinterviews: A guide for designing and conducting a case study for evaluation input.
De Boer, L., Labro, E. and Morlacchi, P.,(2001), Areview of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(1),75-89.
Dibbern J., Goles T., Hirschheim R., &; Jayatilaka B. (2004), Information Systems outsourcing:a survey and analysis of the literature. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 35(4),6-102.
Dickson, G, W., (1966). An Analysis of Supplier Selection System and Decision. Journal of Purchasing, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp.5-17.
Doyle, J., (1995). Multiattribute choice for the lazy decision maker: let the alternatives decide. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 62, pp.87-100.
Doyle, J. and Green, R., (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45, pp.567-578.
Farrell, M.J., (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, CXX, Part 3, 253-290.
Greer, C.R.S.A. Youngblood, &; Gray, D.A., (1999). Human resource management outsourcing: The mark or buy decision. Academy of Management Executive, 13(3):85-96.
Gurbaxani, V. and S. Whang, (1991). The Impact of Information Systems on Organizations and Markets. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No. 1, Jan. 1992 pp.59-93.
Halvey. J. K., &; Melby, B. M. (1966). Information technology outsourcing transactions : process, strategies, and contracts. New York: John Wiley &; Sons, Inc.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. The American Journal of Socialogy,pp.597-606.
Houshyar, A. and David, L., (1992). A systematic selection procedure. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol.23, No.1-4, pp.173-176.
HR Focus., (1997). Ousourcing of HR continues, HR Focus, 74(3):2.
HR Focus., (2000). More employers outsourcing their core HR functions. HR Focus, 77(8):8.
Jensen, M.C. and W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm : Managial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Struture. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp.305-360.
Kao, C., &; Hung, H. T. (2005). Data envelopment analysis with common weights: Thecompromise solution approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56,1196–1203.
Koh, Christine and Ang, Soon and Straub, Detmar W., (2004). IT Outsourcing Success:A Psychological Contract Perspective. Information Systems Research Vol. 15, No. 4,December 2004,pp.356-373.
Laabs, J.J,(1993). Successful Outsourcing Depends on Critical Factors. Personal Journal,pp.51-60.
Looff, Leon de. (1997). Information System Outsourcing Decision making: A managerial Approach. 1st edition, Idea group publishing, London.
Lowell, M.(1994). Managing your outsourcing vendor in the financial services industry. Journal of Systems Management, pp.23-36.
Millet, I., &; Harker, P. T. (1990). Globally Effective Questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), pp.88-97.
Nunnally, J.C., (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik., (1978) . The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row Publishing Co..
Penrose, E. T., (1959). The Theory of Growth of the Firm. in Foss, N. J.(Eds.), Resources Firms and Stagegic, pp.27-39.
Perrow, C., (1986).Complex Organizations : A Critical Essay, 3rd ed. New York : Random House.
Roll, Y., Cook, W. D., and Golany, B., (1991). Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis. IIE Transactions, 23(1), pp.2-9.
Roll, Y. and Golany, B., (1993). Alternate Methods of Treating Factor Weights in DEA. OMEGA, 21(1),pp. 99-109.
Rossi, P. H. &; Freeman, H. E.,(1993). Evaluation: a systematic approach (5th ed.). Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Saaty, T.L. , (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G., (1982). The legitimacy of rank reversal. Omega 12(5), pp.513-516.
Vargas, L.G., (1990).An Overview of The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications. European Journal of Operagion Research, Vol. 48, No. 1.
Watson, S.R. and Freeling, A.N.S., (1983). Comment on:Assessing Attribute Weights by Ration. Omega, Vol.11, No.1, pp.11-13.
Weber, C. A. and Current, J.,(1993). A multiobjective approach to vendor selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 68, pp.173-184.
Wernerfelt, Biger. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Journal of Strategic Management, pp.171-180.
Willcocks,L.P. &; Lacity,M.C. &; Kern,T.,(1999). Risk Mitingation in IT Outsourcing Strategy Revisted:Longitudinal Case Research at LIS. Jounal of Strategic Information System,pp.285-314.
Williamson, O. E., (1979). Transaction Cost Economics : The Governance of Contractual Relation. Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22,No. 2, Oct. 1979, pp.233-261.
Wortzel, L. (1979). Multivariate analysis. N. J., Prentice Hall.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top