臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

美國景觀師協會在永續景觀議題中提出「食用性景觀」與「食用性都市」的概念，在城市空間中種植可食的植物可以增加綠色空間。而台中市政府也在2016年推動城食森林計畫，期望台中市成為兼具低碳、美學、健康的城市。然而，食用性景觀議題在過去的研究中，大多針對環境效益或食品安全進行探討，至於居民對於參與此活動的意願方面，則較少有研究。因此，本研究以台中市為基地，探討台中市居民對於參與食用性景觀之態度與意圖。
本研究以計畫行為理論為架構探討食用性景觀營造，先驅研究運用訪談的方式，萃取出關於參與食用性景觀營造的顯著信念，再結合文獻回顧結果發展成正式問卷。資料蒐集是到台中市9個有進行食用性景觀營造之社區，採用便利抽樣輔以滾雪球抽樣的方式進行現地調查，共計回收209份問卷。在資料分析上使用PLS操作驗證性因素分析及結構方程式以進行假設驗證。
研究結果顯示，有參與食用性景觀營造者及未參與者在意圖、主觀規範、知覺行為控制及顯著信念上皆有顯著差異。而SEM分析結果顯示，知覺行為控制對參與食用性景觀營造的意圖影響最大，其次為主觀規範，然而行為態度對於意圖的影響並不顯著。當人們在決定是否要參與食用性景觀營造時，首先會考慮自己是否有足夠的控制能力，或能夠排除阻礙因素來進行此項活動。其次會考慮到重要他人對於自己參與食用性景觀營造的觀感；最後，就本研究結果而言，行為態度不會影響意圖。換而言之，儘管個人對參與食用性景觀營造抱持著正向的行為態度，但是會影響他參與意圖的關鍵因素仍是阻礙的存在。
依據研究結果，本研究建議台中市政府在推動食用性景觀營造時，提供適合的環境、通用性的基地規劃設計、專業人員協助與相關種植技術課程，並積極地宣導，可以使潛在參與者消除阻礙來參與種植活動。建議未來研究可以探討受測者在參與食用性景觀營造後，其意圖、行為態度、主觀規範、知覺行為控制與顯著信念是否有所改變。

The American Society of Landscape Architects proposed the concepts of “edible landscapes” and “edible cities” as the issue in sustainable landscape. Growing food in public spaces could increase green spaces and safe food production. In 2016, Taichung City Government promoted the urban food forest plan, expecting Taichung to become a low-carbon, aesthetic, and healthy city. However, previous studies regarding edible landscapes almost focused on ecological benefits and food safety. There were few studies to address the willingness of residents to participate in edible landscaping. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the attitude and intention of residents for participating in edible landscaping in Taichung city.
This study used the theory of planned behavior as the theoretical framework to explore edible landscaping. A pilot study was conducted using open-ended interview skill in order to identify the salient beliefs related to edible landscaping. Instruments to measure components in theory of planned behavior composed of the items from both the literature review and the pilot study. Data were collected in nine communities of Taichung where residents are participating in edible landscaping. A convenient sampling technique with snowballing process was used to extract the study sample, and 209 valid samples were obtained. Data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling by partial least squares method.
The results showed that there were significant differences between the residents who participating in edible landscaping and those non-participants in intention, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and salient beliefs. The SEM analysis showed that the strongest influence on intention was perceived behavioral control, followed by subjective norms. However, the influence of attitude on intention is not significant. When people have to decide whether to participate in edible landscaping, they would firstly consider if they are capable of performing the behavior or removing the factors that may impede their performance of this activity. After that, they would start to consider important others’ perception about participating in edible landscaping. In terms of the results of this study, attitudes toward the behavior do not significantly influence intentions. In other words, whether the individuals can foster the intention to participate in edible landscaping depends on the extent to which the barriers exist even though they hold a positive attitude toward edible landscaping.
Based on the findings, it was suggested that Taichung City Government should provide a suitable environment, universal site planning and design, professional assistance, and courses of planting skills, if the government wants to promote the policy of an edible city. Moreover, actively advocating is needed to encourage potential participants to overcome barriers to participate in edible landscaping. It was also suggested that researchers may study whether people change their salient beliefs, attitudes toward the behavior, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and intentions after they participate in edible landscaping for a certain period of time.

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 II
謝 誌 IV
主目錄 V
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節 食用性景觀及其相關理念應用 4
第二節 計畫行為理論與其實證研究應用 9
第三章 研究設計 22
第一節 研究架構與研究假設 22
第二節 先驅研究 23
第三節 測量工具 25
第四節 研究對象與資料蒐集方法 31
第五節 資料分析方法 32
第四章 研究結果 37
第一節 樣本特性 37
第二節 研究變項測量結果 40
第三節 信度分析 49
第四節 研究變項測量模式檢定 51
第五節 結構模式評鑑及假設檢定 60
第五章 結論與建議 63
第一節 結論 63
第二節 討論 64
第三節 建議 66
參考文獻 68
附錄A 訪談逐字稿 73
附錄B 受訪者關鍵語句之信念彙整表 114
附錄C 信念彙整 124
附錄D 前測問卷 133
附錄E 正式問卷 138
附錄F 信度分析 143

中文文獻
1.王明妤、林玠恒、方治文、凃安蓉、張甄育、林倩如（2011）。農民持續採用有機耕種行為意圖之研究：以計畫行為理論為基礎，台灣農學會報，12(1)，68-88。
2.王韻、林玉涵（2016）。以計畫行為理論探討流行女鞋購買意圖之研究。紡織綜合研究期刊，26(2)，頁36-52。
3.吳秉榮（2002）。台中市民參與市民農園意願之研究。未出版之碩士論文，中興大學農業經濟學系。
4.李慶長、張銀益、黃柏翔（2015）。以計畫行為理論探討穿戴型裝置的使用意圖-以 Google 眼鏡為例，電子商務研究， 13(3)，頁315-334。
5.李樂怡（2015）。社區菜園參與對社區連結之關係探討。未出版之碩士論文，臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系。
6.林英彥（1989）。日本之市民農園，發展休閒農業研討會會議實錄，台大農推系編印，頁145-159。
7.林永森、黃文雄、張少熙、林玲玉（2015）。表層及深層演出對工作倦怠與離職意圖之影響：兼論幽默感之調節效果。戶外遊憩研究， 28(1)，頁73-103。
8.林錦郎（2016）。從計畫行為理論探討數位學習平台知識分享行為，全球商業經營管理學報，8，43-55。
9.邱發祥、彭武男、范淑貞、江榮吉（2001）。市民農園發展之研究，桃園區農業改良場研究報告，46，頁27-40。
10.邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式：LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。台北：雙葉。
11.邱皓政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析。台北：五南。
12.涂珮瓊、許文耀、張正雄、陳盈如（2011）。門診癌症患者參與心理社會介入之意圖評估-計畫行為理論之運用，中華心理衛生學刊，24(3)，頁403-428。
13.許家謙、凌家如、林清同（2016）。高齡者參與槌球運動行為模式之探討：計畫行為理論之應用，戶外遊憩研究，29(1)，頁79-111。
14.黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式：理論與應用（五版）。台北市：五南。
15.塗三賢、王松永（2007）。以計畫行為理論分析消費者對木構造房屋的消費行為意向，臺灣林業科學，22(2)，頁173-181。
16.韓選棠（1999）。德國市民農園巡禮。台灣大學農工所鄉村建築與環境組著，農業轉型與休閒產業：德國農村參訪實錄。台北市：豐年社。
17.鄭建雄、蔡奇助（1995 a）。市民農園之推展概況，台灣農業，31（4），頁78-89。
18.鄭建雄、蔡奇助（1995 b）。台灣市民農園的發展經驗，台中區農推專訊，（143）。
19.戴友榆、王慶堂、高紹源、李明儒（2012）。計畫行為理論應用於水域遊憩活動行為之探討-以澎湖為例，管理實務與理論研究，6(1)，頁33-58。
20.鍾政偉、曾宗德、劉嘉麒（2015）。以計畫行為理論模型探討遊客參與休閒漁業活動之決策行為，島嶼觀光研究， 8(2)，頁1-20。
21.蕭文龍（2013）。統計分析入門與應用-SPSS中文版+ PLS-SEM （SmartPLS）。臺北：碁峰資訊。
22.Kumar, R.著（2014）。研究方法入門與實務（Research methodoiogy 3e: A step-by-step guide for beginners，黃國光譯）。台北：雙葉書廊。
英文文獻
1.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
2.Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. rev.
3.Armstrong, H., Brown, H., & Turner, T. (2000). Landscape planning and city form. In Benson, J., & Roe, M, (Eds.).Landscape and sustainability (pp.157-178). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988) . On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
5.Baker, R. K., & White, K. M. (2010). Predicting adolescents’ use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1591-1597.
6.Bendt, P., Barthel, S., & Colding, J. (2013). Civic greening and environmental learning in public-access community gardens in Berlin. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 18-30.
7.Bohn, K., & Viljoen, A. (2011). The edible city: Envisioning the continuous productive urban landscape (CPUL). FIELD, 4(1), 149-161.
8.Borges, J. A. R., Lansink, A. G. O., Ribeiro, C. M., & Lutke, V. (2014). Understanding farmers’ intention to adopt improved natural grassland using the theory of planned behavior. Livestock Science, 169, 163-174.
9.Burton, I. (1987). Report on reports: Our common future. The world commission on environment and development. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 29(5), 25-29.
10.Cleveland, D. A., Phares, N., Nightingale, K. D., Weatherby, R. L., Radis, W., Ballard, J., Campagna, M., Kurtz, D., Livingston, K., Riechers, G., & Wilkins, K. (2017). The potential for urban household vegetable gardens to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 365-374.
11.Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
13.Fraser, R., Ajzen, I., Johnson, K., Hebert, J., & Chan, F. (2011). Understanding employers' hiring intention in relation to qualified workers with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35(1), 1-11.
14.Grayson, R. (2000). An incomplete history: Community gardening in Sydney.
15.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.
16.Hoeksma, D. L., Gerritzen, M. A., Lokhorst, A. M., & Poortvliet, P. M. (2017). An extended theory of planned behavior to predict consumers' willingness to buy mobile slaughter unit meat. Meat Science, 128, 15-23.
17.IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature), UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), & WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature), 1991, Caring for the earth: A strategy for sustainable living. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
18.Karppinen, H., & Berghäll, S. (2015). Forest owners' stand improvement decisions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 275-284.
19.Lu, Y., Zhou, T., & Wang, B. (2009). Exploring Chinese users’ acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 29-39.
20.Lake, B., Milfont, T., & Gavin, M. (2011). The relative influence of psycho-social factors on urban edible gardening. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 50-59.
21.Lautenschlager, L., & Smith, C. (2007). Understanding gardening and dietary habits among youth garden program participants using the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 49(1), 122-130.
22.Lee, H. S. (2016). Examining neighborhood influences on leisure-time walking in older Korean adults using an extended theory of planned behavior. Landscape and Urban Planning, 148, 51-60.
23.Liobikienė, G., Mandravickaitė, J., & Bernatonienė, J. (2016). Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study. Ecological Economics, 125, 38-46.
24.Masud, M. M., Al-Amin, A. Q., Junsheng, H., Ahmed, F., Yahaya, S. R., Akhtar, R., & Banna, H. (2016). Climate change issue and theory of planned behaviour: relationship by empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 613-623.
25.McLain, R., Poe, M., Hurley, P. T., Lecompte-Mastenbrook, J., & Emery, M. R. (2012). Producing edible landscapes in Seattle's urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(2), 187-194.
26.Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
27.United Nations (2014). World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division, United Nations.
28.Oztekin, C., Teksöz, G., Pamuk, S., Sahin, E., & Kilic, D. S. (2017). Gender perspective on the factors predicting recycling behavior: Implications from the theory of planned behavior. Waste Management.
29.Raines-Eudy, R. (2000). Using structural equation modeling to test for differential reliability and validity: An empirical demonstration. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(1), 124-141.
30.Pirouz, D. M. (2006). An overview of partial least squares.
31.Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623-656.
32.Roberto, A. J., Shafer, M. S., & Marmo, J. (2014). Predicting substance-abuse treatment providers' communication with clients about medication assisted treatment: a test of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 47(5), 307-313.
33.Scalco, A., Noventa, S., Sartori, R., & Ceschi, A. (2017). Predicting organic food consumption: A meta-analytic structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 112, 235-248.
34.Senger, I., Borges, J. A. R., & Machado, J. A. D. (2017). Using the theory of planned behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural production. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 32-40.
35.Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness-of-fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS scientific meeting. Vol. 1, pp. 739-742.
36.von Hoffen, L. P., & Säumel, I. (2014). Orchards for edible cities: Cadmium and lead content in nuts, berries, pome and stone fruits harvested within the inner city neighbourhoods in Berlin, Germany. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 101, 233-239.
37.Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & Management, 44(2),
206-215.
38.Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Ｑuarterly, 177-195.
39.Waffle, A. D., Corry, R. C., Gillespie, T. J., & Brown, R. D. (2017). Urban heat islands as agricultural opportunities: An innovative approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, 161, 103-114.
40.Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of consumers' green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114-122.
日文文獻
青鹿四郎、近藤康男，（1935），農業経済地理，農山漁村文化協会。

網路資源
1.Ajzen, I. Sample TPB Questionnaire. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.questionnaire.pdf Retrieved 20 October 2016.
2.American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). https://www.asla.org/sustainableasla.aspx. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
3.Beacon Food Forest.http://beaconfoodforest.org/ Retrieved 30 October 2015.
4.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/home/en/. Retrieved 14 November 2015.
5.Edible Gardens. https://ediblegardencity.wordpress.com/. Retrieved 20 March 2015.
6.Pam Warhurst. How we can eat our landscapes https://www.ted.com/talks/pam_warhurst_how_we_can_eat_our_landscapes/transcript?language=en Retrieved 23 March 2017
7.World Commission on Environmental and Development. (1987) Our Common Future. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm. Retrieved 20 October 2015
8.聯合國（2009）。走向低碳－聯合國氣候中和嚮導，下載日期2016/6/4。取自：http://www.unep.org/pdf/kickthehabitCHINESE.pdf
9.2030永續發展議程-SDGs New Sexy永續發展系列活動，瀏覽日期2016/10/2。https://www.sdgsnewsexy.com/2030agenda
10.新北市政府綠美化環境景觀處，瀏覽日期2016/10/2
http://www.landscaping.ntpc.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&ids=45
11.行政院主計處中華民國統計資訊網，瀏覽日期2017/5/31
http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=18844&ctNode=4944