臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

背景與研究目的：為針對國內正自行發展的電腦化認知評估工具(平板電腦版符號數字轉換測驗,簡稱T-SDMT)建立其心理計量特性，以使該評估工具能予臨床工作者更準確的資訊及提供更佳的療效依據，故本研究目的有五：(一)檢測T-SDMT單回施測中的再測信度及最佳施測次數。(二)檢測T-SDMT和魏氏成人智力量表第四版中文版的分測驗「符號替代測驗」(簡稱DSST) 於二週後的再測信度並比較其優劣。(三)檢測T-SDMT和DSST的同時效度。(四)檢測T-SDMT的收斂效度及區辨效度(和蒙特利爾認知評估MoCA做相關係數驗證)。 (五)檢測T-SDMT的生態效度(和日常生活活動電腦化適性測驗ADL CAT做相關係數驗證)。
方法：徵求30位中風六個月以上之患者，施以前測及後測(間隔時間為二週)，每回都接受T-SDMT和DSST一次的練習測驗及四次的正式測驗，並於前測時加入ADL CAT，而後測時加入MoCA以進行相關效標的檢測。
結果：T-SDMT單回多次測量皆呈現良好的再測信度且合宜的施測次數為二次。T-SDMT與DSST具良好的同時效度，及在間隔二週皆具良好的再測信度，且T-SDMT略優於DSST。T-SDMT與MoCA具良好的收斂效度及具有區辨效度。而在描述性統計上僅教育程度有統計上的顯著差異。另T-SDMT與ADL CAT呈不佳的生態效度。
結論：T-SDMT單回施測以二次為合宜的施測次數，並於二週後的再測信度上略優於DSST，臨床效能上T-SDMT亦有潛力成為具篩檢出輕度認知障礙的評估工具。

Background and purpose: To establish psychometric characteristics for a computerized cognitive assessment tool (the Tablet-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test, T-SDMT) that is being developed in domestic so that the assessment tool can provide clinicians with more accurate information and better efficacy basis. The purposes of this study were five: (1) examine the test-retest reliability and best trial of tests for the T-SDMT in one session. (2) Comparison of test-retest agreement of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale IV Chinese Version of the subtest “Digit Symbol Substitution Test”(DSST) and T-SDMT after two weeks. (3) examine the concurrent validity of T-SDMT and DSST. (4) examine the convergence validity and discriminative validity of T-SDMT (Correlation coefficient verification with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)).(5) examine the ecological validity of T-SDMT (verification of correlation coefficient with Computerized Adaptive Test for Assessing Activities of Daily Living ,ADL CAT).
Method: Thirty patients with stroke of six months or more were recruited for pre-test and post-test (interval time was two weeks). Each time they received T-SDMT and DSST training tests and four formal tests. ADL CAT were added during the pre-test, and MoCA was added for post-test testing.
Results: Appropriate testing times in one session for T-SDMT is twice. Multiple measurements in one session for T-SDMT show good test-retest reliability. T-SDMT and DSST have good concurrent validity. T-SDMT and DSST have good test-retest reliability in two weeks apart, and T-SDMT is slightly better than DSST. T-SDMT and MoCA have good convergence validity and discriminative validity. In terms of descriptive statistics, only statistically significant differences in the education level were observed. Another T-SDMT and ADL CAT showed poor ecological validity.
Conclusion: Appropriate testing times in one session for T-SDMT is twice.T-SDMT was slightly better than DSST in test-retest reliability after two weeks. T-SDMT has the potential to be an assessment tool for the screening of mild cognitive impairment on clinical efficacy.

目錄
誌 謝 I
中文摘要 II
英文摘要 III
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與背景 3
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究假設 6
第四節 研究的重要性 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 中風與疾病相關特性之缺損 8
第二節 訊息處理之定義及相關評估工具的評論 11
第三節 臨床評估工具的心理計量之重要性 18
第三章 研究方法 27
第一節 研究對象 27
第二節 研究流程 29
第三節 研究工具 31
第四節 資料分析 35
第四章 研究結果 38
第一節 描述性統計分析結果 38
第二節 T-SDMT單回多次測量的再測信度結果 41
第三節 T-SDMT和DSST間隔二週的再測信度結果 50
第四節 T-SDMT的同時效度結果 52
第五節T-SDMT的收斂效度及區辨效度結果 53
第五節 T-SDMT的生態效度結果 57
第五章 討論 59
第一節 描述性統計分析 59
第二節 單回多次測量的再測信度 60
第三節 T-SDMT和DSST間隔二週的再測信度 64
第四節 T-SDMT的同時效度 67
第五節 T-SDMT的收斂效度及區辨效度 68
第六節 T-SDMT的生態效度 71
第七節 研究的限制 73
第八節 未來研究建議 74
第九節 結論 75
參考文獻 76
附錄一 簡易智能狀態測驗（MMSE） 80
附錄二 平板電腦版符號數字轉換測驗（T-SDMT）(資料取自T-SDMT施測手冊) 81
附錄三 日常生活活動電腦化適性測驗(簡稱ADL CAT) 84
附錄四 蒙特利爾認知評估(簡稱MOCA) 86

Arnall, F. A., Koumantakis, G. A., Oldham, J. A., & Cooper, R. G. (2002). Between-days reliability of electromyographic measures of paraspinal muscle fatigue at 40, 50 and 60% levels of maximal voluntary contractile force. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16(7), 761-771.
Benedict, R. H., DeLuca, J., Phillips, G., LaRocca, N., Hudson, L. D., Rudick, R., & Consortium, M. S. O. A. (2017). Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 23(5), 721-733.
Cho, K. H., Lee, J. Y., Lee, K. J., & Kang, E. K. (2014). Factors related to gait function in post-stroke patients. Journal of physical therapy science, 26(12), 1941-1944.
Conklin, H. M., Ashford, J. M., Di Pinto, M., Vaughan, C. G., Gioia, G. A., Merchant, T. E., . . . Wu, S. (2013). Computerized assessment of cognitive late effects among adolescent brain tumor survivors. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 113(2), 333-340.
Edwards, J. D., Xu, H., Clark, D. O., Guey, L. T., Ross, L. A., & Unverzagt, F. W. (2017). Speed of processing training results in lower risk of dementia. Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 3(4), 603-611.
Haworth, J., Phillips, M., Newson, M., Rogers, P. J., Torrens-Burton, A., & Tales, A. (2016). Measuring information processing speed in mild cognitive impairment: Clinical versus research dichotomy. Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease, 51(1), 263-275.
Hoops, S., Nazem, S., Siderowf, A., Duda, J., Xie, S., Stern, M., & Weintraub, D. (2009). Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology, 73(21), 1738-1745.
Hsueh, I.-P., Chen, J.-H., Wang, C.-H., Hou, W.-H., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2013). Development of a computerized adaptive test for assessing activities of daily living in outpatients with stroke. Physical therapy, 93(5), 681.
Karimpoor, M., Churchill, N., Tam, F., Fischer, C. E., Schweizer, T. A., & Graham, S. (2017). Tablet-Based Functional MRI of the Trail Making Test: Effect of Tablet Interaction Mode. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 496.
Koh, C.-L., Lu, W.-S., Chen, H.-C., Hsueh, I.-P., Hsieh, J.-J., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2011). Test–retest reliability and practice effect of the oral-format Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients with stroke. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(4), 356-363.
Kuznetsova, K. A., Maniega, S. M., Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Storkey, A. J., Starr, J. M., . . . Bastin, M. E. (2016). Brain white matter structure and information processing speed in healthy older age. Brain Structure and Function, 221(6), 3223-3235.
Kwah, L. K., & Diong, J. (2014). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Journal of Physiotherapy, 60(1), 61.
Lam, B., Middleton, L., Masellis, M., T Stuss, D., D Harry, R., Kiss, A., & E Black, S. (2013). Criterion and Convergent Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment with Screening and Standardized Neuropsychological Testing (Vol. 61).
Lee, Y.-C., Yu, W.-H., Lin, Y.-F., Hsueh, I.-P., Wu, H.-C., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2014). Reliability and responsiveness of the Activities of Daily Living Computerized Adaptive Testing system in patients with stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 95(11), 2055-2063.
Lin, G.-H., Yang, Y.-P., Yang, J.-F., Chen, T.-T., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2018). Reducing the time needed to administer a sustained attention test in patients with stroke. PloS One, 13(3), e0192922.
Su, C.-Y., Wuang, Y.-P., Lin, Y.-H., & Su, J.-H. (2015). The role of processing speed in post-stroke cognitive dysfunction. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(2), 148-160.
Sun, T.-K., Chiu, S.-C., Yeh, S.-H., & Chang, K.-C. (2006). Assessing reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the stroke scale: scale development. International journal of nursing studies, 43(4), 457-463.
Tang, S.-F., Chen, I.-H., Chiang, H.-Y., Wu, C.-T., Hsueh, I.-P., Yu, W.-H., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2018). A comparison between the original and Tablet-based Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients with schizophrenia: Test-retest agreement, random measurement error, practice effect, and ecological validity. Psychiatry Research, 260, 199-206.
Theiling, J., Petermann, F., & Daseking, M. (2013). WAIS-IV profiles in first-ever unilateral ischemic stroke patients. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie.
Toglia, J., Fitzgerald, K. A., O''Dell, M. W., Mastrogiovanni, A. R., & Lin, C. D. (2011). The Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in persons with mild subacute stroke: relationship to functional outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(5), 792-798.
Tung, L.-C., Yu, W.-H., Lin, G.-H., Yu, T.-Y., Wu, C.-T., Tsai, C.-Y., . . . Hsieh, C.-L. (2016). Development of a Tablet-based symbol digit modalities test for reliably assessing information processing speed in patients with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(19), 1952-1960.
Yang, C.-M., Lin, G.-H., Chen, M.-H., Hsueh, I., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2015). Development of a Computerized Digit Vigilance Test and validation in patients with stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(4), 311-317.
王俊傑. (2009). 表現與結果回饋及認知訓練介入對中風後動作能力重建之影響. 大專體育學術專刊, 697-703.
王健, 邹义壮, 崔界峰, 范宏振, 陈楠, 姚晶, 何雪玲. (2013). 韦氏成人智力量表第四版中文版的信度和结构效度.
王程遠, 李智雄, 林育志, 陳苓怡, 方姿蓉, 蔡宜純, . . . 蔡哲嘉. (2010). 經實證證實有效的隨機對照試驗報導及評讀工具—CONSORT Statement 2010 簡介. 內科學誌, 21(6), 408-418.
尤菀薈. (2017) T-SDMT施測手冊.
呂文賢, 李雅珍, 凃富籌, & 謝清麟. (2013). 短版巴氏量表應用於中風患者之最小可偵測變化值及反應性. 台灣復健醫學雜誌, 41(2), 113-119.
李宏鎰, & 林秋燕. (2004). 注意力不足過動症在轉換測驗上的表現. 中華心理衛生學刊, 17(1), 57-74.
邱弘毅. (2008). 腦中風之現況與流行病學特徵. 腦中風會訊, 15(3), 2-4.
姚開屏. (1996). 從心理計量的觀點看測量工具的發展. 職能治療學會雜誌, 14(1), v-xxi.
唐世芬. (2016). 平板電腦版符號數字轉換測驗應用於思覺失調症病患之隨機測量誤差與練習效應改良. 臺灣大學職能治療研究所學位論文, 1-50.
陳學志,邱發忠,劉政宏,林宜利. (2004) 認知心理學. 41-65.
陳恩誠. (2007). 早期阿茲海默症患者在IPS與工作記憶表現初探. 中原大學心理學研究所學位論文, 1-72.
陳心怡, 陳榮華, 花茂琴. (2015) WAIS-IV魏人智力量表第四版(中文版)指導手冊.
喬慧燕, 薛漪平, 古佳苓, 陳蕙君, & 謝清麟. (2007). 常用於中風研究的五種注意力測驗之心理計量特性比較. 台灣復健醫學雜誌, 35(2), 65-72.
曾美君, & 張谷州. (2005). 腦中風嚴重度之衡量與分類. 台灣醫界, 48, 17-19.
黃宗正, 劉智民, 劉震鐘, 謝明憲, 簡意玲, & 胡海國. (2011). 精神分裂症的臨床與精神病理. 台灣醫學, 15(4), 365-374.
蔡惠如, 曾詩蘋, 王守玉, 張瑛瑛, & 趙玉環. (2016). 探討首次腦中風病人初期之調適過程. 護理雜誌, 63(2), 103-112.
鄭麗玉. (2006). 認知心理學: 理論與應用:五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
謝清麟, 陳官琳. (2011) 評估的基本概念.生理疾病職能治療學.第七章
謝清麟, 薛漪平, 黃小玲, 邱恩琦, 尤菀薈, 林恭宏, 李士捷. (2015) 發展電腦化符號數字轉換測驗以降低其用於中風及思覺失調患者之練習效應與隨機測量誤差. 台大醫院臨床神經暨行為醫學中心電子報學二十期.