一、英文部份
1.Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A.,“Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication,” MIS Quarterly, 16(2), pp.227-247, 1992.
2.Ajzen, I., From intention to action: A theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl, J. and Bechmann, J. (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior, pp.11-39, New York:Springer-Verlag, 1985.
3.Afuah, A., “Redefining Firm Boundaries in The Face of The Internet:Are Really Shrinking?,” Academy of Management Re-view Journal, 28(1), pp.34-53, 2003.
4.Ageshin, E. A., “E-Procurement at Work: A Case Study,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, Alexandria, 42(1), pp.48-53, 2001.
5.Amabile, T. M. , R. Conti, H. Coon, J. Lazenby, and M Herron, Assessing the work environment for creativity,” Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), pp.1154-1184, 1996.
6.Bandura, A., “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency,” American Psychologist, 37, pp.122-147, 1982.
7.Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall, 1986.
8.Barclay, D., Higgins, C. and Thompson, R., “The partial least squares(PLS)approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration,” Technology Studies, 2(2), pp.285-309, 1995.
9.Barham,L. J.,Gottlieb,B.H.and Kelloway, E. K., “Variables affecting managers'' willingness to grant alternative work arrangements,” Journal of Social Psychology, 138, pp.291–302, 2001.
10.Batt, R. and Valcour, P. M., “Human resources practices and predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover,” Industrial Relations, 42, pp.189–220, 2003.
11.Brynjolfsson, E., “The productivity paradox of information technology,” Communications of the ACM, 36(12), pp.66-77, 1993.
12.Bollen, K.A. and Stine, R. , “Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability”, In Clogg, C.C. (ed.), Sociological Methods, 20, pp.115-140, Oxford:Basil Blackwell, 1990.
13.Busch, T. , “Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), pp.147-158, 1995.
14.Cardona, P., Lawrence, B. S., and Benter, P. M., “The influence of social exchange relationships on organizational citizenship behavior,” Group & Organization Management, 29(2), pp.219-247, 2004.
15.Chakraborty, I., Hu, P. J.-H., & Cui, D., “Examining the effects of cognitive style in individuals'' technology use decision making,” Journal of Decision Support Systems, 45(2), pp.228-241, 2008.
16.Chau, P.Y.K., “An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), pp.186-204, 1996.
17.Chau, P.Y.K., “Influence of Computer Attitude and Self-Efficacy on IT Usage Behavior.(Industry Trend or Event),” Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), pp.26-33, 2001.
18.Chin W., Newsted, P., “Structural Equation Modeling Analysis with Small Samples Using Partial Least Squares [M]”,In Rich Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Sage Publications, pp.307-341, 1999.
19.Cleverley WO.,Harvey RK., “Competitive strategy for successful hospital management,” Hospital AND Health Services Administration, 37(l), pp.53-69, 1992.
20.Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A., “Computer Self-efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test,” MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp.189-211, 1995b.
21.Compeau, D.,Higgins,C.A. and Huff, S., “Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study,” MIS Quarterly, 23(2), pp.145-158, 1999.
22.Cummings, A and Oldham ,G. R., “Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts for the High Potential Employee,” California Management Review, 40(1), pp.22-38, 1997.
23.Daft L. Richard., Organization theory and design, 7th ed, Cincinnati, Ohio:South-Western College Publishing, pp:238-245, 2001.
24.Davis, F.D., “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13(2), pp.319-340, 1989.
25.Davis, F.D.,“User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions, and behavioral impacts,” International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 38(3), pp.475-487, 1993.
26.Dishaw, M.T., Strong, D.M., “Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs,” Information & Management, 36(1), pp.9-21, 1999.
27.Delcourt, M. A. and Kinzie, M.B., “Computer Technologies in Teacher Education: The Measurement of Attitudes and Self-efficacy,” Journal of research and Development, 27(1), pp.35-41, 1993.
28.Durham C C., Knight D., and Locke E. A., “Effects of Leader Role ,Team-set Goal Difficulty, Efficacy, and Tactics on Team Effectiveness,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proceses, 72, pp.203-231, 1997.
29.Edbrooke DL,Stevens VG.,Hibbert CL.,“A new method of accurately identifying costs of individual patients in intensive care: the initial results,” Intensive Care Med, 23, pp.645-50, 1997.
30.Eden,D.and Aviram, A., “Self-efficacy Training to Speed Reemployment:Helping People to Help Themselves,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), pp.352-360, 1993.
31.Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F.,“Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error ,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39-50, 1981.
32.Frazier,Gary and Summers,John, “Interfirm Influence Strategies and Their Application within Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing, 48(3), Summer, pp.43-55, 1984.
33.Gefen, David and Ridings, Catherine M, “IT acceptance,” ACM SIGMIS Database. 34(3), Summer, pp.25-40, 2003.
34.Gist, M.E.,Schwoerer,C. and Rosen, B., “Effects of Alternative Training Methods Onself-efficacy and Performance in Computer Software Training,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), pp.884-891,1989.
35.Giulio Cainelli,Rinaldo Evangelista and Maria Savona, “Innovation and economic performance in services: a firm-level analysis,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 2006, 30(3), pp.435-458, 2005.
36.Gruber Thomas J., Performance Indicators In Handbook of Health Care Material Management Edited by W.L. Scheyer, Rockville Md. Aspen Publishers, pp.53-58, 1985.
37.Halpern NA, Bettes L, Greenstein R. Federal, “ Nationwide intensive care units and healthcare cost,” Crit Care Med, 22:2001-7, 1994.
38.Harrington, R. W., “First hurdle in ADP: discovering its hospital potentials," Hospitals, 38, pp.39-42, 1964.
39.Hill, T., Smith, N. D. and Mann, M. F., “Role of Efficacy Expectations in Predicting, The Decision to Use Advanced Technologies: The Case of Computers,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), pp.307-313, 1987.
40.Hu, P.J., Chau, P.Y.K., Liu Sheng O.R., Tam K.Y.,“Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology,“ Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(2), pp.91–112, 1999.
41.Huarng, F. H., “Hospital Material Management in Taiwan: A Survey,” Hospital Material Management Quarterly, (19)4, pp.71-81, 1998.
42.House, J. S., Work stress and social support, MA: Addition-Wesley, 1981.
43.Hulland, J. S.,“Use of partial least squares(PLS)in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies ,“ Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), pp.195-204, 1999.
44.Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J., “The Effects of Self-Efficacy on Computer Usage”, Omega, 23(6), pp.587-605, 1995.
45.Igbaria, M.,Parasuraman S., & Jack J. B., “A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage,” Journal of Management Information System, 13, pp.127-143, 1996.
46.Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg. P., Cavaye, A., “Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model,” MIS Quarterly, 21(3), pp.279-302, 1997.
47.Johlke, C. M., and Duhan, F. D., “Testing Competing Models of Sales Force Communication,” The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 21(4), New York:Fall 2001, pp.265-277, 2001.
48.Kim, B. G., Park, S. C., & Lee, K. J., “A structural equation modeling of the Internet acceptance in Korea,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(4), pp.425-432, 2007.
49.King, W. R.; Teo, T. S. H., “Key dimensions of facilitators and inhibitors for the strategic use of information technology,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), pp.35-53, 1996.
50.Kinzie, M.B. and Delcourt, M.A.B., Computer Technologies In Teacher Education: The Measurement of Attitudes and Self-efficacy, Chicago: American Educational Research Association, 1991.
51.Kottke, J. L., & Sahrainski, C., “Measurement perceived supervisor support and organizational support,” Educational and Psychology Measurement, 48 , pp.1075-1079, 1988.
52.L.R. Vijayasarathy, “Predicting consumer intentions to use online shopping: the case for an augmented technology acceptance model”, Information and Management, 41(6), pp.747–762, 2004.
53.Lee, Y., Kozar, K, A and Larsen,K R.T., “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, pp.752-780, 2003.
54.Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette,P., “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information & Management, 40(3), pp.191-204, 2003.
55.Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., Xue, Y., “Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institution pressures and the mediating role of top management,” MIS Quarterly, 31(1), pp.59-88, 2007.
56.L. Hossain, A. de Silva, “Exploring user acceptance of technology using social networks,” Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20(1), pp.1-18, 2009.
57.Lucas, Management Information System, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1981.
58.Mager, R.F. , “No self-efficacy, no performance,” Training, April, pp.32-36, 1992.
59.Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., Chin, W.W., “Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources,” The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), pp.86-112, 2001.
60.Mohr, Jakki J.,and Nevin,J., “Communication Strategies in Marketing Channel: A Theoretical Perspective,” Journal of Marketing, 50(1), pp.36-51, 1990.
61.Mohr, Jakki J,Fisher, Robert J and Nevin, John R., “Collaborative Ccommunication in Interfirm Relationships: Moderating Effects of Integration and Control,” Journal of Marketing, 60(3), July, pp.103-113, 1996.
62.Murphy,C.A.,Coover,D.and Owen,S.V., “Development and Validation of the Computer Self-efficacy Scale,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(4), pp.893-899, 1989.
63.Onnen Moerer, Enno Plock,Uchenna Mgbor,Alexandra Schmid, Heinz Schneider, Manfred Bernd Wischnewsky and Hilmar Burchardi, “A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units,” Critical Care, 11:R69, 2007.
64.Ragu-Nathan, B. S.; Apigian, C. H.; Ragu-Nathan, T. S.; Tu, Q., “A path analytic study of the effect of top management support for information systems performance”, Omega 2004, 32(6), pp.459-471, 2004.
65.Salvador Bueno,Jose L. Salmeron., “TAM-Based success modeling in ERP,” Interacting with Computers, 20, pp.515-523, 2008.
66.Sørebø,O., & Eikebrokk, T. R., “Explaining IS continuance in environments where usage is mandatory,” Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), pp.2357-2371, 2008.
67.Tam, S. F., “Self-efficacy as a predictor of computer skills learning outcomes of individuals with physical disabilities,” The Journal of Psychology, 130(1), pp.51-58, 1996.
68.Tanriverdi,H., “Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms,” MIS Quarterly, 30(1), pp.57-77, 2006.
69.Teo, T. S. H.; Ang, J. S. K., “Critical success factors in the alignment of IS plans with business plans,” International Journal of Information Management, 19,(2), pp.173-185, 1999.
70.Teo,T. S.H., Ang, J. S. K., “An examination of major IS planning problems,” International Journal of Inf ormation Management, 21(6), pp.457-470, 2001.
71.Tiong T. Goh, Chern Li Liew., “SMS-based library catalogue system: a preliminary investigation of user acceptance,” The Electronic Library, 27(3), pp. 394-408, 2009.
72.Torkzadeh, G. and Koufteros, X., “Factorial Validity of A Computer Self-efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training,” Educational and Psychological Measurements, 54(3), pp.813-821, 1994.
73.Turban, E., Mclean, E. and Wetherbe, J., Inforation Technology for Management: Making Connections for Strategic Advantage, 7th ed, New York:John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp.117-136, 1999.
74.Venkatesh, V., “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model,”. Information Systems Research, 11(4), pp.342, 2000.
75.Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use:Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, 27(3), pp.451-481, 1996.
76.Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D., “User Acceptance of Information Technology:Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp.425-478, 2003.
77.Wang, Y. S., Wang, Y. M., Lin, H. H. and Tang, T. I., “Determinants of User Acceptance of Internet Banking: An Empirical Study, ” International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), pp.501-519, 2003.
78.Watkins, K. E., “Changing managers'' defensive reasoning about work/family conflicts,” Journal of Management Development, 14, pp.77–88, 1995.
79.Webster, J. and Martocchio, J.J., “Microcomputer Playfulness: Development of A Measure with Workplace Implications,” MIS Quarterly, 16(2), pp.201-226, 1992.
80.Weill, P., “The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector”, Information Systems Research, 3(4), pp.307-333, 1992.
81.Zuboff, S., Technologies That Informate: Implications for Human Resource Management in the Computerized Industrial Workplace, Human Resource Management Trends and Challenges, Boston: Harvard business School Press, 1985.
82.Zumd, R. W., “An empirical investigation of dimensionality of the concept of information,” Decision Science, 9(2), pp.187-195, 1978.
二、中文部份
1.古凱文，溝通過程、溝通品質與技術移轉績效因果關係之探討-以電子資訊產業為例，銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文，2004。2.朱正一，醫務管理制度、組織與實務，台北市：華泰文化，pp.198-245，2005。
3.何雍慶、蔡青姿，”運用PLS方法探討價值創新導入新產品開發之調節角色”，中華管理評論國際學報，12(2)，pp.1-24，2009。
4.李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬譯，Robbins, S. P.著，組織行為學，台北市：華泰文化，pp.313-315，2001。
5.李婉怡、趙珮如，”醫療產業員工對電子病歷之科技接受模式探討－以中南部地區為例”，醫務管理期刊，5(2)，pp.243-269，2004。6.林信惠、黃明祥、王文良，軟體專案管理，台北市：智勝文化，2002。
7.林財丁、林瑞發譯，Robbins, S. P.著，組織行為，台中市：滄海書局，pp.233-238，2003。
8.洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘，”科技接受模式之彙總研究”，資訊管理學報，12(4)，pp.211-234，2005。9.唐高駿、薛貴霞、蔡建和、陳秀丹，”加護病房成本效益”，中華民國急救加護醫學會雜誌，16(4)，pp.139-145，2005。10.許士軍，管理學，台北市：東華書局，pp.362-381，2005。
11.許秉瑜、申元洪、蕭文龍、莊芷萱、陳炫碩，”探討電腦自我效能對於ERP系統成功之影響”，電子商務學報，10(2)， pp.379-402， 2008。12.張正義，南台灣醫院資材物流實施現況探討，高雄醫學大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文，2002。13.張恆瑜，領導者口語溝通內容、領導行為與部屬信任之探討，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，2004。14.張瓊文，全民健保制度與醫院合作經營之研究，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，1999。15.梁憲初，溝通萬歲，台北市：遠流出版社，1996。
16.黃興進，”醫療資訊管理系統研究議題之探討”，資訊管理學報，9(專)，pp.101-116，2002。17.黃興進，醫療資訊管理，嘉義縣：台灣健康資訊管理學會，248-249，2006。
18.黃敏峰，影響使用第三代電話服務之因素，國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文，2006。19.陳楚杰，”管理篇—醫院資材管理”，醫院，29(1)，pp.52-54，1996。20.陳福基、蕭世榮、陳啟元、杜素珍，”影響醫院接受行動護理站之研究－以南部某區域教學醫院為例”，資訊管理學報，12(S)，67-89，2005。21.陳瑛瑛，”衛材安全庫存管理系統在護理站之應用監護”，榮總護理，10(4)，pp.450-453，1993。22.陳湘珠，手術室專科衛材管理流程再造之研究:以某公立醫學中心泌尿外科手術室為例，東海大學工業工程與經營資訊學系碩士論文，2008。23.謝清佳、吳宗璠，資訊管理理論與實務，台北市：智勝文化，2003。
24.謝靜慧，國民中小學教師之電腦焦慮、電腦自我效能、電腦因應策略與電腦素養之相關研究，國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文，2000。25.魏慶國、王舜睦，醫院資材與物流管埋，台北市：華杏出版，2006。
26.鄭乃本、謝明娟，醫療成本及財務管理，台中市：滄海書局，2003。
27.蘇患卿、王淇俐、劉德鴻、陳玫華、李淑美、陳美美，”某醫院降低開刀房專用衛材庫存成本之成效探討”，醫院，33(5)，pp.31-43，2000。
28.蘇喜、莊逸洲、林曉薇、劉家玲，”醫院醫材存貨管理之實證研究”，中華公共衛生雜誌，16(4)，pp.355-364，1997。三、網站資料部份
1.Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust(2009). Annual reports. Retrieved September 28, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://www.leedsth.nhs.uk/corporate/annual_reports.php
2.Pirouz, D. M. (2006). An overview of p artial least squares. Retrieved February 19, 2008, from the World Wide Web: http://www.merage.uci.edu/~dpirouz04/research/pls/PLS.pdf
3.行政院經濟建設委員會(2009)。OECD國家社會發展趨勢。2009年9月24日，
取自：http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0012319