跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.99) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/11/05 23:53
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉珈柔
研究生(外文):Jia-Rou Liu
論文名稱:社會企業結合企業社會責任策略之經營模式對利害 關係人權衡之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Impact between Social Enterprise’s Business Model Combined with Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy and Stakeholder’s Weighting Method
指導教授:李威龍李威龍引用關係
指導教授(外文):Wei-Long Lee
口試委員:李揚、蔡展維
口試委員(外文):Yang Lee、Chan-Wei Tsai
口試日期:2013-07-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄應用科技大學
系所名稱:國際企業研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:58
中文關鍵詞:社會企業、企業社會責任、經營模式、利害關係人權衡方式
外文關鍵詞:Social enterprise、Corporate Social Responsibility、Business Model、Stakeholder’s weighting method
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:882
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:53
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:5
社會企業結合企業社會責任策略之經營模式對利害

由於非營利組織面臨到捐款的減少,並非每個企業體都善盡企業社會責任,以及身心障礙者就業的限制與不足;因此,結合社會價值與獲利能力的組織-社會企業,開始在世界各地如雨後春筍般發展起來。Forsyth (2012)談到社會企業的每一項決策及策略都需要經過深思熟慮地確認是否兼顧到社會面和經濟面,才能稱為經營良好的社會企業。過去研究學者談到社會企業的經營方式及利害關係人理論,然而卻很少有學者將經營模式與利害關係人權衡方式連結起來探討。本研究運用半結構式訪談,訪問並分析6間台灣社會企業,試圖找出社會企業的經營模式對利害關係人權衡方式的影響。研究結果發現社會企業營運時,偏重社會策略;而在營運時,發現資源夥伴和價值認同也是必要的經營要素;另外,社會企業會依據所偏重的社會價值而影響利害關係人利益分派的依序,所以Mitchell et al. (1997)提出之利害關係人權衡方式並不適用於社會企業,研究也進一步提出對國內社會企業學術與實務建議。


關鍵字: 社會企業、企業社會責任、經營模式、利害關係人權衡方式


THE IMPACT BETWEEN SOCIAL ENTERPRISE’S BUSINESS MODEL COMBINED WITH CORPORATION SOCIAL RESBONSIBILITY STRATEGY AND STAKEHOLDER’S WEIGHTING METHOD

Due to the shortage of donation faced by the non-profit organizations and recent lack of social responsibility for the minority, social enterprises combined with social value and economic profits have gained their weights around the world. Forsyth (2012) suggested that a well-run social enterprise need to balance its social and economic benefits. Researches on the social enterprise have stated the relation between the social enterprise’s business model and stakeholders. However, research which deals empirically with the stakeholder’s weighting method is scant. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to explore the relation between the social enterprise’s business model and stakeholder’s weighting method. The research methods used in this paper involve a semi-structured interview concerning business model and stakeholder’s weighting method. Results of this study show that social enterprises focus on social strategy while there are two other factors are also important in the business model; that is, resource partners and value identification. Moreover, the stakeholder’s weighting method proposed by Mitchell et al. (1997) is not a suitable method for social enterprise. To conclude, the results of this study shed light on the dynamic relationship of social enterprise’s business model and stakeholder’s weighting method, and provide social entrepreneurs with a better understanding of how social enterprise’s business model relate to stakeholder’s weighting method.

Key Words:Social Enterprise; Corporate Social Responsibility; Business Model; Stakeholder’s Weighting Method
中文摘要 --------------------------------------------------------------- i
英文摘要 --------------------------------------------------------------- ii
誌謝 --------------------------------------------------------------- iii
目錄 --------------------------------------------------------------- v
表目錄 --------------------------------------------------------------- vi
圖目錄 --------------------------------------------------------------- vii
第一章 緒論----------------------------------------------------------- 1
第一節 研究背景------------------------------------------------------- 1
第二節 研究動機------------------------------------------------------- 4
第三節 研究目的------------------------------------------------------- 6
第四節 研究流程------------------------------------------------------- 7
第二章 文獻探討------------------------------------------------------- 8
第一節 企業社會責任---------------------------------------------------- 8
第二節 經營模式:營利企業與社會企業-------------------------------------- 11
第三節 利害關係人權衡-------------------------------------------------- 16
第四節 企業社會責任與利害關係人之關聯------------------------------------ 19
第三章 研究方法------------------------------------------------------- 24
第一節 研究架構------------------------------------------------------- 25
第二節 研究變數之操作型定義與訪談題目訂立-------------------------------- 26
第三節 資料來源與分析-------------------------------------------------- 28
第四章 研究結果------------------------------------------------------- 29
第一節 個案介紹------------------------------------------------------- 29
第二節 社會企業提升社會福祉之社會策略------------------------------------ 33
第三節 社會企業融合社會策略與商業策略之經營模式--------------------------- 37
第四節 社會企業經營模式對利害關係人權衡之影響----------------------------- 42
第五章 結論與建議----------------------------------------------------- 45
第一節 研究結論------------------------------------------------------ 45
第二節 管理意涵------------------------------------------------------ 46
第三節 研究限制------------------------------------------------------ 47
參考文獻 ------------------------------------------------------------- 48
附錄一 訪談題目----------------------------------------------------- 59
附錄二 訪談同意書---------------------------------------------------- 60

表 目 錄
表1 企業社會責任的定義---------------------------------------------------- 9
表2 企業社會責任之不同論點------------------------------------------------ 10
表3 各學者之商業模式的建構要素--------------------------------------------- 14
表4 營利、非營利組織組織特性及利害關係人特性的異同----------------------------18
表5 OECD多國企業指導綱領------------------------------------------------- 20
表6 操作性定義表與訪談題目之對照表----------------------------------------- 27
表7 公司基本資料表------------------------------------------------------- 28
表8個案公司比較表-------------------------------------------------------- 32
表9其他經營模式要素表----------------------------------------------------- 42
表10各個案公司之利害關係人權衡依據表---------------------------------------- 44
表11命題總表------------------------------------------------------------ 46



圖 目 錄
圖1研究流程圖------------------------------------------------------------ 7
圖2三種特性區分利害關係人--------------------------------------------------17
圖3企業社會責任金字塔指標--------------------------------------------------19
圖4利害關係人的足跡-找尋合適的鞋子------------------------------------------22
圖5概念性架構圖-----------------------------------------------------------25



參考文獻
中文文獻:
林家五、胡宛先 (2011),「非營利組織之組織認定歸類模式:利益關係者理論觀點」,《臺大管理論叢》,第二十二卷第一期,97-134。
吳韻儀 (2007) ,「專訪麥可波特(Michael Porter),台灣沒理由不能成為醫療照護領先者 」,《天下雜誌》,372:40-42。
李郁怡 (2011) ,「企業要永續社會責任與賺錢熟先? 」,《商業週刊雜誌》,1255:40-42。
劉致昕、邱碧玲、黃亞琪 (2012),「拒絕麻省文憑 金融業菁英改種芽菜」,《商業週刊雜誌》,1286:93。
俞慧芸、簡詩宏、林昌亮 (2011),「企業重大危機管理的倫理分析:利害關係人理論之管理意涵」,《組織與管理》,第四卷第二期,107-144。
許淮之、高明瑞、趙平宜 (2011),「非營利組織企業化之困境與挑戰」,《創業管理研究》,第六卷第一期,55-80。
翁望回、黃俊英、劉水深 (1988),「企業正當性之實證研究-社會責任觀點」,《管理評論》,第七卷,153-171。
潭深、劉開明 (2003),「跨國公司的社會責任與中國社會」,中國北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
楊銘賢、吳濟聰、蘇哲仁、高慈薏 (2009),「社會企業經營模式之建構」,《創業管理研究》,第四卷第四期,57-83。
穆罕默德.尤努斯(Muhammad Yunus) 譯:李宛蓉 (2011),「誰說偉大的事都被有錢人做完了!:你可以改變世界,別只是立志賺錢」,大是文化。
經濟合作暨發展組織 (2000),「OECD 國際投資暨多國企業宣言與決議:基本條文」,經濟部投資業務處。

英文文獻:
Ackerman, R. W., and Bauer, R, A. (1976), “Corporate social responsiveness,” Reston, Virginia: Reston Publishing.
Afuah, A. (2004), “Business Models: A Strategic Management Approach,” McGrawHill/Irwin, International Edition.
Afuah, A. and Tucci C. L. (2001), “Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Case,” New York: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin.
Baron D. (2001), “Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Strategy,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7-45.
Boons, F. and Lüdeke-Freund F. (2013), “Business Models for Sustainable Innovation: State-of-the-art and Steps Toward A Research Agenda,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9-19.
Boschee, J. and McClurg, J. (2003), “Toward a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship: Some Important Distinction,” From www.se-alliance.org/better_understanding.pdf.
Bowen, H. R. (1953), “Social Responsibilities of the Businessman,” Harper and Row, New York .
Carroll, A. B. (1979), “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,” Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991), “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders,” Business Horizons, 34, 39-48.
Carroll, G. R.(1993), “A Sociological View on Why Firms Differ,” Strategic Management Jornal, 14, 237-249.
Casciaro, T. and M. J. Piskorski (2005), “Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167–199.
Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L. and Sekaran U. (2001), “Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantative Methods,” Sydney, John Wiley & Son Inc..
Chesbrough, H., and Rosenbloom, R. (2000), “The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spinoff companies,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 529-555.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995), “A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance,” Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
Cooper, D. R. and Schindler, P. S. (2011), “Business Research Methods,” Taiwan: McGraw-Hill/ Irwin, Edition 11.
Davis, K. (1960), “Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities?” California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
Dee, J. G. (1998), “The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship,” From www.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case.
Donaldson, L. (1990), “The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 15, 369-381.
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implication,” Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
Dixon J., Makarov D., and M. David (1998), “Poverty,” Londen & New York: Routledge.
Dubosson-Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., and Pigneur, Y. (2002), “E-Business Model Design, Classification, and Measurements,” Thunderbird International Business Review, 44, 5-23.
Eells, R., and Walton, C. (1961), “Conceptual Foundations of Business,” Homewood, III.: Richard D. Irwin..
Evan, W. M., and Freeman, R. E. (1988), “A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism,” in T. Beauchamp, & N. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 75-93, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Feddersen T. and Gilligan T. (2001), “Saints and Markets: Activists and the Supply of Credence Goods,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 139-171.
Freeman, R. E. (1997), "A Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation," in Beauchamp T.L. and Bowie, N.E. (EdS.), Ethical Theory and Business, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Freeman, R. E. (1984), “Strategy Management: A Stakeholder Approach,” Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1970), “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits,” New York Times Magazine, September 13.
Friedman, M. (1962), “Capitalism and Freedom,” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Frooman, J. S. (1999), “Stakeholder Influence Strategy,” Academy of Management Review, 24, 191-250.
Goodpaster, K. E. (1991), “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis,” Business Ethics Quarterly, 1, 53-74.
Gareth R. Jones and Charles W. Hill (2010), “Theory of Strategic Management,” South-Western, International Edition.
Hamel, G. (2000), “Leading the Revolution,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Hamish Forsyth (2012), “How to build a social enterprise that makes money,” Guardian, October 22.
Hart S. (1995), “A Natural Resource-based View of the Firm,” Academy of Management Review, 22, 986-1014.
Hay, R. D., Gray, E. R., and Gates, J. E. (1976), “Business and Society,” Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing.
Hill, C. W., Jones and Thomas M. (1992), “Stakeholder-Agency Theory,” Journal of Management Studies, 20, 131-155.
Husted, B. W., and Allen, D. B. (2007), “Corporate Social Strategy in Multinational Enterprises: Antecedents and Value Creation,” Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 345-361.Freeman, 1997
Idris, F., Abdullah, M., Idris, M. A. and Hussain, N. (2003), “Integrating Resource-based View and Stakeholder Theory in Developing the Malaysian Excellence Model: A Conceptual Framework,” Singapore Management Review, 25, 91-109.
Jamali, D. and Mirshak, R. (2006), “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a developing country context,” Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 243-262.
Jenny Purt (2012), “Live discussion: How can big businesses collaborate with social enterprises?,” Guardian., March 22.
Jennings P. and Zandbergen P. (1995), “Ecologically Sustainable Organizations: An Institutional Approach,” Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015-1052.
Jones, G. R. and Hill C. W. (2010), “Theory of Strategic Management,” South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Jones, T. M., Felps, W. & Bigley, G. A. (2007), “Ethical Theory and Stakeholder-Related Decision: The Role of Stakeholder Culture,” Academy of Management Review, 32, 137-155.
Jones, T. M. (1995), “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics,” Academy of Management Review, 20, 404-437.
Kerlinger, F. N., and Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Holt, NY: Harcourt College Publishers.
Langtry, B. (1994), “Stakeholders and The Moral Responsibility of Business,” Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 431-443.
Lee, M. D. P. (2008), “A Review of the Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Evolutionary Path and the Road Ahead,” International Journal of Management Review, 10, 53-73.
Litz, R. A. (1996), “A Resource-Based-View of the Socially Responnsible Firm: Stakeholder Interdependence, Ethical Awareness, and Issue Responsiveness as Strategic Assets, Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1355-1363.
Magretta, J. (2002). "Why Business Models Matter," Harvard Business Review, 80, 86-92.
Mair J. and Marti, I. (2006), “Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction and Delight,” Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44.
Manne, H., and Wallich, H. C. (1972), “The Modern Corporation and social responsibility,” Washington, D.C: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
McGuire, J. W. (1963), “Business and society,” New York- McGraw-Hill.
McWilliams A. and Siegel D. (2001), “Corporate Social Resposibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 26, 117-127.
McWilliams A., Van Fleet D. D. and Cory K. (2002), “Raising Rivals’ Costs Through Political Strategy: An Extension of the Resource-based Theory,” Journal of Management Studies, 39, 707-723.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J. (1997), “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts,” Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
Morimoto, R., Ash, J., and Hope, C. (2005), “Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice, “ Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 315-325.
Oliver Sheldon (1924), “The Philosophy of Management,” London, UK: Sir Issac Pitman & Sons Press.
Oliver C, and Holzinger I. (2008), “The Effectiveness of Strategic Political Management: A Dynamic Capabilities Framework,” Academay of Management Review, 33, 496-520.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., and Rynes, S. L. (2003), “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Metaanalysis,” Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. and Tucci, C. L. (2005), “Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 1-43.
Osterwalder, A. and Pigneur Y. (2012), “Business Model Generation,” John Wiley & Son Inc., Hoboken, New Jersy.
Pestoff, V. A. (1998), “Beyond the Market and State: Social Enterprises and Civil Democracy in a Welfare Society,” Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
Peter Weill and Michael R. Vitale (2001), “Place to Space: Migrating to E-business Model,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Porter, M. E. and Kramer M. R. (2006), “Strategy & Society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility,” Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-92.a
Preffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978), “The External Control of Organazations: A Resource Dependence Perspective,” New York: Harper and Row.
Rappa, M. (2000), “Business models on theWeb,” From http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.pdf
Rowley, T. and Berman, S. L. (2000), “A Brand new Brand of Corporate Social Performance,” Business and Society Review, 39, 397-418.
Russo MV and Fouts PA. (1997), “A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability,” Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.
Sheppard, B. H., and Tuchinsky, M. (1996), “Interfirm Relationships: A Grammar of Paris,” in B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 331-373. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Steiner, G. A. (1972), “Social policies for business,” California Management
Review, 15, 17-24.
Stigson, B. (2006), “Green Business Equals Good Business, World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Scientific American (Special Advertising Section),” December, 2006. Retrieved on March 9, 2007 from http://www.sciam.com/greenbiz/4.cfm
Vivek A. (2012), “Success Through Social Responsibility: A Unique Business Model of Jaipur Rugs Foundation,” The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 11, 52-59.
Waldman D. A., Berson Y. and Pearce C. L. (2005), “Toward an Understanding of Shared Vision and Organizational Learning: The Complementary Roles of Vertical and Shared Leadership,” Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HI.
Weill, P., and Vitale, M.R. (2001), “Place to Space: Migrating to eBusiness Models,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top