跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/07 22:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:許秋娥
研究生(外文):Chiu-E Hsu
論文名稱:以決策樹的模型比較不同膽囊切除手術之成本效益分析
論文名稱(外文):Cost Utility Analysis for Cholecystectomy By Using Decision-Tree Model
指導教授:李金德李金德引用關係
指導教授(外文):King-Teh Lee
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:高雄醫學大學
系所名稱:醫務管理學研究所碩士在職專班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:醫管學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:97
語文別:中文
論文頁數:129
中文關鍵詞:膽囊結石剖腹式膽囊切除術腹腔鏡膽囊切除術SF-36決策樹QALY成本效益分析
外文關鍵詞:Cholelithiasisopen cholecystectomylaparoscopic cholecystectomySF-36decision treeQALYcost effectiveness
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:1576
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
研究目的
目前膽石症仍是腹部常見的疾病之一。本研究將針對膽囊切除術做一系統性、全面性之探討,並比較腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(LC)及剖腹式膽囊切除術(OC)之成本效益分析。
研究方法與材料
本研究樣本醫院採前瞻性縱貫性之研究設計,從 2007年05月至 2008年03月間,接受OC與LC之患者為研究樣本,其蒐集之個案數共259例。醫療直接成本的部分,LC樣本數共223例,OC樣本數共36例;間接成本的部分,亦各為96例及36例。分析不同治療模式、人口特質、臨床特質等變項,是否影響醫療費用分布及病患術後自覺健康狀態的SF-36 分數,並以經濟評估計算兩種治療模式之成本效用比值,且對成本效益面進行單變量敏感度分析;另使用1996年01月至2004年12月之全民健康保險研究資料庫中之「住院醫療費用清單明細檔」與「醫事機構基本資料檔」,為與樣本醫院進行比較之全國資料,其研究樣本OC個案共 32535位、LC個案共 80335位。。
研究結果
檢測結果顯示樣本醫院之病患屬性與全國健保資料庫並無顯著差異性,因此樣本醫院足以代表母群體來做為OC與LC病患醫療資源耗用風險因子之探討。本研究之結果呈現選擇OC病患平均年齡為60.88 ± 15.30歲、LC病患平均年齡為53.49 ± 14.19歲,其中OC vs LC於性別、ASA分類、合併症指數、年齡、手術時間、麻醉時間與平均住院天數對選擇手術切除方式上有顯著差異(P<0.05)。
以線性複迴歸分析的統計方式,探討不同術式對平均住院天數及醫療費用耗用之因素,發現在住院天數方面影響OC之預測因子為「入院形式」、「手術時間」(Adjusted R2=0.461);但影響LC之預測因子卻為「入院形式」、「合併症指數」(Adjusted R2=0.334)。醫療費用之耗用方面,結果顯示影響OC之預測因子為「平均住院天數」(Adjusted R2=0.769);而影響LC之重要因子為「平均住院天數」,其它影響變項依重要程度依序為入院形式、年齡、手術時間(Adjusted R2=0.808)。
在成本效益分析方面直接成本部分:將直接成本與間接成本加總後之醫療總成本分別為OC:89598.23元(N=36)、LC:53947.07元(N=223)。
成本效用方面OC與LC分別可提供19.49 QALY、30.91 QALY;以社會學及病患觀點進行成本效益探討,因此除了醫療直接成本外還納入間接成本考量,所得結果顯示相較於OC病患平均住院天數(10.31 ± 4.75天)與復原時間(13.81 ± 8.36天),選擇LC之病患完全復原所需的住院天數與時間明顯下降(平均住院天數:4.05 ± 3.28天、復原時間:6.34 ± 3.05天),由此可知OC比LC具有較高的增加成本效益比,亦即每增加1年品質調整後存活人年(QALY)的成本費用為3121.27元。經過單變量敏感度分析(One-way sensitivity Analysis)發現不同年齡層與性別,是影響成本效益之重要因素。
結論與建議
1、 剖腹式膽囊切除術之病患年齡偏高且男性多於女性;反之,腹腔鏡膽囊切術之病患則是年齡較輕且女性多於男性。
2、 年齡、入院形式、合併症指數、手術時間與平均住院天數皆為影響醫療資源耗用之風險因子,其中以平均住院天數為最重要因素為,其次為入院形式(門診/急診),而影響平均住院天數卻是入院形式。
3、 本研究是以社會學及病患觀點進行成本效益探討,所得結果顯示LC病患比OC病患術後具有較佳的生活品質,且OC比LC病患每增加1年品質調整後存活人年的成本費用為3121.27元,故LC比OC是較具成本效益的。
4、 腹腔鏡膽囊切除術是較具成本效益的,建議政府與醫療提供者應該為病患規劃出完善的醫療資訊與健康照護療程。
Purpose
Cholelithiasis is still the most common abdominal disease among Taiwanese people. The aims of this study were characterized by a systemic and organized research in comparing outcome cost-effectiveness of both laparoscopic and conventional open cholecystectomy through new statistic method.
Methods
This prospective survey started from May 2007 to March 2008, we collected 259 cases which underwent conventional open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) from the sampling hospital. In the study of direct medical cost/expense, we collected 223 cases for LC and 36 cases for OC; in the study of indirect medical cost/expense we collect 96 cases and 36 cases respectively. We compared the therapeutic model, demographic and clinical variables to identify whether they can affect medical expenditure or the scoring system of SF-36; nevertheless, we also used The Bureau of National Health Insurance, (BNHI) data for January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2004 (n=32535 for OC and n=80335 for LC).
Results
The result showed that data collected from sampling hospital had no difference while comparing with the data collected from BNHI. In the characteristics of age between OC and LC. LC patients were younger than OC. After controlling for age, comorbidity, ASA status, operation time, anesthetic time, length of stay and sex, we had significant result (p< 0.05).
We use linear regression to evaluate the association between length of hospital stay and medical expenditures. We found that the predicting factors which affected the length of hospital stay in OC patients were mode of admission and operation time (Adjusted R2=0.461). While the predicting factors which affected the length of hospital stay in LC patients were mode of admission and comorbidity, CCI (Adjusted R2=0.334). In the study of medical expenditures, the results showed the predicting factors which affected the medical expenditures in OC patients was Average Length Of Stay, ALOS (Adjusted R2=0.769), where affecting the LC group were the Average Length Of Stay, ALOS; and the others factors including mode of admission, age and operation time (Adjusted R2=0.808).
In the study of cost effectiveness, the QALY for OC and LC were 19.49 and 30.91 respectively. In comparing the length of hospital stay and recovery time, OC group patient had a longer length of stay and recovery time while comparing with LC group (ALOS =10.31±4.75 days, recovery= 13.81±8.36 days for OC and ALOS=4.05±3.28 days, recovery= 6.34±3.05 days for LC).We concluded that OC had higher cost expenditure than LC, that is, in increasing per QALY cost $3,121.27 and after One-way sensitivity Analysis we found that the most important factors affecting cost effectiveness were age and sex.
Conclusions
1. There is a prevalence of higher proportion of older male patients in the OC group; while in the LC group had a higher proportion of younger female.
2. Age, mode of admission, comorbidity, operation time and ALOS were the risk factors affecting medical expenditures, and especially in the ALOS.
3. This study was based on sociology and patients point of view on discussing cost effectiveness. Our results showed that LC group had a better post operative quality of life (QOL) than that of OC patients. We also found that every increasing QALY would raise the cost of $3,121.27 in each patient. Thus we can conclude that LC had higher cost effectiveness than OC.
4. There is a higher cost effectiveness in the LC group in our study, so we suggest the government and other medical provider planned for a perfect scheme of medical information medical management programs for their patients.
目 錄

中文摘要........................................................................................................................I
Abstract........................................................................................................................III
誌 謝……………………………………………………………………………......Ⅵ
目 錄........................................................................................................................VII
表目錄........................................................................................................................ IX
圖目錄........................................................................................................................ XI
附 錄……………………………………………………………………………....XII
第一章 緒論..................................................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機......................................................................................1
第二節 研究目的..................................................................................................5
第三節 預期貢獻..................................................................................................6
第四節 名詞解釋..................................................................................................8
第五節 各章節之安排…………………………………………………………11
第二章 文獻探討........................................................................................................12
第一節 膽結石流行病學之描述........................................................................12
第二節 膽囊結石手術治療與其它相關治療…………………………………16
第三節 經濟學評估............................................................................................20
第四節 健康相關生活品質與效用....................................................................28
第五節 膽囊結石之醫療利用與成本效益……………………………………34
第三章 研究方法........................................................................................................46
第一節 研究概念架構及研究假說....................................................................46
第二節 研究設計和研究樣本............................................................................49
第三節 研究材料................................................................................................54
第四節 研究變項................................................................................................55
第五節 分析計畫................................................................................................61
第四章 研究結果........................................................................................................66
第一節 樣本醫院與全國健保資料庫之分析結果............................................66
第二節 樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術與腹腔鏡膽囊切除術之成本效益分析.............................................................................................................80
第三節 樣本醫院膽囊切除術成本效益之單變量敏感度分析結果................84
第五章 討論與結論....................................................................................................86
第一節 研究目的和研究假說討論....................................................................86
第二節 結論與建議............................................................................................93
第三節 研究限制及未來研究方向....................................................................96
參考文獻......................................................................................................................98
中文文獻………………………………………………………………………..98
英文文獻…………………………………………………………...………….100













表目錄

表2-3-1 健康照護經濟分析模式..............................................................................23
表2-4-1 SF-36偏好導向運算法則的彙總................................................................33
表2-5-1 膽囊切除手術方式選擇、醫療資源耗用、間接成本之文獻彙整.........39
表2-5-1 膽囊切除手術方式選擇、醫療資源耗用、間接成本之文獻彙整(續)...40
表2-5-2 成本效益相關之文獻彙整.........................................................................43
表2-5-2 成本效益相關之文獻彙整(續).............................................................44
表3-4-1 樣本醫院風險因子屬性及資料來源.........................................................56
表3-4-2 樣本醫院風險因子屬性及資料來源(續).............................................57
表3-4-3 樣本醫院醫療資源耗用變項屬性及資料來源.........................................58
表3-4-4 樣本醫院醫療資源耗用與效用變項屬性及資料來源.............................59
表3-4-5 NHIRD 風險因子屬性及資料來源..........................................................60
表3-5-1 流行病學變項與實用性數值間對應的轉移機率.....................................63
表4-1-1 比較兩個資料庫剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡式膽囊切除術病患屬性之差異..............................................................................................................................67
表4-1-2 比較樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術病患之屬性結果(一)..........................................................................................................................68
表4-1-3 比較樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術病患之屬性結果(二)...........................................................................................................................69
表4-1-4 影響樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術平均住院天數之
相關因素---單變量變異數分析(一).......................................................................70
表4-1-5 影響樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術平均住院天數之
相關因素---單變量變異數分析(二).......................................................................71

表4-1-6 比較樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術平均住院天數之
影響因---複迴歸分析..................................................................................................74
表4-1-7 影響樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術醫療總費用之相關因素---單變量變異數分析(ㄧ)..........................................................................75
表4-1-8 影響樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術醫療總費用之相關因素---單變量變異數分析(二)..........................................................................76
表4-1-9 比較樣本醫院剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術醫療總費用之影響因素---複迴歸分析..................................................................................................79
表4-2-1 兩種手術治療模式之ICUR計算.............................................................81
表4-2-2 比較剖腹式膽囊切除術及腹腔鏡膽囊切除術術後六個月SF-36構面分數
……………………………………………………………………………..82
表4-3-1 兩種手術治療模式在不同年齡ICUR計算之單變量敏感度分析............84
表4-3-2 兩種手術治療模式在不同性別ICUR計算之單變量敏感度分析............85













圖目錄

圖2-1-1 說明並比較可能事件處置之決策樹.........................................................15
圖3-1-1 研究概念架構圖.........................................................................................47
圖3-2-1 樣本醫院資料處理流程圖.........................................................................52
圖3-2-2 全國健保資料庫處理流程圖.....................................................................53
圖3-5-1 國外之決策樹模型.....................................................................................62
圖4-2-1 樣本醫院決策樹模型.................................................................................80
圖4-2-2 兩種治療模式SF-36之構面分數……………..…………………………..83
















附 錄


附錄一 中文版SF-36 健康量表問卷......................................................................110
附錄二 膽結石病患病歷審查資料表......................................................................113
附錄三 成本估算問卷..............................................................................................115
附錄四 合併症ICD-9-CM診斷碼定義表................................................................116
中文文獻

石美春(1996)。成本效益、成本效果及成本效用分析法之簡介.醫院29(5),9-13。
成佳憲(2002)。癌症診療成本與效果之分析研究-以癌症專科醫院鼻咽癌病人為例。國立台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。
李佳霙(1997)。探討中部五縣市民眾健康狀況及醫療利用之研究。中國醫藥學
院環境醫學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
李金德(2003)。醫師手術量與療效及資源耗用之關係—以腹腔鏡膽囊切除手術為例。高雄醫學大學公共衛生學研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
沈金翰(1999)。腹腔鏡膽囊切除術之膽道相關併發症。臨床醫學,44(6),409-411。李易蓁(1997)。中文版SF-36 在臨床施測之初探。高雄醫學院公共衛生研究所
碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
林妍如、陳金淵譯 (2006)。 健康照護機構財務管理 (初 ed.): 雙葉書廊。
周文鈺(2003)。視訊輔助胸腔鏡手術(VATS)應用於第一次原發性自發性氣胸之成本效果分析。中國醫藥學院醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。
姚開屏 (2002)。健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介。 台灣醫學,6(2),
183-192。
姜桂容 (1997)。談膽石症。台北市藥師公會會刊,15(3),16-23。
陳照文、饒忻、王孔政(2006)。「代理人協商態度推測模型之建立與評估」,中華民國資訊學會通訊(Communications of IICM),第9卷,第2期,第1-12頁。
黃興睦(1996)。腹腔鏡膽囊切除術。臨床醫學,38(1),9-11。
張愷芬(2002)。資料採礦-保險業商品市場分析,淡江大學資訊工程學系碩士論文。
郭昱瑩 (2007)。 成本效益分析 (初 ed.): 華泰文化。
曾旭民、盧瑞芬、蔡益堅 (2003)。國人生活品質測量(II):SF-36 台灣版的常模與效度檢測。台灣衛誌, 22(6), 512-518。


楊宜樺、楊銘欽、季瑋珠(1998)。乳癌確診後之初期罹病成本與相關因素之探討—以台大醫院病患為例。中華衛誌, 17(3), 242-252。
潘昭賢、葉瑞徽譯 (2006)。作業研究 (初 ed.):滄海書局。
盧瑞芬、謝啟瑞 (2005)。 醫療經濟學 (9 ed.):學富文化。
蘇正熙、雷永耀、彭芳谷(1997)。膽道結石症(初 ed.):眾光文化.
蘇顏洲 (2003)。 乳癌患者治療成本效用與其生活品質之探討。私立中國醫藥學院醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。
行政院衛生署 (2005)。衛生統計資訊網網址www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/index 93年台灣地區醫院醫事人員數。























英文文獻

Ahmad N. Z. Byrnes A G. Naqvi A S. A.(2008). A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 22:1928–1934
Anthony RH.(1990). The best decision I ever made. J Am Vet Med Assoc, Jan 1;196(1):48-51.
Bass EB, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD.(1993). Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery,165:466–71.
Berggren U, Zethraeus N, Arvidsson D.(1996). A cost-minimizationof laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery,172:305–10.
Beckingham IJ.(2001). ABC of diseases of liver, pancreas, and biliary system. Gallstone disease.BMJ,13;322(7278):91-94.
Benjamin K. Poulose, Ted Speroff, Michael D. Holzman.(2007). Optimizing Choledocholithiasis Management. A Cost-effectiveness Analysis. Arch Surg, 142:43-48.
Blomqvist P, Ljung H, Nilsson E, Ekbom A. (2000).Cholecystectomy in Sweden 1989 and 1994:Long admissions assessed by the inpatient registry. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology ,53, 1174–1180
Brooks R.(1996). EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy.37:53-72.
Brown M.M, Brown G.C,Sharma S.(2005).Evidance-Based to Value-Based Medicine.15:258.
Bult JR, Hunink MGM, Tsevat J, Weinstein MC.(1998). Heterogeneity in the relationship between the time trade-off and Short Form-36 for HIV infected and primary care patients. Med Care,36:523-532.
Bureau of National Health Insurance. National health insurance annual statistical report for 1998. Taipei: Bureau of National Health Insurance; 1999.
Campbell , B. (1992) . Assessment of attitudes toward cost-containment needs. Nursing Economic, 10(6), 397-401.


Chung WC,Lee CT, Fan PL, Tzeng DS, Chiu HC.(2006). Operating Room Cost of Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy:Does Surgery Volume Matter? Kaohsiung J Med Sci,22:126–34.
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases,40(5),373-83.
Cohen J. (1988). The t test for means. In: L Erlbaum, editor. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. 19–74.
Coupe VM, Veenhof C, van Tulder MW, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW, Van den Ende CH.(2007) The cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Ann Rheum Dis, 66(2): 215-221.
Cook J, Richardson J, Street A.(1994). A cost utility analysis oftreatment options for gallstone disease: Methodological issues and results. Health Econ,3:157–68.
Cox MR, Wilson TG, Luck AJ, Jeans PL, Padbury RT, Toouli J .(1993). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder.Ann Surg, 218: 630–634.
Csikesz NG, Tseng JF, Shah SA.(2008). Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis.Surgery,Aug;144(2):283-9.
Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, et al.(1991). The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Surg,161:385–387.
Cullen DJ, Nemeskal AR, Cooper JB, et al.(1992). Effect of pulse oximetry, age, and ASA physical status on the frequency of patients admitted unexpectedly to a postoperative intensive care unit and the severity of their anesthesia-related complications. Anesth Analg,74:181–8.
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA.(1992). Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.J Clin Epidemiol,45:613–9.
Donovan JM and Carney MC.(1991). Physical-chemical basis of gallstone formation.Gastroenterol Clin N Am,20:-126.
Dolan P.(1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care,35:1095-1108.

Devlin N, Parkin D(2004). Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? Abinary choice analysis. Health Econ, 13:437-452.
Drummond MF, O''Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW.(1997). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd edition. Oxford, NY, Oxford University Press.
Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Goldsmith CH, Zhu Z, DePauw S, Denton M, Boyle M.(2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Med Care, 40:113-128.
Fletcher DR. (1995). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what national benefits have been achieved and at what cost? The Medical Journal of Australia.163:535–8.
Finan KR, Leeth RR, Whitley BM, Klapow JC, Hawn MT.(2006). Improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life after cholecystectomy. Am J Surg, 192: 196-202.
Forrest JB, Rehder K, Cahalan MK, et al.(1992). Multicenter study of general anesthesia. III. Predictors of severe perioperativeadverse outcomes. Anesthesiology,76:3–15.
Garber AM, Phelps CE.(1997). Economic foundation of cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ,16:1-31.
Garbuz DS, Xu M, Sayre EC.(2006). Patients'' outcome after total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score.J Arthroplasty, Oct;21(7):998-1004.
Giger U, Michel JM, Vonlanthen R, Becker K, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L.(2005). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: indication, technique, risk and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 390: 373-380.
Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC.(1996).Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY, Oxford University Press.
Grace PA, Quereshi A, Coleman J, Keane R, McEntee G, Broe P, Osborne H, Bouchier-Hayes D. (1991). Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg, 78: 160–162.
Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM.(1993).The RAND 36 item health survey 1.0. Health Economics,2:217-227.
Lien HH, Huang CC, Wang PC, Chen YH, Huang CS, Lin TL, Tsai MC(2007). Validation Assessment of the Chinese (Taiwan) Version of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index for Patients with Symptomatic Gallstone Disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, Aug;17(4):429-34.
Hirose M, Imanaka Y, Ishizaki T, Sekimoto M, Harada Y, Kuwabara K, Hayashida K, Oh EH, Evans SE.(2005).Profiling hospital performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the administrative data of four teaching hospitals in Japan. World J Surg, 29: 429-436.
Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Fletcher DR, Ridout SC, Knuiman MW.(2004). Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on hospital utilization. ANZ Journal of Surgery,74:222-228.
Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuiman MW, Fletcher DR, Ridout SC.(2006). Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg, 93: 844-853.
Lang HC, Chi C, Liu CM.(2004). Impact of the case payment reimbursement method on the utilization and costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Health Policy, 67,195–206.
JÖ nsson B and Zethraeus N.(2000). Costs and benefits of laparoscopic surgery-a review of the literature. Eur J Surg Suppl, 585: 48-56.
Kaplan RM, Anderson JP.(1988). A general health policy model: update and applications. Health Serv Res, 23:203-235.
Keats AS.(1978).The ASA classifications of physical status - a recapitulation. Anesthesiology,49: 233-6.
Kim WR, Gores GJ, Benson JT, Therneau TM, Melton LJ 3rd.(2005). Mortality and Hospital Utilization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States. Gastroenterology, Aug;129(2):486-93.
Konstadoulakis MM, Antonakis PT, Karatzikos G, Alexakis N, Leandros E(2004). Intraoperative findings and postoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Greek experience with 5,539 patients in a single center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 14:31-36.

Kum CK, Goh PM, Isaac JR, Tekant Y, Ngoi SS. (1994). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg, 81:1651–1654.
Lang HC, Chi C, Liu CM.(2004). Impact of the case payment reimbursement method on the utilization and costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Health Policy,67:195–206.
Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX.(1992). How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization?Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economicevaluations. Cmaj, 146:473-481.
Lee KT, Chang WT, Huang MC, et al.(2004) Influence of surgeon volume on clinical and economic outcomes of laparoscopiccholecystectomy. Dig Surg,21:406–12.
Legorreta AP, Silber JH, Costantino GN, Kobylinski RW, Zatz SL.(1993). Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.[see comment]. JAMA, 270:1429-1432.
Lin IP.(1996). A medical outcome study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: using a medical center and a regional hospital data. Master Thesis. Taichung: China Medical College.
Lo CM, Liu CL, Lai EC, Fan ST, Wong J. (1996). Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg ,223: 37–42.
Lu FH,Chang CJ.(1991). A study on the association of serum lipid and subclinical gall bladder stone. Chin J Fam Med,1:193-200.
Lyass, S., Perry, Y., Venturero, M., Muggia-Sullam, M., Eid, A., Durst, A. et al. (2000). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what does affect the outcome? A retrospective multifactorial regression analysis. Surgical Endoscopy, 14, 661-665.
Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B, et al.(1997).Hospital costs and severity of illness in three types of elective surgery. Anesthesiology,86:92–100.
Mack,M.J. (2001).Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery.JAMA, 285: 568-572.
Mandelblatt JS, Fryback DG, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. (1997).Assessing the Effectiveness of Health Interventions for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. J Gen Intern Med, 12(9), 551-558.
McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Raczek A.E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form healthsurvey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring
physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31(3), 247-263.
McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Lu J.F.R., Sherbourne C.D. (1994). The MOS 36-item
short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Test of data quality, scaling assumptions,
and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32(4), 40-66.
McMahon AJ, Baxter JN, Anderson JR et al.(1994). Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. Lancet, 343: 135–138.
McMahon, A. J., Fischbacher, C. M., Frame, S. H., & MacLeod, M. C. (2000). Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a population-based study. [erratum appears in Lancet, 2001 Jan 27;357(9252):316]. Lancet,356(9242),1632-7.
Metcalfe MS, Ong T, Bruening MH, Iswariah H, Wemyss-Holden SA,Maddern GJ.(2004). Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram amatter of routine? The American Journal of Surgery,187:475-481.
Millat B, Borie F, Decker G.(2000). Treatment of choledocholithiasis:therapeutic ERCP versus peroperative extraction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Gastroenterologica Belgica, 63:301-303.
Muhe E. (1986). Die erste Cholecystektomie durch das Laparoskop,Langenbeck_s Arch. Klin. Chir,369:804.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Health Select Committee Inquiry: submission of supplementary evidence. Paper 2 of 2. http://www.niceorguk/pageaspx?o=27652 [accessed June10, 2004] 2002.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE Guidance on the use of orlistat for the treatment of obesity in adults. Technology Appraisal Guidance. http://www.niceorguk/pageaspx?o=15712 [accessed June 10, 2004] 2002.
Nichol M.B., Sengupta N., Globe DR. (2001). Evaluating Quality-Adjusted Life Years: Estimation of the Health Utility Index (HUI2) from the SF-36. Med Decis Making, 21, 105-112.
NIH consensus conference.(1993). Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA: The Journal of American Medical Association,269:1018–24.
Nilsson E, Ros A, Rahmqvist M, Bäckman K, Carlsson P.(2004). Cholecystectomy: costs and health-related quality of life: a comparison of two techniques. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Volume 16, Number 6: pp. 473–482.


Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, et al.(2004). Patient reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86: 801-809.
Pedersen, G., Hoem, D., & ndren-Sandberg, A. (2002). Influence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the prevalence of operations for gallstones in Norway. European Journal of Surgery,16,464-9.
Pickard AS., Wang Z., Walton SM., Lee TA. (2005). Are decisions using cost-utility
analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm? Health And Quality Of Life Outcomes, 3, 11-19.
Pointer, D. D., & Pointer, T. K. (1989).Case -based prospective, price,reimbursement. Nursing Management,20(4), 30-34.
Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, Blom M, Ryynänen OP, Roine RP.(2007).Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery interms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthopaedica,78 (1): 108–115.
Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Oribe V, Tejada IL, Barrios B, Garay I.(2005). Influence of age and gender on quality of life outcomes after cholecystectomy. Qual Life Res, 14: 815-825.
Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA.(2005)Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data.Med Care, Nov;43(11):1130-9.
Riley, G., Lubitz, J., Gornick, M., Mentnech, R., Eggers, P., & McBean, M. (1993). Medicare beneficiaries: adverse outcomes after hospitalization for eight procedures. Medical Care,31(10),921-49.
Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP(1998). Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyfor common bile duct stones. The Lancet, 251:159-161.
Rosenmüller M, Haapamäki MM, Nordin P, Stenlund H, Nilsson E(2007). Cholecystectomy in Sweden 2000-2003: a nationwide study on procedures, patient characteristics, and mortality.BMC Gastroenterol, Aug 17;7:35.
Robinson, R.(1993). Economic evaluation and health care: Cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ, 11; 307(6907): 793-5.
Robinson, R.(1993). Economic evaluation and health care: Cost-Utility analysis. BMJ, 11; 307(6908): 859-862.
Russell, J. C., Walsh, S. J., Mattie, A. S., & Lynch, J. T. (1996). Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry. Archives of Surgery, 131(4), 382-388.
Sandberg WS, Canty T, Sokal SM, Daily B, Berger DL.(2006). Financial and operational impact of a direct-from-PACU discharge pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Surgery, 140: 372-378.
Sarin SK, Negi VS, Dewan R, Sasan S, Saraya A.(1995). High familial prevalenece of gallstones in the first-degree relatives of gallstones patients. Hepatology,22: 138-141.
Schiphorst Anandi H. W. A Marc G. H. Besselink A Djamila Boerma A (2008) .Timing of cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc, 22:2046–2050.
Secco GB, Cataletti M, Bonfante P, Baldi E, Davini MD, Biasotti B, Ravera G, Ferraris R.(2002). Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study.Chir Ital, Sep-Oct;54(5):685-92.
Sekimoto M, Imanaka Y, Hirose M, Ishizaki T, Murakami G, Fukata Y.(2006). Impact of treatment policies on patient outcomes and resource utilization in acute cholecystitis in Japanese hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res, 6: 40-46.
SF-36 Latest News.(1999). [Online]. Available: http://www.sf-36.com/news.
Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscil RN, Schwartz SJ, Williams SV(1996). Mortality and complications associatedwith laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Annuals of Surgery, 224:609-620.
Shmueli A. (1998). The SF-36 profile and health-related quality of life:an interpretive analysis. Qual Life Res, 7, 187-195.
Shmueli A. (2004). The Relationship between the Visual Analog Scale and the SF-36 Scales in the General Population: An Update Med Decis Making, 24, 61-63.



Srivastava A, Srinivas G, Misra MC, Pandav CS, Seenu V, Goyal A.(2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. A randomized trial.Int J Technol Assess Health Care, Fall;17(4):497-502.
Su CH,Lui WY Lui,and P´eng FK.(1992). Relative prevalence of gallstone disease in Taiwan- A Nationwide Cooperative Study. Dig Dis Sci,37:764-768.
Teerawattananon Y, Mugford M.(2005). Is it worth offering a routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy in developing countries? A Thailand case study. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 3:10.
Topcu O, Karakayali F, Kuzu MA, Ozdemir S, Erverdi N, Elhan A, Aras N.(2002).Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc, 17:291-295.
Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. (1996). Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utility Index Mark 2. Med Care,34:702-722.
Towse A, Pritchard C(2002). National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Is economic appraisal working?Pharmacoeconomics, 20 Suppl 3:95-105.
Vagenas K, Karamanakos SN, Spyropoulos C, Panagiotopoulos S, Karanikolas M, Stavropoulos M.(2006). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report from a single center. World J Gastroenterol, 12(24): 3887-3890.
Veerle M H Coupe´, Cindy Veenhof, Maurits W van Tulder, Joost Dekker, Johannes W J Bijlsma, Cornelia H M Van den Ende .(2007). The cost effectiveness of behavioural graded activity in patients with osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee. Ann Rheum Dis,66:215–221.
Wang L, Ker CC, Chen JS, Ko YC. (1996). Cost and effectiveness assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences,12:150–8.
Weinstein MC, Stason WB.(1977). Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practice. N Engl J Med, Mar 31;296(13):716-21.
Wenner J, Graffiner G, Lindell G.(1995). A financial analysis of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy,9:702–5.

World Health Organization. Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development: report of the commission on macroeconomics and health; 2001.
Zacks, S. L., Sandler, R. S., Rutledge, R., & Brown, R. S., Jr. (2002). A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. American Journal of Gastroenterology,97(2),334-40.
Z''graggen, K., Wehrli, H., Metzger, A., Buehler, M., Frei, E., & Klaiber, C. (1998). Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. A prospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery. Surgical Endoscopy, 12, 1303-1310.
Zucker KA, Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Graham SM, Buell J, Imbembo AL. (1993). Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg,165: 508–514.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top