臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

　本研究探討透過企業社會責任知覺的中介效果，綠色智慧資本對利環境行為的影響。本研究採用問卷調查方式，包含綠色智慧資本、企業社會責任知覺及利環境行為三個構面。我們試圖透過台灣高科技產業的員工了解綠色智慧資本、企業社會責任知覺及利環境行之間的影響。本研究以台灣高科技產業的員工為研究對象，共蒐集了413位員工之樣本資料進行分析。研究結果顯示：企業擁有越多的綠色智慧資本對員工的利環境行為具有正向影響；透過企業社會責任知覺的中介效果，綠色智慧資本對利環境行為具有正向影響。

　This study investigated the relationships between green intellectual capital and pro-environmental behavior. Green intellectual capital influenced pro-environmental behavior through the mediating effect of perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR). This study adopts the questionnaire, which contains three dimensions, including green intellectual capital, perceived CSR and pro-environmental behavior to be measuring instrument. We attempt to understand the relationship between companies green intellectual capital, employees’ perceived CSR and pro-environmental behavior through the employees of high-tech companies in Taiwan. This study focused on employees of high-tech companies in Taiwan. We were collected 413 valid questionnaires. The results indicated that the more three types of green intellectual capital were, the stronger pro-environmental behavior were. Moreover, green intellectual capital was significantly related to pro-environmental behavior through the mediating effect of perceived corporate social responsibility.

Table of Contents
Preface (In Chinese) I
Abstract II
Abstract (In Chinese)………………………………………...………..………. III
Table of Contents…………………………………………………….………IV
List of Figures………………………………………………………………... VII
List of Tables…………………………………………………………..….…VIII
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 General Background Information 1
1.2 Purpose of Research 2
1.3 Procedure of Research 4
Chapter 2 Literature review 5
2.1 Green Intellectual capital 5
2.2 Perceived CSR 7
2.3 Pro-environmental Behavior 8
2.4 Green intellectual capital and pro-environmental behavior 9
2.4.1 Green human capital and pro-environmental behavior 10
2.4.2 Green structural capital and pro-environmental behavior 11
2.4.3 Green relational capital and pro-environmental behavior 12
2.5 Green intellectual capital and perceived CSR 13
2.5.1 Green human capital and perceived CSR 13
2.5.2 Green structural capital and perceived CSR 14
2.5.3 Green relational capital and perceived CSR 15
2.6 Mediating role of perceived CSR 16
2.6.1 Green intellectual capital, perceived CSR and pro-environmental 　　　　behavior 17
Chapter 3 Research Method 19
3.1 Research framework 19
3.2 Measure 20
3.2.1 Green intellectual capital 20
3.2.2 Perceived CSR 23
3.2.3 Pro-environmental Behavior 24
3.2.4 Control variables………………………………………………..25
3.3 Research Sample…………………………………….………………..26
3.4 Research Data and rocedure………………………………….……… 26
3.5 Analysis Method……………………………………………………...27
Chapter 4 Results 30
4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations…………………………….29
4.2 Results of Main Effects and Mediating Effect………………….……32
4.2.1 Green intellectual capital, perceived CSR and pro-environmental
behavior………………………………..………………….………32
4.2.2 Green structural capital, perceived CSR and pro-environmental
behavior…………………………………………………………...34
4.2.3 Green relational capital, perceived CSR and pro-environmental
behavior………………………………………………………….35
Chapter 5 Discussion…………………………………………………………..37
5.1 Conclusion………………………………………………………….37
5.2 Implications…………………………………………………………40
5.2.1 Theoretical Implications………………………………………40
5.2.2 Practical Implications……………..…………………………..41
5.3 Limitations and Directions for Future Research…………………43
Reference 45
Appendix 49
(Abbreviate Vision)……………………………………………………………55

List of Figures
Figure 1.1 Procedure of Research……………………………………………..4
Figure 3.1 Research framework……………………………………………….19


List of Tables
Table 3.1 Factor Analysis of Green Intellectual Capital Items………………...22
Table 3.2 Factor Analysis of Perceived CSR Items…………………………....24
Table 3.3 Factor Analysis of Pro-environmental Behavior Items……………...25
Table 3.4 Reliability of Pretest…………………………………………………27
Table 4.1 Sample's Background………………………………………………..30
Table 4.2 Construct Means, Standard Deviation, and correlations Among Study…………………………………………………………...……32
Table 4.3 Regression Analysis: Green human capital………………………….34
Table 4.4 Regression Analysis: Green structural capital……………………....35
Table 4.5 Regression Analysis: Green relational capital………………...…….36
Table 5.1Results of Hypothesis………………………………………………...39

Reference
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986), The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Berry, M. A. & Rondinelli, D. A., (1998), Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial, Academy of Management Executive , 12(2), 38- 50.
Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T., (1985), Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3-21.
Bontis, N.,(1999), Managing Organizational Knowledge by Diagnosing Intellectual Capital, International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5-8), 433-462.
Capello, R., ( 2002), Spatial and Sectoral Characteristics of Relational Capital in Innovation Activity, European Planning Studies, 10(2), 177-200.
Capello, R. & Faggian, A., (2005), Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local Innovation Processes, Regional Studies, 39(1), 75-87.
Carroll, A. B., (1979), A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate 　　Performance, Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
Chen, Y. S., (2008), The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms, Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 271-286.
Chen, Y. S., Lai, S-B., & Wen, C-T. , (2006), The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339.
Clarkson, M. B. E., (1995), A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , Academy of Management Review, 20, 92-117.
Corral-Verdugo, V., (2002), A structural model of proenvironmental competency, Environment and Behavior, 34, 531-549.
Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A., (1998), Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471.
Dzinkowski, R., (2000), The Value of Intellectual Capital, The Journal of Business Strategy, 2(4), 3-4.
Ebreo, A., Hershey, J.,& Vining, J., (1999), Reducing solid waste. Linking recycling to environmentally responsible consumerism, Environment and Behavior, 31, 107-135.
Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M. S., (1997), Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Co.’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots (Harper Collin Publishers, USA).
European Commission (2001), Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels).
Fransson, N., & Garling, T., (1999), Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Evironmental Psychology, 19, 369-382.
Fujii, S., (2006), Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 262-268.
Greeno, L. J. & Robinson, S. N., (1992), Rethinking Corporate Environmental Management, The Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(3-4), 222–232.
Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., & Stewart, A. L., (1989), A five items measurement of socially desireable response set, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78:662-674.
Hunecke, M., Blöhbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Höger, R., (2001), Responsibility and environment-Ecological norm orientation and external factors in the domain of travel mode choice behaviour, Environment and Behavior, 33, 845-867.
Hungerford, H. R. & Peyton, R. B., (1976), Teaching Environmental Education, Portland, ME: J. Weston Walch.
Johnson, W. H. A., (1999), An Integrative Taxonomy of Intellectual Capital: Measuring the Stock and Flow of Intellectual Capital Components in the Firm, International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5-8), 562-575.
Joyner, B. E. &. Payne, D., (2002), Evolution and Implementation: A Study of Values, Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297-311.
Masoulas, V., (1998), Organizational Requirements Definition for Intellectual Capital Management, International, Journal of Technology Management, 16(1-3), 126-143.
McWilliams, A. & Siegel D.,(2001), Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective, Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Meinhold, J. L. and Malkus, A. J., (2005), Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 511-532.
Miller, R. & Wurzburg, G., (1995), Investing in Human Capital, The OECD Observer, 193, 16-19.
Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V., (2008), Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 63-73.
Porter, M. E. & van der Linde, C., (1995), Green and Competitive, Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
Roos, G. & Roos, J., (1997), Measuring Your Company’s Intellectual Performance’, Long Range Planning, 30(3), 413-426.
Roth, C. E.,(1992), Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution, and directions in the 1990s, Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC Information Reference Center.
Schwartz, S. H., (1977), Normative influence on altruism. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vo1. 10(pp.221-279). New York: Academic Press.
Shafer, W. E., (2002), Ethical Pressure, Organizational Conflict, and Related Work Outcomes among Management Accountants, Journal of Business Ethics, 38,263-275.
Sivek, D.J., & Hungerford, H., (1989-1990). Predictors of responsible behavior in members of three Wisconsin conservation organizations. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35-40.
Snelgar, R. S., (2006), Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: Measurement and structure, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 87-99.
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W., (2005), Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., & Guagnago, G, A., (1995), The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
Stern, P.C., & Oskamp, S., (1987), Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology, (Vol.2, pp.1043-1088). New York :Wiley.
Stewart, T. A., (1994), Your Company’s Most Valuable Asset: Intellectual Capital, Fortune, 130(7), 68-74.
Thøgersen, J., (1999), The ethical consumer. Moral norms and packaging choice, Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 439-460.
Thøgersen, J., (2004), A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103.
Turban, D. B., & Greening D. W.,( 1996), Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees, Academy of Management Journal ,40, 658-672.
Tuzzolino, F. & Armandi B. R.,( 1981), A Need-Hierarchy Framework for Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 6(1),21–28.
UNESCO (1980), Environmental education in the light of the Tbilisi conference. Paris, France: Author.
Valentine, S. & Fleischman, G., (2008), Ethics Programs, Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Satisfaction, Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 159-172.
Wartick, S. L. & Cochran P. L.,(1985), The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model, Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
Wood, D. J., ( 1991), Corporate Social Performance Revisited, Academy of Management Review,16(4), 691–718.