跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/07 23:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:劉書宏
研究生(外文):Shu-hung Liu
論文名稱:鬼魅般的真理:麥可˙翁達吉《阿尼爾的鬼魂》中人權的重寫
論文名稱(外文):Spectral Truth: Rewriting Human Rights in Michael Ondaatje''s Anil''s Ghost
指導教授:陳淑卿陳淑卿引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shu-ching Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:外國語文學系
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:英文
論文頁數:99
中文關鍵詞:離散專業主義歷史書寫真理非政府組織人權
外文關鍵詞:diasporaprofessionalismhistory-writingtruthNGOhuman rights
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:269
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:36
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本篇論文主要探討的麥可.翁達吉『阿尼爾的鬼魂』中人權的全球擴展。人權伴隨著法律保障人類的基本需求及自由,然而當人權成為仲介東西兩方的媒介時,可能會產生問題。『阿尼爾的鬼魂』針對普世人權論述的適用性以及人權如何合法化為普世真理提供了政治層面的討論。翁達吉建構小說的歷史背景於八零年代內戰發生的斯里蘭卡,國內政局的不穩定造成不少死傷,於是聯合國派遣非政府的人權組織進行人權調查。主角阿尼爾身為非政府組織的代表,負責找尋斯里蘭卡政府殺害人民等暴行的證據。透過對阿尼爾的研究,本篇論文將揭露人權為如何在全球政治體系中,成為西方國家的交易商品及談判籌碼,並進ㄧ步探討人權在斯里蘭卡不適用性。
第一章檢視阿尼爾的離散主體建構於西方專業主義的基礎上。經過長時間的專業教育及訓練,阿尼爾深受專業意識型態的影響,專業主義是她建構主體性的重要元素。第二章討論翁達吉如何調和兩種歷史書寫的策略來建構小說文本。透過東西方對於歷史的不同觀點,翁達吉強調此兩種不同的書寫策略皆有其存在的必然性。第三章著重於真理及人權的討論,並進一步檢視阿尼爾對於真理及人權的認知,背後存在著權力的操弄與政治的目的。結論則突顯出斯里蘭卡當地人民對真理的看法,並思考作者翁達吉是否在小說中提出解決衝突的可能性。
This thesis examines the global extension of human rights in the work of Michael Ondaatje’s Anil’s Ghost. Human rights are the concepts accompanied with sets of laws protecting the basic needs and freedom of human beings. However, when human rights are taken as the medium of negotiation between the West and the East, they might be problematic. Anil’s Ghost contributes to the political discussion about the applicability of a universal human rights discourse and the West’s strategy to legislate those rights as the “universal truth.” Ondaatje sets the historical background of the novel in the 1980s when the civil war of Sri Lanka took place. Because of the numerous deaths caused by the civil war, an UN-sponsored non-government organization is dispatched to take charge of the human rights investigation in Sri Lanka. The protagonist, Anil, as the representative of the non-government organization, is responsible for seeking the evidence to determine whether the Sri Lankan government has been killing and torturing its people during the civil war. By focusing on Anil’s investigation, this thesis will unveil how “human rights” are perceived as the “universal truth” in the West and its possible inapplicability in the local Sri Lanka.
The first chapter examines Anil’s diasporic identity constructed on the basis of western professionalism. Trained and selected as a professional specialist, Anil is interpellated by the professional ideology. The second chapter discusses how Ondaatje composes the novel by coordinating two approaches of history-writing. Comparing and contrasting the concepts of history between the West and the East, Ondaatje also emphasizes the fact that the two approaches, the documentary research and the constructivist approach, are both necessary and indispensable. The third chapter discusses the discourses of truth and human rights. This chapter examines that Anil’s idea of truth and human rights constructed on the basis of the western epistemology and institution. The conclusion of the thesis highlights the local concepts of truth. It also discusses if Ondaatje provides any possibility in the novel to solve the conflict in Sri Lanka.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements ---------------------------------------------i
Chinese Abstract --------------------------------------------ii
English Abstract -------------------------------------------iii
Table of Contents --------------------------------------------v
Introduction ------------------------------------------------1
Chapter One
Professionalism and Ideological Construction of Diaspora ----13
I. Diaspora, Escaping from the Tradition --------------------16
II. Professionalism as a Form of Ideology -------------------24
III. An Ideological Constructed Diaspora --------------------31
Chapter Two
History ---------------------------------------------------34
I. Ondaatje and History -------------------------------------34
II. A Documentary or Self-Sufficient Writing of History -----36
III. Writing in the Form of Truth-Claim ---------------------38
Ⅳ. Historical Constructivism and New Historicism -----------45
Ⅴ. Writing to Make Truth-Claims ----------------------------53
Chapter Three
Truth and Human Rights ------------------------------------60
I. Truth in Epistemology ------------------------------------61
II. Truth in NGOs -------------------------------------------77
Conclusion
Exorcising the Ghost ----------------------------------------87
Works Cited--------------------------------------------------95
Althusser, Louise. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.” Essays on Ideology. London: Verso, 1971. 1-60.
Atwood, Margaret. The New Oxford Book of Canadian Verse in English. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Barbour, Douglas. “Crossing Borders in Life and Writing.” Michael Ondaatje. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1993. 1-9.
Braziel, Jana Evans and Anita Mannur. “Nation, Migration, Globalization: Points of Contention in Diaspora Studies.” Theorizing Diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003. 1-22.
Brooks, Peter. “Narrative and the Body.” Body Work: Object of Desire in Modern Narrative. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993. 1-27.
--- “Marking the Modern Body: The French Revolution and Balzac.” Body Work: Object of Desire in Modern Narrative. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993. 54-87.
Chow, Ray. The Protestant Ethnic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
Cook, Victoria. “Exploring Transnational Identities in Ondaatje’s Anil Ghost.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture: a WWWeb Journal. Ed. Steven Totosy. Purdue University Press. September 2004 <http://clcwebjournal.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb04-3/cook04.html>.
Douzinas, Costas. “Human Rights, Humanism and Desire.” Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. 6.3 (2001): 183-205.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Paul Rabinow. “What Is Maturity? Habermas and Foucault on ‘What Is Enlightment?’” Foucault: A Critical Reader. Ed. David Couzens Hoy. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Foucault, Michel. Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon, 1980.
Freidson, Eliot. “The Theory of Professions: State of the Art.” Professionalism Reborn: Theory, Prophecy, and Policy. Oxford: Polity Press, 1994. 13-29.
Goetz, Philip W., et al. The New Encyclopedia Britannica. V.28. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1990.
Greenblatt, Stephen. Introduction. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980. 1-9.
---“Shakespeare and the Exorcists.” Shakespeare and the Question of Theory. Ed. Patricia Parker and Geoffrey Hartman. New York: Routledge, 1990. 160-187.
Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. Empire. Massachussetts: Harvard UP, 2001.
Harvey, David. “Time and Space as Sources of Social Power.” The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Massachusetts: Basil Blackwell, 1989. 226-39.
Hutcheon, Linda. “Historicizing the Postmodern: The Problematizing of History.” A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. New York: Routledge, 1988.
Jameson, Fredric. “On Interpretation.” The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Symboic Act. New York: Cornell University Press, 1981. 17-102.
Keith, Michael and Steve Pile. “Introduction: The Politics of Place.” Place and the Politics of Identity. Eds. Michael Keith and Steve Pile. London: Routledge, 1993.
Kritzman, Lawrence. Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Routledge, 1988.
Kultgen, John. “The Cloak of Ideology.” Ethics And Professionalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988. 99-119.
LaCapra, Dominick. Writing History, Writing Trauma. London: The John Hopkins University Press, 2001.
Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1977, p. 84.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois. Introduction. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
Man, Paul de. “Semiology and Rhetoric.” Diacritics: A Review of Contemporary Criticism. Ithaca, NY. 3.3 (1973): 27-33.
Meskell, Lynn. “The Irresistible Body and the Seduction of Archaeology.” Changing Bodies, Changing Meanings: Studies on the Human Body in Antiquity. Ed. Dominic Montserrat. London: Routledge, 1998. 139-61.
Nisetm Jose G.. “Human Rights in International Law.” Human Rights: Problems and Perspectives. Ed. Han Lih-wu. London: Center for International Studies, 1982. 9-21.
Ondaatje, Michael. Anil’s Ghost. London: Bloomsbury, 2000.
---, The English Patient. New York: Vintage Books, 1992.
Robbins, Bruce. “The Ambiguities of The Professionals.” Secular Vocations: Intellectuals, Professionalism, Culture. London: Verso, 1993. 29-56.
Smart, Barry. “The Politics of Truth and the Problem of Hegemony.” Foucault: A Critical Reader. Ed. David Couzens Hoy. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Taylor, Charles. “Foucault on Freedom and Truth.” Foucault: A Critical Reader. Ed. David Couzens Hoy. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Van Tuijl, Peter. “NGOs and Human Rights: Sources of Justices and Democracy.” Journal of International Affairs. 52.2 (1999): 493-512.
Wachtel, Eleanor. “An Interview with Michael Ondaatje.” Essays on Canadian Writings. 53 (1994):250-261.
Wells, Robin Headlam, Glenn Burgess and Rowland Wymer. Introduction. Neo-Historicism: Studies in Renaissance Literature, History and Politics. London: St Edmundsbury Press, 2000.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊